PIMAN FAMILY.

= Pima, Latham, Nat. Hist. Man, 898, 1850 (cites three languages from

the Mithridates, viz, Pima proper, Opata, Eudeve). Turner in Pac. R.

R. Rep., III, pt. 3, 55, 1856 (Pima proper). Latham in Trans.

Philolog. Soc. Lond., 92, 1856 (contains Pima proper, Opata, Eudeve,

Papagos). Latham, Opuscula, 356, 1860. Latham, El. Comp. Phil., 427,

1862 (includes Pima proper, Opata, Eudeve, Papago, Ibequi, Hiaqui,

Tubar, Tarahumara, Cora). Gatschet in Mag. Am. Hist., 156, 1877

(includes Pima, Névome, Pápago). Gatschet in Beach, Ind. Misc., 429,

1877 (defines area and gives habitat).

Latham used the term Pima in 1850, citing under it three dialects or

languages. Subsequently, in 1856, he used the same term for one of the

five divisions into which he separates the languages of Sonora and

Sinaloa.

The same year Turner gave a brief account of Pima as a distinct

language, his remarks applying mainly to Pima proper of the Gila River,

Arizona. This tribe had been visited by Emory and Johnston and also

described by Bartlett. Turner refers to a short vocabulary in the

Mithridates, another of Dr. Coulter’s in Royal Geological Society

Journal, vol. XI, 1841, and a third by Parry in Schoolcraft, Indian

Tribes, vol. III, 1853. The short vocabulary he himself published was

collected by Lieut. Whipple.

Only a small portion of the territory occupied by this family is

included within the United States, the greater portion being in Mexico

where it extends to the Gulf of California. The family is represented in

the United States by three tribes, Pima alta, Sobaipuri, and Papago. The

former have lived for at least two centuries with the Maricopa on the

Gila River about 160 miles from the mouth. The Sobaipuri occupied the

Santa Cruz and San Pedro Rivers, tributaries of the Gila, but are no

longer known. The Papago territory is much more extensive and extends to

the south across the border. In recent times the two tribes have been

separated, but the Pima territory as shown upon the map was formerly

continuous to the Gila River.

According to Buschmann, Gatschet, Brinton, and others the Pima language

is a northern branch of the Nahuatl, but this relationship has yet to be

demonstrated.[75]

[Footnote 75: Buschmann, Die Pima-Sprache und die Sprache der

Koloschen, pp. 321-432.]

Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1885-1886, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1891 · 第 119 / 361 题