FOOTNOTES:

[1] Lord Langdale resigned three weeks before his death.

[2] The proposal to print and publish the _Calendars_ had been approved

by authority of the new Record Commissioners as early as January 1840.

_See_ preface to Mr. Lemons' 'Calendar' (Domestic, 1547-1580), p. viii.

[3] In Luard's sixth volume there are two facsimiles of certain coloured

drawings of the more precious gems at St. Alban's, with careful

descriptions of them, these and the illustrations being most probably

_executed by Mathew Paris himself_.

Art. II. 1.--_The Christian Brothers, their Origin and Work, with a

sketch of the Life of their Founder, The Venerable Jean Baptiste de la

Salle._ By Mrs. R. F. Wilson, London, 1883.

2. _La Premiere Annee d'Instruction Morale et Civique: notions de droit

et d'economie politique (Textes et Recits) pour repondre a la loi du 28

Mars 1882 sur l'enseignement primaire obligatoire: ouvrage accompagne de

Resume, de Questionnaires, de Devoirs, et d'un Lexique des mots

difficiles._ Par Pierre Laloi. Quatorzieme Edition. Paris, 1885.

3. _Report of the Committee of Council on Education_ (England and

Wales). 1884-85.

4. _Seventy-fourth Annual Report of the Incorporated National Society._

1885.

Most travellers in France will have met occasionally in Paris and in the

provincial towns a school of boys walking two and two, and followed by a

serious-looking superintendent of very solemn deportment. The boys are

in no marked respect different from other boys, but they are orderly and

well conducted. They are probably on their way to a church; and if you

watch them, you will see them march in with much propriety. The

superintendent is evidently not an ordinary schoolmaster; you would

suppose that he is an ecclesiastic of some kind. He wears a loose black

cloak, a hat with a low crown and a portentous brim, and bands such as

were much worn by English clergymen till late years, and which, when

strongly developed, were supposed to indicate a sympathy with

Calvanistic theology. Nevertheless, the solemn-featured young man is not

an ecclesiastic, neither is he a Protestant minister. He is one of the

Freres Chretiens, or Christian Brothers; and the boys whom he has under

his charge are pupils in one of the Ecoles Chretiennes, or Christian

Schools.

We will venture to assume, that some of our readers are not well

acquainted with the story and the principles of the remarkable

institution known as the Schools of the Christian Brothers, or with the

life of their remarkable founder. We propose in this article to supply

some information upon the subject, not only because we think that such

information will be interesting in itself, but also because we believe

that from the story of the work and principles of the French schools of

the Christian Brothers, we may proceed without difficulty, and almost by

necessary consequence, to some useful considerations with respect to

English schools as now established and conducted amongst ourselves.

Jean Baptiste de la Salle was born in Rheims, April 30, 1651. The house

in which he was born is still standing, and is regarded with reverence.

He came of a noble family, which was originally of Bearn. His

grandfather settled at Rheims, of which he became an honoured citizen,

but was apparently in no way himself remarkable. His second son, Louis,

was the father of a child, who received the name of Jean Baptiste on the

same day as that upon which he was born.

This child, whose career we purpose briefly to follow as that of the

founder of the Christian Brothers, exhibited early signs of a devotional

spirit; he learned to recite the Breviary from his grandfather, and

continued to do so even before being bound to the practice by his

ordination vows; and he soon made it clear to himself and to others that

his vocation was that of the priestly office. His conduct as a student

in the University of Rheims, which he entered at eight years old, was

marked by diligence in study and gentle docility.

Before he had reached the age of sixteen he was made a canon of the

cathedral; such were the strange ecclesiastical possibilities of those

times. An aged relative resigned in his favour, and died the following

year. The preferment, however, did not spoil him; he looked upon it as a

call to duty. He was diligent in attendance upon the offices of the

Church, diligent in private prayer, diligent in study--in every way a

remarkable boy-canon!

In October 1670 he entered the seminary of St. Sulpice in Paris, where,

amongst other fellow-students, was Fenelon, subsequently the great

Archbishop of Cambrai. Little is recorded of his seminary life, except

that it was gentle, modest, blameless. In 1672 he lost his father, and

in the same year returned to Rheims to take charge of his younger

brothers and sisters. The responsible position in which he was thus

placed seems to have shaken for a time his persuasion that he had a true

vocation for the priesthood; but after consultation with a friend who

knew him well, his doubts vanished, and on the eve of Trinity Sunday in

this same year he was admitted to the subdiaconate.

Then follow six years of quiet home work and retirement. During this

time he attended the theological course of the University, provided for

the education of his brothers and sisters, and gave himself very

earnestly to prayer and good works. In the year 1678, on Easter Eve, he

was ordained Priest.

During all this time De la Salle's attention does not seem to have been

turned to that which ultimately became the great work of his life. As

not unfrequently happens, the real bent was given to his energies by

what might be described as accidental circumstances. The friend whom he

consulted when in doubt concerning holy orders was one Canon Roland.

This good man had interested himself much about an orphanage for girls

at Rheims, which had fallen under bad management, and urgently needed

reform. Canon Roland was taken ill just before De la Salle's ordination,

and, dying not long after, left the young priest his executor,

commending to his special care the orphanage just mentioned. De la Salle

could not refuse the charge; it was not much to his taste, but it was

the bequest of his friend; it was the leading of God; and he girded

himself to the task. He applied through the Archbishop to the King for

letters patent recognizing the institution, and thus put it upon a

lasting foundation; he bore the expense of the whole transaction; then

he supplemented the funds out of his own means; and having thus

satisfied his obligations to his deceased friend, he returned to his

quiet devotional life. The thought that this orphanage for girls would

constitute a valuable training school for schoolmistresses seems already

to have crossed his mind.

Now comes the turning-point of De la Salle's life, and it comes in a

curious way. There was a certain rich, fashionable, and extravagant

married lady living in Rouen, who, like the rich man in the parable, was

clothed in fine linen and fared sumptuously every day, while Lazarus lay

at the gate. One day a poor beggar, who had been harshly repulsed from

the door, touched the heart of a servant by his manifest misery, and was

received into the stables, where he died the same night. The dead man

must needs be buried; so the servant went to the mistress, confessed his

fault, received some violent language and notice of dismissal, but at

the same time procured a sheet to serve as a shroud for the corpse. At

dinner-time the lady perceived the very sheet, which she had given for

the burial, folded up and lying in her own chair; some mysterious hand

had brought back the ungracious present, as though the deceased beggar

would not receive a favour in death from one who had been so cruel to

him in life.

This strange and apparently not very important occurrence changed the

whole course of the lady's life. She gave up all her old habits of

magnificence and extravagance, lived the life of a devotee, and soon

succeeded in separating from herself all her old companions and friends,

who, in fact, deemed her mad. After her husband's death she became still

more strict in her habits, and devoted to the service of the poor a

large part of her fortune.

Amongst other charities which she assisted was the female orphanage, of

which we have already spoken as having been cared for by Canon Roland,

and after his death by M. de la Salle. She conceived the idea of

establishing something of the same kind for boys in her native town of

Rheims, and she consulted Canon Roland on the subject. Ultimately she

engaged a devout layman, named Adrien Nyel, who had experience of poor

schools in Rouen, promised him maintenance for himself and a young

assistant, gave him a letter of introduction to her relative M. de la

Salle, and sent him to Rheims to open a school there for poor boys.

This school, which was commenced in 1679, was the germ of the great

system of _Ecoles Chretiennes_. Its success led a pious lady in Rheims

to wish to establish another of the same kind in a different part of the

town. She consulted M. de la Salle, who had become patron of the first

school, on the subject; and thus he became, without any special wish or

intention of his own, drawn into the work of the education of poor boys.

His own account of the matter is worth quoting:--

'It was,' he wrote, 'by the chance meeting with M. Nyel, and

by hearing of the proposal made by that lady [to whom

reference has been made], that I was led to begin to

interest myself about boys' schools. I had no thought of it

before. It was not that the subject had not been suggested

to me. Many of M. Roland's friends had tried to interest me

about it, but it took no hold of my mind, and I had not the

least intention of occupying myself with it. If I had ever

thought that the care which out of pure charity I was taking

of schoolmasters would have brought me to feel it a duty to

live with them, I should have given it up at once; for as I

naturally felt myself very much above those whom I was

obliged to employ as schoolmasters, especially at first, the

bare idea of being obliged to live with such persons would

have been insupportable to me. In fact, it was a great

trouble to me when first I took them into my house, and the

dislike of it lasted for two years. It was apparently for

this reason that God, who orders all things with wisdom and

gentleness, and who does not force the inclinations of men,

when He willed to employ me entirely in the care of schools,

wrought imperceptibly and during a long space of time, so

that one engagement led to another in an unforeseen way.'

This passage somewhat anticipates events; but it is convenient for the

condensed character of this narrative that it should be so. We will

therefore briefly fill up the gap left by M. de la Salle's own statement

by saying, that he found the work of directing schools for the poor

increase upon his hands in a wonderful manner. The success of those

which he visited and superintended led to the establishment of others.

Soon the masters themselves formed a small body which required

superintendence and guidance. He took a house in which he placed them;

the home of course needed rules for its orderly and efficient working;

these M. de la Salle supplied. But still all was not quite as it should

be. Cathedral duties took up much of the Canon's time; these duties were

of primary obligation, and left comparatively little of the day to be

given to the superintendence of schoolmasters. But more than this, the

difference of station and comfort and habits between a well-endowed

Canon of a Cathedral, enjoying in addition a private fortune of his own,

and poor schoolmasters taken from the humblest ranks, and living in the

most humble manner, was quite immeasurable. It was comparatively easy to

have the whole company to dine with him, and so to meet them half way

down the social hill; but this was not enough. M. de la Salle began

gradually to realize the fact, that his great undertaking of supplying

schools and schoolmasters for the gratuitous education of the poor,

could only be crowned with complete success on the condition of his own

adoption of poverty in all its thoroughness. Accordingly he determined

to resign his canonry and spend his fortune upon the poor. Not

altogether so easy a thing as might at first sight appear. Great

opposition was made by his friends: the Archbishop was unwilling to

accept his resignation: nothing but persevering determination on the

part of De la Salle could have carried the business through; but he was

full of perseverance and full of determination, and in 1683 he at last

succeeded in divesting himself of his Cathedral preferment. The sale of

his property, and spending the money upon the poor, was an easier

matter, especially as the year 1684 was one of dearth; in the course of

that year and the following he managed to get rid of all.

This parting with his money, instead of spending it upon his great work,

may well seem to be a conduct of doubtful wisdom; especially as at a

later period much difficulty was encountered for want of funds. But it

is hard, and perhaps not justifiable, to find fault with a man, who

adopts the course of selling all that he has and giving to the poor,

after using devoutly such a prayer as the following:--

'My God, I do not know whether to endow or not. It is not

for me to found communities, or to know how they should be

founded. It, is for Thee, Oh my God. Thou knowest how, and

canst do it in the way which is pleasing to Thee. If Thou

foundest them, they will be well founded. If Thou foundest

them not, they will be without foundation. I beseech Thee,

my God, make me know Thy will.'

Soon after the last livre was spent, De la Salle had occasion to make a

journey in connection with his work. He went on foot, as needs he must,

and begged his way. An old woman gave him a piece of black bread; he ate

it with joy, feeling that now he was indeed a poor man. He had at this

time reached the age of thirty-three years.

Behold the Society of the Christian Brothers, and the Christian Schools,

taking form at last with De la Salle at the head! Let us examine that

work and see how matters stand.

In the first place, so far as the founder was himself concerned, his

life was one of asceticism, but still more of prayer:--

'He prayed by day and by night--his life was one incessant

communion with God. He would fain have avoided even the

interruption caused by sleep, and he grudged every moment

given to it, because it shortened his time of prayer. He

slept on the ground, or sometimes in his chair, and was the

first to rise at the sound of the morning bell. While at

Rheims he regularly spent Friday night in the Church of

Saint Remi; he made the sacristan lock him in, and there

poured out his soul in prayer for help, and guidance, and

success in his work.'

The Superior and the Brothers of course lived a common life. The great

principle of bringing himself exactly to the level of those who worked

under him, which had led to his resignation of his stall and the sale of

his property, made it quite certain that he would not call upon the

Brothers to do or to bear anything which he was not willing to do and to

bear himself. But the burden was heavier to him than to them. They were

poor men originally, accustomed to hard work and rough fare; while he

had been brought up in ease and plenty, and had never known what want

and poverty were. Consequently it cost De la Salle much effort and

self-denial to enter upon his new life; but he was satisfied with no

half measures; the sacrifice was to be absolute and complete; he fought

the battle and gained it,--yet not he, but the grace of God that was in

him. At the first starting of the Society there was no distinct rule,

but the following arrangements were made:--

The food was to be substantial but frugal, fit for labourers engaged in

hard toil; nothing costly, nothing but what was necessary; on the other

hand no special rigour of abstinence, beyond that demanded of other

Christians.

For dress was adopted a capote, such as was common in the country, made

of coarse material, and black; together with a black cassock, thick

shoes, and a broad-brimmed hat.

For a name they chose that of 'Freres des Ecoles Chretiennes,' or, as

commonly abbreviated, 'Freres Chretiens.'

With regard to vows, De la Salle decided that they should take the

three vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, but for three years

only. They might make them perpetual the following year.

As to the Superior himself, he had little difficulty with regard to the

first two points, for his only possessions were a New Testament, a copy

of the 'Initiation,' a Crucifix and a Rosary; and to celibacy he was

already committed. With regard to obedience, the fulfilment of the vow

was not easy to a man in his position; but he endeavoured to find a way

to make this vow also a practical one, by the method of resigning his

post and putting one of the Brothers in his place; this he ultimately

succeeded in doing, though only for a short time.

We must leave to the reader's imagination the manner in which the work

grew under such remarkable auspices, the growth of M. de la Salle's

reputation as a saint, and the constantly increasing load of

responsibilities of all kinds which rested upon his shoulders.

In the year 1688 the work extended to Paris. When De la Salle arrived

there he left behind him in Rheims a principal house containing sixteen

Brothers, and a training college for country schoolmasters, containing

thirty men, besides fifteen lads in their noviciate. For the purpose of

his work in Paris he hired a house in the village of Vaugirard; this he

occupied for seven years, collecting the Brothers about him in their

vacations, and making it a home for the sick and weary, and a place

where postulants might make proof of their profession. We shall not

follow his footsteps during this time, except to say that the work

flourished wonderfully well under his hand, as it always did,

notwithstanding all kinds of difficulties. We may produce, however, a

striking document of self-dedication which belongs to this period. The

Brothers seem to have been strongly moved by the desire of making their

vows perpetual, instead of only for three years; the Superior opposed

the innovation, but finding them resolute, he at length gave way, and

commenced the new system by a formal dedication of himself, expressed in

the following remarkable words:--

'Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, prostrate in

deepest reverence before Thine infinite and adorable

Majesty, I consecrate myself wholly to Thee, to seek Thy

glory in all ways possible to me, or to which Thou shalt

call me. And to this end I, Jean Baptiste de la Salle,

Priest, promise and vow to unite myself to, and abide in

society with, the Brothers [here follow twelve names], and

in union and association with them to hold free schools in

any place whatsoever (even though, in order to do so, I

should have to beg for alms, and live on dry bread), or to

do in the said Society any work which may be appointed for

me, whether by the Community or by the Superior who shall

have the direction of it. For which reason I promise and vow

obedience as well to the Society itself as to the Superior

of it. And these vows of association with, and steadfastness

in, the said Community, and of obedience, I promise to keep

inviolable during my whole life; in witness whereof I have

signed. Done at Vaugirard, this sixth day of June, being the

Feast of the Most Holy Trinity, in the year 1694.

'(Signed) DE LA SALLE.'

Having taken this step, De la Salle made a great effort to divest

himself of his post as Superior, but in vain. He argued, but the

Brothers were not convinced. He insisted upon an election, and every

single vote was given for him. He begged for a second voting, but the

result was the same. The Brothers said it would be time enough for them

to elect his successor, when death had deprived them of him. So in his

post of Superior he remained; and doubtless the Brothers were right, and

he was wrong, as to the point in dispute between them.

Let us now look for a moment at the rule of the Christian Brothers in

the complete form which it ultimately assumed.

The Quarterly Review, Volume 162, No. 324, April, 1886 · 第 21 / 75 题