FOOTNOTES:

[161] Bishop Barlow's "Several Miscellaneous and Weighty Cases of

Conscience Resolved," 1692. His "Case of a Toleration in Matters of

Religion," addressed to Robert Boyle, p. 39. This volume was not

intended to have been given to the world, a circumstance which does

not make it the less curious.

[162] In the article _Sancterius_. Note F.

[163] Recent writers among our sectarists assert that Dr. Owen was

the _first_ who wrote in favour of toleration, in 1648! Another

claims the honour for John Goodwin, the chaplain of Oliver Cromwell,

who published one of his obscure polemical tracts in 1644, among a

number of other persons who, at that crisis, did not venture to

prefix their names to pleas in favour of toleration, so delicate and

so obscure did this subject then appear! In 1651, they translated

the liberal treatise of Grotius, _De Imperio Summarum Potestatum

circa Sacra_, under the title of "The Authority of the Highest

Powers about Sacred Things." London, 8vo, 1651. To the honour of

Grotius, the first of philosophical reformers, be it recorded, that

he displeased both parties!

[164] J. P. Rabaut, "sur la Revolution Francaise," p. 27.

[165] "Life of James the Second, from his own Papers," ii 114.

[166] This was a Baron Wallop. From Dr. H. Sampson's Manuscript Diary.

[167] It is curious to observe that the catholics were afterwards

ashamed of these indiscretions; they were unwilling to own that

there were any medals which commemorate massacres. Thuanus, in his

53rd book, has minutely described them. The medals, however, have

become excessively scarce; but copies inferior to the originals have

been sold. They had also pictures on similar subjects, accompanied

by insulting inscriptions, which latter they have effaced, sometimes

very imperfectly. See Hollis's "Memoirs," p. 312-14. This enthusiast

advertised in the papers to request travellers to procure them.

[168] The _Sala Regia_ of the Vatican has still upon its walls a

painting by Vasari of this massacre, among the other important

events in the history of the Popes similarly commemorated.

[169] "Memoires de Michel de Castelnau," liv. i. c. 4.

[170] "Life of Thuanus, by the Rev. J. Collinson," p. 115.

[171] Dr. M'Crie's "Life of John Knox," ii. 122.

[172] I quote from an unpublished letter, written so late as in 1749,

addressed to the author of "The Free and Candid Disquisition," by

the Rev. Thomas Allen, rector of Kettering, Northamptonshire.

However extravagant his doctrine appears to us, I suspect that it

exhibits the concealed sentiments of even some protestant churchmen!

This rector of Kettering attributes the growth of schism to the

_negligence_ of the clergy, and seems to have persecuted both the

archbishops, "to his detriment," as he tells us, with singular plans

of reform borrowed from monastic institutions. He wished to revive

the practice inculcated by a canon of the counsel of Laodicea of

having prayers _ad horam nonam et ad vesperam_--prayers twice a day

in the churches. But his grand project take in his own words:--

"I let the archbishop know that I had composed an _irenicon_,

wherein I prove the necessity of an ecclesiastical _power over

consciences_ in matters of religion, which utterly silences their

arguments who _plead so hard for toleration_. I took my scheme from

'A Discourse of Ecclesiastical Polity,' wherein the authority of the

civil magistrate over the consciences of subjects in matters of

external religion is asserted; _the mischiefs and inconveniences of

toleration_ are represented, and all pretences pleaded in behalf of

_liberty of conscience_ are fully answered. If this book were

reprinted and considered, the king would know his power and the

people their duty."

The rector of Kettering seems not to have known that the author of

this "Discourse on Ecclesiastical Polity" was the notorious Parker,

immortalised by the satire of Marvell. This political apostate, from

a republican and presbyterian, became a furious advocate for

_arbitrary government_ in church and state! He easily won the favour

of James the Second, who made him Bishop of Oxford! His principles

were so violent that Father Petre, the confessor of James, made sure

of him! This letter of the rector of Kettering, in adopting the

system of such a _catholic_ bishop, confirms my suspicion that

_toleration_ is condemned as an evil among some protestants!

[173] The cruelties practised by the Protestant against the Catholic

party are pictured and described in Arnoudt Van Geluwe's book, "Over

de Ontledinghe van dry verscheyden Niew-Ghereformeerde Martelaers

Boecken," published at Antwerp in 1656.

[174] Cornhert was one of the fathers of Dutch literature, and even

of their arts. He was the composer of the great national air of

William of Orange; he was too a famous engraver, the master of

Goltzius. On his death-bed he was still writing against the

_persecution of heretics_.

[175] "Dictionnaire de Trevoux," _ad vocem_ Tolerance. Printed in 1771.

[176] Sismondi, "Hist. des Francais," i. 41. The character of the

_first person_ who introduced _civil_ persecution into the Christian

church has been described by Sulpicius Severus. See Dr. Maclaine's

note in his translation of Mosheim's "Ecclesiastical History," vol.

i. 428.

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 3 · 第 145 / 207 题