Mr. Priessnitz expects all his patients to leave off wearing flannel or

cotton next to the body; he maintains that by keeping up too much heat,

they weaken the skin, which then is less efficient in performing its

offices, and in consequence people become delicate and diseased.

A patient coming out of the bath, on being prevented putting on his

flannel waistcoat and drawers, said, "Tell Mr. Priessnitz, they and I

having been intimately acquainted for twenty years, I hardly like

parting with them so abruptly." His reply was, "They are false friends;

in a short time your skin will regain the proper tone which they

deprived it of, when you will be warmer without flannel than ever you

were with it." Priessnitz does not preach one doctrine and practise

another--he wears nothing under his linen. Some patients of a slow

circulation, on commencing the treatment, are ordered to wear their

flannel waistcoats over their linen for a few days: the want of it is

not felt. It might naturally be supposed, that leaving off flannel of a

sudden, especially in cold weather, would be attended with serious

consequences; but this is never the case in the Water-cure. Invalids

frequently arrive at Gräfenberg in the depth of winter, and after the

bath, invariably leave off flannel. Of the number of cases that came

under my observation, I never knew a single instance of a party catching

cold. After the bath, the patient is expected to keep up a brisk walk

for some time. In winter, it would be as well, after leaving off

flannel, to clothe warmer than usual for a day or two.

Wearing flannel waistcoats in bed of a night is greatly debilitating. An

almost universal prejudice exists in favour of flannel in cases of gout

and rheumatism; hence the question arises, "Does it prevent or cure

those complaints?" Certainly not; for where do you see their victims

without flannel? Experience proves, that it neither protects the wearer

from disease, nor allays pain.

Nightcaps destroy the hair, cause its premature decay, and have an

injurious tendency to those troubled with congestion in the head,

head-aches, etc.; such people cannot have their bedrooms too cold. There

is much sense in the old adage--"Keep the head cold, and the feet

warm." Previously to sleeping without a nightcap, and washing my head

every morning with cold water, I was constantly tormented with cold in

the head, from which I am now perfectly free. Perhaps, in some measure,

I am indebted to my last visit to Gräfenberg for this happy change,

having passed a whole winter there without wearing either hat or

neck-cloth, or making any change from my summer clothing, although the

thermometer was frequently 12° to 14° Reaumur below zero.

The constant use of oils and pomatums to the hair, unless the head is

often washed, closes the pores, and is prejudicial.

With respect to the clothing, Priessnitz advises "when in an open

carriage, or sitting still, the body should be well clothed; when in

exercise, as lightly covered as possible."

One half the cases of consumption in females may be traced to the

wearing of stays, and lacing them too tight. All artists agree, that

stays in growing people destroy, rather than improve, the figure. Bound

up in whalebone, they lose that graceful undulation of the back which is

so pleasing. Every one who has seen the Venus de Medicis, Canova's

Venus, or any other faithful copy of nature, must consider a very small

waist a defect.

Stays, at best, are unwholesome, as they keep up an unnatural heat about

the body; and when laced too tight, are sure to be attended with serious

consequences. I have known several young ladies, whose teeth were

destroyed, whose breaths were intolerable, and who were consigned to a

premature grave, entirely from tight lacing. To have health, the

greatest of all blessings, the complicated machinery inside our bodies

must have room for action (the intestinal canal, for instance, is half

as thick as a man's arm, and sixty or seventy yards long); contract this

space, you contract the vessels, and irregularity of the functions

ensues. This is an offence against nature, which sooner or later she

will repay with misery and pain.

Dr. Abernethy advised air baths, that is, the habit of exposing the body

naked to the air, which may be done with impunity after the cold bath,

but not otherwise. In winter, instead of increasing the amount of

clothing, Priessnitz advises exercise; for, in proportion as the body is

warmly clothed, and the air excluded, the less warmth is produced by the

body itself; resistance to cold causes the body to bring forth its own

energies and powers. There can be no doubt the feet are much warmer,

and that it is much healthier, to go without stockings; it necessitates

washing the feet oftener, which, if done in cold water, tends to bring

warmth to them. The Turks owe much of their health to their habit of

washing their feet. Before going to Gräfenberg, people destitute of

shoes and stockings excited my pity; but since that time, my opinion is

changed: let such persons be well fed, but for health keep their feet

bare. The following extracts from Liebig support Priessnitz's opinion:--

"Our clothing is merely an equivalent for a certain amount of food. The

more we are clothed, the less urgent becomes the appetite for food;

because the loss of heat by cooling, and consequently the amount of heat

to be supplied by the food, is diminished.

"If we were to go naked, like certain savage tribes; or if in hunting or

fishing, we were exposed to the same degree of cold as the Samoyedes, we

should be able with ease to consume ten pounds of flesh, and perhaps a

dozen of tallow candles into the bargain, daily; as warm-clad travellers

have related with astonishment of those people."

"The Englishman, in Jamaica, feels with regret the disappearance of his

appetite, previously a source of frequently recurring enjoyment. And he

succeeds by the use of cayenne pepper and the most powerful stimulants,

in enabling himself to take as much food as he was accustomed to eat at

home. But the whole of the carbon thus introduced into the system is not

consumed; the temperature of the air is too high, and the oppressive

heat does not allow him to increase the number of respirations by active

exercise, and thus to proportion the waste to the amount of food taken;

disease of some kind, therefore, ensues."

"The cooling of the body, by whatever cause it may be produced,

increases the amount of food necessary, the mere exposure to the open

air, in a carriage or on the deck of a ship, by increasing radiation and

evaporation, increases the loss of heat and compels us to eat more than

usual. The same is true of those who are accustomed to _drink large

quantities of water_, which is given off at a temperature of the body

98°. It increases the appetite; and persons of weak constitution find it

necessary, by continued exercise, to supply to the system the oxygen

required to restore the heat abstracted by the cold water. Loud and

long continued speaking, the crying of infants, and moist air, all exert

a decided and appreciable influence on the amount of food which is

taken."--LIEBIG.

"No isolated fact," says Dr. Johnson, "can contravene the law that the

quantity of food is regulated by the number of respirations, by the

temperature of the air, and by the amount of heat given off to the

surrounding medium, as for instance by frequent bathing. Of course it is

a matter of indifference whether that medium be cold air or cold water."

As a healthy naked body generates by heightened perspiration of the

skin, the same warmth as is produced by one which is covered, by means

of retaining the perspiration; so every one who is quite well, might by

use become so hardened, that during the coldest season he might feel,

when naked, as comfortable as any one covered with wool. The truth of

this was verified by two English gentlemen, the winter I spent at

Gräfenberg. One day in December, when the thermometer was at 6°, of

Reaumur, below zero, they proceeded to a mountain, took off all their

clothes, except their drawers, and proceeded to the top, where, though

the wind was blowing strong at the time, they remained two hours. They

stated that after they had walked briskly, or got up the steam for ten

minutes, a glow of heat came on, which counteracting the cold, produced

the most agreeable sensation. Neither of these gentlemen caught cold or

suffered in any way from this experiment.

The Scotch Highlander with his naked legs, does not feel colder,

surrounded by mountains of ice, than we do who are clothed. We prove

this by our bare faces in the coldest winter.

As the skin performs the double function, of drawing nourishment from

the air, and exhaling the phlogisticised air of the diseased matter and

worn-out atoms of the body, it follows that the true art of curing, must

be to endeavour to restore these two functions. Hydropathy causes the

ejection of diseased matter and revives the activity of the skin.

Dr. Johnson observes, "Discomforts are the necessary whips and spurs

which keep the living energies awake; whilst comforts operate upon us

like opiates: since to acquire a 'comfort' is only to remove a

discomfort; and to remove what keeps us awake, is the same thing as to

administer what will send us to sleep. The indulgences, therefore,

wherewith even young and healthy men indulge themselves; the

'comforts,' as they call them, of flannel, warm clothing, closed doors,

carpeted rooms, soft beds, hot food, are infinitely worse than absurd;

because the opposites of all these luxuries, so far from being injurious

to health, are absolutely _necessary_ to it. We actually kill ourselves

with comforts."

XXVIII.--DRUGS.

"Thus with our hellish drugs, Death's ceaseless fountains

In these bright vales, o'er these green mountains

Worse than the very plague we raged.

I have myself to thousands poison given,

And hear their murderer praised as blest by heaven,

Because with Nature strife he waged."

GÖETHE'S FAUST.

The influence of habit and custom is such, that it is difficult to

arouse inquiry, when the result is calculated to derange the existing

order of things. Mr. D'Israeli observes, "Could we conceive that man had

never discovered the practice of washing his hands, but cleansed them as

animals do their paws, he would for certain have ridiculed and protested

against the inventor of soap, and as tardily, as in other matters, have

adopted the invention."

All change, however beneficial, is attended with trouble; and we

therefore adopt the motto, "Whatever is, is right." This very motto is

the key to our method of cure--as it is to that of every other great

moral truth. Yet, to quote the words of Rausse, "We do not take this in

the sense of the philosophy of our days, or in that of the German

philosopher, Hegel, for then we must consider falsehood and

assassination to be good. Rather would we take these words in the sense

in which they were first proclaimed by the philosophy of Geneva, in the

sense in which the _first citizen_ used them for the foundation of his

truths; thus, that which is produced by nature is good; all

inclinations, all impulses of men derived from nature, are good; and

every mis-usage of nature is an outrage which she punishes with misery

and pain. All the principles of the art of curing at Gräfenberg,

attested as they are by thousands, are dictated by that instinct which

nature has given to every human being as his inheritance."

But are not all the cures performed at Gräfenberg--all the doctrines of

Hydropathy--opposed to science? It may be answered, Yes; nor can we shut

our eyes to the fact, that nature refuses all respect for what we are

pleased to denominate learning--nay, tramples upon what is often called

science: particularly on that of medicine. By what delusions were

mankind first persuaded to submit to the use of poisonous drugs! In the

middle ages, water as a beverage, and as a cure for disease, fell into

total disuse. In the time of the Crusades, the Arab doctors introduced

the use of Oriental drugs, to which they attributed miraculous virtues;

and during the period of astrology and alchemy, and when researches were

being made for the philosopher's stone, almost every nation boasted of

having found some panacea--some elixir vitæ: sometimes it was an oil or

an herb; at others, a powder or mineral; until, in process of time,

their accumulation formed the vaunted science of medicine. But, we would

inquire, are the effects of these compounds such as to lead to the

conclusion that they were recommended by nature? Have mankind become

healthier since their introduction? Are those nations who have done most

homage to this science, the strongest and soundest?

To think of eradicating disease with poisons, of which physic is

generally composed, appears paradoxical. How is it possible to bring

physic to bear upon the dispersed and deeply-hidden diseased matter?

Even if this could be done, it is quite impossible, as every chemist

knows, for the peccant matters and physic to dissolve each other into

nothing.

Dr. Forbes, editor of the "British and Foreign Medical Review," supports

this view of the case. He observes, "It is one of the most formidable

difficulties with which the ordinary physician has to contend, that

nearly all his remedies reach the point to which they are directed,

through one channel. If the brain requires to be placed under the

influence of a sedative or a stimulant, if the muscular system demands

invigorating by tonics, if the functions of organic life need correction

by alteratives, the physician has no means of attaining his object

except by inundating the stomach and bowels with foreign and frequently

pernicious substances. It being thus made the medical doorway to all

parts of the system, and so compelled to admit every description of

therapeutical appliances, the organ of digestion is contorted to a

purpose for which it was never intended."

"The consequence," says Dr. Arbuthnot, "of such treatment with physic

is, that to the old evil a new stimulus is added, weak or strong,

according to the dose and quality: what is inflammable, stays in the

blood, and afterwards affects the brain."

We may fairly ask, How can any of these consequences result from

Hydropathy? The following lines of Horace Smith are not far from the

truth:--

"Physic! a freak of times and modes,

Which yearly old mistakes explodes

For new ones still absurder.

All slay,--their victims disappear,

And only leaves the doctrine clear

That killing is no murder."

Are those who do most to aid the apothecaries, and who indulge in

alcoholic drinks, healthier than others; or, are those who are in the

habit of consulting doctors free from pain? No! they drag on a miserable

existence. It might be asked, If certain herbs and minerals were alone

intended for healing man's infirmities, how would the inhabitants of the

temperate zone procure those that are indigenous to the tropics, and

_vice versâ_? Instinct pleads in favour of the element that abounds

wherever human beings ought to live; and innumerable instances might be

adduced of the advantage which the use of water gives the savage over

cultivated man.

From the most remote ages, water was known and resorted to as a curative

agent by the unsophisticated children of nature. In the wilds of

America, the savage is put into a close hut, built of stones, which hut

is heated to produce intense perspiration on the invalid, in which state

he is immersed in the river, near to which the hut is generally placed;

and by Pallme's travels in Kordofan, we find that, in the very depths of

Africa, fevers are cured by cold water. It appears our traveller lay

several days in bed with burning fever, when, at length, his attendants

lifted him out of bed, placed him with his back against the door, and

poured a large volume of cold water on his head and body. After the

shock he was put to bed, covered with sacks and sheepskins: this

produced relief and sleep. A second application of this treatment

effected a cure.

Some writers err in supposing mankind to have arrived at an age of

decrepitude, from its not occurring to them that the deterioration of

health arises from art, and not nature. If you wish to be convinced of

this, leave civilised and go to savage life. There you will see the man

of nature as young and strong as the first created; the generation

cannot grow old, except by art, poison, or vice. Prescribe simple water,

and it is rejected with scorn; but let any quack recommend his drugs,

however poisonous, and they are swallowed regardless of results. It must

have been the enemy of all good who first persuaded mankind that poison

could produce health.

The evils that arise from pernicious drugs, which have swept away

millions, and which will destroy the whole species if no reform takes

place, originate in misunderstanding the first or acute attack, which is

but an attempt of nature to heal. Men take acute attacks for disease,

whilst _in reality they are the means by which the system is relieved of

disease_. Bleeding, blistering, cupping, and drugging, subdue these

efforts,--not by emancipating the system, but by so reducing it that it

can no longer contend with its enemy. Men praised the unlucky discovery,

and hence a host of deadly diseases took their origin, such as

destructions and suppurations of the inner organs, dropsy, etc.:

complaints which were hardly known in times of yore, and which, but for

these causes, would never have reared their heads. However, as the

lamentable consequences in some cases do not appear until years after

the suppression of the acute conflict, no one thinks of attributing them

to drugs. This drug-plague is the most dreadful malady mankind has to

contend with; dug by themselves from the black abysses of the earth, it

has been cherished as the effect of deep science for centuries; how

frequently has the last shilling been offered up at its altar! Upon it

as many millions have been spent as would pay off the National Debt: to

the study of these dangerous errors, millions of men have applied the

whole of their lives and their ability: backed by this so-called

science, they contend against nature; but _how_ does Nature punish those

who wish to master her? Oh, great unspeakable Nature! how dreadfully

beautiful art thou, in thy inexorable and destroying severity!

Mankind may still turn back, and regenerate health; but it is not

sufficient for them to renounce physic: they must abandon wine, spirits,

and poison, in every shape. For the curing of disease, we must not look

into the grey mysteries of the future, but far behind us, on the green

plain of Nature, and of the times which are past.

XXIX.--ASSIMILATION.

The preservation of life requires not only that its consumption should

be reduced, but its restoration rendered more easy. For this purpose two

things are necessary, the perfect assimilation of that which is

beneficial, the separation from that which is injurious. Life, as will

be seen from the following definition, depends upon the identification,

the assimilation, and the animalisation of external matter by the vital

power, in its passage from the chemical to the organic world.

The power of assimilating other substances into itself is the

fundamental principle of nature. This impulse and power is not only

prevalent in all organic matter, but also in elemental bodies, that is

to say, water, earth, and fire. The globe in the beginning was a rigid

rock, upon which air and water effected their power of assimilation.

Assimilation is only possible by dissolving. For the purpose of

assimilation, air and water dissolved the earth's crust; by the agency

of those powers that surface originated which produces and nourishes all

organic bodies. As these exist in the same world in which the elements

continually exercise their power of dissolving and assimilating, it

follows, that from the beginning there must have been developed in all

organic elements the same power, as a protection to themselves.

Air dissolves water into vapours, in order to assimilate gases from it.

Water extracts from air the oxygen gas.

Fire absorbs the oxygen of air, dissolves water into its two component

parts, hydrogen and oxygen, and by converting the former to a flame,

transforms water to fire; air absorbs many gases which fire releases

from combustibles; air draws gases from the soil, the soil absorbs the

oxygen of the air. In this way the elements are in a constant conflict,

each endeavouring to dissolve the other, and to assimilate its matters

with itself. Organic bodies draw oxygen from the air by the process of

respiration, which is also the property of plants: these draw all

assimilatory matter which the earth offers by their roots. The same

process is performed by animals feeding on plants or herbs; whereas, on

the contrary, fire resolves all organic matter into its original

elements. This same process is carried out by water and air, with all

organic beings, but as long as these are living they only get their

evaporation, and after death their entirety. The earth exercises this

power but conditionally and partially, viz. upon all animals that exist

in it, and on all roots of plants; upon mankind the earth only exercises

its power of assimilation after death. The proofs of this conflict of

assimilation in organic matter itself are clear, one animal eats the

other as well as plants; that is to say, it absorbs by the agency of the

stomach so much of their substance as may be assimilated. Plants again

convert parts of dead bodies and other plants (the manure) into their

own substance.

Besides this power of assimilation, there exists in every being, element

and organisation, the necessity of being exposed to foreign

assimilation.

This is the fundamental principle of the true doctrine of healing. In

support of this theory, we find that water, if withdrawn from the power

of dissolution by the fresh air, stinks and putrefies. Air loses its

oxygen and becomes mephitic, if it does not find water or plants with

which it can enter into the conflict of dissolution and assimilation.

Animals and plants fall ill and die if their surface is so covered that

neither air nor water can act upon them. If nourishment is withdrawn

from any organic being, that is to say, if it is deprived of the

opportunity of assimilating with external or foreign substances, death

is caused by the want of a supply of healthy juices; if, on the

contrary, this being is deprived of the influence or effect of this

foreign power of dissolution, illness is the consequence, arising from

the putridity of matter, from which putridity the system ought to have

been released by the agency of foreign assimilation.

XXX.--THE CRISIS.

"Most blessed water! neither tongue can tell

The blessedness thereof, nor heart can think,

Save only those to whom it hath been given

To taste of that divinest gift of heaven.

"I stoop'd and drank of that divinest well,

Fresh from the Rock of Ages where it ran,

It had a heavenly quality to quell

All pain: I rose a renovated man;

And would not now, when that relief was known

For worlds the needful suffering have forgone."

Every Man His Own Doctor The Cold Water, Tepid Water, and Friction-Cure, as Applicable to Every Disease to Which the Human Frame Is Subject, and Also to the Cure of Disease in Horses and Cattle · 第 7 / 19 段