It may be said that there are many cases on record in which men of

quite humble origin have advanced themselves in trade, even to

becoming Lord Mayor of London. Could not a poor lad do in the

nineteenth century what Whittington did in the fourteenth? Could he

not tie up his belongings in a handkerchief and make for London, where

the streets were paved with gold, and the walls were built of jasper?

Well, you see, in this matter of the poor lad and his elevation to

giddy heights there has been a little mistake, principally due to the

chap-books. The poor lad who worked his way upward in the nineteenth

century belonged to the bourgeoise, not the craftsman class. While his

schoolfellows remained clerks, he, by some early good fortune--by

marriage, by cousinship, was enabled to get his foot on the ladder, up

which he proceeded to climb with strength and resolution. The poor lad

who got on in earlier times was the son of a country gentleman. Dick

Whittington was the son of Sir William Whittington, Knight and

afterwards outlaw. He was apprenticed to his cousin, Sir John

Fitzwarren, Mercer and merchant-adventurer, son of Sir William

Fitzwarren, Knight. Again, Chichele, Lord Mayor, and his younger

brother, Sheriff, and his elder brother, Archbishop of Canterbury,

were sons of one Chichele, Gentleman and Armiger of Higham Ferrers in

the county of Northampton. Sir Thomas Gresham was the son of Sir

Richard Gresham, nephew of Sir John Gresham, and younger brother of

Sir John Gresham, also of a good old country family. In fact, we may

look in vain through the annals of London city for the rise of the

humble boy from the ranks of the craftsmen. Once or twice, perhaps,

one may find such a case. If we consider the early years of the

nineteenth century, when the long wars attracted to the army all the

younger sons, it does seem as if the Mayors and Aldermen must have

come from very humble beginnings. Even then, however, we find on

investigation that the city fathers of that time had mostly sprung

from small shops. They were never, to begin with, craftsmen, and at

the end of the century any such rise was never dreamed of by the most

ambitious. The clerk, if a lad became a clerk, remained a clerk: he

had no hope of becoming anything else. The shopman remained a shopman,

his only hope being the establishment of himself as a master if he

could save enough money. The craftsman remained a craftsman. And for

partnerships there were always plenty--younger sons and others--eager

to buy themselves in, or there were sons and nephews waiting their

turn. No son of a working man, or a clerk, could hope for any other

advancement in the City than advancement to higher salary for long and

faithful service.

Once more, then, the situation was this: To him who could afford to

earn nothing till he was two-and-twenty, and little till he was

five-and-twenty, and could find the money for fees, lectures, and

courses and coaches, everything that the country had to offer was

open. With this limitation there was never any country in which prizes

were more open than Great Britain and Ireland. A clever lad might

enter the Royal Engineers or Artillery with a tolerable certainty of

being a Colonel and a K.C.B. at fifty; or he might go into the Church

where if he had ability and had cultivated eloquence and possessed

good manners, he might count on a Bishopric; or he might go to the

Bar, where, if he was lucky, he might become a judge or even Lord

Chancellor. Unless, however, he could provide the capital wanted for

admission, he could attain to nothing--nothing--nothing.

What became, then, of the clever lad? In some cases he became a clerk,

crowding into a trade already overcrowded. He trampled on his

competitors, because most of them, the sons and grandsons of clerks,

had no ambition and no perception of the things wanted. This young

fellow had. He taught himself the things that were wanted; he

generally took therefore the best place. But he had to remain a clerk.

Or, more often, he became a teacher in a Board School. In this

capacity he obtained a certain amount of social consideration, a

certain amount of independence, and an income varying From £150 to

£400 a year.

Or, which also happened frequently, he might become a dissenting

minister of the humbler kind. In that case he had every chance of

passing through life in a little chapel at a small town, a slave to

his own, and to his congregation's, narrow prejudices.

Or, he might go abroad, to one of the Colonies. Earlier in the

century, between the years 1850 and 1880, many poor lads had gone to

Australia or New Zealand and had done well for themselves, a few had

become millionaires; but by the year 1890 these Colonies, considered

as likely places wherein it young man could advance himself, seemed

played out. Working-men they wanted, but not clever and penniless

young fellows.

He might, it has been suggested, go into the House. There were already

one or two workingmen in the House. But they were sent there

especially to represent certain interests by working-men, not because

their representative was an ambitious and clever young man. And the

working-man's member, so far, had advanced a very little way as a

political success. It was not in Politics that a young man would find

his opening.

This brings us to the one career open to him--he might become a

Journalist. It is an attractive profession: and even in its lower

walks it seems a branch of literature. There is independence of hours:

the pay depends upon the man's power of work: there are great openings

in it and--to the rising lad at least--what seems a noble possibility

in the shape of pay. Many distinguished men have been journalists,

from Charles Dickens downward. Nearly all the novelists have dabbled

with journalism; and, since all of us cannot be novelists, the young

man might reflect that there are editor, sub-editors, assistant

editors, news-editors, leader writers, descriptive writers, reviewers,

dramatic critics, art and music critics, wanted for every paper. He

could become a journalist and he could rise to the achievement of

these ambitions.

At first he rose a very little way, despite his ambition, because in

every branch of letters imperfect education is an insuperable

obstacle. Still he could become news-editor, descriptive reporter,

paragraph writer, and even, in the case of country papers, editor.

Sometimes he passed from the office of the journal to that of one of

the many societies, where he became secretary and succeeded in getting

his name associated with some cause, which gave him some position and

consideration. Whether he succeeded greatly or not, his whole object

was to pass from the class which has no possible future to the class

for which everything is open. His sons would be gentlemen, and if he

could only find the necessary funds, they should make what he had been

unable to make, an attempt upon the prizes of the State.

This was the situation at the beginning of the last decade of the

nineteenth century. It is summed up by saying that all the avenues to

honour and power were closed and barred to the lad who could not

command a thousand pounds at least. Let us pass on.

Most thoughtful people have considered the growth and development of

the great educational movement whose origin belongs to the nineteenth

century; whose development so profoundly affects the history of our

own.

It began, like the spread of scientific knowledge, and the reforms in

the Old Constitution, and everything else, with the introduction of

railways. Before the end of the century the country was covered with

schools, as it was also covered with railways. There was hardly a man

or woman living when the nineteenth century ended who could not read;

there were few indeed who did not read. But the school course

naturally taught little beyond the elements and was already completed

when the pupil reached his fourteenth year. He was then taken from

school and put to work, apprenticed--set to something which was to be

his trade. Clever or stupid, keen of intellect or dull, that was to be

the lot of the boy. He was set to learn how to earn his livelihood.

About the year 1885 or 1890--no exact date can be fixed for the birth

of a new idea--began a very remarkable extension of the educational

movement. It was discovered by philanthropists that something ought to

be done with the boys after they had left school. The first intentions

seem to have been simply to keep them out of mischief. Having nothing

to do the lads naturally took to loafing about the streets, smoking

bad tobacco, drinking, gambling, and precocious love-making. It was

also perceived by economists about the same time that unless something

was done for technical education, the old superiority of the British

craftsman would speedily vanish. It was further pointed out that the

education of the Board Schools gave the pupils little more than the

mastery of the merest elements, the tools by means of which knowledge

could be acquired. In order, therefore, to carry on general education

and to provide technical training there were started simultaneously in

every great town, but especially in London, Technical Schools,

'Continuation' Classes, Polytechnics, Young Men's Associations and

Clubs, Guilds for instruction and recreation--under whatever form they

were known, they were all schools.

Then the young working lad was invited to enter himself at one of

these places, and to spend his evenings there. 'Come,' said the

founders, 'you are at an age when everything is new and everything is

delightful. Give up all your present joys. Send the girl with whom you

keep company, night after night, home to her mother. Put down your

cherished cigarette, cease to stand about in bars, give up drinking

beer, go no more to the music-hall. Abandon all that you delight in.

And come to us. After working all day long at your trade, come to us

and work all the evening at books.'

A strange invitation! To forego delights and live laborious evenings.

Stranger still, the lads accepted the invitation. They accepted in

thousands. They consented to work every evening as well as every day.

The inducements to join were, in fact, artfully devised with a full

knowledge of boys' nature. What a boy desires, over and above

everything else, more than the company of a girl, more than idleness,

more than gambling, more than beer-drinking, more than tobacco, is

association with other lads of the same age. These Polytechnics or

Institutes or Clubs gave him, first of all, that association. They

provided him with societies of every kind. They added recreation to

study; pleasure to work. If half of the evening was spent in a

classroom, or in a workshop, the other half was passed in orderly

amusement. There was, moreover, every kind of choice; the lad felt

himself free, there were, to be sure, barriers here and there, but he

did not feel them; there was a steady pressure upon him in certain

directions, but he did not feel it; in some there were

prayer-meetings; the boys were not obliged to go, but some time or

other they found themselves present. Then there were some who wore the

blue ribbon of temperance; nobody was obliged to assume that symbol,

but somehow most of them did, without feeling that they had been

pressed to do so. For the very work and life and atmosphere of the

place into which beer was not admitted gave them a dislike for beer,

with its coarse and rough associations. Insensibly the boy who joined

was led upward to a nobler and higher level.

The motives which were strong enough to persuade a working lad to work

on, over hours, may he partly understood by considering one of these

Institutions--the largest and the most popular--the Polytechnic of

Regent Street, called familiarly the Regent Street 'Poly,' with its

thirteen thousand members. Take first its social side, as offering

naturally greater attractions than its educational side. It contained

about forty clubs. The new member on joining was asked in a pamphlet

these three questions:

1. 'Do you wish to make friends?'

2. 'Are you anxious to improve yourself?'

3. 'Do you seek the best opportunities of recreation in your leisure

hours?'

Observe that the serious object is placed between the other two. What

the Poly lads said to the new member was: 'Come in and have a good old

time with us.' It was for the good old time that the new member

joined. Once in he could look about him and choose. The Gymnasium, the

Boxing Club, the Swimming Club, the Roller-skating Club, the Cricket,

Football, Lawn Tennis, Athletic, Rowing, Cycling, Ramblers and

Harriers Clubs all invited him to join. Surely, among so many clubs

there must be one that he would like. Of course they had their showy

uniform, their envied Captains and other officers, their field days,

their public days, and their prizes. Or there was the Volunteer Corps,

with its Artillery Brigade, and its Volunteer Medical Staff Corps.

There was the Parliament, conducted on the same rules as that of the

House of Commons. For the quieter lads there were Sketching, Natural

History, Photographic, Orchestral, and Choral Societies. There was a

Natural History Society and an Electrical Engineering Society. There

were also associations for religious and moral objects; a Christian

Workers' Union, a Temperance Society, a Social League, a Polytechnic

Mission, and a Bible Class. There were reading-rooms and

refreshment-rooms; in the suburbs there were playing-fields for them.

Up the river was a house-boat for the Rowing Club, the largest on the

Thames. Add to all this an intense 'College feeling'; an ardent

enthusiasm for the Poly; friendships the most faithful; a wholesome,

invigorating, stimulating atmosphere; the encouragement always felt of

bravo endeavour and noble effort, and high principle--in one word the

gift to the young fellows of the working class of all that the public

schools and universities could offer that was best and most precious.

Such an institution as the Polytechnic--mother and sister of so many

others--was a revolution in itself.

But for the second question: 'Are you anxious to improve yourself?'

What answer was given? Strange to say the answer was also very

decidedly in the affirmative.

The young fellows were anxious to improve themselves. Now, mark the

difference between these working lads and the boys from the public

schools. Had such a question been put to the latter their answer would

have been a contemptuous stare, or a contemptuous laugh. Improve

themselves? They were already improved. They were so far improved that

nine-tenths of them were contented with the moderate amount of

knowledge necessary for the practice of their professions. If one

became a solicitor, a doctor, a schoolmaster, a barrister, a

clergyman, it was sufficient for him, in most cases, just to pass the

examinations. Then, no further improvement for the rest of their

natural life. But these others, who had everything to gain, whose

ambitions were just awakening, who were just beginning to understand

that there was every inducement to improve themselves, joined the

classes, and began to work with as much zeal as they showed in their

play.

What they learned concerns us little. It may be recorded, however,

that they learned everything. Practical trades were taught; technical

classes were held; there was a School of Science in which such

subjects as chemistry, physics, mathematics, mechanics, building, were

taught. There was a School of Art, in which wood modelling, carving,

and other minor arts were taught, as well as painting and drawing.

There was a Commercial School for Arithmetic, Book-keeping, Shorthand,

Typewriting; French, German, etc., were taught; there were Musical

Classes, Elocution Classes, a School of Engineering, a School of

Photography. Enough; it will be seen that everything a lad might

desire to learn he could learn and did learn.

But the Polytechnic was only one of many such institutions. In London

alone there existed, in the year 1893, between two and three hundred,

large and small; there were nearly fifty branches of the University

Extension Scheme; the Continuation classes were held in many Board

Schools, while of special clubs, mostly for athletic purposes, the

number was legion. As for the numbers enrolled in these associations,

already in 1893, when those things were all young, one finds 13,000

members of the Regent Street Poly, 4,000 at the People's Palace; the

same number at the Birkbeck; the same at the Goldsmiths' Institute; at

the City of London College, 2,500; and so on. Of the Athletic Clubs

the Cyclists' Union alone contained no fewer than 20,000 members.

Figures may mean anything. It is, however, significant that in a

population of five millions which gives perhaps 700,000 young men

between fifteen and twenty, of whom about 100,000 were below the rank

of craftsmen and 100,000 above, there should have been found a few

years after the introduction of the system about 70,000 youths wise

enough and resolute enough to join these classes.

It must be owned that only the more generous spirits--the nobler

sort--were attracted by the Polytechnics. They were a first selection

from the mass. Of these, again, another selection was made--those few

who studied the things which at first sight appeared to be least

useful. Everyone who knew a craft could see the wisdom of acquiring

perfection in his trade; everyone who was a clerk, or who hoped to

become a clerk, could see the advantage of learning shorthand,

book-keeping, French and German. What did that boy aim at who studied

Latin, Greek, and Mathematics, matriculated and took his degree at the

London University, then an examining body only? Why did he learn time

things? He did not learn them, remember, in the perfunctory way in

which a public-school boy generally works through his subjects; he

learned as if he meant to know these subjects; he devoured his books;

he tore the heart out of them; he compelled them to give up their

secrets. He had everything to get for himself, while the public-school

boy had everything given to him.

When it was done, when he had acquired as much knowledge as any

average boy from the best public school, when he had read in the Poly

Reading Room all that there was to read, what was he to do? For when

he looked about him he saw, stretching before him, fair and stately,

the long avenues which led to distinction; but before each there was a

toll-gate, and at the gate stood a man, saying, 'Pay me first a

thousand pounds. Then, and not till then, you shall enter.'

Alas! and he had not a sixpence--he, or his parents. And so perforce

he must stand aside, while other lads, without his intellect and

courage, paid the money, and were admitted.

There was but one outlet. He might become a journalist. He had learned

shorthand, a necessary accomplishment; therefore, he got an

appointment as reporter and general hand on a country paper. Such a

youth in these years of which we write was uncommon, but he very soon

became much more common. The charm of learning was discovered by one

lad after another. The chance of exchanging the craftsman's work for

the scholar's work, never thought of before, fired the brains of

hundreds first, and thousands afterward. Then began a rage for

learning. All those who had abilities even mediocre tried to escape

their lot by working at the higher subjects. It was reproached to the

Polytechnics that their original purpose, to bring the boys together

for common discipline and orderly recreation, and to train them in

their crafts, was departed from, and that all their energies were now

devoted to turning working lads into classical scholars,

mathematicians, logicians, and historians.

Nor was the complaint wholly unfounded. But it was too late to recede.

The boys crowded to the classes; they read and worked with incredible

eagerness; they thought that to be a man of books was better than to

be a man with a saw and a plane. Ambition seized them seized them by

tens of thousands; they would rise. Learning was their stepping-stone.

The recreative side of the Polytechnics was lost in the educational

side. Never before had there been such an ardour, such a thirst for

knowledge; yet only for knowledge as a means to rise. And there was

but one outlet. That, in the course of a few years, became congested.

Journalism, as the number of papers increased, demanded more workmen,

and still more. These young men from the Polytechnic filled up every

vacancy. They had seized upon this profession and made it their own;

those who did not belong to them were gradually, but surely, ousted.

It was recognised that it was the profession of the young man who

wanted to get on. Some there were who affected to lament an alleged

decay; the old scholarly style, they said, was gone; there was also

gone the old reverence for authority, rank, and the established order.

Perhaps the journal, as the new men made it, was above all vigorous.

But it was _true_, which could not always be said of the papers before

their time. From their college--the old Poly--the young men carried

away a love of truth and right dealing which, once imported into the

newspaper press, made it an engine far more mighty--an influence far

more potent--than ever it had been before. There may have been some

loss in style, though many of them wrote gracefully, and many showed

on occasion a wonderful command of wit, sarcasm and satire. But

because the papers were always truthful the writers always knew what

they wanted, and so their work had the strength of directness.

A few, but very few, continued at the work, whatever it might be, to

which they had been apprenticed. Then their lives were spent in a day

of painful drudgery, followed by an evening of delightful study. Very

few heard of these men. Now and then one would be discovered by a

clergyman working in his parish; now and then one emerged from

obscurity by means of a letter or a paper contributed to some journal.

Most of them lived and died unknown.

Yet there was one. His case is remarkable because it first set rolling

the ball of reform, He was by trade a metal turner and fitter; he had

the reputation of being an unsociable man because he went home every

day after work and stayed there; he was unmarried and lived alone in a

small, four-roomed cottage near Kilburn, one of a collection of

Workmen's villages. Here it was known that he had a room which he had

furnished with a furnace, a table, shelves and bottles, and that he

worked every evening at something. One day there appeared in a

scientific paper an article containing an account of certain

discoveries of the greatest importance, signed by a name utterly

unknown to scientific men. The article was followed by others, all of

the greatest interest and originality. The man himself had little idea

of the importance of his own discoveries. When his cottage was

besieged by leaders in the world of science, he was amazed; he showed

his simple laboratory to his visitors; he spoke of his labours

carelessly; he told them that he was a metal turner by trade, that he

worked every day for an employer at a wage of thirty-five shillings a

week, and that he was able to devote his evenings to reading and

research. They made him an F.R.S., the first working man who had ever

attained that honour. They tried to get him put upon the Civil List,

but the First Lord of the Treasury had already, according to the usual

custom, given away the annual grant made by the House for Literature,

Science and Art, to the widows and daughters of Civil servants. This

attempt failing, the Royal Society, in order to take him away from his

drudgery, created a small sinecure post for him, and in this way found

an excuse for giving him a pension.

Then some writer in a London 'Daily' asked how it was that with his

genius for science, which, it was now recalled, had been remarked

while he was a student at the South London Poly, this man had been

allowed to remain at his trade.

And the answer was, 'Because there is no opening for such an one.'

As We Are and As We May Be · 第 10 / 17 段