[11] One of the strongest reasons for drawing the line of separation

clearly and broadly between science and art is the following:--That the

principle of classification in science most conveniently follows the

classification of _causes_, while arts must necessarily be classified

according to the classification of the _effects_, the production of

which is their appropriate end. Now an effect, whether in physics or

morals, commonly depends upon a concurrence of causes, and it frequently

happens that several of these causes belong to different sciences. Thus

in the construction of engines upon the principles of the science of

_mechanics_, it is necessary to bear in mind the _chemical_ properties

of the material, such as its liability to oxydize; its electrical and

magnetic properties, and so forth. From this it follows that although

the necessary foundation of all art is science, that is, the knowledge

of the properties or laws of the objects upon which, and with which, the

art dons its work; it is not equally true that every art corresponds to

one particular science. Each art presupposes, not one science, but

science in general; or, at least, many distinct sciences.

(Editor's note:)

Essays on some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy

These five essays represent Mill's earliest thoughts on economic matters

and were first composed in 1829 and 1830 before his reputation had been

established by the publication of _Logic_ in 1843. Their successful

reception no doubt hastened the composition of his comprehensive work

the _Principles of Political Economy_ (1848).

Essays on some unsettled Questions of Political Economy · 第 12 / 12 段