AULUS PERSIUS FLACCUS.

If you have imagined what a divine work is spread out for the poet, and

approach this author too, in the hope of finding the field at length

fairly entered on, you will hardly dissent from the words of the

prologue,

“Ipse semipaganus

Ad sacra Vatum carmen affero nostrum.”

I half pagan

Bring my verses to the shrine of the poets.

Here is none of the interior dignity of Virgil, nor the elegance and

vivacity of Horace, nor will any sibyl be needed to remind you, that

from those older Greek poets there is a sad descent to Persius. You can

scarcely distinguish one harmonious sound amid this unmusical bickering

with the follies of men.

One sees that music has its place in thought, but hardly as yet in

language. When the Muse arrives, we wait for her to remould language,

and impart to it her own rhythm. Hitherto the verse groans and labors

with its load, and goes not forward blithely, singing by the way. The

best ode may be parodied, indeed is itself a parody, and has a poor and

trivial sound, like a man stepping on the rounds of a ladder. Homer and

Shakespeare and Milton and Marvell and Wordsworth are but the rustling

of leaves and crackling of twigs in the forest, and there is not yet

the sound of any bird. The Muse has never lifted up her voice to sing.

Most of all, satire will not be sung. A Juvenal or Persius do not marry

music to their verse, but are measured fault-finders at best; stand but

just outside the faults they condemn, and so are concerned rather about

the monster which they have escaped, than the fair prospect before

them. Let them live on an age, and they will have travelled out of his

shadow and reach, and found other objects to ponder.

As long as there is satire, the poet is, as it were, _particeps

criminis_. One sees not but he had best let bad take care of itself,

and have to do only with what is beyond suspicion. If you light on the

least vestige of truth, and it is the weight of the whole body still

which stamps the faintest trace, an eternity will not suffice to extol

it, while no evil is so huge, but you grudge to bestow on it a moment

of hate. Truth never turns to rebuke falsehood; her own

straightforwardness is the severest correction. Horace would not have

written satire so well if he had not been inspired by it, as by a

passion, and fondly cherished his vein. In his odes, the love always

exceeds the hate, so that the severest satire still sings itself, and

the poet is satisfied, though the folly be not corrected.

A sort of necessary order in the development of Genius is, first,

Complaint; second, Plaint; third, Love. Complaint, which is the

condition of Persius, lies not in the province of poetry. Erelong the

enjoyment of a superior good would have changed his disgust into

regret. We can never have much sympathy with the complainer; for after

searching nature through, we conclude that he must be both plaintiff

and defendant too, and so had best come to a settlement without a

hearing. He who receives an injury is to some extent an accomplice of

the wrong-doer.

Perhaps it would be truer to say, that the highest strain of the muse

is essentially plaintive. The saint’s are still _tears_ of joy. Who has

ever heard the _Innocent_ sing?

But the divinest poem, or the life of a great man, is the severest

satire; as impersonal as Nature herself, and like the sighs of her

winds in the woods, which convey ever a slight reproof to the hearer.

The greater the genius, the keener the edge of the satire.

Hence we have to do only with the rare and fragmentary traits, which

least belong to Persius, or shall we say, are the properest utterances

of his muse; since that which he says best at any time is what he can

best say at all times. The Spectators and Ramblers have not failed to

cull some quotable sentences from this garden too, so pleasant is it to

meet even the most familiar truth in a new dress, when, if our neighbor

had said it, we should have passed it by as hackneyed. Out of these six

satires, you may perhaps select some twenty lines, which fit so well as

many thoughts, that they will recur to the scholar almost as readily as

a natural image; though when translated into familiar language, they

lose that insular emphasis, which fitted them for quotation. Such lines

as the following, translation cannot render commonplace. Contrasting

the man of true religion with those who, with jealous privacy, would

fain carry on a secret commerce with the gods, he says:—

“Haud cuivis promptum est, murmurque humilesque susurros

Tollere de templis; et aperto vivere voto.”

It is not easy for every one to take murmurs and low

Whispers out of the temples, and live with open vow.

To the virtuous man, the universe is the only _sanctum sanctorum_, and

the penetralia of the temple are the broad noon of his existence. Why

should he betake himself to a subterranean crypt, as if it were the

only holy ground in all the world which he had left unprofaned? The

obedient soul would only the more discover and familiarize things, and

escape more and more into light and air, as having henceforth done with

secrecy, so that the universe shall not seem open enough for it. At

length, it is neglectful even of that silence which is consistent with

true modesty, but by its independence of all confidence in its

disclosures, makes that which it imparts so private to the hearer, that

it becomes the care of the whole world that modesty be not infringed.

To the man who cherishes a secret in his breast, there is a still

greater secret unexplored. Our most indifferent acts may be matter for

secrecy, but whatever we do with the utmost truthfulness and integrity,

by virtue of its pureness, must be transparent as light.

A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers · 第 42 / 51 题