LETTER XXXVIII.

SELBORNE, _Feb._ 12_th_, 1778.

"Forte puer, comitum seductus ab agmine fido,

Dixerat, ecquis adest? et, adest, responderat echo,

Hic stupet; utque aciem partes divisit in omnes;

Voce, veni, clamat magna. Vocat illa vocantem."

Dear Sir,--In a district so diversified as this, so full of hollow vales

and hanging woods, it is no wonder that echoes should abound. Many we

have discovered that return the cry of a pack of dogs, the notes of a

hunting-horn, a tunable ring of bells, or the melody of birds very

agreeably; but we were still at a loss for a polysyllabical articulate

echo, till a young gentleman, who had parted from his company in a summer

evening walk, and was calling after them, stumbled upon a very curious

one in a spot where it might least be expected. At first he was much

surprised, and could not be persuaded but that he was mocked by some boy;

but repeating his trials in several languages, and finding his respondent

to be a very adroit polyglot, he then discerned the deception.

This echo in an evening, before rural noises cease, would repeat ten

syllables most articulately and distinctly, especially if quick dactyls

were chosen. The last syllables of

"Tityre, tu patulae recubans . . . "

were as audibly and intelligibly returned as the first; and there is no

doubt, could trial have been made, but that at midnight, when the air is

very elastic, and a dead stillness prevails, one or two syllables more

might have been obtained; but the distance rendered so late an experiment

very inconvenient.

Quick dactyls, we observed, succeeded best; for when we came to try its

powers in slow, heavy, embarrassed spondees of the same number of

syllables,

"Monstrum horrendum, informe, ingens . . . "

we could perceive a return but of four or five.

All echoes have some one place to which they are returned stronger and

more distinct than to any other; and that is always the place that lies

at right angles with the object of repercussion, and is not too near, nor

too far off. Buildings, or naked rocks, re-echo much more articulately

than hanging woods or vales; because in the latter the voice is as it

were entangled, and embarrassed in the covert, and weakened in the

rebound.

The true object of this echo, as we found by various experiments, is the

stone-built, tiled hop-kiln in Gally Lane, which measures in front forty

feet, and from the ground to the eaves twelve feet. The true _centrum

phonicum_, or just distance, is one particular spot in the king's field,

in the path to Nore Hill, on the very brink of the steep balk above the

hollow cart-way. In this case there is no choice of distance; but the

path, by mere contingency, happens to be the lucky, the identical spot,

because the ground rises or falls so immediately, if the speaker either

retires or advances, that his mouth would at once be above or below the

object.

We measured this polysyllabical echo with great exactness, and found the

distance to fall very short of Dr. Plot's rule for distinct articulation;

for the doctor, in his history of Oxfordshire, allows a hundred and

twenty feet for the return of each syllable distinctly; hence this echo,

which gives ten distinct syllables, ought to measure four hundred yards,

or one hundred and twenty feet to each syllable; whereas our distance is

only two hundred and fifty-eight yards, or near seventy-five feet, to

each syllable. Thus our measure falls short of the doctor's, as five to

eight; but then it must be acknowledged that this candid philosopher was

convinced afterwards, that some latitude must be admitted of in the

distance of echoes according to time and place.

When experiments of this sort are making, it should always be remembered

that weather and the time of day have a vast influence on an echo; for a

dull, heavy, moist air deadens and clogs the sound; and hot sunshine

renders the air thin and weak, and deprives it of all its springiness,

and a ruffling wind quite defeats the whole. In a still, clear, dewy

evening the air is most elastic; and perhaps the later the hour the more

so.

Echo has always been so amusing to the imagination that the poets have

personified her; and in their hand she has been the occasion of many a

beautiful fiction. Nor need the gravest man be ashamed to appear taken

with such a phenomenon, since it may become the subject of philosophical

or mathematical inquiries.

One should have imagined that echoes, if not entertaining, must at least

have been harmless and inoffensive; yet, Virgil advances a strange

notion, that they are injurious to bees. After enumerating some probable

and reasonable annoyances, such as prudent owners would wish far removed

from their bee gardens, he adds--

. . . "aut ubi concava pulsu

Saxa sonant, vocisque offensa resultat imago."

This wild and fanciful assertion will hardly be admitted by the

philosophers of these days, especially as they all now seem agreed that

insects are not furnished with any organs of hearing at all. But if it

should be urged, that though they cannot hear yet perhaps they may feel

the repercussions of sounds, I grant it is possible they may. Yet that

these impressions are distasteful or hurtful, I deny, because bees, in

good summers, thrive well in my outlet, where the echoes are very strong;

for this village is another Anathoth, a place of responses and echoes.

Besides, it does not appear from experiment that bees are in any way

capable of being affected by sounds; for I have often tried my own with a

large speaking-trumpet held close to their hives, and with such an

exertion of voice as would have hailed a ship at the distance of a mile,

and still these insects pursued their various employments undisturbed,

and without showing the least sensibility or resentment.

Some time since its discovery this echo is become totally silent, though

the object, or hop-kiln, remains; nor is there any mystery in this

defect; for the field between is planted as a hop-garden, and the voice

of the speaker is totally absorbed and lost among the poles and entangled

foliage of the hops. And when the poles are removed in autumn the

disappointment is the same; because a tall quick-set hedge, nurtured up

for the purpose of shelter to the hop ground, entirely interrupts the

impulse and repercussion of the voice; so that till those obstructions

are removed no more of its garrulity can be expected.

Should any gentleman of fortune think an echo in his park or outlet a

pleasing incident, he might build one at little or no expense. For

whenever he had occasion for a new barn, stable, dog-kennel, or the like

structure, it would be only needful to erect this building on the gentle

declivity of a hill, with a like rising opposite to it, at a few hundred

yards distance; and perhaps success might be the easier ensured could

some canal, lake, or stream intervene. From a seat at the _centrum

phonicum_ he and his friends might amuse themselves sometimes of an

evening with the prattle of this loquacious nymph; of whose complacency

and decent reserve more may be said than can with truth of every

individual of her sex; since she is . . .

" . . . quae nec reticere loquenti,

Nec prior ipsa loqui didicit resonabilis echo."

The Natural History of Selborne, Vol. 2 · 第 47 / 90 题