CONDUCT OF THE WHIGS.--REFORM OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.

The conduct of the Whigs is extravagantly inconsistent. It originated in

the fatal error which Fox committed, in persisting, after the first three

years of the French Revolution, when every shadow of freedom in France had

vanished, in eulogizing the men and measures of that shallow-hearted

people. So he went on gradually, further and further departing from all the

principles of English policy and wisdom, till at length he became the

panegyrist, through thick and thin, of a military frenzy, under the

influence of which the very name of liberty was detested. And thus it was

that, in course of time, Fox's party became the absolute abettors of the

Buonapartean invasion of Spain, and did all in their power to thwart the

generous efforts of this country to resist it. Now, when the invasion is by

a Bourbon, and the cause of the Spanish nation neither united nor, indeed,

sound in many respects, the Whigs would precipitate this country into a

crusade to fight up the cause of a faction.

I have the honour of being slightly known to my lord Darnley. In 1808-9, I

met him accidentally, when, after a few words of salutation, he said to me,

"Are you mad, Mr. Coleridge?"--"Not that I know, my lord," I replied; "what

have I done which argues any derangement of mind?"--"Why, I mean," said he,

"those letters of yours in the Courier, 'On the Hopes and Fears of a People

invaded by foreign Armies.' The Spaniards are absolutely conquered; it is

absurd to talk of their chance of resisting."--"Very well, my lord," I

said, "we shall see. But will your lordship permit me, in the course of a

year or two, to retort your question upon you, if I should have grounds for

so doing?"--"Certainly!" said he; "that is fair!" Two years afterwards,

when affairs were altered in Spain, I met Lord Darnley again, and, after

some conversation, ventured to say to him, "Does your lordship recollect

giving me leave to retort a certain question upon you about the Spaniards?

Who is mad now?"--"Very true, very true, Mr. Coleridge," cried he: "you are

right. It is very extraordinary. It was a very happy and hold guess." Upon

which I remarked, "I think '_guess_' is hardly a fair term. For, has any

thing happened that has happened, from any other causes, or under any other

conditions, than such as I laid down Beforehand?" Lord Darnley, who was

always very courteous to me, took this with a pleasant nod of his head.

* * * * *

Many votes are given for reform in the House of Commons, which are not

honest. Whilst it is well known that the measure will not he carried in

parliament, it is as well to purchase some popularity by voting for it.

When Hunt and his associates, before the Six Acts, created a panic, the

ministers lay on their oars for three or four months, until the general

cry, even from the opposition, was, "Why don't the ministers come forward

with some protective measure?" The present Ministry exists on the weakness

and desperate character of the Opposition. The sober part of the nation are

afraid of the latter getting into power, lest they should redeem some of

their pledges.

* * * * *

_April_ 29. 1823.

Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge · 第 8 / 270 题