II

A philosopher and an artist, he was drawn by circumstance into the

vortex of affairs. Except for the stirring events of 1848, he might

have lived and died a professor at Bonn or Heidelberg. If he had

pursued his musical studies at Leipsic he must have become a master of

the piano keyboard. As it was, he played Schumann and Chopin

creditably. The rescue of Kinkel, the flight from the fatherland, the

mild Bohemianizing in Paris and London awakened within him the spirit

of action rather than of adventure.

There was nothing of the Dalgetty about him; too reflective and too

accomplished. His early marriage attests a domestic trend, from which

he never departed; though an idealist in his public aspirations and

aims he was a sentimentalist in his home life and affections. Genial in

temperament and disposition, his personal habit was moderation itself.

He was a German. Never did a man live so long in a foreign country and

take on so few of its thoughts and ways. He threw himself into the

anti-slavery movement upon the crest of the wave; the flowing sea

carried him quickly from one distinction to another; the ebb tide,

which found him in the Senate of the United States, revealed to his

startled senses the creeping, crawling things beneath the surface;

partyism rampant, tyrannous and corrupt; a self-willed soldier in the

White House; a Blaine, a Butler and a Garfield leading the

Representatives, a Cameron and a Conkling leading the Senate;

single-minded disinterestedness, pure unadulterated conviction,

nowhere.

Jobs and jobbing flourished on every side. An impossible scheme of

reconstruction was trailing its slow, putrescent length along. The

revenue service was thick with thieves, the committees of Congress were

packed with mercenaries. Money-making in high places had become the

order of the day. Was it for this that oceans of patriotism, of

treasure and of blood had been poured out? Was it for this that he had

fought with tongue and pen and sword?

There was Sumner—the great Sumner—who had quarreled with Grant and

Fish, to keep him company and urge him on. There was the Tribune, the

puissant Tribune—two of them, one in New York and the other in

Chicago—to give him countenance. There was need of liberalizing and

loosening things in Missouri, for which he sat in the Senate—they could

not go on forever half the best elements in the State disfranchised.

Thus the Liberal Movement of 1872.

Schurz went to Cincinnati elate with hope. He was an idealist—not quite

yet a philosopher. He had his friends about him. Sam Bowles—the first

newspaper politician of his day, with none of the handicaps carried by

Raymond and Forney—a man keen of insight and foresight, fertile of

resources, and not afraid—stood foremost among them. Next came Horace

White. Doric in his simplicity like a marble shaft, and to the outer

eye as cold as marble, but below a man of feeling, conviction and

tenacity, a working journalist and a doughty doctrinaire. A little

group of such men formed itself about Schurz—then only forty-three

years old—to what end? Why, Greeley, Horace Greeley, the bellwether of

abolitionism, the king bee of protectionism, the man of fads and isms

and the famous “old white hat.”

To some of us it was laughable. To Schurz it was tragical. A bridge had

to be constructed for him to pass—for retrace his steps he could

not—and, as it were, blindfolded, he had to be backed upon this like a

mule aboard a train of cars. I sometimes wonder what might have

happened if Schurz had then and there resigned his seat in the Senate,

got his brood together and returned to Germany. I dare say he would

have been welcomed by Bismarck.

Certainly there was no lodgment for him thenceforward in American

politics. The exigencies of 1876-77 made him a provisional place in the

Hayes Administration; but, precisely as the Democrats of Missouri could

put such a man to no use, the Republicans at large could find no use

for him. He seemed a bull in a china shop to the political organization

he honored with a preference wholly intellectual, and having no stomach

for either extreme, he became a Mugwump.

Marse Henry: An Autobiography, Complete · 第 150 / 184 题