I said in answer:

Louisville, July 22, 1892.—My Dear Sir: I do not see how you could

misunderstand the spirit in which I wrote, or be offended by my plain

words. They were addressed as from one friend to another, as from one

Democrat to another. If you entertain the idea that this is a false

view of our relative positions, and that your eminence lifts you above

both comradeship and counsels, I have nothing to say except to regret

that, in underestimating your breadth of character I exposed myself too

contumely.

You do, indeed, ride a wave of fortune and favor. You are quite beyond

the reach of insult, real or fancied. You could well afford to be more

tolerant.

In answer to the ignorance of my service to the Democratic party, which

you are at such pains to indicate—and, particularly, with reference to

the sectional issue and the issue of tariff reform—I might, if I wanted

to be unamiable, suggest to you a more attentive perusal of the

proceedings of the three national conventions which nominated you for

President.

But I purpose nothing of the sort. In the last five national

conventions my efforts were decisive in framing the platform of the

party. In each of them I closed the debate, moved the previous question

and was sustained by the convention. In all of them, except the last, I

was a maker, not a smasher. Touching what happened at Chicago, the

present year, I had a right, in common with good Democrats, to be

anxious; and out of that sense of anxiety alone I wrote you. I am sorry

that my temerity was deemed by you intrusive and, entering a respectful

protest against a ban which I cannot believe to be deserved by me, and

assuring you that I shall not again trouble you in that way, I am, your

obedient servant,

Marse Henry: An Autobiography, Complete · 第 139 / 184 题