CHAPTER XII

THE FALL OF THE GIRONDE

The disappearance of Louis XVI from the scene left the Mountain and the

Gironde face to face, to wage their faction fight, a fight to the

knife; while France in her armies more nobly maintained her greater

struggle on the frontier. There for a while after Valmy all had

prospered. Brunswick had fallen back to Coblenz. A French army under

the Marquis de Custine had overrun all the Rhineland as far as Mainz.

Dumouriez, transferred from the Ardennes to the Belgian frontier, had

invaded the Austrian Netherlands. On the 6th of November he won a

considerable victory at Jemmappes, and towards the end of December, he

controlled most of the province.

The Convention, elated at these successes, issued decrees proclaiming a

crusade against the European tyrannies, and announcing the propaganda

of the principles of liberty. But in practice the French invasion did

not {171} generally produce very edifying results. Generals and troops

plundered unmercifully, to make up for the disorganization of their own

service and lack of pay, and even the French Government imposed the

expenses of the war on the countries that had to support its horrors.

The close of the year 1792 marked a period of success. The opening of

1793, however, saw the pendulum swing back. New enemies gathered about

France. Sardinia, whose province of Savoy had been invaded, now had a

considerable army in the field. At short intervals after the execution

of Louis, England, Holland, Spain, joined the coalition. And the

Convention light-heartedly accepted this accumulation of war. To face

the storm it appointed in January a committee of general defence of

twenty-five members; but Danton alone would have done better than the

twenty-five. While the trial of the King proceeded he was casting

about for support in the assembly for a constructive policy. He

stretched a hand to the Girondins; they refused it; and Danton turned

back to the Mountain once more, compelled to choose between two

factions the one that was for the moment willing to act with him.

{172} Through February and into March the military situation kept

getting worse, and the Mountain made repeated attacks on the Gironde.

On the 5th of March news reached Paris that the Austrians had captured

Aix-la-Chapelle, and that the French general Miranda had been compelled

to abandon his guns and to retire from before Maestricht, which he was

besieging. Danton, who was in the north, arranging the annexation of

the Netherlands to France, started for Paris at once. On the 14th the

capital heard, with amazement and alarm, that the Vendée had risen in

arms for God and King Louis XVII.

The Vendée was a large district of France, a great part of the ancient

province of Poitou, lying just to the south of the Loire and near the

Atlantic Ocean. A great part of the country was cut up by tracts of

forest and thick and numerous hedges. The peasants were fairly

prosperous, and well-affected to the priests and seigneurs. The latter

were mostly resident landlords, holders of small estates, living near

and on kindly terms with their peasantry. The priests and nobles had

long viewed the Revolution with aversion, an aversion intensified by

the proclamation of the Republic and the execution of the King. And

{173} when, on the 26th of February, the Convention passed an army

ballot law and sent agents to press recruits among the villages of the

Vendée, the peasants joined their natural leaders and rose in arms

against the Government. The Vendéens were, in their own country,

formidable opponents. They had born leaders, men who showed wonderful

courage, dash, and loyalty. They prayed before charging an enemy, and

on the march or in battle sang hymns, always the most irresistible of

battle songs. Their badges were the white flag, the Bourbon lilies,

and the cross. For awhile they swept everything before them.

Danton arrived in Paris on the 8th of March. He immediately attempted

to reconcile the factions of the assembly, and to persuade its members

to turn their wasted vigour into war measures. From neither side did

he receive much encouragement. To his demands for new levies and

volunteer regiments, Robespierre replied that the most urgent step was

to purify the army of its anti-revolutionary elements. To his proposal

that the executive should be strengthened by composing the ministry of

members of the Convention, the Girondins opposed their implacable

suspicion and hatred. But Paris had long been working up {174} its

hostility to the Gironde; an insurrectional committee had just come

into existence that aimed at dealing with them after the fashion in

which it had dealt with Louis on the 10th of August; and the Girondins'

stand against Danton precipitated the outbreak.

On the 9th of March a premature and imperfectly organized insurrection

occurred, directed against the Gironde. The demonstrators marched

against the Convention, but were held in check by a few hundred

well-affected provincial national guards. On the 10th it became known

that Dumouriez was severely pressed by the Austrians and in danger of

being cut off. Under the influence of this news, and with the

Girondins showing little fight because of the event of the day before,

the Convention passed a measure of terrorism; it voted the

establishment of a Revolutionary Tribunal to judge "traitors,

conspirators, and anti-revolutionists." In vain Buzot and other

Girondins pointed out that this meant establishing "a despotism worse

than the old." Danton, unquenchably opportunist, supported the

measure, and it was carried. Immediately after this he left Paris for

the frontier once more. On the 18th of March Dumouriez was severely

defeated at Neerwinden. And now not {175} only was the Vendée in arms,

but Lyons, Marseilles, Normandy, appeared on the point of throwing off

the yoke of Paris and of the Jacobins; the situation looked well-nigh

desperate. A week later the papers published letters of Dumouriez

which showed that ever since the trial of the King the Girondin general

had been factious, that is, had been as much inclined to turn his arms

against Paris as against the Austrians. Danton was now back from the

frontier; he and Robespierre were at once elected to the committee of

general defence; and that committee declared itself in continuous

session.

Extraordinary measures were now passed in quick succession which, added

to the creation of the Revolutionary Tribunal, made up a formidable

machinery of terrorism. Deputies of the Convention were sent out on

mission to superintend the working of the armies and of the internal

police. They were given the widest powers,--were virtually made

pro-dictators. On the 1st of April was passed a new law of suspects to

reinforce the action of the representatives on mission and of the

Revolutionary Tribunal. On the 6th of April was created the executive

power that Danton urged the need of so pertinaciously; this was the

Committee of {176} Public Safety, a body of nine members of the

Convention, acting secretly, directing the ministers, and having

general control of the executive functions. The Girondins had to

submit to the measure, and their opponents secured control of the

Committee. Among its first members were Danton, Cambon, and Barère.

Just as the Committee of Public Safety came into existence the

situation on the frontier was getting even worse. On the 4th of April

Dumouriez, fearing that the Convention would send him to the

Revolutionary Tribunal, made an attempt to turn his army against the

Government, and failing, rode over into the Austrian lines. At the

same time, Custine was being driven out of Alsace by the Prussians,

who, on the 14th of April, laid siege to Mainz.

With the Mountain immensely strengthened by the formation of the

Committee of Public Safety, the attack on the Girondins increased in

vigour. Robespierre accused them of complicity with Dumouriez in

treasonable intentions against the Republic. The Gironde retaliated,

and, on the 13th of April, succeeded in rallying a majority of the

Convention in a second onslaught against Marat for his incendiary

articles. It was decreed that the _Ami du peuple_ should be sent to

the Revolutionary {177} Tribunal. It was the last success of the

Girondins, and it did not carry them far. The Jacobins closed their

ranks against this assault. They had the Commune and the Revolutionary

Tribunal under their control. The former body sent a petition to the

Convention demanding the exclusion of twenty-two prominent Girondins as

enemies of the Revolution; and a few days later the Tribunal absolved

Marat of all his sins.

Incidentally to the bitter struggle between the two factions, great

questions, social, political, economic, were being debated, though not

with great results. They could really all be brought back to the one

fundamental question which the course of the Revolution had brought to

the surface. What was to be the position of the poor man, and

especially of the poor man in the modern city and under industrial

surroundings,--what was to be his position in the new form of social

adjustment which the Revolution was bringing about? What about the

price of food? the monopoly of capital? the private ownership of

property? Such were some of the questions that underlay the debates of

the Convention in the spring of 1793.

The food question was dealt with in various {178} ways. The famous law

of the Maximum, passed on the 3rd of May, attempted to regulate the

prices of food by a sliding scale tariff. The measure was economically

unsound, and in many ways worked injustice; it alarmed property holders

and alienated them from the Government. On its own initiative the

Commune made great efforts, and with some success, to maintain the food

supply of the city, and to keep down the price of bread. Spending

about 12,000 francs a day, less than half a sou per head, it succeeded

for the most part in keeping bread down to about 3 sous per pound.

But by virtue of what theory of government were the poor entitled to

this special protection? Was the Jacobin party prepared to advance

towards a socialist or collectivist form of government? Of that there

was no sign; and several years were yet to pass before Babeuf was to

give weight to a collectivist theory of the State. There were special

reasons of some force to explain why the Convention, however much it

might be addicted to humanitarian theories, however anxious it might be

to curry favour with the lowest class, should keep a stiff attitude on

the question of collectivism and property. The whole financial system

of the Revolution, endorsed by the {179} Convention as by its

predecessors, was based on the private proprietorship of land and on

increasing the number of small proprietors. Not only was the

Convention bound to maintain the effect of the large sales of national

lands that had already taken place, but the prejudices and temper of

its members made in the same direction. Robespierre, trying to

reconcile the narrow logic of a lawyer with the need of pleasing his

ardent supporters, based his position on a charitable and not on a

political motive: "Public assistance is a sacred debt of Society.

Society is under the obligation of securing a living for all its

members, either by procuring work for them, or by securing the

necessaries of existence to those who are past work."

Although the Convention maintained a conservative attitude in regard to

the question of real property, it was decidedly inclined towards a

confiscatory policy in all that related to personal wealth. This did

not, however, become well marked until after the conclusion of the

great struggle between the Mountain and the Gironde, which entered its

last phase in May.

On the 12th of that month the Convention voted the formation of an army

of _sans-culottes_ for the defence of Paris, a measure of more {180}

significance for the internal than for the external affairs of France.

On the 14th the Gironde made their reply by reading an address of the

city of Bordeaux offering to march to Paris to help the Convention. On

the 15th the Commune proceeded to appoint one of its nominees as

provisional general of the national guard of Paris. And on the

following day the Girondins, alarmed into an attempt at action,

proposed to the assembly that the municipal authorities of Paris should

be removed from office and that the substitutes for the deputies to the

Convention should be assembled at Bourges in case the Convention itself

should be attacked and destroyed. This last proposal was highly

characteristic of the Girondins, heroic as orators, but as members of a

political party always timid of action.

The Committee of Public Safety, already tuned to its higher duties and

viewing the faction fight of the assembly with some slight degree of

detachment, steered a middle and politic course. Barère proposed a

compromise, which the Girondins weakly accepted. But its enemies

continued strenuous action, formed a new insurrectional committee, and

set Hébert's infamous sheet, the _Père Duchesne_, {181} howling for

their blood. This newspaper deserves a few lines.

Hébert, a man of the middle class, after a stormy youth drifted into

revolutionary journalism. With much verve, and a true Voltairian

spirit, he at first took up a moderate attitude, but being a time

server soon discovered that his interest lay in another direction.

From the middle of 1792 he rose rapidly to great popularity by his loud

defence of extreme courses. The _Père Duchesne_, copies of which are

at this day among the greatest of bibliographical curiosities, was

written for the people and in a jargon out-Heroding their own, a

compound of oaths and obscenities. The _Père Duchesne_ was nearly

always in a state of _grande joie_ or of _grande colère_, and at the

epoch we have reached his anger is being continuously poured out, the

filthiest stream of invective conceivable, against the Girondins.

With Marat and Hébert fanning the flames, the insurrectional committee

drew up a new list of 32 suspect deputies. The Committee of Public

Safety, appealed to by the Girondins, ordered the arrest of Hébert. On

the following day, the 25th of May, the Commune demanded his release.

Isnard, one of the {182} Gironde, that day acting as president of the

Convention, answered the deputation of the Commune with unbridled

anger, and concluded by declaring that if Paris dared to lay one finger

on a member of the Convention, the city would be destroyed. There was

in this an unfortunate echo of the Duke of Brunswick's manifesto.

On the 26th Robespierre, at the Jacobin Club, gave his formal assent to

the proposal that an insurrection should be organized against the

Gironde. Two days later Hébert was released, and the Commune and the

committees of the sections began organizing the movement. As a first

step Hanriot, a sottish but very determined battalion leader, was

placed in supreme command of the national guard.

The movement took place on the 31st of May. On that day the Convention

was subjected to the organized pressure of a mob of about 30,000 men,

the greater part national guards. The Convention was not invaded,

however, nor was there any attempt, any desire, to suppress it as an

institution. For the leaders fully realized that it was by maintaining

the Convention as a figurehead that they could continue the fiction

that the Government {183} of France was not local, or Parisian, but

national, or French. But while refraining from a direct attack on the

Convention they subjected it to a pressure so strong and so long

continued that they converted it, as they intended, into an organ of

their will.

For three days Hanriot and his men remained at the doors of the

Convention, and for three days, with growing agitation, the members

within wrestled with the problem thus insistently presented at the

point of bayonets and at the mouth of cannon. Motions of all sorts,

some logical, some contradictory, were presented. Robespierre moved

the arrest of twenty of his colleagues. The Committee of Public

Safety, anxious to retain supreme power, tried for some middle course

that might satisfy the mob. Barère proposed that, to relieve the

Convention from its difficulty, the Girondins should pronounce their

own exclusion from the assembly. The impetuous Isnard, one of the few

attacked members present, accepted. This was on the 2d of June.

On the basis of the self-exclusion of the Girondin deputies the

Committee of Public Safety now believed it could regain control of the

situation, thereby demonstrating that it {184} had formed an inadequate

estimate of Hanriot. It decided to proclaim the suppression of the

insurrectional committee, and it announced this to Hanriot at the same

time as the self-exclusion of the Girondins. But Hanriot, sitting his

horse at the doors of the Convention, was resolute and tipsy, a man of

the sword not to be moved by parliamentary eloquence. He declined to

accept any compromise, and ordered his guns to be brought up and

unlimbered. The Convention was immediately stampeded by this act of

drunken courage. The members attempted to escape. But every avenue,

every street was closed by Hanriot's national guard, and Marat, blandly

triumphant, led the members back to the hall sacred to their

deliberations. There, ashamed and exhausted, at eleven o'clock that

night, the Convention mutilated itself, suspended twenty-two of its

members, and ordered the arrest of twenty-nine others.

{185}

The French Revolution: A Short History · 第 12 / 17 章