SIR EGERTON BRYDGES.--THE LATE DUKE OF NORFOLK.

(_From Clavering’s Autobiography._)

I saw Sir Egerton Brydges in the streets, was introduced to him, and

recalled to his mind our rencontre at Mr. Carter’s at Deal, thirty years

ago. He walked feebly, was lame, and had been confined to his bed for

many months the preceding winter. He was pale, apparently grief-worn,

and had a most grave and melancholy countenance, and languid look; but

now and then flashed, both with eyes and words. He amused himself with

printing privately, and distributing among his friends a variety of

fragments. He complained bitterly of some London agents, who had cheated

him most enormously, and whom he was bringing before the Court of

Chancery. His common acquaintance complained that he was too grave for

them, and that he was deficient in wit and point. They said he was “all

sober sadness,” and that he had romantic views of life, and did not know

the human character. I had not sufficient conversation with him to judge

of this. He was intimate with d’Invernois, who spoke highly of him. He

had certainly none of our Irish vivacity, and fulness of imagery. He was

rather querulous and prolix, than piquant, and declaimed rather than

said sharp things. I said to him, “Why do you not endeavour, in your

writings, to accommodate yourself more to the public taste?” He

answered, in despair, “I cannot--I have no turn that way. I know the

value of the bon-mot, the sarcasm, and the epigram; but I have no

ability that way.” And it seemed true; he _had_ no ability that way.

When the old lineal Duke of Norfolk died--I think it was in 1778--the

pomp of that mighty house was much abased. His collateral successor, Mr.

Howard, of Graystock, was a man of mean and intemperate habits, which

were inherited by his son, the late duke, then known by the name of Lord

Surry, and who made himself conspicuous as a Whig, and by electioneering

contests and intrigues. With this last I was familiar, but soon saw that

I could put no trust in him. I wrote many political squibs at his

desire--not worth preserving; he was a man of a good deal of spleen,

personal as well as political. Charles Fox flattered him, that he might

have his aid to the party; but he did not love or respect him. He

married an Irishwoman for his first wife. I think his mother’s name was

Brockholes. It was amusing to see him in contest with the late Lord

Abingdon, whose power of speaking in the House (whatever mental

eccentricities he might have) was so great, that many preferred his

eloquence even to Lord Chatham’s. The duke was never at rest: he always

had some jobs in hand: by which he often put himself into pecuniary

embarrassment. His face was very much like that of Cardinal Howard,

Temp. Car. II., of whom there are so many engraved portraits. He prided

himself upon a common dress, very much like that of a yeoman, or rather

country schoolmaster. It was generally a grey coat, with black buttons,

and black waistcoat. I once asked him to use his interest for a relation

of mine; he readily promised--but never attempted to perform. He had a

personal antipathy to Pitt and Lord Grenville; and one of the constant

subjects of his jokes and raillery was the Grenville pedigree. A Mr.

Dallaway, a clergyman, was his private secretary, as earl-marshal; with

whom I once dined at the duke’s table; a large, heavy-looking man, who,

I was told, had written several books; but I presume he is deceased, as

I have not seen his name announced for a long while.

* * * * *

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 20, No. 561, August 11, 1832 · 第 11 / 31 题