COSMETIC VALUE OF ODOURS

We come now to the fourth important function of the nose—the sense of

smell. What has this to do with Personal Beauty? A great deal. In the

first place, is not the flower-like fragrance of a lovely maiden a

personal charm that has been sung of by a thousand poets, of all times?

“The fragrant bosom of Andromache and of Aphrodite finds a place in

Homer’s poetry,” as Professor Bain remarks; and an eccentric German

professor, Dr. Jäger of Stuttgart, even wrote a book a few years ago on

the _Discovery of the Soul_, in which he endeavoured to prove that the

whole mystery of Love lies in the intoxicating personal perfumes.

It is not with such fancies, however, that we are concerned here. It can

be shown on purely scientific grounds that the cause of Personal Beauty

would gain an immense advantage if people would train and refine their

olfactory nerves systematically, as they do their eyes and ears.

Unfortunately, Kant’s absurd notion, expressed a century ago, that it is

not worth while to cultivate the sense of smell, has been countenanced

to the present day by the erroneous views held by the leading men of

science, including Darwin, who wrote that “the sense of smell is of

extremely slight service” to man.

In an article on the “Gastronomic Value of Odours,” which appeared in

the _Contemporary Review_ for November 1886, I pointed out that this

under-valuation of the sense of smell is explained by the fact that the

sense of taste has hitherto been credited with all the countless

flavours inherent in food, whereas, in fact, taste includes only four

sensations of gastronomic value—sweet, sour, bitter, and saline, all

other “flavours” being in reality odours; as is proved by the fact that

by clasping the nose we cannot distinguish between a lime and a lemon,

different kinds of confectionery, of cheese, of nuts, of meat, etc.

Now it is well known that most people show a most amazing tolerance to

insipid, badly-cooked food, gulping it down as rapidly as possible; and

why? Simply because they do not know that in order to enjoy our meals we

must eat slowly, and, while masticating, _continually exhale the

aroma-laden air through the nose_ (mind, not inhale but _exhale_). This

is what epicures do unconsciously; and look at the results! No

dyspepsia, no anæmia and sickly pallor, no walking skeletons;—and surely

a slight _embonpoint_ is preferable to leanness from the point of view

of Personal Beauty.

If this gastronomic secret were generally known, people would insist on

having better cooked food; dyspepsia, and leanness, and a thousand

infirmities hostile to Beauty would disappear, and in course of time

everybody would be as sleek and handsome and rosy-cheeked as a

professional epicure.

Nor is this the only way in which refinement of the sense of smell would

benefit Personal Beauty. In consequence of the criminally superstitious

dread of night air, the atmosphere in most bedrooms is as foul, compared

to fresh air, as a street puddle after a shower compared to a mountain

brook. I have seen well-dressed persons in America and Italy take into

their mouths the shamefully filthy and disease-soaked banknotes current

in those countries; and I have seen others shudder at this sight who, if

their smell were as refined as their sight, would have shuddered equally

at the foul air in their bedrooms, which diminishes their vital energy

and working power by one-half. Architects, of course, will make no

provision for proper ventilation as long as they are not compelled to do

so. Why should they? They don’t even care, in building a theatre, how

many hundreds of people will some day be burnt in it, in consequence of

their neglect of the simplest precautions for exit.

One more important consideration. When you leave the city for a few

weeks everybody will exclaim on your return, “Why, how well you look!

where have you been?” But wherein lies this cosmetic magic of country

air? Not in its oxygen, for it has been proved, by accurate chemical

tests, that in regard to the quantity of oxygen there is not the

slightest difference between city and country air. What, then, is the

secret?

I am convinced, from numerous experiments, that the value of country air

lies partly in its tonic fragrance, partly in the _absence of

depressing, foul odours_. The great cosmetic and hygienic value of

deep-breathing has been proved in the chapter on the Chest. Now the

tonic value of fragrant meadow or forest air lies in this—that it causes

us involuntarily to breathe deeply, in order to drink in as many

mouthfuls of this luscious aerial Tokay as possible: whereas in the city

the air is—well, say unfragrant and uninviting; and the constant fear of

gulping down a pint of deadly sewer gas discourages deep breathing. The

general pallor and nervousness of New York people have often been noted.

The cause is obvious. New York has the dirtiest streets of any city in

the world, except Constantinople and Canton; and, moreover, it is

surrounded by oil-refineries, which sometimes for days poison the whole

city with the stifling fumes of petroleum, so that one hardly dares to

breathe at all. No wonder that, by universal consent, there is more

Fashion than Beauty in New York. And no wonder that it is becoming more

and more customary, for all who can afford it, to spend six to eight

months of the year in the country.

Romantic Love and Personal Beauty Their development, causal relations, historic and national peculiarities · 第 262 / 296 题