GRAND CHORUS.

(_By a Grateful Crowd._)

"This 'ere's the larkiest of lays!

Things _do_ begin to move!

'ERBERT and GEORGY let us praise,

And all the powers above.

We've spent a reglar pleasant 'our

Music like this the Mob devour.

Yah! Anerchy is all my heye.

That cornet tootles scrumptiously.

Go it, young GLADSTING! Don't say die

Dear Dook, but 'ave another try.

'Armony makes disorder fly

And Music tunes hus to the sky!

* * * * *

"THE 'KEY-NOTE'-ORIOUS MRS. EBBSMITH."

[Illustration: The Dowdy Mrs. Ebbsmith makes it hot for her young man.]

MR. PINERO'S new play at the Garrick Theatre is a series of scenes in

dialogue with only one "situation," which comes at the end of the third

act, and was evidently intended to be utterly unconventional, dreadfully

daring, and thrillingly effective. "Unconventional?" Yes. "Daring?"

Certainly; for to burn a bible might have raised a storm of sibilation.

But why dare so much to effect so little? For at the reading, or during

rehearsal, there must have been very considerable hesitation felt by

everybody, author included, as to the fate of this risky situation--this

"_momentum unde pendet_"--and for which nothing, either in the character

or in the previous history of the heroine, has prepared us. Her earliest

years have been passed in squalor; she has made a miserable marriage;

then she has become a Socialist ranter, and hopes to achieve a triumph

as a Socialist demagogue. Like Maypole Hugh in _Barnaby Rudge_ she would

go about the world shrieking "No property! No property!" and when, in a

weak moment, she consents to temporarily drop her "mission," she goes to

another extreme and comes out in an evening dress--I might say almost

comes out _of_ an evening dress, so egregiously _décolleté_ is it--to

please the peculiar and, apparently, low taste of her lover, who is a

married man,--"which well she knows it," as Mrs. GAMP observes,--but

with whom she is living, and with whom, like GRANT ALLEN'S _The Woman

who did_ (a lady whom in many respects Mr. PINERO'S heroine closely

resembles), and who came to grief in doing it, she intends to continue

living. This man, her paramour, she trusts will be her partner in the

socialistic regeneration of the human race. At the close of the third

act _Mrs. Ebbsmith_, being such as the author of her being has made her,

is presented with a bible, and, in a fit of ungovernable fury, she

pitches it into the stove "with all her might and main"; and then it

suddenly occurs to her that she has committed some terrible crime (more

probably it occurred to the author that _he_ had committed the

unpardonable sin of offending his audience)--and so she shoots out her

arm into a nice, cool-looking stove (suggestive of no sort of danger to

her or the book), and drags out the pocket volume apparently quite as

uninjured as is her own hand at the moment, though this is subsequently

carefully bound up with a white handkerchief in the last act.

Well--that's all. There is _the_ situation. The Key-note-orious _Mrs.

Ebbsmith_ is supposed to repent of her sins against society; and off she

goes to become the companion of the unmarried parson and of the lively

widow his sister. What the result of this arrangement will be is pretty

clear. The Key-note-orious One will soon be the parson's bride; but

"that is another story."

To carry out this drama of inaction, as it is schemed, should occupy

eight persons something under two hours; but it takes thirteen persons

three hours to carry it along. Five of these _dramatis personæ_ are

superfluous; and much time is wasted on dialogues in Italian and French

that could be "faked up" from any conversation-book in several

languages, and evidently only lugged in under the mistaken impression

that thereby a touch of "local colour" is obtained.

As it is the audience wearies of the long speeches, and there is nothing

in the action that can rouse them as there was in _The Second Mrs.

Tanqueray_, a play that Mr. PINERO has not yet equalled, much less

surpassed.

But what is a real pleasure, and what will attract all lovers of good

acting, is, first of all, Mr. FORBES ROBERTSON'S admirable impersonation

of the difficult, unsympathetic _rôle_ of a despicably selfish,

self-conceited, cowardly prig; and, secondly, to a certain extent, the

rendering of the heroine by Mrs. PATRICK CAMPBELL, who, however, does

not come within measurable distance of her former self as _Mrs.

Tanqueray_--her "great stove scene" being about the weakest point in her

performance. But there cannot be a divided opinion as to the perfect

part given to Mr. JOHN HARE, and as to the absolutely perfect manner in

which it is played by this consummate artist in character. All the

scenes in which he appears are admirably conceived by the author, and as

admirably interpreted by the actor.

Mr. HARE'S performance of the _Duke of St. Olpherts_ is a real gem,

ranking among the very best things he has ever done, and I may even add

"going one better." It is on his acting, and on the acting of the scenes

in which he appears, that the ultimate popularity of the piece must

depend. The theatrical stove-cum-book situation may tell with some

audiences better than with others, but it is not an absolute certainty;

while every scene in which the _Duke of St. Olpherts_ takes part, as

long as this character is played by Mr. HARE, is in itself an absolute

isolated triumph. Mr. AUBREY SMITH, as the modern young English

moustached parson, _en voyage_, with his pipe, and bible in his pocket

(is he a _colporteur_ of some Biblical Society, with a percentage on the

sale? otherwise the book is an awkward size to carry about, especially

if he has also a _Murray_ with him), is very true to life, at all events

in manner and appearance; and Miss JEFFREYS, as his sister, who looks

just as if she had walked out of a fashion-plate in _The Gentlewoman_,

or some lady's journal, plays discreetly and with considerable

self-repression. Of course it will remain one of the notable pieces of

the year; but what will keep it green in the memory of playgoers is not

the story, nor its heroine, nor its hero, but the captivating

impersonation of the _Duke of St. Olpherts_ by Mr. JOHN HARE.

[Illustration: Transformation Scene. The Rowdy-Dowdy Mrs. Ebbsmith

fascinates the Dook.]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 108, March 30th 1895 · 第 10 / 23 题