“On this day (the 14th), about noon, the _Britannia_, which had left

port in a favourable condition, was attacked suddenly, and in twenty

hours upwards of fifty of her crew had expired. We knew nothing of the

calamity that had overwhelmed our leader until the following morning,

when ‘reports of the sick’ were sent from each ship to the admiral. By

this time (the evening of the 16th), eighty had died, and more than two

hundred remained in greater or less danger.

“The night of the 16th must have been one of great consternation on

board her. The epidemic went on with unchecked violence; the officers

were voluntarily attending on the sick; and the very few of the crew who

had not been attacked, or who were not assisting their unfortunate

messmates, were found quite insufficient to perform the duties of a ship

when under sail; and the admiral, therefore, determined to return to

Baljik, taking with him the _Trafalgar_ and _Albion_, also badly

affected.

“The crew of the _Britannia_ were at once sent away from the ship, in

small parties, into the numerous transports that remained idle; and it

appears that, by this procedure, the epidemic influences operating among

them have been greatly moderated, if not extirpated.”

[Sidenote: THE CHOLERA NEAR GOLDEN SQUARE.]

The most terrible outbreak of cholera which ever occurred in this

kingdom, is probably that which took place in Broad Street, Golden

Square, and the adjoining streets, a few weeks ago. Within two hundred

and fifty yards of the spot where Cambridge Street joins Broad Street,

there were upwards of five hundred fatal attacks of cholera in ten days.

The mortality in this limited area probably equals any that was ever

caused in this country, even by the plague; and it was much more sudden,

as the greater number of cases terminated in a few hours. The mortality

would undoubtedly have been much greater had it not been for the flight

of the population. Persons in furnished lodgings left first, then other

lodgers went away, leaving their furniture to be sent for when they

could meet with a place to put it in. Many houses were closed

altogether, owing to the death of the proprietors; and, in a great

number of instances, the tradesmen who remained had sent away their

families: so that in less than six days from the commencement of the

outbreak, the most afflicted streets were deserted by more than

three-quarters of their inhabitants.

There were a few cases of cholera in the neighbourhood of Broad Street,

Golden Square, in the latter part of August; and the so-called outbreak,

which commenced in the night between the 31st August and the 1st

September, was, as in all similar instances, only a violent increase of

the malady. As soon as I became acquainted with the situation and extent

of this irruption of cholera, I suspected some contamination of the

water of the much-frequented street pump in Broad Street, near the end

of Cambridge Street; but on examining the water, on the evening of the

3rd September, I found so little impurity in it of an organic nature,

that I hesitated to come to a conclusion. Further inquiry, however,

showed me that there was no other circumstance or agent common to the

circumscribed locality in which this sudden increase of cholera

occurred, and not extending beyond it, except the water of the above

mentioned pump. I found, moreover, that the water varied, during the

next two days, in the amount of organic impurity, visible to the naked

eye, on close inspection, in the form of small white, flocculent

particles; and I concluded that, at the commencement of the outbreak, it

might possibly have been still more impure. I requested permission,

therefore, to take a list, at the General Register Office, of the deaths

from cholera, registered during the week ending 2nd September, in the

sub-districts of Golden Square, Berwick Street, and St. Ann’s, Soho,

which was kindly granted. Eighty-nine deaths from cholera were

registered, during the week, in the three sub-districts. Of these, only

six occurred in the four first days of the week; four occurred on

Thursday, the 31st August; and the remaining seventy-nine on Friday and

Saturday. I considered, therefore, that the outbreak commenced on the

Thursday; and I made inquiry, in detail, respecting the eighty-three

deaths registered as having taken place during the last three days of

the week.

On proceeding to the spot, I found that nearly all the deaths had taken

place within a short distance of the pump. There were only ten deaths in

houses situated decidedly nearer to another street pump. In five of

these cases the families of the deceased persons informed me that they

always sent to the pump in Broad Street, as they preferred the water to

that of the pump which was nearer. In three other cases, the deceased

were children who went to school near the pump in Broad Street. Two of

them were known to drink the water; and the parents of the third think

it probable that it did so. The other two deaths, beyond the district

which this pump supplies, represent only the amount of mortality from

cholera that was occurring before the irruption took place.

With regard to the deaths occurring in the locality belonging to the

pump, there were sixty-one instances in which I was informed that the

deceased persons used to drink the pump-water from Broad Street, either

constantly or occasionally. In six instances I could get no information,

owing to the death or departure of every one connected with the deceased

individuals; and in six cases I was informed that the deceased persons

did not drink the pump-water before their illness.

The result of the inquiry then was, that there had been no particular

outbreak or increase of cholera, in this part of London, except among

the persons who were in the habit of drinking the water of the

above-mentioned pump-well.

I had an interview with the Board of Guardians of St. James’s parish, on

the evening of Thursday, 7th September, and represented the above

circumstances to them. In consequence of what I said, the handle of the

pump was removed on the following day.

Besides the eighty-three deaths mentioned above as occurring on the

three last days of the week ending September 2nd, and being registered

during that week in the sub-districts in which the attacks occurred, a

number of persons died in Middlesex and other hospitals, and a great

number of deaths which took place in the locality during the last two

days of the week, were not registered till the week following. The

deaths altogether, on the 1st and 2nd of September, which have been

ascertained to belong to this outbreak of cholera, were one hundred and

ninety-seven; and many persons who were attacked about the same time as

these, died afterwards. I should have been glad to inquire respecting

the use of the water from Broad Street pump in all these instances, but

was engaged at the time in an inquiry in the south districts of London,

which will be alluded to afterwards; and when I began to make fresh

inquiries in the neighbourhood of Golden Square, after two or three

weeks had elapsed, I found that there had been such a distribution of

the remaining population that it would be impossible to arrive at a

complete account of the circumstances. There is no reason to suppose,

however, that a more extended inquiry would have yielded a different

result from that which was obtained respecting the eighty-three deaths

which happened to be registered within the district of the outbreak

before the end of the week in which it occurred.

The additional facts that I have been able to ascertain are in

accordance with those above related; and as regards the small number of

those attacked, who were believed not to have drank the water from Broad

Street pump, it must be obvious that there are various ways in which the

deceased persons may have taken it without the knowledge of their

friends. The water was used for mixing with spirits in all the public

houses around. It was used likewise at dining-rooms and coffee-shops.

The keeper of a coffee-shop in the neighbourhood, which was frequented

by mechanics, and where the pump-water was supplied at dinner time,

informed me (on 6th September) that she was already aware of nine of her

customers who were dead. The pump-water was also sold in various little

shops, with a teaspoonful of effervescing powder in it, under the name

of sherbet; and it may have been distributed in various other ways with

which I am unacquainted. The pump was frequented much more than is

usual, even for a London pump in a populous neighbourhood.

There are certain circumstances bearing on the subject of this outbreak

of cholera which require to be mentioned. The Workhouse in Poland Street

is more than three-fourths surrounded by houses in which deaths from

cholera occurred, yet out of five hundred and thirty-five inmates only

five died of cholera, the other deaths which took place being those of

persons admitted after they were attacked. The workhouse has a pump-well

on the premises, in addition to the supply from the Grand Junction Water

Works, and the inmates never sent to Broad Street for water. If the

mortality in the workhouse had been equal to that in the streets

immediately surrounding it on three sides, upwards of one hundred

persons would have died.

There is a Brewery in Broad Street, near to the pump, and on perceiving

that no brewer’s men were registered as having died of cholera, I called

on Mr. Huggins, the proprietor. He informed me that there were above

seventy workmen employed in the brewery, and that none of them had

suffered from cholera,—at least in a severe form,—only two having been

indisposed, and that not seriously, at the time the disease prevailed.

The men are allowed a certain quantity of malt liquor, and Mr. Huggins

believes they do not drink water at all; and he is quite certain that

the workmen never obtained water from the pump in the street. There is a

deep well in the brewery, in addition to the New River water.

At the percussion-cap manufactory, 37 Broad Street, where, I understand,

about two hundred workpeople were employed, two tubs were kept on the

premises always supplied with water from the pump in the street, for

those to drink who wished; and eighteen of these workpeople died of

cholera at their own homes, sixteen men and two women.

Mr. Marshall, surgeon, of Greek Street, was kind enough to inquire

respecting seven workmen who had been employed in the manufactory of

dentists’ materials, at Nos. 8 and 9 Broad Street, and who died at their

own homes. He learned that they were all in the habit of drinking water

from the pump, generally drinking about half-a-pint once or twice a day;

while two persons who reside constantly on the premises, but do not

drink the pump-water, only had diarrhœa. Mr. Marshall also informed me

of the case of an officer in the army, who lived at St. John’s Wood, but

came to dine in Wardour Street, where he drank the water from Broad

Street pump at his dinner. He was attacked with cholera, and died in a

few hours.

I am indebted to Mr. Marshall for the following cases, which are

interesting as showing the period of incubation, which in these three

cases was from thirty-six to forty-eight hours. Mrs. ——, of 13 Bentinck

Street, Berwick Street, aged 28, in the eighth month of pregnancy, went

herself (although they were not usually water drinkers), on Sunday, 3rd

September, to Broad Street pump for water. The family removed to

Gravesend on the following day; and she was attacked with cholera on

Tuesday morning at seven o’clock, and died of consecutive fever on 15th

September, having been delivered. Two of her children drank also of the

water, and were attacked on the same day as the mother, but recovered.

Dr. Fraser, of Oakley Square, kindly informed me of the following

circumstance. A gentleman in delicate health was sent for from Brighton

to see his brother at 6 Poland Street, who was attacked with cholera and

died in twelve hours, on 1st September. The gentleman arrived after his

brother’s death, and did not see the body. He only stayed about twenty

minutes in the house, where he took a hasty and scanty luncheon of

rumpsteak, taking with it a small tumbler of brandy and water, the water

being from Broad Street pump. He went to Pentonville, and was attacked

with cholera on the evening of the following day, 2nd September, and

died the next evening.

Dr. Fraser also first called my attention to the following

circumstances, which are perhaps the most conclusive of all in proving

the connexion between the Broad Street pump and the outbreak of cholera.

In the “Weekly Return of Births and Deaths” of September 9th, the

following death is recorded as occurring in the Hampstead district: “At

West End, on 2nd September, the widow of a percussion-cap maker, aged 59

years, diarrhœa two hours, cholera epidemica sixteen hours.”

I was informed by this lady’s son that she had not been in the

neighbourhood of Broad Street for many months. A cart went from Broad

Street to West End every day, and it was the custom to take out a large

bottle of the water from the pump in Broad Street, as she preferred it.

The water was taken on Thursday, 31st August, and she drank of it in the

evening, and also on Friday. She was seized with cholera on the evening

of the latter day, and died on Saturday, as the above quotation from the

register shows. A niece, who was on a visit to this lady, also drank of

the water; she returned to her residence, in a high and healthy part of

Islington, was attacked with cholera, and died also. There was no

cholera at the time, either at West End or in the neighbourhood where

the niece died. Besides these two persons, only one servant partook of

the water at Hampstead West End, and she did not suffer, or, at least,

not severely. There were many persons who drank the water from Broad

Street pump about the time of the outbreak, without being attacked with

cholera; but this does not diminish the evidence respecting the

influence of the water, for reasons that will be fully stated in another

part of this work.

[Illustration: _MAP 1._]

The deaths which occurred during this fatal outbreak of cholera are

indicated in the accompanying map, as far as I could ascertain them.

There are necessarily some deficiencies, for in a few of the instances

of persons who died in the hospitals after their removal from the

neighbourhood of Broad Street, the number of the house from which they

had been removed was not registered. The address of those who died after

their removal to St. James’s Workhouse was not registered; and I was

only able to obtain it, in a part of the cases, on application at the

Master’s Office, for many of the persons were too ill, when admitted, to

give any account of themselves. In the case also of some of the

workpeople and others who contracted the cholera in this neighbourhood,

and died in different parts of London, the precise house from which they

had removed is not stated in the return of deaths. I have heard of some

persons who died in the country shortly after removing from the

neighbourhood of Broad Street; and there must, no doubt, be several

cases of this kind that I have not heard of. Indeed, the full extent of

the calamity will probably never be known. The deficiencies I have

mentioned, however, probably do not detract from the correctness of the

map as a diagram of the topography of the outbreak; for, if the locality

of the few additional cases could be ascertained, they would probably be

distributed over the district of the outbreak in the same proportion as

the large number which are known.

The dotted line on the map surrounds the sub-districts of Golden Square,

St. James’s, and Berwick Street, St. James’s, together with the

adjoining portion of the sub-district of St. Anne, Soho, extending from

Wardour Street to Dean Street, and a small part of the sub-district of

St. James’s Square enclosed by Marylebone Street, Titchfield Street,

Great Windmill Street, and Brewer Street. All the deaths from cholera

which were registered in the six weeks from 19th August to 30th

September within this locality, as well as those of persons removed into

Middlesex Hospital, are shown in the map[10] by a black line in the

situation of the house in which it occurred, or in which the fatal

attack was contracted.

In addition to these the deaths of persons removed to University College

Hospital, to Charing Cross Hospital, and to various parts of London, are

indicated in the map, where the exact address was given in the “Weekly

Return of Deaths,” or, when I could learn it by private inquiry.

The pump in Broad Street is indicated on the map, as well as all the

surrounding pumps to which the public had access at the time. It

requires to be stated that the water of the pump in Marlborough Street,

at the end of Carnaby Street, was so impure that many people avoided

using it. And I found that the persons who died near this pump in the

beginning of September, had water from the Broad Street pump. With

regard to the pump in Rupert Street, it will be noticed that some

streets which are near to it on the map, are in fact a good way removed,

on account of the circuitous road to it. These circumstances being taken

into account, it will be observed that the deaths either very much

diminished, or ceased altogether, at every point where it becomes

decidedly nearer to send to another pump than to the one in Broad

Street. It may also be noticed that the deaths are most numerous near to

the pump where the water could be more readily obtained. The wide open

street in which the pump is situated suffered most, and next the streets

branching from it, and especially those parts of them which are nearest

to Broad Street. If there have been fewer deaths in the south half of

Poland Street than in some other streets leading from Broad Street, it

is no doubt because this street is less densely inhabited.

In some of the instances, where the deaths are scattered a little

further from the rest on the map, the malady was probably contracted at

a nearer point to the pump. A cabinet-maker, who was removed from

Philip’s Court, Noel Street, to Middlesex Hospital, worked in Broad

Street. A boy also who died in Noel Street, went to the National school

at the end of Broad Street, and having to pass the pump, probably drank

of the water. A tailor, who died at 6, Heddon Court, Regent Street,

spent most of his time in Broad Street. A woman, removed to the hospital

from 10, Heddon Court, had been nursing a person who died of cholera in

Marshall Street. A little girl, who died in Ham Yard, and another who

died in Angel Court, Great Windmill Street, went to the school in

Dufour’s Place, Broad Street, and were in the habit of drinking the

pump-water, as were also a child from Naylor’s Yard, and several others,

who went to this and other schools near the pump in Broad Street. A

woman who died at 2, Great Chapel Street, Oxford Street, had been

occupied for two days preceding her illness at the public washhouses

near the pump, and used to drink a good deal of water whilst at her

work; the water drank there being sometimes from the pump and sometimes

from the cistern.

The limited district in which this outbreak of cholera occurred,

contains a great variety in the quality of the streets and houses;

Poland Street and Great Pulteney Street consisting in a great measure of

private houses occupied by one family, whilst Husband Street and Peter

Street are occupied chiefly by the poor Irish. The remaining streets are

intermediate in point of respectability. The mortality appears to have

fallen pretty equally amongst all classes, in proportion to their

numbers. Masters are not distinguished from journeymen in the

registration returns of this district, but, judging from my own

observation, I consider that out of rather more than six hundred deaths,

there were about one hundred in the families of tradesmen and other

resident householders. One hundred and five persons who had been removed

from this district died in Middlesex, University College, and other

hospitals, and two hundred and six persons were buried at the expense of

St. James’s parish; the latter number includes many of those who died in

the hospitals, and a great number who were far from being paupers, and

would on any other occasion have been buried by their friends, who, at

this time, were either not aware of the calamity or were themselves

overwhelmed by it. The greatest portion of the persons who died were

tailors and other operatives, who worked for the shops about Bond Street

and Regent Street, and the wives and children of these operatives. They

were living chiefly in rooms which they rented by the week.

The following table exhibits the chronological features of this terrible

outbreak of cholera.

=TABLE I.=

Date. No. of Fatal Attacks. Deaths.

August 19 1 1

„ 20 1 0

„ 21 1 2

„ 22 0 0

„ 23 1 0

„ 24 1 2

„ 25 0 0

„ 26 1 0

„ 27 1 1

„ 28 1 0

„ 29 1 1

„ 30 8 2

„ 31 56 3

September 1 143 70

„ 2 116 127

„ 3 54 76

„ 4 46 71

„ 5 36 45

„ 6 20 37

„ 7 28 32

„ 8 12 30

„ 9 11 24

„ 10 5 18

„ 11 5 15

„ 12 1 6

„ 13 3 13

„ 14 0 6

„ 15 1 8

„ 16 4 6

„ 17 2 5

„ 18 3 2

„ 19 0 3

„ 20 0 0

„ 21 2 0

„ 22 1 2

„ 23 1 3

„ 24 1 0

„ 25 1 0

„ 26 1 2

„ 27 1 0

„ 28 0 2

„ 29 0 1

„ 30 0 0

Date unknown 45 0

——— ———

Total 616 616

The deaths in the above table are compiled from the sources mentioned

above in describing the map; but some deaths which were omitted from the

map on account of the number of the house not being known, are included

in the table. As regards the date of attack, I was able to obtain it

with great precision, through the kindness of Mr. Sibley, in upwards of

eighty deaths which occurred in Middlesex Hospital; for the hour of

admission was entered in the hospital books, as well as the previous

duration of the illness. In a few other cases also I had exact

information of the hour of attack, and in the remainder I have

calculated it by subtracting the duration of the illness from the date

of death. Where the illness did not exceed twelve hours, the attack was

considered to have commenced the same day; where the illness exceeded

twelve, and did not exceed thirty-six hours, the attack was put down to

the previous day, and so on. Where the illness exceeded forty-eight

hours, its duration is generally given in days, which were subtracted

from the date of the attack. Although this plan does not always give the

precise date of attack, it reaches within a few hours of it, and is as

valuable perhaps as if the exact day were given, unless the hour as well

as the day could be introduced into the table. Where premonitory

diarrhœa is stated to have existed, the period of its duration is

deducted from the date of death, and, in fact, the time of attack is

fixed at the first commencement of indisposition, except in two or three

instances in which the patient was labouring under another disease, as

phthisis or typhus fever. There are forty-five cases in which the

duration of the illness was not certified, or entered in the books of

the registrars, and the time of attack in these cases is consequently

unknown. These persons nearly all died in the first days of September,

in the height of the calamity, and it is almost certain that they were

cut off very quickly, like the others who died at this time.

It is pretty certain that very few of the fifty-six attacks placed in

the table to the 31st August occurred till late in the evening of that

day. The irruption was extremely sudden, as I learn from the medical men

living in the midst of the district, and commenced in the night between

the 31st August and 1st September. There was hardly any premonitory

diarrhœa in the cases which occurred during the first three days of the

outbreak; and I have been informed by several medical men, that very few

of the cases which they attended on those days ended in recovery.

On the mode of communication of cholera · 第 3 / 15 段