The furnace shown in Figs. 1 and 2 is built of the sandy soil of the

district, moistened and kneaded and generally strengthened by a sort

of skeleton of strips of flexible wood. In form it varies from a

cylinder, more or less circular, diverging into a tolerably acute

cone, the walls being about 3 in. thick. The height is generally

about 3 ft. and the mean internal diameter about 1 ft., but all these

dimensions vary with different workmen and in different localities.

There are two apertures at the base of the furnace; one in front,

about 1 ft. in height, and rather less in width than the internal

diameter of the furnace, through which, when the smelting of one

charge is finished, the resulting mass of spongy iron is extracted,

and which during the smelting is well plastered up, the small conical

tuyere being inserted at the bottom. This tuyere is usually made of

the same material as the furnace--namely, of a sandy soil; worked by

hand into the required form and sun-dried; but sometimes no other

tuyere is employed than a lump of moist clay with a hole in it, into

which the bamboo pipes communicating with the bellows are inserted.

The other aperture is smaller, and placed at one side of the furnace,

and chiefly below the ground, forming a communication between the

bottom of the furnace chamber and a small trench into which the slag

flows and filters out through a small pile of charcoal. It is this

slag being found in places where iron is not now made that shows that

iron smelting was an occupation there, perhaps many centuries before.

The inclined tray shown at the top of the furnace on Fig. 1 is made of

the same material as the furnace itself, and when kneaded into shape

is supported on a wooden framework. On it is piled a supply of

charcoal, which is raked into the furnace when required.

The blowing apparatus is singularly ingenious, and is certainly as

economical of manual labor as a blowing arrangement depending on

manual labor well can be. A section of the bellows forms the portion

to the right of Fig. 1, showing tuyere forming the connection between

bellows and furnace. It consists of a circular segment of hard wood,

rudely hollowed, and having a piece of buffalo hide with a small hole

in its center tied over the top. Into this hole a strong cord is

passed, with a small piece of wood attached to the end to keep it

inside the bellows, while the other end is attached to a bent bamboo

firmly fixed into the ground close by. This bamboo acts as a spring,

drawing up the string, and consequently the leather cover of the

bellows, to its utmost stretch, while air enters through the central

hole. When thus filled, a man places his foot on the hide, closing the

central hole with his heel, and then throwing the whole weight of his

body on to that foot, he depresses the hide, and drives the air out

through a bamboo tube inserted in the side and communicating with the

furnace. At the same time he pulls down the bamboo with the arm of

that side. Two such bellows are placed side by side, a thin bamboo

tube attached to each, and both entering the one tuyere; and so by

jumping on each bellows alternately, the workman keeps up a continuous

blast.

[Illustration: Fig. 2.--PLAN OF INDIAN BLAST FURNACE AND BLOWING

MACHINE.]

The Figs. 1 and 2 are taken from sketches, and the description from

particulars, by Mr. Blandford, who was for some years on the

Geological Survey of India, and had exceptional opportunities in his

journeyings of observing the customs and occupations of the Indian

iron smelters. The blowing machine is an especially wonderful and

effective machine, and was first described and illustrated by Mr.

Robert Rose, in a Calcutta publication, more than half a century ago.

He also had seen it used in iron making in India.--_Colliery

Guardian._

* * * * *

WOOD OIL.

Wood oil is now made on a large scale in Sweden from the refuse of

timber cuttings and forest clearings, and from stumps and roots.

Although it cannot well be burned in common lamps, on account of the

heavy proportion of carbon it contains, it is said to furnish a

satisfactory light in lamps specially made for it; and in its natural

state it is the cheapest illuminating oil. There are some thirty

factories engaged in its production, and they turn out about 40,000

liters of the oil daily. Turpentine, creosote, acetic acid, charcoal,

coal-tar oils, etc., are also obtained from the same materials as the

wood oil.

* * * * *

SOAP.

By HENRY LEFFMANN, M.D.

Although the use of soap dates from a rather remote period, the

chemist is still living, at an advanced age, to whom we are indebted

for a knowledge of its composition and mode of formation. Considerably

more than a generation has elapsed since Chevreul announced these

facts, but a full appreciation of the principles involved is scarcely

realized outside of the circle of professional chemists. Learned

medical and physiological writers often speak of glycerin as the

"sweet principle of fats," or term fats compounds of fatty acids and

glycerin. Indeed, there is little doubt that the great popularity of

glycerin as an emollient arose from the view that it represented the

essential base of the fats. With regard to soap, also, much erroneous

and indistinct impression prevails. Its detergent action is sometimes

supposed to be due to the free alkali, whereas a well-made soap is

practically neutral.

A desire to secure either an increased detergent, cleansing, or other

local effect has led in recent years to the introduction into soaps of

a large number of substances, some of which have been chosen without

much regard to their chemical relations to the soap itself. The result

has been the enrichment of the materia medica with a collection of

articles of which some are useful, and others worse than useless. The

extension of the list of disinfectant and antiseptic agents and the

increased importance of the agents, in surgery, have naturally

suggested the plan of incorporating them with soaps, in which form

they will be most convenient for application. Accordingly, the

circulars of the manufacturing pharmacists have prominently displayed

the advantages of various disinfecting soaps.

Among these is a so-called corrosive sublimate soap, of which several

brands are on sale. One of these, containing one per cent. of

corrosive sublimate, is put on the market in cakes weighing about

sixteen hundred grains, and each cake, therefore, contains sixteen

grains of the drug--a rather large quantity, perhaps, when it is

remembered that four grains is a fatal dose. Fortunately, however, for

the prevention of accidents, but unfortunately for the therapeutic

value of the soap, a decomposition of the sublimate occurs as soon as

it is incorporated in the soap mass, by which an insoluble mercurial

soap is formed. This change takes place independently of the alkali

used in the soap; in fact, as mentioned above, a well-made soap

contains no appreciable amount of free alkali, but is due to the

action of the fat acids. Corrosive sublimate is _incompatible_ with

any ordinary soap mass, and this incompatibility includes not only

other soluble mercurial salts, but also almost all the mineral

antiseptics, such as zinc chloride, copper sulphate, iron salts. Some

of the preparations of arsenic may, however, be incorporated with soap

without decomposition.

Such being the chemical facts, we must admit that no reliance can be

placed in corrosive sublimate soaps as germicide agents. It must not

be supposed that this incompatibility interferes with the use of these

soaps for general therapeutic purposes. It is only the specific

germicide value which is destroyed. Since the fats used in soap

manufacture yield oleic acid, we will have a certain amount of

mercuric oleates formed together with stearate and other salts, and

for purposes of inunction these salts might be efficient. Still the

physician would prefer, doubtless, to use the specially prepared

mercurial.

In producing, therefore, a disinfecting soap, being debarred from

using the metallic germicides, we are fortunate in the possession of a

number of efficient agents, organic in character, which may be used

without interference in soaps.

Among these are thymol, naphthol, oil of eucalyptus, carbolates, and

salicylates. There is no chemical incompatibility of these with soap,

and as they are somewhat less active, weight for weight, than

corrosive sublimate, they are capable of use in larger quantities with

less danger, and can thus be made equally efficacious.

It is in this direction, therefore, that we must look for the

production of a safe and reliable antiseptic soap.

There is not much exact knowledge as to the usefulness of such

additions to soap as borax and glycerin. They are frequently added,

and highly spoken of in advertisements. Borax is a mild alkaline body,

and as a detergent is probably equivalent to a slight excess of

caustic soda. Glycerin, although originally considered an emollient,

probably on account of its source and physical properties, is in

reality, to some skins at least, a slight irritant. It is, in fact, an

alcohol, not a fat. It does not pre-exist in fats, but is formed when

the fat is decomposed by alkali or steam.

In ordinary cases, soap owes its detergent effect to a decomposition

which occurs when it is put in water.

A perfectly neutral soap, that is, one which contains the exact

proportion of alkali and fat acid, will, when placed in cold water,

decompose into two portions, one containing an excess of the acid, the

other an excess of alkali. The latter dissolves, and gives a slightly

alkaline solution; the former precipitates, and gives the peculiar

turbidity constituting "suds." These reactions must be kept in mind in

determining the effect of the addition of any special substance to the

soap.--_The Polyclinic._

* * * * *

OPTICAL ERRORS AND HUMAN MISTAKES.[1]

[Footnote 1: Read before the American Association, Buffalo,

August, 1886.]

By ERNST GUNDLACH.

I wish to call attention to a few mistakes that are quite commonly

made by microscopists and writers in stating the result of their

optical tests of microscope objectives.

If the image of an object as seen in the microscope appears to be

unusually distorted and indistinct toward the edge of the field, and

satisfactory definition is limited to a small portion of the center,

the cause is often attributed to the spherical aberration of the

objective, while really this phenomenon has nothing to do with that

optical defect of the objective, if any exists, but is caused by a

lack of optical symmetry. If a perfectly symmetrical microscope

objective could be constructed, then, with any good eye-piece, it

would make no difference to the definition of the object were it

placed either in the center or at the edge of the field, even if the

objective had considerable spherical aberration. But, unfortunately,

our most symmetrical objectives, the low powers, leave much to be

desired in this respect, while our wide angle, high powers are very

far from symmetrical perfection.

There are two causes of this defect in the latter objectives, one

being the extreme wideness of their angular apertures, and the other

the great difference in the distances of the object and the image from

the optical center of the objectives.

Another mistake is often made in regard to the cause of certain

prismatic colors that are sometimes, in a striking degree, produced by

otherwise good objectives. According to the nature of these colors,

whether yellow or blue, green or indigo, they are generally regarded

as evidences of either chromatic over or under correction of the

objective. Of course the presence of either of these defects is

certainly and correctly indicated by the appearance of one or the

other of the colors, under certain circumstances; but the simple

visibility of prismatic color is by no means a reliable indication of

over or under correction of color, and, indeed, to the honor of our

opticians, it may be stated that very few objectives are made that

cannot justly be called achromatic in the general sense of the term.

By far the most common causes of prismatic color, in otherwise

carefully constructed objectives, are the so-called chromatic

aberrations of second or higher order. Every achromatic lens which is,

as it should be, at its best at about two-thirds of its aperture, is

inside of this ring or zone, toward the center slightly under and

outside, toward the edge, slightly over corrected. This defect is the

greater, the less the difference of the dispersive powers of the two

glasses used in the construction of the lens, for a given proportion

of their refractive indexes, and therefore the degree of visibility of

the colors of the aberrations of the second order depends greatly on

the nature of the glass employed in the construction of the lens.

This defect may be corrected by a suitable combination of two or more

lenses, though not without again having similarly, as in the

correction of the first color, some faint remnants of color, the

aberrations of third or still higher order. But even the correction of

the third or still higher order may, if the angular aperture is very

wide, leave quite visible and disturbing remnants of color.

Another and not uncommon explanation of the cause of this unwelcome

color, though not so serious and damaging a charge to the maker of the

objectives, is its attribution to the so-called "secondary spectrum."

This error, like that previously mentioned, is certainly indicated by

the appearance of certain colors under certain conditions, but being,

as a rule, one of the least defects of even our best objectives in

most cases, it is probably not the true source of the disturbance.

The secondary spectrum is very commonly confounded with the chromatic

aberration of higher order. While the latter is produced by

imperfections in the form of the lens, the former is due to an

imperfection of the optical qualities of the material from which the

lens is constructed, the crown and flint glass.

A glass prism of any angle will project upon a white surface a

spectrum of any length, according to the arrangement of the light

source, the screen, and the prism. So with two prisms of the same kind

of glass, but of different angles, two spectra can be produced of

exactly equal length, so that if one is brought over the other, with

the corresponding colors in line, they will appear as one spectrum.

But if one of the prisms is made of crown and the other of flint

glass, then their spectra cannot be arranged so that all their

corresponding colors would be in line, for the proportional distances

of the different colors differ in the two spectra. If two colors of

the spectra are, by suitable arrangement, brought exactly in line,

then the others will be out. The two spectra do not coincide, and the

result, if an achromatic lens be made of these glasses, must be a

remnant of color which cannot be neutralized. This remnant is the

secondary spectrum.

Although this peculiar disharmony in the dispersive powers of the two

glasses, crown and flint, was discovered almost immediately after

achromatism was invented, it was only recently that the first

successful attempts were made to produce different glasses, which,

possessing the other requirements for achromatic objectives, would

produce coincident spectra, or nearer so than the ordinary crown and

flint glass do. It was about twelve years ago, if my memory serves me,

when I learned that a well-known English firm, engaged in the

manufacture of optical glass, had brought out some new glass possessed

of the desired qualities, and a little later I received a circular

describing the glass. But at the same time I learned that the new

glass was very soft and difficult to polish, and also that it had to

be protected from the atmosphere, and further, that an English

optician had failed to construct an improved telescope objective from

it. I had ordered some samples of the glass, but never received any.

A few months ago, news from Europe reached this country that another

and seemingly more successful attempt had been made to produce glass

that would leave no secondary spectrum, and that Dr. Zeiss, the famous

Jena optician, had constructed some new improved objectives from it.

But the somewhat meager description of these objectives, as given by

an English microscopist, did not seem fit to excite much enthusiasm

here as to their superiority over what had already been done in this

country. Besides this, the report said that the new objectives were

five system, and also that extra eye-pieces had to be used with them.

I confess I am much inclined to attribute the optical improvement,

which, according to Dr. Abbe's own remark, is very little, more to the

fact that the objectives are five system than to the new glass used in

their construction.

After a close study of a descriptive list of the new glass, received a

week or two ago from the manufacturers, I find, to my great regret,

that this new glass seems to suffer from a similar weakness to that

made by the English firm twelve years ago; as all the numbers of the

list pointed out by the makers as having a greatly reduced secondary

spectrum are accompanied with the special remark "to be protected."

Furthermore, from a comparison of the dispersive and refractive powers

of these glasses, as given in the list, I find that objectives

constructed from them will leave so great aberrations of higher order,

both spherical and chromatic, that the gain by the reduction of the

secondary spectrum would be greatly overbalanced.

In conclusion, I wish to say that while I would beware of

underestimating the great scientific and practical value of the

endeavor of the new German glass makers to produce improved optical

glass, and the great benefit accruing to opticians and all others

interested in the use of optical instruments, I think it wise not to

overestimate the real value of the defects of the common crown and

flint glass, which I have sought to explain in this paper. And, for

myself, I prefer to fight the more serious defects first, and when its

time has come I will see what can be done with the secondary spectrum.

* * * * *

PROBABLE ISOLATION OF FLUORINE. DECOMPOSITION OF HYDROFLUORIC ACID

BY AN ELECTRIC CURRENT.

By M.H. MOISSAN.

In a former memoir[1] we showed that it was possible to decompose

anhydrous hydrofluoric acid by the action of an electric current. At

the negative pole hydrogen collects; at the positive pole a gaseous

body is disengaged, having novel properties. The experiment was

performed in a platinum U tube, closed by stoppers of fluorite, and

having at the upper part of each branch a small delivery tube, also of

platinum. Through the stopper passes a platinum rod, which acts as

electrode. The metal employed for the positive pole is an alloy

containing 10 per cent. of iridium.

[Footnote 1: _Comptes Rendus_, vol. cii., p. 1543, and _Chemical

News_, vol. liv., p. 36.]

To obtain pure anhydrous hydrofluoric acid, we begin by preparing

fluorhydrate of fluoride of potassium, taking all the precautions

pointed out by M. Fremy. When the salt is obtained pure, it is dried

on a water bath at 100°, and the platinum capsule containing it is

then placed in a vacuum in the presence of concentrated sulphuric

acid, and two or three sticks of potash fused in a silver crucible.

The acid and potash are renewed every morning for a fortnight, and the

vacuum is kept at 2 cm. of mercury. Care must be taken during this

desiccation to pulverize the salt every day in an iron mortar, so as

to renew the surface. When the fluorhydrate contains no more water it

falls to powder, and is then fit to serve for the preparation of

fluoric acid; the fluorhydrate of fluoride of potassium, if well

prepared, is much less deliquescent than the fluoride.

When the fluoride is quite dry, it is quickly introduced into a

platinum alembic, which has just been dried by heating it to redness.

The whole is kept at a gentle temperature for an hour or an hour and a

half, so as to allow the decomposition to commence very slowly; the

first portions of acid which come over are rejected as they carry with

them traces of water remaining in the salt. The platinum receiver is

then attached, and the heat increased, allowing the decomposition to

proceed with a certain degree of slowness. The receiver is then

surrounded with a mixture of ice and salt, and from this moment all

the hydrofluoric acid is condensed as a limpid liquid, boiling at

19.5°, very hygroscopic, and, as is well known, giving abundant fumes

in presence of the atmospheric moisture.

During this operation the platinum U tube, dried with the greatest

care, has been fixed with a cork in a cylindrical glass vessel

surrounded with chloride of methyl. Up to the moment of introducing

the hydrofluoric acid, the leading tubes are attached to drying tubes

containing fused caustic potash. To introduce the hydrochloric acid

into the apparatus, it may be absorbed through one of the lateral

tubes in the receiver in which it is condensed.

In some experiments we have directly condensed the hydrofluoric acid

in the U tube surrounded with chloride of methyl; but in this case

care must be taken that the tubes are not clogged up by small

quantities of fluoride carried over, which would infallibly lead to an

explosion and projections, which are always dangerous with so

corrosive a liquid.

When we have introduced in advance in the small platinum apparatus a

determined amount of hydrofluoric acid cooled with chloride of methyl,

in tranquil ebullition at a temperature of -23°, the current of 20

cells of Bunsen large size, arranged in series, is passed through by

means of the electrodes. An amperemeter in the circuit admits of the

intensity of the current being observed.

If the hydrofluoric acid contains a small quantity of water, either by

accident or design, there is always disengaged at the positive pole

ozone, which has no action on crystallized silicium. In proportion as

the water contained in the acid is thus decomposed, it is seen by the

amperemeter that the conductivity of the liquid rapidly decreases.

With absolutely anhydrous hydrofluoric acid the current will no longer

pass. In many of our experiments we have succeeded in obtaining an

acid so anhydrous that a current of 25 amperes was entirely arrested.

To render the liquid conducting, we have added before each experiment

a small quantity of dried and fused fluorhydrate of fluoride of

potassium. In this case, decomposition proceeds in a continuous

manner; we obtain at the negative pole hydrogen, and at the positive

pole a regular disengagement of a colorless gas in which crystallized

silicium in the cold burns with great brilliancy, becoming fluoride of

silicium. This latter gas has been collected over mercury, and

accurately characterized.

Deville's adamantine boron burns in the same manner, but with more

difficulty, becoming fluoride or boron. The small quantity of carbon

and aluminum which it contains impedes the combination. Arsenic and

antimony in powder combine with this gaseous body with incandescence.

Sulphur takes fire in it, and iodine combines with a pale flame,

losing its color. We have already remarked that it decomposes cold

water, producing ozone and hydrofluoric acid.

The metals are attacked with much less energy. This is due, we think,

to the small quantity of metallic fluoride formed preventing the

action being very deep. Iron and manganese in powder, slightly heated,

burn with sparks. Organic bodies are violently attacked. A piece of

cork placed near the end of the platinum tube, where the gas is

evolved, immediately carbonizes and inflames. Alcohol, ether, benzol,

spirit of turpentine, and petroleum take fire on contact.

The gas evolved at the negative pole is hydrogen, burning with a pale

flame, and producing none of these reactions.

When the experiment has lasted several hours, and there is not enough

hydrofluoric acid left at the bottom of the tube to separate the two

gases, they recombine in the apparatus in the cold, with violent

detonation.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886 · 第 7 / 9 段