CHAPTER VII

GEORGIAN ARCHITECTURE IN NEW YORK

Strange as it may seem, the territory comprised in the present state of

New York is not nearly so rich in Georgian remains as are the other

parts of our country contained within the boundaries of the original

Colonies. At first it may astonish the student of architectural history

to find one of the oldest, wealthiest and most important communities,

rich not only in material resources but in history, so devoid of the

Georgian landmarks that characterise the adjacent sections of the

country. New England is filled with well preserved memorials of the

eighteenth century. So likewise are New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware

and the South. How is it, then, that New York is, by comparison, so

deficient in this respect?

Several reasons may be assigned in answer to this question. In the first

place, the representative Georgian houses in all parts of the Colonies

were the homes of that part of the population that enjoyed affluent

circumstances; they were not the homes of the plainer folk nor of those

in humble circumstances. The majority of well-to-do citizens were to be

found in New York City and there, naturally, were most of the Georgian

houses. Even those that counted themselves as residents of other parts

of the Province, as a rule, had their town houses there. What befel the

Georgian country houses we shall shortly learn.

Unfortunately for the student of our architectural history, the

relentless tide of mercantile progress in New York City has ruthlessly

swept aside nearly all the landmarks of former generations and replaced

them with high office buildings, factories, flats or warehouses. Only in

the fabric of a few of the older churches or in some of the backwaters

left by the eddying currents of urban life have a few scattered remnants

of the city of the eighteenth century been preserved for us and even

these are rapidly disappearing.

In the second place, a large proportion of the Georgian country houses,

outside the territory now covered by the spread of New York City, have

suffered so sadly at the hands of nineteenth century “improvers”, whose

unintelligent alterations and additions have wrought architectural

havoc, that oftentimes nearly all traces of Georgian characteristics

have either been seriously marred or altogether destroyed. Instead of

stately Georgian dwellings of august mien and compelling interest, as

they once were, they have become mere commonplace and often repulsive

agglomerations of masonry like other structures erected during the

uninspired Victorian era. This is their plight outwardly and within they

have often been subjected to indignities quite as revolting. Such

systematic and calculating vandalism on the part of former owners cannot

be too severely condemned but condemnation will not undo the mischief,

and only the most conscientious process of restoration can in some

measure remedy the misdeeds of the “enlightened” nineteenth century

spoiler.

Another important reason for the paucity of Georgian domestic structures

within the territory of New York is that, in the Hudson region and in

the valleys abutting upon it, the majority of houses built during the

eighteenth century, houses belonging to those in moderate and

comfortable circumstances and also some belonging to people of great

wealth and social prominence, remained Dutch in type and in their later

architecture borrowed freely from Georgian and Classic Revival sources

and adapted such details as they saw fit to new uses with a considerable

degree of success. The Dutch colonial tradition was exceptionally

strong, virile and intensely characteristic and persisted in spite of

the introduction of the Georgian mode. Curiously enough, notwithstanding

the potent individuality of the Dutch style, none of its significant

peculiarities seems to have been grafted upon the Georgian stock in like

manner with the blending processes and modifications that took place in

New England or in the South.

Finally, a great many houses built about the beginning of the nineteenth

century or at the very end of the eighteenth in the western part of New

York showed a strong Classic Revival influence rather than any

essentially Georgian affinities.

Several of the finest examples of eighteenth century work, which for

lack of further special subdivision of our subject must be included in

the Georgian period, belong to the Queen Anne category under the

strictest classification. These are Fraunce’s Tavern and the Philipse

House in Yonkers. The former was erected during the reign of Queen Anne

and was originally the home of the Van Cortlandts and DeLanceys. It was

not until the middle part of the eighteenth century that it became a

hostelry. So many important events have been closely associated with the

venerable building, among them Washington’s affecting leave-taking of

his officers and troops, that it was both the privilege and duty of

patriotism and a proper national pride to rescue the fabric from neglect

and the

[Illustration: PHILIPSE MANOR HOUSE, YONKERS, N. Y. 1683.]

[Illustration:

Copyright, by International News Service.

FRAUNCE’S TAVERN, BROAD STREET, NEW YORK CITY.]

base uses to which it had fallen and restore it, so far as possible, to

its former appearance and condition after all the vicissitudes which

several generations of nineteenth century neglect and lack of

appreciation had imposed upon it. In its general proportions, in the

lines of its hipped roof and in many interior details, such as the

panelling, it is distinctly reminiscent of some of the best English work

of Queen Anne’s day although in several respects may also be traced the

architectural influences of a later era. The other building, even

earlier in date than Fraunce’s Tavern, has not suffered from the same

damaging chances of fortune and debasement and far fewer of its details

are conjectural. One might say that the carcase and contour of the

Philipse Manor House are of Queen Anne character but that beyond that it

is conglomerate since it embodies so many peculiarities and additions of

later times that it can scarcely be considered truly typical of any one

epoch. While much of the fabric is in its original condition, as erected

in the latter part of the seventeenth century, the addition of Georgian

details and adornments made by the lords of the manor during the

eighteenth century may readily be traced, and while they are all

interesting and admirable and not in any sense to be regarded as pieces

of vandalism, they prevent the structure from presenting an appearance

in strict chronological keeping with the date of its erection.

The Schuyler and Van Rensselaer houses have also undergone some

unfortunate modifications from time to time which have impaired their

typal value to the architectural student so that we are forced to

content ourselves, when considering the Georgian houses of New York that

are still really characteristic, with the Van Cortlandt house in Van

Cortlandt Park and the Jumel Mansion. These are, both of them,

interesting and worthy specimens belonging to the middle Georgian phase

or the phase that corresponds chronologically with the middle Georgian

phase elsewhere, but even here the hand of the “restorer” has recently

taken some liberties which one cannot help feeling were unnecessary. The

Van Cortlandt house--it is not to be confounded with the Van Cortlandt

Manor House which is of much earlier date and is situated at the mouth

of the Croton River many miles distant--was erected slightly before the

middle of the eighteenth century and is an admirable specimen of the

Georgian feeling of that particular day. One of the most striking

features of exterior detail is to be found in the procession of

grotesque heads or masques carved in high relief on the keystones of the

lintels above the windows. They are typical of the decorative trend of

the epoch, and although

[Illustration: WINDOW DETAIL, VAN CORTLANDT HOUSE.]

[Illustration: PHILIPSE HOUSE, NEAR TARRYTOWN, N. Y.]

[Illustration:

Copyright, J. B. Lippincott Co.

WAYNESBOROUGH, PAOLI, PA. 1724.

Transition from Colonial to First Georgian phase.]

[Illustration:

Copyright, J. B. Lippincott Co.

GRAEME PARK, HORSHAM, PA. 1721.

Middle Colonies Georgian, first phase.]

their employment is not common in American Georgian architecture, other

examples are to be found on the tower of the State House in

Philadelphia, the tower of Christ Church, in the same city, and in the

trims of some of the small circular windows in the gable ends of the Old

State House in Boston. The panelling and interior adornments of the Van

Cortlandt house display the disciplined proportion and judicious placing

usually observable in other representative houses of the middle of the

eighteenth century before the delicacy and decorative profusion of Adam

influence had replaced the simpler and more robust conceptions of the

school of Gibbs and his contemporaries. The Jumel Mansion with its

hipped roof terminating in a balustraded deck, its substantial

foursquare dimensions, its heavy quoins and its well proportioned

columns is also eminently characteristic of the same school of

architectural design.

The Architecture of Colonial America · 第 7 / 14 章