We all know how the size of sums of money appears to vary in a

remarkable way according as they are being paid in or paid out. We

all know to our cost the extraordinary superiority of the epochs when

our more elderly relatives were youthful. The fact remains that we

are always prone to regard the registering machine as a constant,

and to believe that all the variation comes from outside. It is easy

to discount the inner variation in ourselves when we are seasick, or

in others when they are old and reminiscent, but not only is this

discounting sometimes far more difficult, it is sometimes not even

attempted.

What, for instance, are we to say to those who profess to find a

harmony in the universe, those to whom poverty and discomfort and

hard work appear the merest accidents, to whom even disease, pain,

loss, death, and disaster are “somehow good”? You and I would probably

retort that we have a rooted dislike to discomfort, that we should most

strongly deny that the loss of a friend or even of a leg was anything

but bad, that a toothache was not damnably unpleasant. But I think that

if they were philosophically inclined (which they probably would not

be), they might justifiably retort that the difference between their

universe and ours was due to a difference in their mental machinery,

which they had succeeded in adjusting so that it registered in a

different and a better way.

It is at least clear that something of the sort can happen in the

intellectual sphere. To the uneducated, the totality of things, if ever

reflected upon, is a compound of fog and chaos: advance is painfully

slow, and interlarded with unpleasant falls into pits and holes of

illogicality and inconsequence; to those who have taken the trouble to

push on, however, an orderly system at last reveals itself.

The problem of the origin and relationship of species gave such mental

distress to those zoologists of the first half of the nineteenth

century who were conscientious enough to struggle with it, that

many of them ended by a mental suppression of the problem and a

refusal to discuss it further. The publication of Darwin’s _Origin

of Species_ was to them what psycho-analysis is (or may be) to a

patient with a repressed complex. Or again, no one can read accounts

of the physicists’ recent work on the structure of the atom without

experiencing an extraordinary feeling of satisfaction. Instead of

wallowing in unrelated facts, we fly on wings of principle; not only

can we better cut our way through the jungle of things, but we are

allowed a privilege that has universally been considered one of the

attributes of Gods--the calm and untroubled understanding of things and

processes.

“The Gods are happy.

They turn on all sides

Their shining eyes,

And see below them

The earth and men.”

This being so, what is to prevent us from believing that, once certain

adjustments are made in the mental sausage-machine, we shall discover

that what we once found impossibly tough meat will pass smoothly

through and become done up into the most satisfactory of sausages?

In other words, that the values are there if we choose to make

them--an Euckenish doctrine which, for all that it arouses instinctive

suspicion, may none the less be true.

But even when we have made all possible discounts of this kind, evolved

the smoothest-running machinery, converted the raw and meaty material

of being into every conceivable kind of tidy sausage, the fact remains

that there are feats beyond the power of our machine--beyond its power

because of the very quality of its being.

We live at a certain rhythm in time, at a certain level of size and

space; beyond certain limits, events in the outer world are not

directly appreciable by the ordinary channels of sense, although a

symbolic picture of them may be presented to us by the intellect.

When we are listening to the organ, sometimes there come notes which

are on the border-line between sound and feeling: their separate

vibrations are distinguishable and pulse through us, and the more the

vibrations are separable, the more they are felt as mechanical shocks,

the less as sound. However, we know perfectly well that all sounds as

a matter of fact depend on vibratory disturbance, and that it is only

some peculiarity of the registering machinery, in ear or brain, which

enables us to hear a note as continuous.

Still more remarkable are the facts of vision. As I write I see

the tulips in my garden, red against the green grass: the red is a

continuous sensation; but the physicists appear to be justified in

telling us that the eye is being bombarded every second with a series

of waves, not the few hundred or thousand that give us sound, but the

half-billion or so which conspire to illuminate our vision.

With sound, we alter the frequency of the waves and we get a difference

of tone which seems to be merely a difference of more or less: but

alter the frequency of light-waves, and the whole quality of the

sensation changes, as when I look from the tulips to the sky. The

change of registering mechanism is here more profound than the change

in outer event.

Or again, to choose an example that depends more on size than rhythm,

how very difficult it is to remember that the pressure of air on our

bodies is not the uniform gentle embrace of some homogeneous substance,

but the bombardment of an infinity of particles. The particles are not

even all alike: some are of oxygen, others of nitrogen, of carbonic

acid gas, of water vapour. They are not all travelling at uniform

speeds; collisions are all the time occurring, and the molecules are

continuously changing their rate of travel as they clash and bump.

We have only to look down a microscope to convince ourselves of the

alteration in our experience that it would mean if we were to become

sufficiently diminished. The tiniest solid particles in fluids can

be seen to be in a continuous state of agitation--inexplicable until

it was pointed out that this mysterious “Brownian” movement was the

inevitable result of impacts by the faster-moving molecules of the

fluid. Many living things that we can still see are small enough to

live permanently in such agitation; the longest diameter of many

bacteria is but half a micron (a two-thousandth of a millimetre), and

there are many ultra-microscopic organisms which, owing to their closer

approximation to molecular dimensions, must pass their lives in erratic

excursions many times more violent than any visible Brownian motion.

If we could shrink, like Alice, at the persuasion of some magic

mushroom, the rain of particles on our skin, now as unfelt as midges

by a rhinoceros, would at last begin to be perceptible. We should

find ourselves surrounded by an infinity of motes; titillated by

a dance of sand-grains; bruised by a rain of marbles; pounded by

flights of fives-balls. What is more, the smaller we became, the

more individuality and apparent free-will should we detect in the

surrounding particles. As we got still smaller, we should, now and

again, find the nearly uniform bombardment replaced by a concerted

attack on one side or the other, and we should be hurled for perhaps

double our own length in one direction. If we could conceivably enter

into a single inorganic molecule, we should find ourselves one of a

moving host of similar objects: and we should further perceive that

these objects were themselves complex, some like double stars, others

star-clusters, others single suns, and all again built of lesser units

held in a definite plan, in an architecture reminding us (if we still

had memory) of a solar system _in petto_. If we were lucky enough

to be in a complicated fluid like seawater, we should be intrigued

by the relations of the different kinds of particles. They would be

continually coming up to other particles of different kinds, and would

then sometimes enter into intimate union with them. If we could manage

to follow their history, we should find that after a time they would

separate, and seek new partners, of the same or of different species.

Some kinds of the units, or people as we should be inclined to call

them, would spend most of their existence in the married state, others

would apparently prefer to remain single, or, if they married, would

within no long time obtain divorce.

We should be forcibly reminded of life in some cosmopolitan city like

London or New York. If there existed a registrar to note down the

events of these little beings’ existence, and we were privileged to

inspect the register, we should find that each had its own history,

different from that of every other in its course and its matrimonial

adventures.

If we were near the surface we should find that the outer beings always

arranged themselves in a special and coherent layer, apparently to

protect themselves against the machinations of the different beings

inhabiting the region beyond; for every now and again one would seem

to be pulled from the water and be lost among the more scattered

inhabitants of the air.

If we could now revert to our old size, we might remember, as we

listened to the scientist enunciating the simple formulæ of the

gas-laws, or giving numerical expression to vapour-pressures and

solubilities, that this simplicity and order which he enabled us to

find in inorganic nature was only simplicity when viewed on a large

enough scale, and that it was needful to deal in millions and billions

before chance aberrations faded into insignificance, needful to

experience molecules from the standpoint of a unit almost infinitely

bigger before individual behaviour could be neglected and merged in the

orderly average. And we might be tempted to wonder how the personal

idiosyncrasies of our human units might appear to a being as much

larger than we as we are larger than a molecule--whether kings and

beggars would not fare alike, and all the separate, striving, feeling,

conflicting personalities, with their individual histories, their

ancestors, successes, marriages, friendships, pains, and pleasures, be

merged in some homogeneous and simple effect, altering in response to

circumstances, with changes capable of expression in some formula as

simple as Boyle’s or Avogadro’s Law.

Almost more startling might be the effect of altering the rhythm at

which we live, or rather at which we experience events.

If only I were Mr. H. G. Wells, I could make a mint of money by a story

based on this idea of rhythm of living.[42] Let us see.... First there

would be Mercaptan the distinguished inventor, who would lead me (lay,

uninstructed, Watsonish me, after the fashion of narrators) into his

laboratory. There on the table would be the machine--all but complete:

handles, coils of wire, quartz terminals, gauges of rock-crystal in

which oscillated coloured fluids, platinum cogwheels ... dot ... dot

... dot ... dot.... He hardly dared to make the final connections, all

clear and calculable though they were. He had put so much of himself

into it: so many hopes ... fears ... dots....

Then there would be the farewell dinner-party--first the inventor’s

voice on the wireless telephone, summoning Wagrom the explorer, Glosh

of the _Evening Post_, Stewartson Ampill the novelist, and the rest

of our old friends: then the warm friendly light of the candles, the

excellent port, the absence of women, the reminiscences, the asterisks,

the....

Mercaptan refuses to allow the rest to come into the laboratory, in

case something should go wrong. He straps the machine on his shoulders,

makes a final connection; his life processes begin to work faster,

faster, ever faster. The first effect of course was a change of colour.

The blue oblong of the window became green--yellow--orange--red.

Meanwhile each wave-length of the ultra-violet became blue, and itself

ran down the gamut of colour. Then came the turn of the X-rays--by

their dim light he groped about, till they too became relatively too

slow for his retina. That ought to make him blind, of course--but no!

Mr. Wells had thought that all out; and he came into a state of nearly

maximum speed where he perceived a brilliant, phosphorescent light

given out by all objects, generated by disturbances of a wave-length

unimaginably, undiscoverably small. Meanwhile he had passed through an

amazing experience--he had heard the veritable music of the spheres!

That had happened when in his acceleration he had, so to speak, caught

up with the light-waves, until they were tuned to his ear’s organ of

Corti: and all that had been visible in his ordinary life was now to be

appreciated by hearing. Unfortunately, as his ears possessed no lens,

this universal music was to him of course merely a hideous babel of

sound.

At last, as the workings of his body approached the rapidity of light’s

own oscillations, he entered on a new phase--surrounded on every side

by an ocean of waves which lapped softly against his body--waves,

waves, and still more waves....

He was in that region not unlike that from which life has escaped when

it ceased to be infinitely little, a region in which none of the events

that make up our ordinary life, none of the bodies that are our normal

environment, have existence any more--all reduced to a chaos of billows

ceaselessly and meaninglessly buffeting his being.

“Mi ritrovai in una selva oscura.”

Life is a wood, dark and trackless enough to be sure; but Mercaptan

could not even see that it was a wood--for the trees.

Yet it was soothing: the very meaninglessness of the wave-rocking

released one of responsibility, and it was delicious to float upon this

strange etheric sea.

Then his scientific mind reasserted itself. He realized that he had

magnified his rate of life and was consuming his precious days at an

appalling speed. The lever was thrown into reverse, and he passed

gradually back to what he had been accustomed to think of as reality.

Back to it; and then beyond it, slowing his vital rhythm. This time

he was able by an ingenious arrangement to eliminate much of the

disturbing effect of his rhythm-change on his vision. It was an idea

of which he was very proud: every alternate light-wave was cut out when

he doubled the capacity of each process of life, and so on in automatic

correspondence. As a result he was enabled to get a picture of the

outer world very similar to that obtained in the ordinary accelerations

of slow processes that are made possible by running slow-taken cinema

records at high speed. He saw the snowdrops lift their matutinal heads

and drop them again at evening--an instant later; the spring was an

alarming burst of living energy, the trees’ budding and growth of

leaves became a portent, like the bristling of hairs on the backs of

vegetable cats. As his rate changed and he comprehended more and more

in each pulse, the flowers faded and fell before he could think of

plucking them, autumnal apples rotted in his grasp, day was a flash

and night a wink of the eye, the two blending at last in a continuous

half-light.

After a time ordinary objects ceased to be distinguishable; then the

seasons shared the fate of day and night. The lever was now nearly hard

over, and the machine was reaching its limits. He was covering nearly a

thousand of men’s years with each of his own seconds.

The cinema effect was almost useless to him now; and he discarded this

apparatus. Now followed what he had so eagerly awaited, something

deducible in general but unpredictable in all particulars. As the

repeated separate impacts of the ether waves had condensed, at his old

ordinary rate, to form the continuous sensation of light, so now the

events of nature coalesced to give new objects, new kinds of sensation.

Especially was this so with life: the repeated generations seemed to

act like separate repeated waves of light, blending to give a picture

of the species changing and evolving before his eyes.

Other experiences he could explain less well. He was conscious of

strange sensations that he thought were probably associated with

changes in energy-distribution, in entropy; others which he seemed to

perceive directly, by some form of telepathy, concerning the type of

mental process occurring around him. It was all strange: but of one

thing he was sure--that if only he could find a way of nourishing and

maintaining himself in this new state, he would be able, as a child

does in the first few years of life, to correlate his puzzling new

sensations, and that when he had done this he would obtain a different

and more direct view of reality than any he had ever obtained or

thought of obtaining before.

As the individual light-waves were summed to give light, as the

microcosm of gas-molecules cancelled out to give a uniformity of

pressure, so now the repetition of the years coalesced into what could

be described as visible time, a sensation of cosmic rate; the repeated

pullulations of living things fused into something perceived as organic

achievement: and the infinite variety of organisms, their conflicts

and interactions, resolved itself, through the mediation of his

sense-organs and brain at their new rhythm, into a direct perception of

life as a whole, an entity with a pressure on its environment, a single

slowly-evolving form, a motion and direction.

He put the lever to its limit: the rhythm of the cosmos altered again

in relation to his own. He had an extraordinary sense of being on the

verge of a revelation. The universe--that was the same; but what he

experienced of it was totally different. He had immediate experience

of the waxing and waning of suns, of the condensation of nebulæ, the

slowing down and speeding up of evolutionary processes.

The curious, apparently telepathic sense which he had had of the

mental side of existence was intensified. Through it, the world began

to be perceived as a single Being, with all its parts in interaction.

The shadowy lineaments of this being were half seen by his mental

vision--vast, colossal, slowly changing; but they appeared only to

disappear again, like a picture in the fire.

Strive as he might, he could not see its real likeness. Now it appeared

benign; at its next dim reappearance there would be a feeling of

capricious irresponsibility about it: at another instant it was cold,

remote; once or twice terrible, impending over and filling everything

with a black demoniacal power which brought only horror with it.

If he could but accelerate the machine! He wanted to _know_--to know

whether this phantom were a reality, to know above all if it were a

thing of evil or of good: and he could not know unless he could advance

that last final step necessary to fuse the rhythm of separate events

into the sensation of the single whole.

He sat straining all his faculties: the machine whirred and rocked: but

in vain. And at last, feeling desperately hungry, for he had forgotten

to take food with him, he gradually brought back the lever to its

neutral-point.

* * * * * * *

Of course, Mr. Wells would have done it much better than this.

* * * * * * *

And then there would have to be an ending. I think the newspaper man

would take his opportunity to slink off into the laboratory and get on

the machine with the idea of making a scoop for his paper; ... and then

he would put the lever in too violently, and be thrown backwards. His

head hit the corner of a bench, and he remained stunned; but by evil

chance, the handles of the machine still made connection with his body

after the fall. The machine was making him adjust his rhythm to that of

light; so that he was living at an appalling rate. He had gone into the

laboratory late at night. Next morning they found him--dead: and dead

of senile decay--grey-haired, shrivelled, atrophic.

Then of course the machine is smashed up; and Mr. Wells begins to write

another book.

* * * * * * *

I have spent so much time in frivolous discussion of rhythm and size

and commonplaces that I have not pointed out another fundamental fact

of biological relativity--to wit, that we are but parochial creatures

endowed only with sense-organs giving information about the agencies

normally found in our own little environment. Mind without the objects

of mind is the very Chimaera bombinating _in vacuo_.

Out of all the ether waves we are sensitive to an octave as light, and

some few others as heat. X-rays and ultra-violet destroy us, but we

know nothing about them until they begin to give us pain; while the low

swell of Hertzian waves passes by and through us harmless and unheeded.

Electrical sense again we have none.

Imagine what it would be for inhabitants of another planet where

changes in Hertzian waves were the central, pivotal changes in

environment, where accordingly life had become sensitive to “wireless”

and to nought else save perhaps touch--imagine such beings broadcast

upon the face of the Earth. With a little practice and ingenuity they

would no doubt be able to decipher the messages floating through

our atmosphere, would feel the rhythms of the Black Hamitic Band

transmitting Jazz to a million homes, and be able to follow, night by

night, the soporific but benevolent fairy-stories of Uncle Archibald.

I wonder what they would make of it all. They would at intervals,

of course, be bumping into things and people. But would touch and

radio-sense alone make our world intelligible? I wonder....

When we begin trying to quit our anthropocentry and discover what the

world might be like if only we had other organs of body and mind for

its assaying, we must flounder and bump in a not dissimilar fashion.

Even the few senses that we do possess are determined by our

environment. Sweet things are pleasant to us: sugar is sweet: so is

“sugar of lead”--lead acetate; sugar is nutritious, lead acetate a

poison. The biologist will conclude, and with perfect reason, that if

sugar was as rare as lead acetate in nature, lead acetate as common as

sugar, we should then abominate and reject sweet things as emphatically

as we now do filth or acids or over-hot liquids.

But I must pause, and find a moral for my tale; for all will agree that

a moral has been so long out of fashion that it is now fast becoming

fashionable again.

Every schoolboy, as Macaulay would say, knows William of Occam’s

Razor--that philosophical tool of admirable properties:--“Entia non

multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.”

We want another razor--a Relativist Razor; and with that we will carry

out barbering operations worthy of another Shaving of Shagpat: we will

shave the Absolute.

The hoary Absolute, enormous and venerable, grey-bearded and

grey-locked--he sits enthroned, wielding tremendous power, filling

young minds with fear and awe.

Up, barbers, and at him! Heat the water of your enthusiasm: lather

those disguising appurtenances. See the tufts collapse into the white

foam--feel the hairy jungles melt away before your steel! And at the

end, when the last hair falls, you will wipe away the lather, and look

upon that face and see--ah, what indeed?

I will not be so banal as to attempt to describe that sight in

detail. You will have seen it already in your mind’s eye: “or else”

(to quote Mr. Belloc)--“or else you will not; I cannot be positive

which.” If not, you never will; if yes, what need to waste more of the

compositor’s time? But of him who forges that razor, who arms those

barbers, who gives them courage for their colossal task, of him shall a

new Lucretius sing.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Belloc, H. “The Bad Child’s Book of Beasts.”

Bergson, H. “Time and Free-Will.”

Carroll, L. “Alice in Wonderland.”

---- ---- “Alice Through the Looking Glass.”

Clerk Maxwell. “Collected Papers.”

Einstein. See Kant.

Hegel. See Einstein.

Kant. See Hegel.

Lear, E. “Nonsense Songs and Stories.”

Lucretius. “De Rerum Natura.”

Macaulay, Lord. “Essays.”

Mee, A. “Children’s Encyclopædia.”

Meredith, G. “The Shaving of Shagpat.”

Occam, W. de. “Opera Omnia.”

Shapley. Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci., 6, 204.

Swift, J. “Gulliver’s Travels.”

Wells, H. G. “The New Accelerator.”

Wheeler, W. M. “Ants” (Columbia University Series).

FOOTNOTES:

[41] Read before the Heretics Club, Cambridge, May 1922.

Essays of a Biologist · 第 11 / 17 段