CHAPTER XV.

Palenque. — The Forest. — The Palace or Monastery. — Night

at Palenque. — Brilliancy of the light of the fireflies. —

Pyramidal Mounds and Temples. — Tablet of the Cross. —

Hieroglyphs. — An Indian Statue. — Antiquity of the Buildings. —

The Tower. — Stucco Ornamentation. — Action of the tropical

climate upon the Ruins. — Note upon the decipherment of the

hieroglyphic characters.

It was a bright tropical morning when we mounted our horses and

followed the narrow path leading to Palenque. After riding for a league

through woods, savannahs, and cornfields, we reached and crossed the

river Michol.

As we approached the ruins, the forest was so thick that we were not

able to see anything beyond the track which had been cleared for us by

our men. At a distance of about three Spanish leagues from San Domingo,

we came to the borders of a small running stream. Dr. Coller stopped

and said that at this point we should dismount, as we had arrived at

our destination. We then went up a steep slope, on the summit of which

I could see dimly, the pillars and ruined roof of the “Palace.”

Our Indians met us at the entrance. They had already cleared the

brushwood which had overgrown the quadrangles, and had removed all that

interfered with any exploring work that they thought we might wish

to carry out. The luxuriance of the vegetation was surprising. In one

of the open courts we observed a large plant which we found to be a

species of arum. The leaves were of an extraordinary size, and averaged

four feet six inches long by three feet six inches wide; the stalks

were over seven feet high.

The greater part of the day was occupied in making a survey of the

ground plans of the building, as far as it was possible to trace them

amongst the accumulations of fallen ruins. Upon the completion of this

work, and after having made an examination of the series of small

chambers below the corridors, it became evident that the building

was erected with the intention of establishing a monastery, similar

to those which were described by the historians of the conquest of

Mexico as being dedicated to the use of the priests who worshipped

and performed ceremonies at the shrines of the god Quetzalcoatl, and

who, in addition to those duties, were given the charge of educating

the children of the chiefs. They also trained those youths who were

intended to become priests.

It is to be regretted that this great structure was called by its first

discoverers “The Palace,” and that its purpose was rendered perplexing

by theories connected with the dwellings of Kings or Caciques.

According to the investigations of Mr. Stephens, its extreme dimensions

were two hundred and twenty-eight feet long, by one hundred and eighty

feet wide. The height of the rectangular mound upon which it is placed

has been variously estimated. It appears to have been about twenty

feet high. Upon the summit of this platform was built with stone and

mortar, the various foundations upon which the buildings and galleries

of the monastery were erected. The base upon the east front was about

ten feet high. The height of the building may be estimated to have been

nearly twenty-four feet. Thus it may be concluded that the whole height

from the ground to the roof must have been approximately fifty-four

feet. The architectural proportions seem to have been well designed.

The interior gave me the impression of being Moorish in its style,

especially with respect to the open inner courts, the arrangement

of the corridors and the lavish employment of stucco ornamentation,

brilliantly coloured. A closer investigation into architectural details

left the subject in doubt, but there still remained upon the mind the

feeling that in some unintelligible manner, the construction had been

directed either by foreigners or by Indians who were partly descended

from men of foreign origin. The forms of ancient mosques and of the

inner courts and quadrangles of Arabian or Moorish and Spanish public

buildings were indistinctly recalled to the memory. It was however to

be observed, upon an examination of the methods adopted at Palenque

in supporting the weight of the roofs, that the arches (if it is

permissible for that term to be applied to straight converging slopes

covered with flat coping stones,) are absolutely exceptional and unlike

any other arch that is known. I was reminded, to a certain extent, of

the ruins of Alatri, near Mycenæ on the plains of Argos, and of an

Etruscan tomb near Perugia, but the system employed by the American

architects, in placing the cap or terminal cross stones was essentially

different.

In the exploration of the ruins our attention was chiefly directed

to certain doubtful points, particularly with regard to the chambers

which are beneath the corridors, and are entered from the level of the

courts. There have been several conjectures respecting the purposes

of these cells. I think that it is probable that they were used as

dormitories. In some of the chambers there was a low, wide stone table,

placed against the wall at the end. These benches were large flat

smooth slabs of limestone supported on four stone legs. In height,

shape and dimensions they were like the wooden bedsteads used by the

Indians at the present time.

There is a square tower in one of the inner courts which must be

considered as the most singular structure in Palenque. In position and

manner of construction it is abnormal in character. It was probably

intended for some special object, after the monastery had been

completed. When Captain Del Rio saw this tower, in 1787, he estimated

its height to be sixteen yards. In 1870 there were heaps of rubble

and fallen stones piled against the base, which made it difficult for

me to make exact measurements, but an approximate estimate gave the

sides of the square near the base as twenty-three feet, and the height

about forty-five feet. The peculiarity about the construction is the

fact that it consists of a tower within a tower. The inner structure

contains a steep and narrow staircase. Light is obtained through large

openings in the sides of the outer tower, and then through smaller

openings in the walls of the interior one. The steps appear to have

led up to the top. The walls are formed of rough slabs of limestone

which had been thickly coated over with cement, portions of which

still remained. It was raised to a height which commanded views of the

adjacent temples.

Upon my return to the eastern front, I found that the Indians had

slung the hammocks in the outer corridor overlooking the forest. A

few minutes before sunset we heard the strange and beautiful notes of

a solitary bird singing amongst the ruins. The song resembled in its

tone that of a thrush. Dr. Coller said that the bird was a kind of

nightingale, and that it was only known to live within and around the

Palenque temples. The bird sang in a slow, deliberate manner, each of

the notes having a short interval of time between them. The song was

maintained during the twilight, and ceased as soon as it became dark

and the night had begun. It was an evening hymn to the setting sun.

The hoarse screams and movements of troops of monkeys then disturbed

the precincts. These harsh noises gradually stopped, and as the

night advanced the forest became silent. The moon was up and we knew

that it was shining brightly above the trees, but we could only see

occasionally its faint glimmer. I had expected to hear the croaking of

frogs or the sounds of cicadas, the usual accompaniment to a tropical

evening, but although there was a running stream of water at the foot

of the mound, these familiar sounds were absent.

The brushwood covering the ground was made brilliant by numerous

fireflies. The light which shone from these beetles far exceeded

anything of that nature that I had seen in other regions, and I took

the opportunity of ascertaining the strength of the illuminating power.

I sent one of the men into the wood to catch the largest firefly

that he could find, and then, after having made the corridor dark by

extinguishing our candles, the insect was held about two inches from a

blank page of my note book, Dr. Coller watched the experiment. We found

that the light was steady and shed a soft clear phosphorescent glow

over the paper. The luminous power was sufficient to enable us to read

or write with ease over a surface two inches square. After writing a

few notes upon what had been done during the day we added:—

“Written by the light of a firefly in the Palace, in the ruins

of Palenque, the night of Wednesday, March 10th, 1870, the

candle (firefly) held by Dr. Albert Coller. The light about

equal to that of a small wax candle and very pure. The light

rather greenish.”

“Dr. A. J. COLLER.”

Before turning into my hammock I visited the horses tethered at the

base of the mound near the stream. They were much worried by flies,

mosquitos, and small ticks called garrapátas, which find their way

under the skin and cause great irritation. In the corridor, thirty

feet above them, we were not troubled with any of these pests, but

there were numerous bats. The Indians said that, sometimes, horses were

seriously injured by bats biting them above their hoofs.

In the morning, upon the earliest indications of dawn, the solitary

nightingale again began its song, and the clear staccato, and

singularly musical note was again heard amongst the ruins until

sunrise, when it ceased. Thus this bird sang its song of praise as the

herald of the day.

At sunrise Dr. Coller returned to San Domingo, leaving me alone at

Palenque to carry out the investigation of the mounds and temples, a

work which he thought would be laborious and oppressive. My guides

were however well acquainted with the ruins, and I consequently

knew that I should be spared all unnecessary exertion. But until I

began the exploration I had no idea of the difficulties that had to

be encountered. The men were employed in cutting a path through the

brushwood and it was impracticable to do more than follow a certain

line of direction and obtain ideas of distances by counting the

number of paces or by noting intervals of time. I soon ascertained

that with the means at my disposal it was hopeless to expect to do

more than obtain a general knowledge of the extent and form of the

chief structures, and the positions of the mounds. It was a serious

disappointment to find that it was impossible to make a thorough

examination without the aid of a large number of Indians to cut down

the trees and clear the ground. This would have been a work involving

much time and expenditure and was entirely beyond my power. The forest

was sombre, for the light that penetrated through the trees, was

insufficient. It was however possible to obtain a fair knowledge of the

extent of the space covered by the mounds, and their distances from the

monastery. The ground plan of the inclosure could also be approximately

understood.

The first and, with respect to its altar, the most important building

that I saw, was that known by the name of the Temple of the Cross.

Before ascending the sides of the mound upon which it stands, I

examined the formation of an ancient causeway which covered, for some

distance, the stream near its base. I traced it for about one hundred

and fifty yards. A small portion was sufficiently preserved to enable

the system of construction to be ascertained. It appears to have been

intended for the purpose of confining the rivulet that ran beneath it,

and thus to secure a dry roadway, or crossing, during the rainy season.

It was stated by the Indians, that there still existed, in the forest,

the remains of a stone bridge. As far as I could understand their

description, it appeared that in shape it was not unlike the ancient

Chinese bridges, and rose to the centre by steep gradients.

After finishing the measurements of the causeway we began to ascend

the mound. About halfway up the slope, the men stopped and pointed to

a place where, lying with its face on the ground, was the stone of

the cross. As this tablet had been the subject of much investigation,

and is undoubtedly, with respect to its meaning, the most remarkable

monument at Palenque, I was anxious to examine it with the utmost care.

I directed the Indians to turn it over and thoroughly clean it from

moss and dirt, so as to enable me to make a sketch of it. I found that,

in consequence of the action of the earth upon the face of the stone,

parts of the sculpture were difficult to trace, but the central figures

were quite distinct. I was able to make a satisfactory outline,

chiefly confining my attention to the cross, the bird surmounting it,

and the dress of the man, having in his hands what seemed to be a

child, which he was presenting as a votive offering.

The bird, with its long double tail feathers, was probably the

representation of the Quetzal, the sacred bird of the Quichés, and

thus it may be assumed that the temple in which this tablet formed the

centre of the altar-piece, was dedicated to the worship of the god

Quetzalcoatl. But, judging by the peculiarities of the dress worn by

the principal worshipper, I formed the opinion that he was not, as has

previously been supposed, a priest offering sacrifice. The worshippers

and the offerings have, I believe, other significations.[81]

The temple, placed upon the top of the mound, must have been—when it

was externally perfect—a graceful and well proportioned shrine; but

when I saw it, the outer walls were so enveloped in brushwood and

enclosed by trees, that it was not practicable to do more than obtain

a conception of its proportions. After having measured the length,

breadth and height, and made a ground plan, I examined the interior.

A corridor ran along the front; within was the chamber which had

contained the inscribed stone slabs which formed the back of the altar,

in the centre of which had been the figure of the cross. This, and the

right and left hand tablets, had been all closely joined together so

as to form one subject,[82] the meaning of which was probably explained

by the hieroglyphic characters. The right hand tablet, which had been

removed, I had already seen at the museum in Washington.

After leaving this sanctuary, we descended the southern slope until

we reached the base, and then began to ascend the adjoining mound, on

whose summit was another temple. Thus we proceeded until we reached a

singular little structure which has been considered to be exceptional,

from the fact that the figure upon the altar had been placed upon a

base supported by what are supposed to have been two tigers. I could

only trace the remains of the feet, as everything within and without

the temple was in ruins. Following the direction of the quadrangular

precincts, we finally crossed over an unusually lofty mound, and then

arrived at the back or western face of the monastery.

We had completed a slight survey of the mounds and temples on the sides

of the inclosure, having passed successively over them and examined the

altars, as far as their more or less ruined state permitted. These all

varied in their dimensions, but they were evidently built for analagous

purposes as shrines for the worship of the Indian gods.[83] There was,

however, one important exception which requires to be noticed.

At the south-west angle of the monastery—and connected with it in such

a manner that it seems to have been an adjunct to the main building—are

the ruins of a structure which has been considered to have been a

temple, but which, I think, served for a different purpose. It stands

upon a mound about forty-five feet high. Its frontage was found to be

longer than that of any of the other temples. In the interior there

was no altar, but the upright slabs of stone placed upon the inner

wall were covered with hieroglyphs. When the Indians, who accompanied

Mr. Stephens, saw these groups of characters they declared that the

building was an escuela or schoolhouse. Other opinions were also given,

but the subject has not received any investigation. I think it is

probable that the opinion of the Indians was correct, and that it was

here that the boys were taught the meaning of the hieroglyphic symbols,

and were thus able to read and interpret the signs placed upon the

idols and altars.

In the afternoon we re-entered the monastery. We had been for nearly

seven hours occupied in crossing over the mounds and clearing a path

through the forest, and yet at no time did I estimate that we were more

than five hundred yards from our starting point. At the end of this

part of the day’s work, I found that I was able to establish some

deductions respecting the positions and heights of the raised platforms

and the character of the stone edifices.

It may be concluded that Palenque consists of a group of mounds having

buildings upon them exclusively devoted to the purposes of religion.

In the year 1840, five of the mounds had temples upon their summits

which were in a fair state of preservation. The survey of Captain

Antonio Del Rio was made in the year 1787, and, as he was an officer

of the Artillery, his Report, with respect to the general plan, and

the bearings and distances of the mounds then remaining, may be

accepted as being correct. He states that he visited the ruins called

Casas de Piedras (stone houses) on the 5th of May, and finding that

nothing could be distinctly made out in consequence of the forest,

he engaged a large number of Indians from Tumbalá, who felled the

trees and afterwards cleared the ground by fire, thus opening up a

sufficient space to enable him to observe the true positions of the

mounds and buildings. He found that they were all contained within a

rectangular area, four hundred and fifty yards long and three hundred

yards wide. In the centre was the mound upon which stood the largest

structure. This was surrounded by other edifices, “namely: five to the

northward, four to the southward, one to the south-west, and three to

the eastward.”

Thus it appears that in 1787 there were thirteen mounds with buildings

upon their summits, besides the large platform earthwork upon which

was placed the “Palace.” In 1806, nearly twenty years afterwards, the

Spanish Government ordered another survey to be made. The expedition

was placed under the orders of Captain Dupaix, who had served as

an officer in the Dragoons. He reported that, at that time, eleven

temples were still standing. Thirty-four years later, Mr. Stephens

could only discover five temples not utterly ruined. It is strange that

in these short intervals of time, such changes should have happened

amongst monuments of this nature. With regard to this subject, it is

of consequence to notice the statements given by the local authorities

who made the original discoveries which led to the survey of Del Rio.

The explorations were conducted, under the orders of the Spanish

authorities at Guatemala, by one of the principal inhabitants of

the village of San Domingo, named Calderon, aided by the Government

architect, Bernasconi. In their Report, which was made only three years

before that of Del Rio, they declared that there were evidences of the

ruins of numerous houses occupying a large space of land to the west

of the temples. Nothing was known by my Indians upon this subject. It

should, however, be observed, with respect to undiscovered ruins, that

any rumours relating to what may, or may not, exist in the heart of a

tropical forest, must necessarily be doubtful, for where nothing can be

seen, except what may happen to be found in the direction of the path,

much must be unknown.

On the slopes of the ground in front of one of the temples I saw a

large and rudely carved statue, which in consequence of its form

and manner of sculpture is of much importance. There is reason to

believe that it was intended to represent Quetzalcoatl, an Indian god,

a mythical or real personage, who, for many reasons connected with

Palenque, requires to have an especial consideration given to him. It

is a distinctive characteristic of this statue, that the features are

essentially different from those of the Indians whose figures are to be

seen upon the altars of the temples and within the courts and corridors

of the monastery. These have receding foreheads and sharply defined

prominent faces, quite unlike the present races in Central America, but

in a marked degree resembling the tribes of the North American Indians,

who had the custom of flattening the heads of their children.

The statue by my measurement, was a few inches more than eight feet in

height, exclusive of the lower part of the stone, which tapered off in

such a manner as to show that it had been originally placed upright and

fixed in the ground. The feet stood on a base upon which was carved the

hieroglyph which probably denoted the name. The forehead was low and

straight. The face was completely different in type and expression,

from that of any known race of Indians. The head was surmounted by a

kind of high tiara. The left hand held in front of the figure a small

head, in the same position as in the little figure at Ocosingo.

As, after completing the circuit of the mounds, there were still a few

hours at my disposal before leaving Palenque so as to reach the village

before nightfall, I decided to devote the time to the investigation of

certain problems regarding the age and construction of the buildings.

But in the first place, attention should be directed to the manner in

which the open courts within the monastery are disposed, and access is

obtained to the rooms beneath the corridors. Commencing from the east

front, there are two ranges of corridors which are separated throughout

their whole length by a strong wall, which receives the thrust of the

two inner slopes supporting the roof. There is only one entrance or

means of communication between them in the existing northern portion

of the ruins. The interior width of each of these galleries is about

seven feet four inches. After passing across them, the principal court

is reached and the floor of the open space is seen ten feet below.

A wide flight of large and well hewn stone steps leads down to the

bottom, which appears to have been paved with several layers of cement.

This court is twenty-eight paces wide. The rooms are entered through

doorways in the sides of the inclosing walls. Opposite to the first

flight of steps there are similar steps leading to a second series of

corridors. Passing through these, another court is reached, and beyond

is the outer gallery which runs along the western side of the building.

The total width of this cross section of the monastery is approximately

one hundred and seventy-six feet.

[Illustration]

When wandering amongst these courts, and looking at the vestiges of

an unknown state of civilisation, I endeavoured to form conclusions

with regard to the purpose and antiquity of all that was seen. The

problem is difficult to solve. It has been surmised that the temples

of Palenque were erected during a period not exceeding four centuries

before the Spanish conquest. This opinion was based upon what has been

observed with respect to the condition of the ruins, and the freshness

of portions of the colouring of the stucco. This method of estimating

comparative antiquity presents some local difficulties.

The square tower was originally faced with thick cement, and then

covered with washes of colour, in the same manner as the walls of the

Teocallis in the Quiché city of Utatlan upon which the faded colours

are still visible. If the existing outer coating was the only one that

had been given it would be reasonable to infer that the age of the

tower was not great. But it happens that in those places where portions

of the stucco have fallen, there have been numerous applications

of colour, and therefore admitting that the latest may look bright

and fresh, it is not possible to estimate the periods that may have

elapsed between the dates of successive layers. Although I was at first

inclined to think that the building could not be ancient, yet a more

careful examination left the subject indeterminate. Any conclusions

which may have been thought probable on account of the state of the

walls and roofs are equally uncertain. With regard to this matter it is

necessary to take into consideration certain existing conditions.

Immediately behind the ruins are the slopes of the sierras which

I traversed on the way from Tumbalá. They are covered with loose

fragments of the limestones of which they are formed. These were the

building materials used by the architects of the temples. Their small

size and flat surface were suitable for the purpose, when combined with

mortar, the mixing of which the Indians well understood. The walls of

the monastery were made with layers of these flat stones bound together

with quantities of this mortar. The outer faces were carefully arranged

to receive a thick casing of cement, which was so hard and sound, that

it is evident the builders must have had an accurate knowledge of the

best proportions of the substances required for its composition. The

cement had a smooth surface and in several places it was still perfect.

The colours laid upon it are red, blue, yellow and white. They appear

to have been made more or less vivid and varied in accordance with what

was thought necessary to obtain good contrasts. The stucco figures and

scrolls were skilfully designed, and were coloured in a manner which

was harmonious and effective. The sound state of the cement where

it is sheltered from the action of the rain is extraordinary. It is

strange that in this tropical climate where, for half the year there

are continuous and heavy rainfalls, the variations from the damp, close

atmosphere in the summer to the dry season of winter should not have

had a more destructive influence upon buildings, mainly composed of

rubble and mortar.

In one instance, that of the tower, the astonishing growth of tropical

vegetation has had the effect of preventing its fall. Thick creepers

have wound themselves like strong ropes around the walls and bound

them firmly together. The walls at the corners of the entrances to the

courts were remarkably uninjured. The cement was intact, and this, even

in positions where it might have been expected that, in a long course

of time, in consequence of being partly exposed and partly sheltered,

it would have broken away and fallen.

It would be justifiable to conclude from these evidences of stability

that the buildings are comparatively modern. But there is a difficulty

with regard to this assumption which has to be considered. In the

year 1525, when Cortes on his march from Mexico to Honduras passed

with his expeditionary forces within a few leagues of this place, the

temples had been already abandoned. Consequently not less than four

centuries must have now elapsed since Palenque was deserted. If then,

within the tropics, buildings made of such perishable materials have

remained for that long period in a fair state of preservation, it may

be inferred that there are some local circumstances which have caused

an exceptional power of resistance to the disintegrating action of the

climate. The forest may have afforded some protection, and therefore

the age of the monastery may be greater than might be estimated from

the condition of the ruins.

There are, however, other facts which are opposed to any theories

of great antiquity. The Indians had cleared, for my inspection, the

stone steps leading from the western side of the principal court.

Upon these were carved groups of hieroglyphs which were in an almost

perfect state. The edges of the steps were unworn. It was therefore

made evident that in an open court, completely exposed to the weather

and the influence of the tropical rains, inscriptions graven upon the

surface of these flat stone slabs had remained uninjured.

After looking at the sculptures, and the coloured stucco figures which

adorned the piers and inner walls, I endeavoured to establish some

standard of comparison by which I might be able to form well-founded

conjectures regarding their age. I thought of various ruins in Egypt

and Asia Minor, then of those belonging to later periods in Italy

and Great Britain, but there were such essential differences in the

materials used, and the influences of the atmosphere, that it was not

possible to establish any assured conclusions. Opinions formed upon

the results of an examination of the temples on the mounds would

be equally unsatisfactory, for some of them, especially in their

interiors, were in a comparatively good condition, others were in

ruins. But, there are proofs of a moderate antiquity. The lintels

that once supported the walls over the doorways and other openings

have completely disappeared. In only one instance, which came under

my notice, were there any signs of the thick, hard beams of zapote

wood which had been employed for that purpose. A broad lintel in the

monastery had left its impress upon the under surface of the wall which

had weighed downwards upon it. The marks of the fibre and the shape

of the lintel were clearly defined upon the mortar. Dr. Coller found

amongst the ruins a piece of this wood. It was exceedingly heavy and

close-grained, and was of the nature of what is known, in the East

Indies, by the name of iron wood. The zapote trees grow chiefly in the

forests in the valley of the Usamacinta and towards the lake of Peten.

When the evening drew near, I called my Indians together and entered

the forest on the way back to the village. As I rode slowly forward

I felt that these mysterious ruins contained a secret which has yet

to be unravelled. The priests of a powerful race, having strange and

unknown forms of religion, had been for centuries worshipping at these

shrines. Within the sanctuaries were graven upon tablets of stone those

records which, when interpreted, may throw some light upon what is now

obscure.[84]

Travels Amongst American Indians, Their Ancient Earthworks and Temples Including a Journey in Guatemala, Mexico and Yucatan, and a Visit to the Ruins of Patinamit, Utatlan, Palenque and Uxmal · 第 15 / 20 章