BOOK IX.

I.

After the dispersion of the Constituent Assembly, the mission of M. and

Madame Roland having terminated, they quitted Paris. This woman, who had

just left the centre of faction and business, returned to La Platière to

resume the cares of her rustic household and the pruning of her vines.

But she had quaffed of the intoxicating cup of the Revolution. The

movement in which she had participated for a moment impelled her still,

though at a distance. She carried on a correspondence with Robespierre

and Buzot; political and formal with Robespierre, pathetic and tender

with Buzot. Her mind, her soul, her heart, all recalled it. Then took

place between herself and her husband a deliberation, apparently

impartial, in order to decide whether they should bury themselves in the

country, or should return to Paris. But the ambition of the one, and the

ardent desire of the other, had decided, unknown to, and before, either.

The most trifling pretext was sufficient for their impatience. In the

month of December they were again installed in Paris.

It was the period when all their friends arrived. Pétion had just been

elected _maire_, and was creating a republic in the _commune_.

Robespierre, excluded from the Legislative Assembly by the law which

forbade the re-election of the members of the Constituent Assembly,

found a tribune in the Jacobins. Brissot assumed Buzot's place in the

new Assembly, and his reputation, as a public writer and statesman,

brought around him and his doctrines the young Girondists, who had

arrived from their department, with the ardour of their age, and the

impulse of a second revolutionary tide. They cast themselves, on their

arrival, into the places which Robespierre, Buzot, Laclos, Danton, and

Brissot had marked out for them.

Roland, the friend of all these men, but in the back ground, and

concealed in their shadow, had one of those peculiar reputations, the

more potent over opinion, as it made but little display: it was spoken

of as though an antique virtue, beneath the simple appearance of a

rustic: he was the Siéyès of his party. Beneath his taciturnity his deep

thought was assured, and in his mystery the oracle was accredited. The

brilliancy and genius of his wife attracted all eyes towards him: his

very mediocrity, the only power that has the virtue of neutralising

envy, was of service to him. As no one feared him, every body thrust him

forward--Pétion as a cover for himself--Robespierre to undermine

him--Brissot to put his own villanous reputation under the shelter of

proverbial probity--Buzot, Vergniaud, Louvet, Gensonné, and the

Girondists, from respect for his science, and the attraction towards

Madame Roland; even the Court, from confidence in his honesty and

contempt for his influence. This man advanced to power without any

effort on his own part, borne onwards by the favour of a party, by the

_prestige_ which the unknown has over opinion, by the disdain of his

opponents and the genius of his wife.

II.

The king had for some time hoped that the wrath of the Revolution would

be softened down by its triumph. Those violent acts, those stormy

oscillations between insolence and repentance, which had marked the

inauguration of the Assembly, had painfully undeceived him. His

astonished ministry already trembled before so much audacity, and in the

council avowed their incompetency. The king was desirous of retaining

men who had given him such proofs of devotion to his person. Some of

them, confidants or accomplices, served the king and queen, either by

keeping up communications with the emigrants or by their intrigues in

the interior.

M. de Montmorin, an able man, but unequal to the difficulties of the

crisis, had retired. The two principal men of the ministry were M. de

Lessart for Foreign Affairs; M. Bertrand de Molleville in the Marine

Department. M. de Lessart, placed by his position between the armed

emigrants, the impatient Assembly, undecided Europe, and the inculpated

king, could not fail to fall under his own good intentions. His plan was

to avoid war in his own country by temporising and negotiations--to

suspend the hostile demonstration of foreign power: to present to the

intimidated Assembly the king, as sole arbiter and negotiator of peace

between his people and the foreigner; and he trusted thus to adjourn the

final collisions between the Assembly and the throne, and to

re-establish the regular authority of the king by preserving peace. The

personal arrangements of the emperor Leopold aided him in his plans; he

had only to contend against the fatality which urges men and things to

their _dénouement_. The Girondists, and Brissot especially, overwhelmed

him with accusations, inasmuch as he was the man who could most retard

their triumph. By sacrificing him they could sacrifice a whole system:

their press and their harangues pointed him out to the fury of the

people;--the partisans of war marked him down as their victim. He was no

traitor--but with them to negotiate was to betray. The king, who knew he

was irreproachable and confided all his plans to him, refused to

sacrifice him to his enemies, and thus accumulated resentments against

the minister. As to M. de Molleville, he was a secret enemy of the

constitution. He advised the king to play the hypocrite, acting in the

letter, and thus to destroy the spirit, of the law,--advancing by

subterranean ways to a violent catastrophe,--when, according to him the

monarchical cause must come out victorious. Confiding in the power of

intrigue more than in the influence of opinion, seeking everywhere

traitors to the popular cause, paying spies, bargaining for consciences,

believing in no one's incorruptibility, keeping up secret intelligence

with the most violent demagogues, paying in hard money for the most

incendiary propositions under the idea of making the Revolution

unpopular from its very excesses, and filling the tribunes of the

Assembly with his agents in order to choke down with their hootings, or

render effective by their applause, the discourses of certain orators,

and thus to feign in the tribunes a false people and a false opinion;

men of small means in great matters presuming that it is possible to

deceive a nation as if it were an individual. The king, to whom he was

devoted, liked him as the depositary of his troubles, the confidant of

his relations with foreign powers, and the skilful mediator of his

negotiation with all parties. M. de Molleville thus kept himself in

well-managed balance between his favour with the king, and his

intrigues with the revolutionary party He spoke the language of the

constitution well--he had the secret of many consciences bought and paid

for.

It was between these two men that the king, in order to comply with

popular opinion, called M. de Narbonne to the ministry of war. Madame de

Stäel and the constitutional party sought the aid of the Girondists.

Condorcet, was the mediator between the two parties. Madame de

Condorcet, an exceedingly lovely woman, united with Madame de Stäel in

enthusiasm for the young minister. The one lent him the brilliancy of

her genius, the other the influence of her beauty. These two females

appeared to fuse their feelings in one common devotion for the man

honoured by their preference. Rivalry was sacrificed at the shrine of

ambition.

III.

The point of union of the Girondist party with the constitutional party,

in that combination of which M. de Narbonne's elevation was the

guarantee, was the thirst of both parties for war. The constitutional

party desired it, in order to divert internal anarchy, and dispel those

fermentations of agitation which threatened the throne. The Girondist

party desired it in order to push men's minds to extremities. It hoped

that the dangers of the country would give it strength enough to shake

the throne and produce the republican regime.

It was under these auspices that M. de Narbonne took office. He also was

desirous of war; not to overthrow the throne in whose shadow he was

born, but to dazzle and shake the nation, to hazard fortune by desperate

casts, and to replace at the head of the people under the arms of the

high military aristocracy of the country, La Fayette, Biron, Rochambeau,

the Lameths, Dillon, Custines, and himself. If victory favoured the

French flag, the victorious army, under constituent chiefs, would

control the Jacobins, strengthen the reformed monarchy, and maintain the

establishment of the two chambers; if France was destined to reverses,

unquestionably the throne and aristocracy must fall, but better to fall

nobly in a national contest of France against her enemies, than to

tremble perpetually and to perish at last in a riot by the pikes of the

Jacobins. This was the adventurous and chivalrous policy which pleased

the young men by its heroism, and the women by its _prestige_. It

betokened the high courage of France. M. de Narbonne personified it in

the council. His colleagues, MM. de Lessart and Bertrand de Molleville,

saw in him the total overthrow of all their plans. The king, as usual,

was all indecision; one step forward and one backwards; surprised by the

event in his hesitation, and thus unable to resist a shock, or himself

to give any impulse.

Beside these official councillors, certain constituents not in the

Assembly, especially the Lameths, Duport, and Barnave, were consulted by

the king. Barnave had remained in Paris some months after the

dissolution of the Constituent Assembly. He redeemed by sincere devotion

to the monarchy the blows he had previously dealt upon it. He had

measured with an eye of judgment, the rapid declivity down which the

love of popular favour had impelled him. Like Mirabeau, he wished to

pause when it was too late. Henceforth, remaining on the brink of

events, he was besieged with terror and remorse. If his intrepid heart

did not tremble for himself, the sympathy he experienced for the queen

and royal family urged him to give the king advice which had but one

fault,--it was impossible now to follow it.

These consultations, held at Adrien Duport's, the friend of Barnave and

the oracle of the party, only served to embarrass the mind of the king

with another element of hesitation. La Fayette and his friends also

added their imperious counsel. La Fayette could not believe that he was

supplanted. The national guard, which yet remained attached to him,

still credited his omnipotence,--all these men and all these parties

lent M. de Narbonne secret support. A courtier in the eyes of the court,

an aristocrat in the eyes of the nobility, a soldier in the eyes of the

army, one of the people in the eyes of the people, irresistible in the

eyes of the women, he was the minister of public hope. The Girondists

alone had an _arrière-pensée_ in their apparent favour towards him. They

elevated him to make his fall the more conspicuous: M. de Narbonne was

to them but the hand which prepared the way for their advent.

IV.

Scarcely had he taken his place in the cabinet, than this young minister

displayed all the activity, frankness, and grace of his character in the

discussion of affairs, and his intercourse with the Assembly. He

employed the system of confidence, and surprised the Assembly by his

_abandon_, and these austere and suspicious men, who had hitherto seen

nothing but deceit in the language of ministers, now yielded to the

charm of his speeches. He addressed them, not in the official and cold

language of diplomacy, but in the open and cordial tone of a patriot. He

brought the dignity of his office to the tribune; he generously assumed

all responsibility, and he professed the most cherished principles of

the people with a sincerity that precluded the possibility of suspicion.

He openly disclosed his projects, and the energy of his mind

communicated itself to those men who were the most difficult to be won

over. The nation too saw with delight an _aristocrate_ so well adapt

himself to their costume, their principles, and their passions. The

ardour of his patriotism did not suffer the impulse, that confounded in

him the king and the people, to slacken; and in the course of his short

administration he did wonders of activity. He visited and put in a state

of defence all the fortified places; raised an army, harangued the

troops; arrested the emigration of the nobility, in the name of the

common danger; nominated the generals, and summoned La Fayette,

Rochambeau, and Luckner. A patriotic sentiment, of which he was the

soul, pervaded France; by rendering the throne the centre of the

national defence, he rendered the king again popular for a short time,

and in the enthusiasm felt for their country, all parties became

reconciled. His eloquence was rapid, brilliant, and sonorous as the

clash and din of arms. This expansion of his heart was a part of his

character; he bared his breast to the eyes of his adversaries, and by

this confidence won them to his side.

The first day of his appointment to office, instead of announcing his

nomination by a letter to the president, as was customary with the other

ministers, he proceeded to the Assembly, and mounted the tribune. "I

come to offer you," said he, "the profoundest respect for the authority

with which the people have invested you; from attachment for the

constitution, to which I have sworn; a courageous love for liberty and

equality--yes, for equality, which has no longer any opponents, but

which should nevertheless possess no less energetic supporters." Two

days afterwards he gained the entire confidence of the Assembly, when

speaking of the responsibility of the ministers. "I accept," cried he,

"the definition of the situation of ministers just made, that tells us

responsibility is death. Spare no threats, no dangers. Load us with

personal fetters, but afford us the means of aiding the constitution to

progress. For my own part, I embrace this opportunity of entreating the

members of this Assembly to inform me of every thing which they deem

useful to the welfare of the nation, during my administration. Our

interests, our enemies are the same; and it is not the letter of the

constitution only that we should seek to enforce, but the spirit; we

must not seek merely to acquit ourselves, but to succeed. You will see

that the minister is convinced that there is no hope for liberty unless

it proceed through you and from you: cease then for awhile to mistrust

us, condemn us afterwards if we have merited it; but first give us with

confidence the means of serving you."

Such words as these touched even the most prejudiced, and it was

unanimously voted that the speech should be printed, and sent to all the

departments. In order to cement the reconciliation of the king and the

nation, M. de Narbonne went to the committees of the Assembly,

communicated to them his plans, discussed his measures, and won over all

to his resolutions. This government in common was the spirit of the

constitution; the other ministers saw in this the abasement of the

executive power and an abdication of royalty, whilst M. de Narbonne saw

in it the sole means of winning back public feeling to the king. Opinion

had dethroned the royalty; it was to opinion that he looked to

strengthen it, and therefore he made himself the minister of public

opinion.

At the moment when the emperor sent to the king a communication

threatening the frontiers, and the king personally informed the Assembly

of the energetic measures he had adopted, M. de Narbonne, re-entering

the Assembly after the king's departure, mounted the tribune. "I am on

the eve of quitting Paris," said he, "in order to visit our frontiers;

not that I believe the mistrust felt by the soldiers for their officers

has any foundation, but because I hope to dissipate them by addressing

all in the name of their king and their country. I will say to the

officers, that ancient prejudices and an affection for their king

carried to an excess for a time, may have excused their conduct, but

that the word treason is unknown amongst nations of honourable men. To

the soldiers, your officers who remain at the head of the army are bound

by their oath and their honour to the Revolution. The safety of the

state depends on the discipline of the army. I confide my post to the

minister of foreign affairs, and such is my confidence, such should be

the confidence of the nation in his patriotism, that I take on myself

the responsibility of all the orders that he may give in my name." M. de

Narbonne displayed on this occasion as much skill as magnanimity; he

felt that he had sufficient credit with the nation to cover the

unpopularity of his colleague, M. de Lessart, already denounced by the

Girondists, and thus placed himself between them and their victim. The

Assembly was carried away by his enthusiasm; he obtained 20,000,000 of

francs for the preparations for war, and the grade of marshal of France

for the aged Luckner. The press and the clubs themselves applauded him,

for the general eagerness for war swept away all before it, even the

resentments of faction.

One man alone of the Jacobins resisted the influence of this enthusiasm:

this man was Robespierre. Up to this time Robespierre had been merely a

discusser of ideas, a subaltern agitator, indefatigable and intrepid,

but eclipsed by other and greater names. From this day he became a

statesman; he felt his own mental strength; he based this strength on a

principle, and alone and unaided ventured to cope with the truth. He

devoted himself without regarding even the number of his adversaries,

and by exercising he doubled his force.

All the cabinets of the princes threatened by the Revolution still

debated the question of peace or war. It was discussed alike in the

councils of Louis XVI., in the meetings of parties in the Assembly, at

the Jacobins, and in the public journals. The moment was decisive, for

it was evident that the negotiation between the emperor Leopold and

France on the subject of the reception of emigrants in the states

dependent on the empire was fast drawing to a close, and that before

long the emperor would have given satisfaction to France by dispersing

these bodies of emigrés, or that France would declare war against him,

and by this declaration draw on herself the hostilities of all her

enemies at the same time. France thus would defy them all.

We have already seen that the Statesmen, and Revolutionists,

Constitutionalists, and Girondists, Aristocrats, and Jacobins, were all

in favour of war. War was, in the eyes of all, an appeal to destiny, and

the impatient spirit of France wished that it would pronounce at once,

either by victory or defeat. Victory seemed to France the sole issue by

which she could extricate herself from her difficulties at home, and

even defeat did not terrify her. She believed in the necessity of war,

and defied even death. Robespierre thought otherwise, and it is for that

reason that he was Robespierre.

He clearly comprehended two things; the first, that war was a gratuitous

crime against the people; the second, that a war, even though

successful, would ruin the cause of democracy. Robespierre looked on the

Revolution as the rigorous application of the principles of philosophy

to society. A passionate and devoted pupil of Jean Jacques Rousseau, the

_Contrat Social_ was his gospel; war, made with the blood of the people,

was in the eyes of this philosopher--what it must ever be in the eyes of

the wise--wholesale slaughter to gratify the ambition of a few, glorious

only when it is defensive. Robespierre did not consider France placed in

such a position as to render it absolutely necessary for her safety that

the human vein should be opened, whence would flow such torrents of

blood. Embued with a firm conviction of the omnipotence of the new ideas

on which he nourished faith and fanaticism within a heart closed against

intrigue, he did not fear that a few fugitive princes, destitute of

credit, and some thousand aristocratic emigrés, would impose laws or

conditions on a nation whose first struggle for liberty had shaken the

throne, the nobility, and the clergy. Neither did he think that the

disunited and wavering powers of Europe would venture to declare war

against a nation that proclaimed peace so long as we did not attack

them. But should the European cabinets be sufficiently mad to attempt

this new crusade against human reason, then Robespierre fully believed

they would be defeated, for he knew that there lies invincible force in,

the justice of a cause--that right doubles the energy of a nation, that

despair often supplies the want of weapons, and that God and men were

for the people.

He thought, moreover, that if it was the duty of France to propagate the

advantages and the light of reason and liberty, the natural and peaceful

extension of the French Revolution in the world would prove far more

infallible than our arms,--that the Revolution should be a doctrine and

not an universal monarchy realised by the sword, and that the patriotism

of nations should not coalesce against his dogmata. Their strength was

in their minds, for in his eyes the power of the Revolution lay in its

enlightenment. But he understood more: he understood that an offensive

war would inevitably ruin the Revolution, and annihilate that premature

republic of which the Girondists had already spoken to him, but which he

himself could not as yet define. Should the war be unfortunate, thought

he, Europe will crush without difficulty beneath the tread of its armies

the earliest germs of this new government, to the truth of which perhaps

a few martyrs might testify, but which would find no soil from whence to

spring anew. If fortunate, military feeling, the invariable companion of

aristocratic feeling, honour, that religion that binds the soldier to

the throne; discipline, that despotism of glory, would usurp the place

of those stern virtues to which the exercise of the constitution would

have accustomed the people,--then they would forgive every thing, even

despotism, in those who had saved them. The gratitude of a nation to

those who have led its children to victory is a pitfall in which the

people will ever be ensnared,--nay, they even offer their necks to the

yoke; civil virtues must ever fade before the brilliancy of military

exploits. Either the army would return to surround the ancient royalty

with all its strength, and France would have her Monk, or the army would

crown the most successful of its generals, and liberty would have her

Cromwell. In either case the Revolution escaped from the people, and

lay at the mercy of the soldiery, and thus to save it from war was to

save it from a snare. These reflections decided him; as yet he meditated

no violence; he but saw into the future, and read it aright. This was

the original cause of his rupture with the Girondists; their justice was

but policy, and war appeared to them politic. Just or unjust, they

wished for it as a means of destruction to the throne, of aggrandisement

for themselves. Posterity must decide, if in this great quarrel the

first blame lies on the side of the democrat, or the ambitious

Girondists. This fierce contest, destined to terminate in the death of

both parties, began on the 12th of December at a meeting of the Jacobin

Club.

V.

"I have meditated during six months, and even from the first day of the

Revolution," said Brissot, the leader of the Gironde, "to what party I

should give my support. It is by the force of reason, and by considering

facts, that I have come to the conviction that a people, who, after ten

centuries of slavery, have re-conquered liberty, have need of war. War

is necessary to consolidate liberty, and to purge the constitution from

all taint of despotism. War is necessary to drive from amongst us those

men whose example might corrupt us. You have the power of chastising the

rebels, and intimidating the world; have the courage to do so. The

emigrés persist in their rebellion, the sovereigns persist in supporting

them. Can we hesitate to attack them? Our honour, our public credit, the

necessity of strengthening our revolution, all make it imperative on us.

France would be dishonoured, did she tamely suffer the insolence and

revolt of a few factions, and outrages that a despot would not bear for

a fortnight. How shall we be looked upon? No! we must avenge ourselves,

or become the opprobrium of all the other nations. We must avenge

ourselves by destroying these herds of _brigands_, or consent to behold

faction, conspiracy, and rebellion perpetuated, and the insolence of the

aristocrats greater than ever. They rely on the army at Coblentz,--in

that they put their trust. If you would at one blow destroy the

aristocracy, destroy Coblentz, and the chief of the nation will be

compelled to reign, according to the Constitution, with us and through

us."

These words, pronounced by the statesman of the Gironde, awakened an

echo in the breast of every man, from the Jacobin Club to the extremity

of the country. The vehement applause of the tribunes was merely the

expression of that impatience to know the final decision that pervaded

all parties. Robespierre needed iron nerve and determination to confront

his friends, his enemies, and public opinion; and yet he sustained this

struggle of a single idea against all this passion for weeks. Great

convictions are indefatigable; and Robespierre, by his own unaided

exertions, balanced all France during a month. His very enemies spoke

with respect of his firmness, and those who had not the courage to

follow him, yet would have been ashamed not to esteem him. His

eloquence, which had been dry, verbose, and dialectic, now became more

elegant and more imposing. The public journals printed his speeches.

"You, O people, who do not possess the means of procuring the speeches

of Robespierre, I promise them to you," said the _Orateur du Peuple_,

the Jacobin paper. "Preserve carefully the numbers that contain these

speeches; they are masterpieces of eloquence, that should be preserved

in every family, in order to teach future generations that Robespierre

existed for the public good and the preservation of liberty."

After having exhausted every argument that philosophy, policy, and

patriotism could suggest against an offensive war, commenced by the

Gironde, and secretly fomented by the ministers, and carried on by the

generals most suspected by the people, he mounted the tribune for the

last time, against Brissot, on the night of the 13th January, and

declared his conviction against war, in a speech as admirable as it was

pathetic.

VI.

"Yes, I am vanquished; I yield to you," cried he, in a broken voice, "I

also demand war. What do I say?--I demand a war, more terrible, more

implacable than you demand. I do not demand it as an act of prudence, an

act of reason, an act of policy, but as the resource of despair. I

demand it on one condition, which doubtless you have anticipated,--for I

do not think that the advocates of war have sought to deceive us. I

demand it deadly--I demand it heroic--I demand it such as the genius of

Liberty would declare against all despotism--such as the people of the

Revolution, under their own leaders, would render it;--not such as

intriguing cowards would have it, or as the ambitious and traitorous

ministers and generals would carry it on.

"Frenchmen, heroes of the 14th of July, who, without guide or leader,

yet acquired your liberty, come forth, and let us form that army which

you tell us is destined to conquer the universe. But where is the

general, who, imperturbable defender of the rights of the people, and

born with a hatred to tyrants, has never breathed the poisonous air of

the courts, and whose virtue is attested by the hatred and disgrace of

the court; this general, whose hands, guiltless of our blood, are worthy

to bear before us the banner of freedom; where is he, this new Cato,

this third Brutus, this unknown hero? let him appear and disclose

himself, he shall be our leader. But where is he? Where are these

soldiers of the 14th of July, who laid down, in the presence of the

people, the arms furnished them by despotism. Soldiers of Châteauvieux,

where are you? Come and direct our efforts. Alas! it is easier to rob

death of its prey, than despotism of its victims. Citizens! Conquerors

of the Bastille, come! Liberty summons you, and assigns you the honour

of the first rank! They are mute. Misery, ingratitude, and the hatred of

the aristocracy, have dispersed them. And you, citizens, immolated at

the Champ-de-Mars, in the very act of a patriotic confederation, you

will not be with us. Ah, what crime had these females, these massacred

babes, committed? Good God! how many victims, and all amongst the

people--all amongst the patriots, whilst the powerful conspirators live

and triumph. Rally round us, at least you national guards, who have

especially devoted yourselves to the defence of our frontiers in this

war with which a perfidious court threatens us. Come--but how?--you are

not yet armed. During two whole years you have demanded arms, and yet

have them not. What do I say? You have been refused even uniforms, and

condemned to wander from department to department, objects of contempt

to the minister, and of derision to the patricians, who receive you

only to enjoy the spectacle of your distress. No matter; come, we will

combat naked like the American savages.

"But shall we await the orders of the war office to destroy thrones?

Shall we await the signal of the court? Shall we be commanded by these

patricians, these eternal favourites of despotism, in this war against

aristocrats and kings? No--let us march forward alone; let us be our own

leaders. But see, the orators of war stop me! Here is Monsieur Brissot,

who tells me that Monsieur le Comte de Narbonne must conduct this

affair; that we must march under the orders of Monsieur le Marquis de La

Fayette; that the executive power alone possesses the right of leading

the nation to victory and freedom. Ah, citizens, this word has dispelled

all the charm! Adieu, victory and the independence of the people; if the

sceptres of Europe ever be broken, it will not be by such hands. Spain

will continue for some time the degraded slave of superstition and

royalism. Leopold will continue the tyrant of Germany and Italy, and we

shall not speedily behold Catos or Ciceros replace the pope and the

cardinals in the conclave. I declare openly, that war, as I understand

the term--war, such as I have proposed, is impracticable. And if it be

the war of the court, of the ministers, of the patricians who affect

patriotism, that we must accept--oh, then, far from believing in the

freedom of the world, I despair of your liberty. The wisest course left

us is to defend it against the perfidy of those enemies at home who lull

you with these heroic illusions.

"I continue calmly and sorrowfully. I have proved that liberty possesses

no more deadly foe than war; I have proved that war, advised by men

already objects of suspicion, was, in the hands of the executive power,

nought save a means of annihilating the constitution, only the end of a

plot against the Revolution. Thus to favour these plans of war, under

what pretext soever, is to associate ourselves with these treasonable

plots against the Revolution. All the patriotism in the world, all the

pretended political commonplaces, cannot change the nature of things. To

inculcate, like M. Brissot and his friends, confidence in the executive

power, and to call down public favour on the generals, is to disarm the

Revolution of its last hope--the vigilance and energy of the nation. In

the horrible position in which despotism, intrigue, treason, and the

general blindness have placed us, I consult alone my head and my heart.

I respect nothing, save my country; I obey nought, save truth. I know

that some patriots blame the frankness with which I present this

discouraging future of our situation. I do not conceal my fault from

myself. Is not the truth already sufficiently guilty because it is the

truth? Ah! so that our slumbers be light, what matter, though we be

awakened by the clash of chains?--and in the quietude of slavery let us

no longer disturb the repose of these fortunate patriots. No, but let

them know that we can measure with a firm eye and steady heart the depth

of the abyss. Let us adopt the device of the palatine of Posnania--'_I

prefer the storms of liberty to the serenity of slavery_.'

"If the moment of emancipation be not yet arrived, at least we should

have the patience to await it. If this generation was but destined to

struggle in the quicksand of vice, into which despotism had plunged it;

if the theatre of our revolution was destined but to present to the eyes

of the universe a struggle between perfidy and weakness, egotism and

ambition;--the rising generation would commence the task of purifying

this earth, so sullied by vice. It would bring, not the peace of

despotism or the sterile agitations of intrigue, but fire and sword to

lay low the thrones and exterminate the oppressors. O more fortunate

posterity, thou art not stranger to us! It is for thee that we brave the

storms and the intrigues of tyranny. Often discouraged by the obstacles

that environ us, we feel the necessity of struggling for thee. Thou

shalt complete our work. Retain on thy memory the names of the martyrs

of liberty." The sentiments of Rousseau were to be traced in these

words.

VII.

Louvet, one of the friends of Brissot, felt their power, and mounted the

tribune in order to move the man who alone arrested the progress of the

Gironde. "Robespierre," said he, apostrophising him directly;

"Robespierre--you alone keep the public mind in suspense--doubtless this

excess of glory was reserved for you. Your speeches belong to

posterity, and posterity will come to judge between you and me. But you

Will mar a great responsibility by persisting in your opinions; you are

accountable to your contemporaries, and even to future generations--yes,

posterity will judge between us, unworthy as I may be of it. It will

say, a man appeared in the Constituent Assembly--inaccessible to all

passions, one of the most faithful defenders of the people--it was

impossible not to esteem and cherish his virtues--not to admire his

courage--he was adored by the people, whom he had constantly served, and

he was worthy of it. A precipice opens. Fatigued by too much labour,

this man imagined he saw peril where there was none, and did not see it

where it really was. A man of no note was present, entirely occupied

with the present moment, aided by other citizens, he perceived the

danger, and could not remain silent. He went to Robespierre, and sought

to make him touch it with his finger. Robespierre turned away his eyes,

and withdrew his hand, the stranger persisted, and saved his country."

Robespierre smiled with disdain and incredulity at these words. The

suppliant gestures of Louvet, and the adjurations of the tribunes

found-him the next morning firm and unmoved. Brissot resumed the debate

on war;--"I implore Monsieur Robespierre," said he, in conclusion, "to

terminate so unworthy a struggle, which profits alone the enemies of the

public welfare." "My surprise was extreme," cried Robespierre, "at

seeing this morning, in the journal edited by M. Brissot, the most

pompous eulogium on M. de La Fayette." "I declare," replied Brissot,

"that I am utterly ignorant of the insertion of this letter in '_Le

Patriots Français_.'" "So much the better," returned Robespierre. "I am

delighted to find that M. Brissot is not a party to any such apologies."

Their words became as bitter as their hearts, and hate became more

perceptible at every reply. The aged Dusaulx interfered, made a touching

appeal to the patriots, and entreated them to embrace. They complied. "I

have now fulfilled a duty of fraternity, and satisfied my heart," cried

Robespierre. "I have yet a more sacred debt to pay my country. All

personal regard must give place to the sacred interests of liberty and

humanity. I can easily reconcile them here with the regard and respect I

have promised to those who serve them; I have embraced M. Brissot, but

I persist in opposing him: let our peace repose only on the basis of

patriotism and virtue." Robespierre, by his very isolation, proved his

force, and obtained fresh influence over the minds of the waverers. The

papers began to side with him. Marat heaped invectives on Brissot;

Camille Desmoulins, in his pamphlets, exposed the shameful association

of Brissot, in London, with Morande, the dishonoured libellist. Danton

himself, the orator of success, fearing to be deceived by fortune,

hesitated between the Girondists and Robespierre. He remained silent for

a long time, and then made a speech full of high-sounding words, beneath

which was visible the hesitation of his convictions, and the

embarrassment of his mind.

History of the Girondists, Volume I Personal Memoirs of the Patriots of the French Revolution · 第 10 / 17 章