TO THE JUNIOR MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY OF FRIENDS.

The situation in which the Society of Friends has of late been placed,

has, I have no doubt, attracted the attention of all its members; and

that even those among you who have not been in the habit of attending

its meetings for discipline, are no strangers to their proceedings,

although you have not yet felt it your duty to take any part in them.

And to you more especially I submit the observations contained in the

following letters.

When in my early days I sometimes attended these meetings, my mind was

filled with admiration at the harmony and prudence with which their

affairs were conducted, and that genuine christian forbearance, one with

another, which enabled them to triumph over all the difficulties which

are imposed by conflicting opinions, and generally to unite in the

adoption of such measures as true wisdom dictated; and it was gratifying

to me to observe that it was, to other sects, a subject of wonder, how

any numerous association could conduct their business without the

intervention of votes or other substitutes, to ascertain the opinions of

the majority of the assembly.

The form is, I have no doubt, yet preserved, and the language of

forbearance and humility retained by many who in their hearts entertain

far different feelings; and the proceedings have in several instances

proved, that the spirit which formerly pervaded these assemblies, no

longer prevails in some of them.

Why this great change has taken place, will no doubt be ascribed to

different causes by the parties more immediately interested: an

impartial spectator may form conclusions different from many of them,

and may be permitted to ask, whether the leading causes may not have

been produced by some of that class, to whom the great majority of the

members of the society look for instruction.

The situation of a christian teacher is of awful responsibility, and in

the Society of Friends peculiarly beset with dangers, not only because

of the high claim on which their ministry is founded, and which seems to

require a degree of unremitting watchfulness with which it is difficult

for man to comply; but also, because it requires a constant attention to

keeping the mind in that state of lowliness and humility, which can

alone preserve them from mistaking the wanderings of the imagination for

a call of duty; and from those feelings which lead them to seek after

the applause of men. Hence it must necessarily follow, that but few

among them are always preserved in such a state of mind, as not to

require the caution and advice of their friends: and consequently, that

some portion of the society must be selected to watch over their

conduct; and as this is an office of the greatest importance to their

well being, the greatest care ought to be observed in the appointment.

The elders are the depositaries of this power, so essential to the very

existence of the society; and as the most prudent and cautious use of it

cannot always prevent the objects of their attention from feelings of

resentment, so it will naturally follow, that those to whom the exercise

of it is most necessary, will always be the most zealous in abridging

it.

This impatience of control is increased by a ranting spirit which seems

of late to have infected a portion of the society, and which, in its

consequences, is always more injurious than infidelity itself; and

generally arises from a restlessness of disposition, which not content

with the measure of light which may have been imparted, is always

aspiring after greater things. It arises from a desire after

distinction; and as this disposition must prevent a growth in genuine

religion, the delusions of self-love easily enable a man to substitute

his own imaginations for revelations; and as every passion is

strengthened by indulgence, he proceeds from one step to another, until

he fancies himself under the constant and peculiar guidance of the

spirit, not only in his religious duties, but in all the temporal

concerns of life. It naturally follows, that when he has persuaded

himself that he is thus gifted and endowed, he will feel himself above

the advice of men, and regard all regulations which may have a tendency

to restrain his wanderings, as obstructing him in his duties, and it

will be one of his favourite objects to relieve himself from all

control. How individuals actuated by such passions can subject the minds

of others to their illusions, would indeed be wonderful, did not history

furnish sufficient proof that it is difficult to calculate too largely

on the credulity of a portion of mankind.

Whenever this disposition of mind is discovered, especially in any part

of the ministry, every reflecting member of society must perceive the

necessity of adopting means to prevent the injurious consequences of it;

and as that duty more especially devolves on the elders, (who are, and

always have been, the true and efficient support of the society,) they

soon become objects of dislike to the sublimated spirits opposed to

them, and the diminution of their power and authority, the first and

favourite scheme.

That they will not succeed, I am fully persuaded; because I think it

must be evident to every unclouded mind, that without such salutary

interference as they often find it necessary to exercise, all order and

propriety would be banished from the society.

Cunning is not more inconsistent with fanaticism, than it is with

lunacy; for however perverted the mind may be in relation to particular

subjects, we often see individuals in both situations, adopting the most

plausible means for the accomplishment of the most irrational objects.

It is not therefore to be expected that any attempts will be made

totally to abolish the eldership: such a proposal would hardly be

successful; but if means are found to render that body less independent,

and to diminish the weight and authority which they have long and

deservedly possessed, it may subserve the cause, and lead to ultimate

success in their projects: and here, if any where, the danger seems to

be.[1]

Footnote 1:

Since writing the above, I have been informed that this attempt has

actually been made in the yearly meetings in Philadelphia and New

York, under the pretext of a necessity of subjecting all important

appointments to change at stated periods. No measure could be devised

more injurious to the society, and every friend to its welfare must

rejoice that it was rejected. I know there are many very pious

labourers in the ministry of this people, yet I think it must be

evident to every observing mind, that there never was a period since

the existence of the society, in which there was greater necessity of

unremitting watchfulness on the part of the elders; and that so far

from its being expedient to diminish their control, it ought, if

possible, to be rendered more efficient. There is a spirit now abroad,

which if not checked, will devastate this society. Who would be the

principal agents is not for me to say; but one thing is certain, that

if there is any disposition on the part of its ministers to relieve

themselves from this control, it is sufficient evidence of the

necessity of it. Such a disposition must proceed from a mind not

imbued with true christian humility, but presumptuously confident in

itself. It is spiritual pride, than which nothing is more injurious

and odious in a christian professor.

It is with this disposition that such extraordinary solicitude has been

manifested, to induce the youth of the society and others of its

members, who had before silently attended to its proceedings, to take

part in its deliberations, and to flatter them into a belief that they

are qualified to administer to its affairs and direct its proceedings;

instead of recommending an endeavour to discipline the mind to the

weighty business of the society, and cautioning them against indulging a

spirit of judging without a serious and solemn consideration of the

subject; and against interrupting the business by their councils, unless

it is under a solemn impression of duty.

The effect has been such as might be expected, and was probably

intended. Individuals who had before taken no part in the deliberations

of the society, and who, (however respectable in life,) had never

evinced that disposition of mind which had before been thought a

necessary qualification of an active member, are now among the most

busy; and some of the younger portion of the society forgetting that

modesty is the most becoming ornament of youth, are found opposing their

unripe notions with unhesitating pertinacity, to the wisdom and

experience of age.

Under these circumstances is it not proper for you to consider whether

you have not a part to act? When you look back to the history of your

society and consider its admirable organization; and when you reflect on

the respectable standing, to which the unostentatious propriety by which

all its transactions have been governed, has raised it; you must be

impressed with an honest zeal for its welfare; and that reverence which

every ingenuous mind feels for the institutions and practices of their

ancestors, strengthened as it is in this case by the best of all tests,

a long experience, must induce you to oppose the innovations of the

restless agitators of the present day: and your good sense will, I

trust, enable you to distinguish between true religion and fanaticism,

and not permit you to lose your reverence for the one, in contemplating

the wild deformity of the other.

And perhaps you may be induced to believe that your attendance at the

meetings for discipline, may not be without its use; that your presence

may give additional strength and encouragement to the long tried

standard bearers, and though you may not feel yourselves called upon to

take a very active part in their deliberations, your example may be of

use to some of those froward spirits, who, whatever may be their

exterior appearance, are less qualified for the important business than

many of yourselves.

I know there are individuals in every stage of life, who judge of

preaching as others do of music, by the concord of sweet sounds; and who

are convinced more by the harmony of a well turned sentence, than by the

sentiment it is intended to convey; whose religion is founded on

sensation rather than reflection, and is an affair of feeling instead of

a deliberate sense of duty. To these I have nothing to say. My endeavour

has been to show the inconsistencies into which men are led, by

unfounded pretensions to a state of perfectability,[2] and an

acquaintance with the inscrutable workings of Providence, (which all

experience proves to be unattainable by man;) to show that such lofty

aspirations are not in accordance with the genuine principles of the

religion of Jesus Christ; and that it is by a submissive acquiescence in

the measure of knowledge communicated, and an anxious endeavour to

fulfil the obligations it imposes, rather than by curious researches

into hidden things, that we best perform our duties here; and as no

intelligent mind among you can believe that the suggestions of infinite

wisdom are ever contradictory, it was part of my plan to show the

inconsistencies in the doctrines of the great leader of the illuminati

of your society.

Footnote 2:

Perfection, in the sense in which it is understood by some people,

frequently leads to great extravagance on religious subjects, by

inducing men to believe that they have eradicated from their hearts

every propensity to evil, and have arrived at a state of stainless

purity. There is a great difference between the perfection of the

Creator and man. The perfection of man consists in his possessing all

that is requisite to attain the end of his creation; and the proper

question for him to consider, is not whether he has arrived at that

perfection which is the promised reward in another state of being, but

whether he has by careful diligence and attention secured for himself

that reward.

If I have succeeded in this, and to your deliberate examination I submit

it, my task is accomplished; for if we are permitted to judge of the

sermons as the arguments of a simple individual, sure I am, there are

none among you habituated to reflection, who will not discover that they

abound with inconsistencies, and are totally irreconcileable with

reason, and the authority of the Scriptures. And you must unite with me

in lamenting the strange illusion which induced the author of such

discourses to declare that "he dare not speak at random, otherwise he

should show that he departed from God's illuminating spirit."

Observations on the Sermons of Elias Hicks In Several Letters to Him; With Some Introductory Remarks, Addressed to the Junior Members of the Society of Friends. · 第 13 / 33 题