THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 85, Art. 3]

Whether the Virtue of Penance Is a Species of Justice?

Objection 1: It would seem that the virtue of penance is not a

species of justice. For justice is not a theological but a moral

virtue, as was shown in the Second Part (II-II, Q. 62, A. 3). But

penance seems to be a theological virtue, since God is its object,

for it makes satisfaction to God, to Whom, moreover, it reconciles

the sinner. Therefore it seems that penance is not a species of

justice.

Obj. 2: Further, since justice is a moral virtue it observes the

mean. Now penance does not observe the mean, but rather goes to the

extreme, according to Jer. 6:26: "Make thee mourning as for an only

son, a bitter lamentation." Therefore penance is not a species of

justice.

Obj. 3: Further, there are two species of justice, as stated in

_Ethic._ v, 4, viz. "distributive" and "commutative." But penance

does not seem to be contained under either of them. Therefore it

seems that penance is not a species of justice.

Obj. 4: Further, a gloss on Luke 6:21, "Blessed are ye that weep

now," says: "It is prudence that teaches us the unhappiness of

earthly things and the happiness of heavenly things." But weeping is

an act of penance. Therefore penance is a species of prudence rather

than of justice.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says in _De Poenitentia_ [*De vera et

falsa Poenitentia, the authorship of which is unknown]: "Penance is

the vengeance of the sorrowful, ever punishing in them what they are

sorry for having done." But to take vengeance is an act of justice,

wherefore Tully says (De Inv. Rhet. ii) that one kind of justice is

called vindictive. Therefore it seems that penance is a species of

justice.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1, ad 2) penance is a special

virtue not merely because it sorrows for evil done (since charity

would suffice for that), but also because the penitent grieves for

the sin he has committed, inasmuch as it is an offense against God,

and purposes to amend. Now amendment for an offense committed against

anyone is not made by merely ceasing to offend, but it is necessary

to make some kind of compensation, which obtains in offenses

committed against another, just as retribution does, only that

compensation is on the part of the offender, as when he makes

satisfaction, whereas retribution is on the part of the person

offended against. Each of these belongs to the matter of justice,

because each is a kind of commutation. Wherefore it is evident that

penance, as a virtue, is a part of justice.

It must be observed, however, that according to the Philosopher

(Ethic. v, 6) a thing is said to be just in two ways, simply and

relatively. A thing is just simply when it is between equals, since

justice is a kind of equality, and he calls this the politic or

civil just, because all citizens are equal, in the point of being

immediately under the ruler, retaining their freedom. But a thing is

just relatively when it is between parties of whom one is subject to

the other, as a servant under his master, a son under his father, a

wife under her husband. It is this kind of just that we consider in

penance. Wherefore the penitent has recourse to God with a purpose

of amendment, as a servant to his master, according to Ps. 122:2:

"Behold, as the eyes of servants are on the hands of their

masters . . . so are our eyes unto the Lord our God, until He have

mercy on us"; and as a son to his father, according to Luke 15:21:

"Father, I have sinned against heaven and before thee"; and as a wife

to her husband, according to Jer. 3:1: "Thou hast prostituted thyself

to many lovers; nevertheless return to Me, saith the Lord."

Reply Obj. 1: As stated in _Ethic._ v, 1, justice is a virtue towards

another person, and the matter of justice is not so much the person

to whom justice is due as the thing which is the subject of

distribution or commutation. Hence the matter of penance is not God,

but human acts, whereby God is offended or appeased; whereas God is

as one to whom justice is due. Wherefore it is evident that penance

is not a theological virtue, because God is not its matter or object.

Reply Obj. 2: The mean of justice is the equality that is established

between those between whom justice is, as stated in _Ethic._ v. But

in certain cases perfect equality cannot be established, on account

of the excellence of one, as between father and son, God and man, as

the Philosopher states (Ethic. viii, 14), wherefore in such cases, he

that falls short of the other must do whatever he can. Yet this will

not be sufficient simply, but only according to the acceptance of the

higher one; and this is what is meant by ascribing excess to penance.

Reply Obj. 3: As there is a kind of commutation in favors, when, to

wit, a man gives thanks for a favor received, so also is there

commutation in the matter of offenses, when, on account of an offense

committed against another, a man is either punished against his will,

which pertains to vindictive justice, or makes amends of his own

accord, which belongs to penance, which regards the person of the

sinner, just as vindictive justice regards the person of the judge.

Therefore it is evident that both are comprised under commutative

justice.

Reply Obj. 4: Although penance is directly a species of justice, yet,

in a fashion, it comprises things pertaining to all the virtues; for

inasmuch as there is a justice of man towards God, it must have a

share in matter pertaining to the theological virtues, the object of

which is God. Consequently penance comprises faith in Christ's

Passion, whereby we are cleansed of our sins, hope for pardon, and

hatred of vice, which pertains to charity. Inasmuch as it is a moral

virtue, it has a share of prudence, which directs all the moral

virtues: but from the very nature of justice, it has not only

something belonging to justice, but also something belonging to

temperance and fortitude, inasmuch as those things which cause

pleasure, and which pertain to temperance, and those which cause

terror, which fortitude moderates, are objects of commutative

justice. Accordingly it belongs to justice both to abstain from

pleasure, which belongs to temperance, and to bear with hardships,

which belongs to fortitude.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 622 / 654 题