FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 83, Art. 1]

Whether Christ Is Sacrificed in This Sacrament?

Objection 1: It seems that Christ is not sacrificed in the

celebration of this sacrament. For it is written (Heb. 10:14) that

"Christ by one oblation hath perfected for ever them that are

sanctified." But that oblation was His oblation. Therefore Christ is

not sacrificed in the celebration of this sacrament.

Obj. 2: Further, Christ's sacrifice was made upon the cross, whereon

"He delivered Himself for us, an oblation and a sacrifice to God for

an odor of sweetness," as is said in Eph. 5:2. But Christ is not

crucified in the celebration of this mystery. Therefore, neither is

He sacrificed.

Obj. 3: Further, as Augustine says (De Trin. iv), in Christ's

sacrifice the priest and the victim are one and the same. But in the

celebration of this sacrament the priest and the victim are not the

same. Therefore, the celebration of this sacrament is not a sacrifice

of Christ.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says in the Liber Sentent. Prosp. (cf.

Ep. xcviii): "Christ was sacrificed once in Himself, and yet He is

sacrificed daily in the Sacrament."

_I answer that,_ The celebration of this sacrament is called a

sacrifice for two reasons. First, because, as Augustine says (Ad

Simplician. ii), "the images of things are called by the names of the

things whereof they are the images; as when we look upon a picture or

a fresco, we say, 'This is Cicero and that is Sallust.'" But, as was

said above (Q. 79, A. 1), the celebration of this sacrament is an

image representing Christ's Passion, which is His true sacrifice.

Accordingly the celebration of this sacrament is called Christ's

sacrifice. Hence it is that Ambrose, in commenting on Heb. 10:1,

says: "In Christ was offered up a sacrifice capable of giving eternal

salvation; what then do we do? Do we not offer it up every day in

memory of His death?" Secondly it is called a sacrifice, in respect

of the effect of His Passion: because, to wit, by this sacrament, we

are made partakers of the fruit of our Lord's Passion. Hence in one

of the Sunday Secrets (Ninth Sunday after Pentecost) we say:

"Whenever the commemoration of this sacrifice is celebrated, the work

of our redemption is enacted." Consequently, according to the first

reason, it is true to say that Christ was sacrificed, even in the

figures of the Old Testament: hence it is stated in the Apocalypse

(13:8): "Whose names are not written in the Book of Life of the Lamb,

which was slain from the beginning of the world." But according to

the second reason, it is proper to this sacrament for Christ to be

sacrificed in its celebration.

Reply Obj. 1: As Ambrose says (commenting on Heb. 10:1), "there is

but one victim," namely that which Christ offered, and which we

offer, "and not many victims, because Christ was offered but once:

and this latter sacrifice is the pattern of the former. For, just as

what is offered everywhere is one body, and not many bodies, so also

is it but one sacrifice."

Reply Obj. 2: As the celebration of this sacrament is an image

representing Christ's Passion, so the altar is representative of the

cross itself, upon which Christ was sacrificed in His proper species.

Reply Obj. 3: For the same reason (cf. Reply Obj. 2) the priest also

bears Christ's image, in Whose person and by Whose power he

pronounces the words of consecration, as is evident from what was

said above (Q. 82, AA. 1, 3). And so, in a measure, the priest and

victim are one and the same.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 602 / 654 题