FIFTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 79, Art. 5]

Whether the Entire Punishment Due to Sin Is Forgiven Through This

Sacrament?

Objection 1: It seems that the entire punishment due to sin is

forgiven through this sacrament. For through this sacrament man

receives the effect of Christ's Passion within himself as stated

above (AA. 1, 2), just as he does through Baptism. But through

Baptism man receives forgiveness of all punishment, through the

virtue of Christ's Passion, which satisfied sufficiently for all

sins, as was explained above (Q. 69, A. 2). Therefore it seems the

whole debt of punishment is forgiven through this sacrament.

Obj. 2: Further, Pope Alexander I says (Ep. ad omnes orth.): "No

sacrifice can be greater than the body and the blood of Christ." But

man satisfied for his sins by the sacrifices of the old Law: for it

is written (Lev. 4, 5): "If a man shall sin, let him offer" (so and

so) "for his sin, and it shall be forgiven him." Therefore this

sacrament avails much more for the forgiveness of all punishment.

Obj. 3: Further, it is certain that some part of the debt of

punishment is forgiven by this sacrament; for which reason it is

sometimes enjoined upon a man, by way of satisfaction, to have masses

said for himself. But if one part of the punishment is forgiven, for

the same reason is the other forgiven: owing to Christ's infinite

power contained in this sacrament. Consequently, it seems that the

whole punishment can be taken away by this sacrament.

_On the contrary,_ In that case no other punishment would have to be

enjoined; just as none is imposed upon the newly baptized.

_I answer that,_ This sacrament is both a sacrifice and a sacrament.

it has the nature of a sacrifice inasmuch as it is offered up; and it

has the nature of a sacrament inasmuch as it is received. And

therefore it has the effect of a sacrament in the recipient, and the

effect of a sacrifice in the offerer, or in them for whom it is

offered.

If, then, it be considered as a sacrament, it produces its effect in

two ways: first of all directly through the power of the sacrament;

secondly as by a kind of concomitance, as was said above regarding

what is contained in the sacrament (Q. 76, AA. 1, 2). Through the

power of the sacrament it produces directly that effect for which it

was instituted. Now it was instituted not for satisfaction, but for

nourishing spiritually through union between Christ and His members,

as nourishment is united with the person nourished. But because this

union is the effect of charity, from the fervor of which man obtains

forgiveness, not only of guilt but also of punishment, hence it is

that as a consequence, and by concomitance with the chief effect, man

obtains forgiveness of the punishment, not indeed of the entire

punishment, but according to the measure of his devotion and fervor.

But in so far as it is a sacrifice, it has a satisfactory power. Yet

in satisfaction, the affection of the offerer is weighed rather than

the quantity of the offering. Hence our Lord says (Mk. 12:43: cf.

Luke 21:4) of the widow who offered "two mites" that she "cast in

more than all." Therefore, although this offering suffices of its own

quantity to satisfy for all punishment, yet it becomes satisfactory

for them for whom it is offered, or even for the offerers, according

to the measure of their devotion, and not for the whole punishment.

Reply Obj. 1: The sacrament of Baptism is directly ordained for the

remission of punishment and guilt: not so the Eucharist, because

Baptism is given to man as dying with Christ, whereas the Eucharist

is given as by way of nourishing and perfecting him through Christ.

Consequently there is no parallel.

Reply Obj. 2: Those other sacrifices and oblations did not effect the

forgiveness of the whole punishment, neither as to the quantity of

the thing offered, as this sacrament does, nor as to personal

devotion; from which it comes to pass that even here the whole

punishment is not taken away.

Reply Obj. 3: If part of the punishment and not the whole be taken

away by this sacrament, it is due to a defect not on the part of

Christ's power, but on the part of man's devotion.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 568 / 654 题