FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 73, Art. 1]

Whether the Eucharist Is a Sacrament?

Objection 1: It seems that the Eucharist is not a sacrament. For two

sacraments ought not to be ordained for the same end, because every

sacrament is efficacious in producing its effect. Therefore, since

both Confirmation and the Eucharist are ordained for perfection, as

Dionysius says (Eccl. Hier. iv), it seems that the Eucharist is not a

sacrament, since Confirmation is one, as stated above (Q. 65, A. 1;

Q. 72, A. 1).

Obj. 2: Further, in every sacrament of the New Law, that which comes

visibly under our senses causes the invisible effect of the

sacrament, just as cleansing with water causes the baptismal

character and spiritual cleansing, as stated above (Q. 63, A. 6; Q.

66, AA. 1, 3, 7). But the species of bread and wine, which are the

objects of our senses in this sacrament, neither produce Christ's

true body, which is both reality and sacrament, nor His mystical

body, which is the reality only in the Eucharist. Therefore, it seems

that the Eucharist is not a sacrament of the New Law.

Obj. 3: Further, sacraments of the New Law, as having matter, are

perfected by the use of the matter, as Baptism is by ablution, and

Confirmation by signing with chrism. If, then, the Eucharist be a

sacrament, it would be perfected by the use of the matter, and not by

its consecration. But this is manifestly false, because the words

spoken in the consecration of the matter are the form of this

sacrament, as will be shown later on (Q. 78, A. 1). Therefore the

Eucharist is not a sacrament.

_On the contrary,_ It is said in the Collect [*Postcommunion "pro

vivis et defunctis"]: "May this Thy Sacrament not make us deserving

of punishment."

_I answer that,_ The Church's sacraments are ordained for helping man

in the spiritual life. But the spiritual life is analogous to the

corporeal, since corporeal things bear a resemblance to spiritual.

Now it is clear that just as generation is required for corporeal

life, since thereby man receives life; and growth, whereby man is

brought to maturity: so likewise food is required for the

preservation of life. Consequently, just as for the spiritual life

there had to be Baptism, which is spiritual generation; and

Confirmation, which is spiritual growth: so there needed to be the

sacrament of the Eucharist, which is spiritual food.

Reply Obj. 1: Perfection is twofold. The first lies within man

himself; and he attains it by growth: such perfection belongs to

Confirmation. The other is the perfection which comes to man from the

addition of food, or clothing, or something of the kind; and such is

the perfection befitting the Eucharist, which is the spiritual

refreshment.

Reply Obj. 2: The water of Baptism does not cause any spiritual

effect by reason of the water, but by reason of the power of the Holy

Ghost, which power is in the water. Hence on John 5:4, "An angel of

the Lord at certain times," etc., Chrysostom observes: "The water

does not act simply as such upon the baptized, but when it receives

the grace of the Holy Ghost, then it looses all sins." But the true

body of Christ bears the same relation to the species of the bread

and wine, as the power of the Holy Ghost does to the water of

Baptism: hence the species of the bread and wine produce no effect

except from the virtue of Christ's true body.

Reply Obj. 3: A sacrament is so termed because it contains something

sacred. Now a thing can be styled sacred from two causes; either

absolutely, or in relation to something else. The difference between

the Eucharist and other sacraments having sensible matter is that

whereas the Eucharist contains something which is sacred absolutely,

namely, Christ's own body; the baptismal water contains something

which is sacred in relation to something else, namely, the

sanctifying power: and the same holds good of chrism and such like.

Consequently, the sacrament of the Eucharist is completed in the very

consecration of the matter, whereas the other sacraments are

completed in the application of the matter for the sanctifying of the

individual. And from this follows another difference. For, in the

sacrament of the Eucharist, what is both reality and sacrament is in

the matter itself, but what is reality only, namely, the grace

bestowed, is in the recipient; whereas in Baptism both are in the

recipient, namely, the character, which is both reality and

sacrament, and the grace of pardon of sins, which is reality only.

And the same holds good of the other sacraments.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 514 / 654 题