THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 69, Art. 3]

Whether Baptism Should Take Away the Penalties of Sin That Belong to

This Life?

Objection 1: It seems that Baptism should take away the penalties of

sin that belong to this life. For as the Apostle says (Rom. 5:15),

the gift of Christ is farther-reaching than the sin of Adam. But

through Adam's sin, as the Apostle says (Rom. 5:12), "death entered

into this world," and, consequently, all the other penalties of the

present life. Much more, therefore, should man be freed from the

penalties of the present life, by the gift of Christ which is

received in Baptism.

Obj. 2: Further, Baptism takes away the guilt of both original and

actual sin. Now it takes away the guilt of actual sin in such a way

as to free man from all debt of punishment resulting therefrom.

Therefore it also frees man from the penalties of the present life,

which are a punishment of original sin.

Obj. 3: Further, if the cause be removed, the effect is removed. But

the cause of these penalties is original sin, which is taken away by

Baptism. Therefore such like penalties should not remain.

_On the contrary,_ on Rom. 6:6, "that the body of sin may be

destroyed," a gloss says: "The effect of Baptism is that the old man

is crucified, and the body of sin destroyed, not as though the living

flesh of man were delivered by the destruction of that concupiscence

with which it has been bespattered from its birth; but that it may

not hurt him, when dead, though it was in him when he was born."

Therefore for the same reason neither are the other penalties taken

away by Baptism.

_I answer that,_ Baptism has the power to take away the penalties of

the present life yet it does not take them away during the present

life, but by its power they will be taken away from the just in the

resurrection when "this mortal hath put on immortality" (1 Cor.

15:54). And this is reasonable. First, because, by Baptism, man is

incorporated in Christ, and is made His member, as stated above (A.

3; Q. 68, A. 5). Consequently it is fitting that what takes place in

the Head should take place also in the member incorporated. Now, from

the very beginning of His conception Christ was "full of grace and

truth," yet He had a passible body, which through His Passion and

death was raised up to a life of glory. Wherefore a Christian

receives grace in Baptism, as to his soul; but he retains a passible

body, so that he may suffer for Christ therein: yet at length he will

be raised up to a life of impassibility. Hence the Apostle says (Rom.

8:11): "He that raised up Jesus Christ from the dead, shall quicken

also our [Vulg.: 'your'] mortal bodies, because of His Spirit that

dwelleth in us [Vulg.: 'you']": and further on in the same chapter

(Rom. 8:17): "Heirs indeed of God, and joint heirs with Christ: yet

so, if we suffer with Him, that we may be also glorified with Him."

Secondly, this is suitable for our spiritual training: namely, in

order that, by fighting against concupiscence and other defects to

which he is subject, man may receive the crown of victory. Wherefore

on Rom. 6:6, "that the body of sin may be destroyed," a gloss says:

"If a man after Baptism live in the flesh, he has concupiscence to

fight against, and to conquer by God's help." In sign of which it is

written (Judges 3:1, 2): "These are the nations which the Lord left,

that by them He might instruct Israel . . . that afterwards their

children might learn to fight with their enemies, and to be trained

up to war."

Thirdly, this was suitable, lest men might seek to be baptized for

the sake of impassibility in the present life, and not for the sake

of the glory of life eternal. Wherefore the Apostle says (1 Cor.

15:19): "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all

men most miserable."

Reply Obj. 1: As a gloss says on Rom. 6:6, "that we may serve sin no

longer--Like a man who, having captured a redoubtable enemy, slays

him not forthwith, but suffers him to live for a little time in shame

and suffering; so did Christ first of all fetter our punishment, but

at a future time He will destroy it."

Reply Obj. 2: As the gloss says on the same passage (cf. ad 1), "the

punishment of sin is twofold, the punishment of hell, and temporal

punishment. Christ entirely abolished the punishment of hell, so that

those who are baptized and truly repent, should not be subject to it.

He did not, however, altogether abolish temporal punishment yet

awhile; for hunger, thirst, and death still remain. But He overthrew

its kingdom and power" in the sense that man should no longer be in

fear of them: "and at length He will altogether exterminate it at the

last day."

Reply Obj. 3: As we stated in the Second Part (I-II, Q. 81, A. 1; Q.

82, A. 1, ad 2), original sin spread in this way, that at first the

person infected the nature, and afterwards the nature infected the

person. Whereas Christ in reverse order at first repairs what regards

the person, and afterwards will simultaneously repair what pertains

to the nature in all men. Consequently by Baptism He takes away from

man forthwith the guilt of original sin and the punishment of being

deprived of the heavenly vision. But the penalties of the present

life, such as death, hunger, thirst, and the like, pertain to the

nature, from the principles of which they arise, inasmuch as it is

deprived of original justice. Therefore these defects will not be

taken away until the ultimate restoration of nature through the

glorious resurrection.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 482 / 654 题