SECOND ARTICLE [III, Q. 41, Art. 2]

Whether Christ Should Have Been Tempted in the Desert?

Objection 1: It would seem that Christ should not have been tempted

in the desert. Because Christ wished to be tempted in order to give

us an example, as stated above (A. 1). But an example should be set

openly before those who are to follow it. Therefore He should not

have been tempted in the desert.

Obj. 2: Further, Chrysostom says (Hom. xii in Matth.): "Then most

especially does the devil assail by tempting us, when he sees us

alone. Thus did he tempt the woman in the beginning when he found her

apart from her husband." Hence it seems that, by going into the

desert to be tempted, He exposed Himself to temptation. Since,

therefore, His temptation is an example to us, it seems that others

too should take such steps as will lead them into temptation. And yet

this seems a dangerous thing to do, since rather should we avoid the

occasion of being tempted.

Obj. 3: Further, Matt. 4:5, Christ's second temptation is set down,

in which "the devil took" Christ up "into the Holy City, and set Him

upon the pinnacle of the Temple": which is certainly not in the

desert. Therefore He was not tempted in the desert only.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Mk. 1:13) that Jesus "was in the

desert forty days and forty nights, and was tempted by Satan."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1, ad 2), Christ of His own

free-will exposed Himself to be tempted by the devil, just as by His

own free-will He submitted to be killed by his members; else the

devil would not have dared to approach Him. Now the devil prefers to

assail a man who is alone, for, as it is written (Eccles. 4:12), "if

a man prevail against one, two shall withstand him." And so it was

that Christ went out into the desert, as to a field of battle, to be

tempted there by the devil. Hence Ambrose says on Luke 4:1, that

"Christ was led into the desert for the purpose of provoking the

devil. For had he," i.e. the devil, "not fought, He," i.e. Christ,

"would not have conquered." He adds other reasons, saying that

"Christ in doing this set forth the mystery of Adam's delivery from

exile," who had been expelled from paradise into the desert, and "set

an example to us, by showing that the devil envies those who strive

for better things."

Reply Obj. 1: Christ is set as an example to all through faith,

according to Heb. 12:2: "Looking on Jesus, the author and finisher of

faith." Now faith, as it is written (Rom. 10:17), "cometh by

hearing," but not by seeing: nay, it is even said (John 20:29):

"Blessed are they that have not seen and have believed." And

therefore, in order that Christ's temptation might be an example to

us, it behooved that men should not see it, and it was enough that

they should hear it related.

Reply Obj. 2: The occasions of temptation are twofold. One is on the

part of man--for instance, when a man causes himself to be near to

sin by not avoiding the occasion of sinning. And such occasions of

temptation should be avoided, as it is written of Lot (Gen. 19:17):

"Neither stay thou in all the country about" Sodom.

Another occasion of temptation is on the part of the devil, who

always "envies those who strive for better things," as Ambrose says

(In Luc. iv, 1). And such occasions of temptation are not to be

avoided. Hence Chrysostom says (Hom. v in Matth. [*From the

supposititious Opus Imperfectum]): "Not only Christ was led into the

desert by the Spirit, but all God's children that have the Holy

Ghost. For it is not enough for them to sit idle; the Holy Ghost

urges them to endeavor to do something great: which is for them to be

in the desert from the devil's standpoint, for no unrighteousness, in

which the devil delights, is there. Again, every good work, compared

to the flesh and the world, is the desert; because it is not

according to the will of the flesh and of the world." Now, there is

no danger in giving the devil such an occasion of temptation; since

the help of the Holy Ghost, who is the Author of the perfect deed, is

more powerful* than the assault of the envious devil. [*All the

codices read 'majus.' One of the earliest printed editions has

'magis,' which has much to commend it, since St. Thomas is commenting

the text quoted from St. Chrysostom. The translation would run thus:

'since rather is it (the temptation) a help from the Holy Ghost,

who,' etc.].

Reply Obj. 3: Some say that all the temptations took place in the

desert. Of these some say that Christ was led into the Holy City, not

really, but in an imaginary vision; while others say that the Holy

City itself, i.e. Jerusalem, is called "a desert," because it was

deserted by God. But there is no need for this explanation. For Mark

says that He was tempted in the desert by the devil, but not that He

was tempted in the desert only.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 281 / 654 题