SECOND ARTICLE [III, Q. 32, Art. 2]

Whether It Should Be Said That Christ Was Conceived of (_de_) the

Holy Ghost?

Objection 1: It would seem that we should not say that Christ was

conceived of (_de_) the Holy Ghost. Because on Rom. 11:36: "For of

Him (_ex ipso_) and by Him, and in Him, are all things," the gloss of

Augustine says: "Notice that he does not say, 'of Him' (_de ipso_),

but 'of Him' (_ex ipso_). For of Him (_ex ipso_), are heaven and

earth, since He made them: but not of Him [de ipso, since they are

not made of His substance." But the Holy Ghost did not form Christ's

body of (_de_) His own substance. Therefore we should not say that

Christ was conceived of (_de_) the Holy Ghost.

Obj. 2: Further, the active principle of (_de_) which something is

conceived is as the seed in generation. But the Holy Ghost did not

take the place of seed in Christ's conception. For Jerome says

(Expos. Cathol. Fidei) [*Written by Pelagius]: "We do not say, as

some wicked wretches hold, that the Holy Ghost took the place of

seed: but we say that Christ's body was wrought," i.e. formed, "by

the power and might of the Creator." Therefore we should not say that

Christ's body was conceived of (_de_) the Holy Ghost.

Obj. 3: Further, no one thing is made of two, except they be in some

way mingled. But Christ's body was formed of (_de_) the Virgin Mary.

If therefore we say that Christ was conceived of (_de_) the Holy

Ghost, it seems that a mingling took place of the Holy Ghost with the

matter supplied by the Virgin: and this is clearly false. Therefore

we should not say that Christ was conceived of (_de_) the Holy Ghost.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Matt. 1:18): "Before they came

together, she was found with child, of (_de_) the Holy Ghost."

_I answer that,_ Conception is not attributed to Christ's body alone,

but also to Christ Himself by reason of His body. Now, in the Holy

Ghost we may observe a twofold habitude to Christ. For to the Son of

God Himself, who is said to have been conceived, He has a habitude of

consubstantiality: while to His body He has the habitude of efficient

cause. And this preposition of (_de_) signifies both habitudes: thus

we say that a certain man is "of (_de_) his father." And therefore we

can fittingly say that Christ was conceived of the Holy Ghost in such

a way that the efficiency of the Holy Ghost be referred to the body

assumed, and the consubstantiality to the Person assuming.

Reply Obj. 1: Christ's body, through not being consubstantial with

the Holy Ghost, cannot properly be said to be conceived "of" (_de_)

the Holy Ghost, but rather "from (_ex_) the Holy Ghost," as Ambrose

says (De Spir. Sanct. ii.): "What is from someone is either from his

substance or from his power: from his substance, as the Son who is

from the Father; from his power, as all things are from God, just as

Mary conceived from the Holy Ghost."

Reply Obj. 2: It seems that on this point there is a difference of

opinion between Jerome and certain other Doctors, who assert that the

Holy Ghost took the place of seed in this conception. For Chrysostom

says (Hom. i in Matth. [*Opus Imperf., among the supposititious

writings]): "When God's Only-Begotten was about to enter into the

Virgin, the Holy Ghost preceded Him; that by the previous entrance of

the Holy Ghost, Christ might be born unto sanctification according to

His body, the Godhead entering instead of the seed." And Damascene

says (De Fide Orth. iii): "God's wisdom and power overshadowed her,

like unto a Divine seed."

But these expressions are easily explained. Because Chrysostom and

Damascene compare the Holy Ghost, or also the Son, who is the Power

of the Most High, to seed, by reason of the active power therein;

while Jerome denies that the Holy Ghost took the place of seed,

considered as a corporeal substance which is transformed in

conception.

Reply Obj. 3: As Augustine says (Enchiridion xl), Christ is said to

be conceived or born of the Holy Ghost in one sense; of the Virgin

Mary in another--of the Virgin Mary materially; of the Holy Ghost

efficiently. Therefore there was no mingling here.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 222 / 654 题