SIXTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 7, Art. 6]

Whether in Christ There Was the Gift of Fear?

Objection 1: It would seem that in Christ there was not the gift of

fear. For hope would seem to be stronger than fear; since the object

of hope is goodness, and of fear, evil, as was said above (I-II, Q.

40, A. 1; I-II, Q. 42, A. 1). But in Christ there was not the virtue

of hope, as was said above (A. 4). Hence, likewise, there was not the

gift of fear in Him.

Obj. 2: Further, by the gift of fear we fear either to be separated

from God, which pertains to _chaste_ fear--or to be punished by Him,

which pertains to _servile_ fear, as Augustine says (In Joan. Tract.

ix). But Christ did not fear being separated from God by sin, nor

being punished by Him on account of a fault, since it was impossible

for Him to sin, as will be said (Q. 15, AA. 1, 2). Now fear is not of

the impossible. Therefore in Christ there was not the gift of fear.

Obj. 3: Further, it is written (1 John 4:18) that "perfect charity

casteth out fear." But in Christ there was most perfect charity,

according to Eph. 3:19: "The charity of Christ which surpasseth all

knowledge." Therefore in Christ there was not the gift of fear.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Isa. 11:3): "And He shall be filled

with the spirit of the fear of the Lord."

_I answer that,_ As was said above (I-II, Q. 42, A. 1), fear regards

two objects, one of which is an evil causing terror; the other is

that by whose power an evil can be inflicted, as we fear the king

inasmuch as he has the power of putting to death. Now whoever can

hurt would not be feared unless he had a certain greatness of might,

to which resistance could not easily be offered; for what we easily

repel we do not fear. And hence it is plain that no one is feared

except for some pre-eminence. And in this way it is said that in

Christ there was the fear of God, not indeed as it regards the evil

of separation from God by fault, nor as it regards the evil of

punishment for fault; but inasmuch as it regards the Divine

pre-eminence, on account of which the soul of Christ, led by the Holy

Spirit, was borne towards God in an act of reverence. Hence it is

said (Heb. 5:7) that in all things "he was heard for his reverence."

For Christ as man had this act of reverence towards God in a fuller

sense and beyond all others. And hence Scripture attributes to Him

the fulness of the fear of the Lord.

Reply Obj. 1: The habits of virtues and gifts regard goodness

properly and of themselves; but evil, consequently; since it pertains

to the nature of virtue to render acts good, as is said _Ethic._ ii,

6. And hence the nature of the gift of fear regards not that evil

which fear is concerned with, but the pre-eminence of that goodness,

viz. of God, by Whose power evil may be inflicted. On the other hand,

hope, as a virtue, regards not only the author of good, but even the

good itself, as far as it is not yet possessed. And hence to Christ,

Who already possessed the perfect good of beatitude, we do not

attribute the virtue of hope, but we do attribute the gift of fear.

Reply Obj. 2: This reason is based on fear in so far as it regards

the evil object.

Reply Obj. 3: Perfect charity casts out servile fear, which

principally regards punishment. But this kind of fear was not in

Christ.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 63 / 654 题