FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 5, Art. 4]

Whether the Son of God Assumed a Human Mind or Intellect?

Objection 1: It would seem that the Son of God did not assume a human

mind or intellect. For where a thing is present, its image is not

required. But man is made to God's image, as regards his mind, as

Augustine says (De Trin. xiv, 3, 6). Hence, since in Christ there was

the presence of the Divine Word itself, there was no need of a human

mind.

Obj. 2: Further, the greater light dims the lesser. But the Word of

God, Who is "the light, which enlighteneth every man that cometh into

this world," as is written John 1:9, is compared to the mind as the

greater light to the lesser; since our mind is a light, being as it

were a lamp enkindled by the First Light (Prov. 20:27): "The spirit

of a man is the lamp of the Lord." Therefore in Christ Who is the

Word of God, there is no need of a human mind.

Obj. 3: Further, the assumption of human nature by the Word of God is

called His Incarnation. But the intellect or human mind is nothing

carnal, either in its substance or in its act, for it is not the act

of a body, as is proved _De Anima_ iii, 6. Hence it would seem that

the Son of God did not assume a human mind.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine [*Fulgentius] says (De Fide ad Petrum

xiv): "Firmly hold and nowise doubt that Christ the Son of God has

true flesh and a rational soul of the same kind as ours, since of His

flesh He says (Luke 24:39): 'Handle, and see; for a spirit hath not

flesh and bones, as you see Me to have.' And He proves that He has a

soul, saying (John 17): 'I lay down My soul [Douay: 'life'] that I

may take it again.' And He proves that He has an intellect, saying

(Matt. 11:29): 'Learn of Me, because I am meek and humble of heart.'

And God says of Him by the prophet (Isa. 52:13): 'Behold my servant

shall understand.'"

_I answer that,_ As Augustine says (De Haeres. 49, 50), "the

Apollinarists thought differently from the Catholic Church concerning

the soul of Christ, saying with the Arians, that Christ took flesh

alone, without a soul; and on being overcome on this point by the

Gospel witness, they went on to say that the mind was wanting to

Christ's soul, but that the Word supplied its place." But this

position is refuted by the same arguments as the preceding. First,

because it runs counter to the Gospel story, which relates how He

marveled (as is plain from Matt. 8:10). Now marveling cannot be

without reason, since it implies the collation of effect and cause,

i.e. inasmuch as when we see an effect and are ignorant of its cause,

we seek to know it, as is said _Metaph._ i, 2. Secondly, it is

inconsistent with the purpose of the Incarnation, which is the

justification of man from sin. For the human soul is not capable of

sin nor of justifying grace except through the mind. Hence it was

especially necessary for the mind to be assumed. Hence Damascene says

(De Fide Orth. iii, 6) that "the Word of God assumed a body and an

intellectual and rational soul," and adds afterwards: "The whole was

united to the whole, that He might bestow salvation on me wholly; for

what was not assumed is not curable." Thirdly, it is against the

truth of the Incarnation. For since the body is proportioned to the

soul as matter to its proper form, it is not truly human flesh if it

is not perfected by human, i.e. a rational soul. And hence if Christ

had had a soul without a mind, He would not have had true human

flesh, but irrational flesh, since our soul differs from an animal

soul by the mind alone. Hence Augustine says (Qq. lxxxiii, qu. 80)

that from this error it would have followed that the Son of God "took

an animal with the form of a human body," which, again, is against

the Divine truth, which cannot suffer any fictitious untruth.

Reply Obj. 1: Where a thing is by its presence, its image is not

required to supply the place of the thing, as where the emperor is

the soldiers do not pay homage to his image. Yet the image of a thing

is required together with its presence, that it may be perfected by

the presence of the thing, just as the image in the wax is perfected

by the impression of the seal, and as the image of man is reflected

in the mirror by his presence. Hence in order to perfect the human

mind it was necessary that the Word should unite it to Himself.

Reply Obj. 2: The greater light dims the lesser light of another

luminous body; but it does not dim, rather it perfects the light of

the body illuminated--at the presence of the sun the light of the

stars is put out, but the light of the air is perfected. Now the

intellect or mind of man is, as it were, a light lit up by the light

of the Divine Word; and hence by the presence of the Word the mind of

man is perfected rather than overshadowed.

Reply Obj. 3: Although the intellective power is not the act of a

body, nevertheless the essence of the human soul, which is the form

of the body, requires that it should be more noble, in order that it

may have the power of understanding; and hence it is necessary that a

better disposed body should correspond to it.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part III (Tertia Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 49 / 654 题