“P. S. Kindly be very careful in keeping everything secret

and confidential. When comrades arrive they should go and

see Domela Nieuwenhuis, 20 Burgmestre Schooklaan, Hilversum

(near Amsterdam). He will tell them where to meet me. Please

also write a letter to the above address in Scheveningen, in

addition to the telegram. Telegram may be intercepted.

“H. D.”

[Illustration: Lieutenant Commander Spencer Eddy]

Not satisfied apparently that this letter would reach Berkman, Har

Dayal wrote another a week later, which read as follows:

“Address: Israel Aaronson,

“c/o Madame Kercher,

“116 Oude Scheveningerweg,

“Scheveningen.

“Dear Comrade:

“I am well and busy. Can you send me some earnest and sincere

comrades men and women, to help our Indian revolutionary party

at this juncture? They should be persons of good character. If

Tannenbaum is free, would he like to come?

“Please keep this matter strictly _secret_ and _confidential_.

Kindly don’t discuss it with too many people.

“This is a great opportunity for our party. I need the

coöperation of earnest comrades for very important work.

Several of our comrades have come from India with encouraging

news and messages.

“If some comrades can come, please _wire_ and _write_ to the

above address to my assumed name, ‘Israel Aaronson.’ I shall

send you money immediately to the name which you telegraph. Let

it be a name beginning with a B. I shall understand. Please

don’t telegraph in your own name.

“Kindly also word the telegram in such a way that I can

understand how many comrades are coming. If five comrades wish

to come, please wire:

“‘Five hundred dollars job vacant come.’ Just put the number of

comrades before the ‘_hundred_.’ Or use any other device.

“Kindly also send me names and addresses of the prominent

anarchist comrades in Denmark, France, Norway, Sweden,

Switzerland, Italy, Germany, Austria, and other European

countries. Please also send letters of introduction for me to

them from Emma or yourself, if you know them.”

And so on. There is enough to show the company the Hindu-German

intriguers kept, and to show that the Hindu committee in Berlin had

enough money to buy mercenaries from the American anarchist group, for

which the American brokers would hardly go unrewarded. Rintelen, within

a week of his arrival in the United States in May, 1915, had tried to

hire anarchists to blow up shipping and start strikes in munitions

plants. It further shows that during that week in October of 1915,

Har Dayal had a bright thought that if he could only get letters from

Emma Goldman or Berkman introducing him to the anarchists of Europe,

and could perhaps introduce to them in turn his lieutenant, Frank

Tannenbaum, from America--the same who stormed St. Alphonsus’ church

with a gang of I. W. W.’s in 1914, demanding food--he could hoodwink

the anarchists into believing that he was playing their game, and

really make good use of them in playing his game--which of course was

Berlin’s.

As it happened, Tannenbaum was busy. So was Emma. So was Berkman,

who received the letter. He was just formulating plans to go to San

Francisco and become an editor--not a new avocation, for he had for

ten years helped Emma Goldman issue a publication known as “Mother

Earth”--and to carry out certain radical and novel ideas. Before we

sketch the way in which he put those ideas on paper, it may be well

to see what experiences he had had to generate ideas, and just what

promise his career contained that he would be of guiding benefit to

these United States.

Alexander Berkman was a Russian by birth, and was then about 44 years

old. When he was a youth of 20 he became involved in the famous

Homestead strike in Pennsylvania, and on July 22, 1892, he burst into

the office of Henry Frick, a steel manufacturer, in the Carnegie

Building in Pittsburg and shot that gentleman in the neck. He then went

to the Western Penitentiary and served fourteen years. This qualified

him as a rare martyr among anarchists. After he got out of prison he

was occasionally arrested in various cities, for wherever he appeared

among advocates of violence there was pretty certain to be trouble.

The long prison term had given him a chance to develop his mind, and

he had written 512 pages on “The Prison Life of an Anarchist,” which

the “Mother Earth Publishing Company” brought out, and which sold for

$1.15--a very interesting book indeed.

So he went to San Francisco in the fall of 1915. A short time before he

left New York his friend Bill Shatoff gave him a farewell dinner. As

the evening wore on the diners adjourned to the neighborhood of Second

Avenue and Fifth Street for a frolic, and Berkman and Shatoff playfully

mauled a policeman, and took his club away, for which both men were

arrested. But that did not interfere long with Berkman’s departure for

the Coast, and the purpose and fruit of his journey appeared within a

short time.

[Illustration: Major Fuller Potter, Military Intelligence]

It was called _The Blast_. According to its own description _The

Blast_ was a revolutionary labor weekly, which meant that it preached

revolution every so often to those who had a grievance against their

employers and to those who had no employers but who had a deep contempt

for anything of the sort. Alexander Berkman appeared as editor and

publisher, E. B. Morton as associate editor, and M. E. Fitzgerald

as manager. It sold for five cents a copy, unless you bought it in

bundles, in which case you paid half that price.

In the first issue, dated January 15, 1916, the title of the paper is

explained by the editor. “Do you mean to destroy?” he asks. “Do you

mean to build? These are the questions we have been asked from many

quarters by inquirers sympathetic and otherwise. Our reply is frank and

bold: We mean both: to destroy and to build. For socially speaking,

Destruction is the beginning of Construction.... The time is NOW. The

breath of discontent is heavy upon this wide land. It permeates mill

and mine, field and factory. Blind rebellion stalks upon highway and

byway. To fire it with the spark of Hope, to kindle it with the light

of Vision, and turn pale discontent into conscious social action--that

is the crying problem of the hour. It is the great work calling to

be done. To work, then, and blasted be every obstacle in the way of

the Regeneration!” In a congratulatory telegram in the same issue,

Emma wrote to Alexander: “Let _The Blast_ re-echo from coast to coast,

inspiring strength and courage into the disinherited, and striking

terror into the hearts of the craven enemy, now that one more of our

brothers has fallen a victim to the insatiable Moloch. May _The Blast_

tear up the solidified ignorance and cruelty of our social structure.

Blast away! To the daring belongs the future.”

A sample of the methods by which _The Blast_ proposed to begin its

regeneration of the disinherited is this delicate editorial paragraph:

“_Judas Made Respectable._

“Judas Iscariot delivered the Nazarene agitator into the hands

of the Roman District Attorney. This base betrayal incensed the

people against the mercenary stool-pigeon. Judas had enough

decency to go and hang himself.”

A slap evidently at the person whom Emma referred to in her telegram,

who had just sold out to Moloch.

It was a cardinal principle of the paper to be scurrilous and direct

in its attacks upon the enemies of anarchy. General Harrison Grey

Otis, a Los Angeles publisher whose newspaper building was bombed in

1912 after labor trouble, was referred to as “General Hungry Growl

Otis,” Colonel Roosevelt as “The Human Blowout.” The leading cartoon

of the second issue, drawn--and well drawn--by Robert Minor, showed a

huge figure of a laborer bearing on a tray the figure of a tiny though

corpulent judge, its mouth open in speech, and its chair guarded by

three stolid elephantine policemen. The laborer is bearing the dish to

a feast of anarchists, the title of Minor’s contribution is “The Court

Orders--.” The court had evidently ordered in the direction of _The

Blast_, and Berkman did not like the order. In the same issue he wrote

editorials against conscription in England, against the convention

of the American Federation of Labor which had just been held in San

Francisco, against its president, Samuel Gompers, and against national

preparedness.

I have quoted these extracts not because they are specially interesting

or readable, but because they will give one who is not wholly familiar

with the practical platform of anarchy a suggestion of anarchy’s tone

of voice. It is not friendly, but is on the contrary quite snobbish.

Selig Schulberg, in an article on Mexico, gently suggested: “Toilers

of America, if the Hearsts, Otises and Rockefellers have property, for

which they want protection, in Mexico, let _them_ protect it!” The

editor says: “The Fords, the Bryans, the Jane Addams may be sincere.

If so they are blind leaders of the blind.” A writer signing himself

“L. E. Claypool,” wrote, under the title “Preparedness is Hell,” this

tribute to our tortured Ally in Europe: “Most of you gents that yell

(i. e., yell, ‘What about Belgium?’) never heard of Belgium till this

war broke out. A lot of you probably don’t know that the language

of the Belgians is French. Further, you don’t know that Belgium had

a treaty with England and France which placed the little nation in

the war before the German invasion. You may not know that French and

English engineers and military experts had surveyed the land and were

preparing to make it a battle ground long before the Germans did

so.” That statement was typical German propaganda of a very crude

sort, calculated to appeal by its insinuation to the class of readers

who affected _The Blast_. The platform of the paper, in a word, was

Against.

Berkman was in a rich field for labor unrest. California is a strong

labor state. The whole country, outside as well as inside California,

had been excited over the _Los Angeles Times_ bomb affair in 1912, and

it revived that excitement when two of the culprits were prosecuted

three years later. One finds constant reference to the case in the

files of _The Blast_, and to the strikes at Lawrence, Mass., and

Ludlow, Colorado, and Youngstown, Ohio. Anti-capitalistic rough-house

in any corner of the continent was good copy for Berkman. If it

flagged for a moment he took up the cudgels for his friend Emma, who

had just been arrested in New York and sentenced to the workhouse for

distributing birth-control literature. Or he dove into international

relations, comparing in one instance Villa and President Wilson, with

little mercy for the latter. The issue of April Fool’s Day, 1916,

carried a leading editorial directed against the Pacific Coast Defense

League, just organized to bring the national guard of the Pacific and

Mountain states into a condition of higher efficiency and to start

a program of “healthy physical and military training” in the public

schools. This editorial was signed by Tom Mooney, who soon appeared in

the columns of the paper in another capacity.

The publication did not go unheeded by the Post Office department.

On May 1 Berkman burst out with an article headed, “To Hell With The

Government,” in which he used language that would make any ordinary

head of hair curl up. He was angry because the Government had issued an

order holding up all succeeding issues of the paper. In an editorial

he said he welcomed the uprising in Ireland--the Easter Day affair in

Dublin which cost several Sinn Feiners their lives. Other anarchistic

publications in the country were meeting the same fate. _The Alarm_, in

Chicago, _Revolt_ of New York, _Regeneracion_, a Mexican revolutionary

sheet issued in Los Angeles, and _Voluntad_, a Spanish paper in New

York, were closed up. But Berkman went on publishing, and howling about

the constitutional freedom of the press. Back in New York other friends

of his had been making more trouble: Mrs. Max Eastman and Bolton Hall

were arrested for circulating birth-control pamphlets, and Bouck White

was jailed for distributing an effigy of the American flag bearing a

dollar-mark. Berkman took up their cases and howled. He sent appeals

for help in his fight against the Post Office department, and raised

a little money. One of his liberal contributors was a writer named

John Reed, who sent him five dollars from New York. Then a strike

broke out, fostered by the I. W. W., on the iron ranges in Northern

Minnesota, and William M. Haywood wrote Berkman an appeal for help

which the latter published in _The Blast_ with a eulogy. He found

no dearth of subjects to fill his pages, and then suddenly came an

interruption.

San Francisco turned out in a great preparedness parade on July 22.

Someone threw a bomb into the ranks of the marchers. Nine people were

killed. The next issue of _The Blast_ said substantially: “Well,

they might have expected it,” and said actually: “To try to connect

the Anarchists, the I. W. W., the Labor elements or the participants

in the peace meeting with the bomb tragedy is stupid. The act was

obviously the work of an individual who evidently sought to express

his opposition to Preparedness for Slaughter by using the ammunition

of Preparedness. Terrible as it is, it is merely a foretaste in

miniature of what the people may expect multiplied a million times,

from the Preparedness insanity.” When two men, Nolan and Tom Mooney,

were arrested and charged with the crime, _The Blast_ rushed to their

defense. When Warren Billings and Israel Weinberg were added to the

list of accused, _The Blast_ ran sketches of the defendants by Minor,

the staff artist. The case was of consuming interest to the anarchist

group, and they rubbed their hands, in _The Blast_ office, over their

good luck that it had happened right in their own little circle. _The

Blast_ ceased firing random shots and focussed on the bomb case in

salvos, followed the course of the trials, drew a parallel between the

condition of the San Francisco suspects and that of Fielden, Neebe and

Schwab, three of the anarchists who were implicated in the Haymarket

bomb outrage in Chicago in 1886 and pardoned.

The business of being an anarchist became surrounded with more and

more difficulty as the year drew toward a close. Caplan, the fourth

Los Angeles bomb suspect to be tried, was convicted and sentenced to

ten years; a group of laborers who had engaged in violence in strikes

against the United States Steel Corporation were under sentence in a

Pittsburg prison; Carlo Tresca (whom we recall as a speaker at the

Brescia Circle in 1915), and ten others were in jail in Duluth charged

with murder in the I. W. W. strike on the Mesaba Iron range; the Magon

brothers, two Mexican revolutionary anarchists, were in prison, and the

days of _The Blast_ were numbered. Berkman came back to New York in the

fall. While he was absent, _The Blast_ sputtered once more in its

issue of January, 1917, with a venomous cartoon by Minor, and went out,

for want of funds.

[Illustration: Lieutenant A. R. Fish, Naval Intelligence]

Berkman found Emma Goldman well and prosperous. She had visited him in

March in San Francisco, and again in June and July had delivered two

series of birth-control lectures there. After her first visit, _The

Blast_ had blossomed out with a book advertisement, which included

the list of volumes sold by the Mother Earth Publishing Company in

New York. There were the usual texts on anarchy, revolution, and

syndicalism, and it is interesting to note among the books sent to

Berkman for review the following titles: “A Few Facts About British

Rule In India. Published by the Hindustani Gadar, San Francisco,”

“India’s ‘Loyalty’ to England. Published by The Indian Nationalist

Party,” and “The Methods of the Indian Police in the Twentieth Century.

Published by the Hindustan Gadar.” Har Dayal had been the editor of

_Ghadr_ until 1914; apparently his acquaintanceship with Berkman was

being kept fresh by his successors at the nest of Hindu intrigue in

Berkeley.

But when Berkman got back to New York he found that birth-control was

no longer the thing. A new development had taken place, half-way

around the earth, and it looked promising for the anarchistic

interests. So we must leave the two for a moment.

On January 9, 1917, the Russian premier resigned. A fortnight later

the newspapers announced that the Germans had recaptured considerable

important ground on the Riga front. On February 3, the United States

severed diplomatic relations with Germany, gave Bernstorff his papers,

and sent him home two weeks later. On March 11 a revolutionary

demonstration broke out in Petrograd, and the next day the Czar of All

the Russias abdicated his throne. A new cabinet was formed, its foreign

minister told the Allies that Russia would continue to fight, and the

United States recognized the new régime. The news was hailed with a

good deal of fraternal spirit in America, and with special cordiality

in New York, where there were great numbers of Russians who had left

Europe to escape the persecution of the old régime.

Many of the New York Russians knew what was going to happen in

Petrograd. The Bomb Squad made friends with an anarchist as early as

February 1, 1917. On that day at a spot not far from where Shatoff

and Berkman had attacked the policeman a year before, a certain

Mr. Plotkin met a Mr. Bogdanovitch. Plotkin urged Bogdanovitch to

call a special conference of all the revolutionary organizations in

the city to protest against militarism. “No,” said the conservative

Bogdanovitch. “Our group will either have to pass a resolution as a

single unit, or else go over to Group 2 and see what they are doing

about this news that we are going to have war. Don’t be too ready to

jump to conclusions.” So the two went to call on Group 2, which was

in session--some 50 Russians and Russian Jews, who spent the evening

harmlessly reading the war prospects from American newspapers. No

resolution was passed.

The next night, however, there was a lecture at Beethoven Hall, at 210

East 5th Street. The speaker was introduced as “Mr. Bornstein,” who had

just returned from Russia. “Mr. Bornstein” was Leon Trotzky.

Trotzky, using the Russian language, told of the plans that were being

developed for revolution. “You anarchists here,” he said, “don’t want

any militarism or any government which is of no help to the working

class, and is always ready to fire on the workman. It’s time you did

away with such a government once and forever!” After his speech, the

chairman, Comrade G. Chudnofsky, rose and addressed the crowd of 300

in the hall, to this effect:

“Comrades, some of you can’t read English. You don’t know what is

going on until you see it in the Russian papers. Only to-day I noticed

that the Police Commissioner is going to call out all the reserves he

can get to handle the situation, since Germany notified America what

she would do. The capitalistic government is _afraid of us_! They are

afraid of the working class. Remember that, for in case of war, we can

protest against militarism and start our own war. Here is a resolution

which I propose to prevent any of our loyal number joining the army. I

will read it.” And he read it.

The next day Bill Shatoff was scheduled to speak at a meeting at Number

9 Second Avenue, but he was suddenly called to Boston, and a substitute

took the platform. He was howled down because he made a speech which

reflected loyalty to the United States. The audience consisted of 75

Russians, of whom some 30 were anarchists known to the Bomb Squad. The

United States severed diplomatic relations with Germany that night.

On February 4 the representatives of several of the Russian anarchist

groups were to meet at 534 East 5th Street and pass the resolution

against militarism, but they could not agree upon it, and the session

ended by postponing the matter. Most of the delegates present adjourned

to 64 East 7th Street (almost within earshot of the Washington Arch),

to hear Chudnofsky rave against enlistment, the police, the government

and the war.

Those little meetings were typical of the eruptions which occurred

throughout the poorer districts of the great city during the remainder

of the month of February. Such propagandists as Chudnofsky and Trotzky,

uttering their exhortations to a multiplication of such groups as

gathered in the Fifth Street house, spread among the gossipy East

Siders and into the remotest slums the news that great things were

about to happen in Russia, and rumor and expectancy set the stage for

the arrival of the news of the revolution on March 12. The leaders then

began to mobilize their forces and act quickly. Under Shatoff, Schnabel

and Rodes the revolutionary fire was passed along from one to another.

The story was that Russia was free, reclaimed from Czardom and all that

it had meant of oppression.

The lid was off, and it was a case of first come, first served. The

Provisional Government was no better than any other, these men said.

“Russia shall be ours.” “How?” asked the eager disciples. “By helping

yourselves,” answered Shatoff and Schnabel and Rodes. “That’s all very

well,” said the proletariat, “but we haven’t the price.” “Oh, in that

case, come to the farewell meeting on March 26 for Leon Trotzky, at

Harlem River Casino, and all will be made clear to you.”

Some 800 people were at Trotzky’s farewell party, which was held under

the auspices of the German Socialist Federation. Alexander Berkman and

Emma Goldman were among those present. A blond Russian made a speech in

which he said: “Comrades, some of us are going back to Russia to push

the revolution as we think it ought to be pushed, and those who remain

here must get ready to do their share of the work as it ought to be

done.” Trotzky then rose and speaking first in German, then in Russian,

repeated the advice the previous speaker had given, and added: “You who

stay here must work hand in hand with the revolution in Russia, for

only in that way can you accomplish revolution in the United States.”

He was cheered to the echo.

(There are still those who wonder why we have not recognized the

Bolsheviki.)

The pier of the Norwegian-American line the next morning was a strange

sight. Trotzky, with his wife, Chudnofsky, Plotkin, and a group

of fifty more Russians, including such names as Muhin, Rapaport,

Dnieprofsky, Yaroshefsky and Rashkofsky, sailed for Norway. An

undersized, wild-eyed, fanatic little plucked-bantam of a Russian

expatriate literally set out from Hoboken to upset the Provisional

Government of Russia, prevent the formation of a republic, stop the war

with Germany and prevent interference from other governments--that was

his open boast. And, if such a mission can be crowned with success, he

succeeded.

The leaders of the groups left behind began that very afternoon to

examine recruits for the return to Russia. They met at 534 East 5th

Street and elected a committee of five to serve as examining board

for applicants for the $20 to $50 free passage money extended by the

Provisional Government to help Russians who had fled the persecutions

of the old days to repatriate themselves. It is unnecessary to state

that the Provisional Government hardly knew how thoroughly these homing

pigeons were going to re-establish themselves. All those who passed

muster were put down for a sailing date.

Throttled! The Detection of the German and Anarchist Bomb Plotters · 第 13 / 14 段