CHAPTER X.

DEACONESSES IN ENGLAND.

To learn the first facts about deaconesses in England, we must go back

to the early days of the Puritans. In 1576, under Queen Elizabeth, about

sixty non-conformist ministers of the eastern counties assembled to make

regulations concerning Church constitution and discipline, and one of

them was as follows: "Touching deacons of both sorts, namely, both men

and women, the Church should be admonished what is required by the

apostle, that they are not to choose men by custom or course, or for

their riches, but for their faith, zeal, and integrity; and that the

Church is to pray in the meantime to be so directed that they may choose

them that are meet. Let the names of those that are thus chosen be

published the next Lord's Day, and after that their duties to the

Church, and the Church's duty toward them. Then let them be received

into their office with the general prayers of the whole Church."[52]

There are other references in the works of the early Puritans that

indicate that the office of deaconess was as well known and recognized

as were the other offices that were named in accordance with the usages

of the primitive Church.

In the early part of the seventeenth century it still survived, as we

shall see from a quaint and curious picture that is of especial interest

to all Americans, because it portrays what took place in that community

of pious souls who furnished us the men we delight to honor as the

Pilgrim Fathers. A number of these heroic souls, who could give up their

country, but would not yield their faith, went forth from England in

1608, and settled in Amsterdam. They preserved in a foreign land their

own Church usages, as the following words show: "In Amsterdam there were

about three hundred communicants, and they had for their pastor and

teacher those two eminent men before named (Johnson and Ainsworth); and

had at one time four grave men for ruling elders, three able, godly men

for deacons, and one ancient widow for a deaconess, who did them service

many years, though she was sixty years of age when she was chosen. She

honored her place, and was an ornament to the congregation. She usually

sat in a convenient place in the congregation, with a little birchen rod

in her hand, and kept little children in awe from disturbing the

congregation. She did frequently visit the sick and weak, especially

women, and as there was need called out ladies and young women to watch

and do them other helps as their necessity should require; and if there

were poor she would gather relief for them of those that were able, or

acquaint the deacons. And she was obeyed as a mother in Israel and an

officer of Christ."[53]

Whether the "ancient widow" with the little "birchen rod" had any

followers in the early Puritan communities of the Plymouth Colony we

cannot say, as there are no records that throw light on the subject; but

the history of early New England Congregationalism gives us one

indication that the office was recognized in the New World. In the

Cambridge Platform, a system of Church discipline agreed upon by the

elders and messengers of the New England churches assembled in synod at

Cambridge, in 1648, the seventh chapter enumerates the duties of elder

and deacons, and then adds, "The Lord hath appointed _ancient widdows_,

where they may be had, to minister in the Church, in giving attendance

to the sick, and to give succor unto them and others in the like

necessities." The same confusion of thought concerning the Church widow

and the deaconess is here seen, but there is evident the recognition of

the services that women were officially to render the Church.

In the early part of the present century Southey voiced the complaint,

long reiterated, that Protestantism had no missionaries. We who live in

the closing years of the same century, surrounded by the multiplied

evidences of the extent of missions, when the Protestants of the world

are expending nearly ten millions of dollars annually, and employing

nearly six thousand men and women as missionaries, cannot realize the

change that has taken place. In 1830 Southey again wrote: "Thirty years

hence another reproach may also be effaced, and England may have her

Sisters of Charity." He had learned to know their value when serving as

a volunteer in Wellington's army, and a year after the battle of

Waterloo he had visited the Béguines at Ghent, and what he saw deeply

impressed him. "We should have such women among us," he said. "It is a

great loss to England that we have no Sisters of Charity. There is

nothing Romish, nothing unevangelical in such communities; nothing but

what is right and holy; nothing but what belongs to that religion which

the apostle James has described as 'pure and undefiled before God the

Father.'"[54]

Southey's prophecy has come true. England to-day in her deaconesses

possesses her Sisters of Charity. How has this change been brought

about? The acquaintance of Mrs. Fry with Fliedner, and her visit to

Kaiserswerth, led her to introduce into England the practical training

of nurses for the sick. The Nursing Sisters' Institution in Devonshire

Square, Bishop's Gate, was founded through her efforts in 1840, and

still exists "to train nurses for private families, and to provide

pensions for aged nurses."[55]

In 1842, Fliedner came to London, accompanied by four sisters, at the

invitation of the German Hospital at Dalston. These deaconesses won

golden opinions from the hospital authorities for their quiet, efficient

manner, and their trained skill. The hospital continues to be served by

them, but the Sisters now come from the mother house at Darmstadt.

Kaiserswerth and its deaconesses became more widely known through the

life and inestimable services of Florence Nightingale. When a child,

one of Fliedner's reports fell into her hands. Its perusal marked an

era in her life. It made clear to her what she should do. She would go

to Kaiserswerth, and fit herself for a nurse. Her childish resolve never

wavered. "Happy is the man who holds fast to the ideals of his youth."

Florence Nightingale held fast to hers. She went to Kaiserswerth at two

different times, and through her deeds and her writings the care of the

sick in England has been completely transformed. She has won a nation's

gratitude, and now is living in honored old age in one of the London

institutions founded mainly by the money that she contributed, and which

she obtained by selling some valuable gifts given her by a foreign

government in acknowledgment of her care of its wounded soldiers during

the Crimean war.

Another woman distinguished in England's philanthropies is Agnes Jones,

who left a home of wealth and refinement to receive her training also at

Kaiserswerth. Returning to England she gave her time and talents in

single-hearted devotion to the care of the poor in the Liverpool

work-house, and met death in the midst of her labors. The training which

led two such women to accomplish such noble deeds naturally was

recognized as valuable, and Kaiserswerth soon became an honored name in

England.

In 1851 Miss Nightingale sent out anonymously her little book entitled

_An Account of the Institution of Deaconesses_, which added to the

knowledge already in circulation about the movement in Germany.

Meanwhile articles were appearing in the reviews. In 1848 one was

written in the _Edinburgh Review_ by John Malcolm Ludlow, who later, in

1866, gave the results of the thoughts and studies of a number of years

in _Woman's Work in the Church_, the best historical study of the

subject up to the date at which it was written. Since then the Germans

have pushed their historical investigations further, and the work needs

to be revised and to be brought down to the present time.

In _Good Words_ for 1861 there were two articles by Dr. Stevenson, of

the Irish Presbyterian Church, entitled "The Blue Flag of Kaiserswerth,"

afterward incorporated in his work, _Praying and Working_, a book too

little known among us.

The great upholder of the deaconess cause in the Church of England was

the late Dean of Chester, Rev. J. S. Howson. His essay, first published

in the _Quarterly Review_, was amplified and issued in book form in 1860

under the title _Deaconesses_. It won many friends. The cause remained a

favorite one with him, and he constantly advocated it by speech and by

deed. Since his death his latest thoughts, which remained substantially

the same as those that he first advanced, have been published in a work

entitled _The Diaconate of Women_.

Within the Church of England, however, the deaconess cause has not met

the same prosperous development that it has obtained in connection with

certain independent institutions, notably that of Mildmay.

Among the institutions on the Continent, as well as in the pages of this

work up to the present, the terms "sister" and "deaconess" are used

synonymously, to indicate one and the same person. But when we come to

consider the deaconess institutions within the Church of England we

cannot continue to use these two names in the same way. A deaconess is a

member of a deaconess institution, actively engaged in charitable deeds,

but, like the deaconess on the Continent, she can sever her connection

with it when adequate cause presents itself, and return to her family

and friends. A sister belongs to a sisterhood which closely resembles

the Roman Catholic sisterhoods in many features. These sisterhoods began

in 1847 with a number of ladies brought together through the influence

of Dr. Pusey, who formed themselves into a community to live under its

rule. Their influence and number increased, and twenty-three

sisterhoods are mentioned in the last official report.[56]

Doubtless it was the activity and great usefulness of the continental

deaconess houses that provided the stimulating examples which acted on

the Church of England and led to the rise of sisterhoods and deaconess

institutions. But the two opposing tendencies within the Episcopal

Church--namely, that which desires to approach the Church of Rome, with

which it feels itself in sympathy on many points, and that which views

with disfavor any conformity to it, and strives to keep to the landmarks

set at the great Reformation--these two distinct tendencies are closely

reflected in the woman's work of the Anglican Church.[57] The

sisterhoods are distinctly under the fostering care of the former

element, the deaconesses are manifestly favored by the latter.

Sisterhoods, again, differ among themselves, some being strongly

conventual in their life and practice, adopting the three vows of

poverty, chastity, and obedience, and a few even advocating penance and

confession. The vows are taken for life, and, in connection with the

view of the sacred obligation to life-long service, great stress is laid

upon the position of the sister as the "bride of Christ"--the same

thought of the mysterious union with the heavenly Bridegroom that is so

dwelt upon in the nunneries of the Catholic Church. With such views

Protestants, distinctly such, can have no sympathy. Those who look upon

the deaconess as a valuable member of the Church economy do so because

they regard her as a Christian woman, strengthened and disciplined by

special training to do better service for Christ in the world. This is

the recognized difference: "The sisterhood exists primarily for the sake

of forming a religious community, but deaconesses live together for the

sake of the work itself, attracted to deaconess work by the want which

in most populous towns is calling loudly for assistance; and with a view

of being trained, therefore, for spiritual and temporal usefulness among

the poor."[58]

There are now seven deaconess establishments in the Church of England,

each having a larger or smaller number of branches, with diocesan

sanction and under the supervision of clergymen.[59]

The first of these was founded in 1861, and is now known as the London

Diocesan Deaconess Institution. At that time Kaiserswerth was accepted

as its model; deaconesses were sent there to be trained; Kaiserswerth

rules were adopted as far as possible, and a modification of the

Kaiserswerth dress for the sisters. The house was then represented at

the triennial Conferences in Germany, and in the list of mother houses

published at Kaiserswerth[60] the name still appears. It would seem,

however, that now the Kaiserswerth connection is entirely set aside by

the London house, for in an historical sketch of the revival of

deaconesses in the Church, that is found in the organ of the

institution, called _Ancilla Domini_, for March, 1887, there is no

mention made of any of the continental houses. The Anglican Church

apparently dates the entire work from the setting apart of its first

deaconess, Elizabeth C. Ferard, in 1861, as she was the first to receive

consecration through the touch of a bishop's hand. The former connection

with Kaiserswerth and the great work carried on in Germany from 1836 to

the present time are quite ignored.

Besides the London house already mentioned an East London deaconess home

was opened in 1880, to provide deaconesses and church-workers for East

London. Besides the deaconesses and probationers thirty-two associates

are connected with this home. The associates are ladies who do not

intend to become deaconesses, but give as much time as they can to the

work. They live with the deaconesses, conform to the rules, and wear the

garb, but pay their own expenses. These associates are a highly

important part of the working force. They form a valuable tie connecting

the sisters with sources of influence and aid that would otherwise be

closed to them. Nearly always they are ladies of independent means, and

come for longer or shorter periods to relieve the deaconesses, their

zeal often being as great as that of the sisters whose places they take.

Besides these houses there are homes located at Maidstone, Chester,

Bedford, Salisbury, and Portsmouth, in the respective dioceses of

Canterbury, Chester, Ely, Salisbury, and Winchester.

In the home at Portsmouth sisters not only engage in nursing and parish

work, but are also given special training for penitentiary and

out-of-door rescue work. They also have a home for the rescue of

neglected children.

The Salisbury Home is beautifully situated in the quiet cathedral city

of the same name. The house is a picturesque and venerable mansion,

covered with clinging green vines, opening out into a garden which in

olden times belonged to the convent. There is in connection with the

home an institution for training girls for domestic service, supported

by the funds of a charity given for that purpose. The whole service of

the house is done by the girls. They attend upon the deaconesses and the

ladies who board there to receive training in the hospital. Each

deaconess pays for board and lodging while training, and, if able to do

so, when she returns for rest, or a visit to her old home.

In other houses the deaconess is expected to keep her own room in order,

and may have some duties in the house, but servants do the rough work.

The social status of the English deaconesses is, as a rule, markedly

different from the German deaconesses. Here ladies of rank and inherited

social traditions, of refinement, of accomplishments, and of education,

many of them women of means, defraying their entire expenses and often

those of their poorer sisters, are largely represented among the

deaconesses. On the other hand, the German deaconesses, as we have seen,

are largely of that station in life that furnishes many for domestic

service. Although of course there are among them women of all ranks and

all degrees of education, still such women form the larger number; and

the conditions under which Fliedner began the work, as well as the

difference of custom and habit in the two countries, incline the German

houses to maintain the rules of service by which nearly every detail of

domestic service in their institutions is cared for by the deaconesses.

There is more of ceremony and formality in the English deaconess

institutions which are under the direction of the Church of England. At

Salisbury, for instance, the candidate must reside in the home for three

months, that her ability and efficiency may be tested. If accepted, she

then puts on a gray serge habit, a leathern girdle, white cap, black

bonnet, the veil and cloak of a probationer, and is admitted to the

"degree" of a probationer at a special service. The year of probation

having come to an end, she is again presented to the bishop, and is set

apart as a deaconess by the laying on of hands. This time the habit is

changed from gray to blue, and a black ebony cross, with one of gold

inlaid, is hung upon her neck.[61]

This is very different from the way in which Fliedner regarded the dress

and adornment of the deaconesses for whom he was responsible. The king

of Prussia desired to present them with a small silver cross as their

badge of service, but the simple-hearted German pastor dissuaded him,

saying that the deaconesses needed no ornament save a meek and quiet

spirit, and they must avoid symbols which would suggest Romish

imitations.

The Strasburg deaconesses also at first wore a small cross, but Pastor

Härter discontinued it when he found that the wearing of it gave

occasion for complaint.

Yet however we may differ in the lesser details, of garb, of rules, and

of ceremonies, from those accepted by some of the Church of England

deaconess institutions, we can give unstinted admiration to the lives of

self-denial, and active, unceasing efforts in behalf of others, that we

see among their numbers. Take, for instance, the little publication _The

Deaconess_, issued by the East London Home, and notice the undertakings

carried on by the members--district-visiting, nursing of the sick,

mothers' meetings, Sunday-school teaching, Bible classes, and all the

multitudinous ways of meeting the squalor, poverty, ignorance, sickness,

and sin of the poor of the east of London. There is no poetic enthusiasm

that strengthens one for such work, the dirt, the degradation, the

forlorn condition are so trying. The little children so precociously

wicked, so preternaturally cunning, that the natural charm and

attraction of childhood have wholly disappeared; the sights and sounds

that assail the senses; the dulled, hopeless faces, the apathy, the

stunted intellectual growth--these are the depressing influences that

continually beset the deaconesses, and nothing short of God-given

strength and Christ-like enthusiasm can enable these women to devote

six, eight, and ten years of service to this worst city district, and to

come forth with sunshiny, peaceful faces, and sympathetic, loving

hearts.

Taking the total number of deaconess institutions under the Church of

England, there are eighty one deaconesses, thirty-four probationers, and

two hundred and twenty-nine associates.[62]

So far, sisterhoods have proved more attractive to the women of the

Church of England than have deaconess establishments. The latter do not

seem to increase largely in numbers. Vexing questions have arisen as to

how the deaconess should be set apart to her work. Should she be

consecrated by the imposition of the bishop's hands? What relation

should she have to the Church? These questions have been partially

settled by the principles and rules that were drawn up in 1871 and were

signed by the two archbishops and eighteen bishops. They define a

deaconess as "a woman set apart by a bishop, under that title, for

service in the Church;"[63] placing her under the authority of the

bishop of the diocese. These recommendations have not been formally

adopted by the Church of England; they hold good only so far as they are

accepted.

But there are other institutions, lying outside of the boundaries of the

State Church, which have developed more fully and prosperously than

those within it. Of these we must speak first of the institution of

Dr. Laseron, which is more closely connected with Kaiserswerth than any

other in England. In 1855 Dr. Laseron and his wife lost their only

child; and as Mrs. Laseron walked through the streets with burdened

heart she looked at the little children with quickened sympathy, and

noticed how many were poor and hungry and scantily clothed. She talked

with her husband, and they opened a "ragged school" for children. This

increased and branched off, until now there is an orphanage, workhouses

for boys, and a servants' training school for girls. Requests were

frequently made for some of the older girls to act as nurses among the

poor; and, finally, Dr. Laseron, who was a German by birth, determined

to found a deaconess house and hospital. A small hospital of twelve beds

was opened, and proved insufficient to meet the demands; and none could

be accepted as deaconesses, as there was no opportunity to train them in

so small a place. While waiting to see how the house could be enlarged,

he mentioned his perplexity to Mr. Samuel Morley. This gentleman heard

him with interest, and said that he was one of the directors of a large

hospital; that at a recent meeting of the directors a Catholic bishop

had offered to send Sisters of Charity who, without compensation, should

nurse the sick, and he had thought what a fine thing it would be if the

Protestant Church had also its women of piety who could devote

themselves to a similar work. The result of the conversation was that

Mr. Morley contributed forty thousand dollars, with which Dr. Laseron

purchased a site in Tottenham, built a hospital with fifty beds, and a

deaconess was called from Kaiserswerth to superintend it. The hospital

has been again enlarged, so that it now accommodates one hundred

patients. Sixty-four deaconesses are connected with it, who are at

service in the hospitals of Cork, Dublin, Scarborough, and Sunderland.

This institution is unsectarian, and has met with special aid from

non-conformists. It still keeps in close relation to Kaiserswerth, and

is represented at the Conferences. It has constantly thriven, and the

mother-house at Tottenham is a center for various benevolent

enterprises.

In connection with Dr. Barnardo's Orphanage there is also a deaconess

house. Harley House, the missionary training-school under the direction

of Dr. and Mrs. Grattan Guinness in East London, has a deaconess home as

one of its branches. The Kilburn (St. Augustine's) Orphanage of Mercy,

and the London Bible-women's Mission are also centers for the training

and organizing of women's work in London.

We must pause more at length over the prison mission under the care of

Mrs. Meredith. American women are beginning to occupy themselves with

questions of philanthropy and religious activity to an extent not before

equaled. The women's prisons in England are especially fruitful of

suggestions to us, as many here are interested in having our women

prisoners separated in prisons by themselves, as has already been

attempted in a few States. Mrs. Meredith's work is in behalf of the

prisoners after they have served their sentence and are discharged. She

is the daughter of General Lloyd, who was formerly governor-general of

prisons in Ireland. As a little child she was accustomed to go about

with her father, and the interior of prisons became familiar to her.

Later in life, when her family ties were broken, and her hands left free

for service, her interest was engaged in behalf of the women convicts

who were discharged from prison. She enlisted the support of other

ladies of like views, able to assist her, and in 1866 the Prison Gate

Mission began, which has continued to the present day. Every morning, as

the gate of Millbank prison swings back to allow those who have been

released from penal bondage to come forth, a sister stands waiting to

invite those who will go with her to a room near by, where breakfast

awaits them; there are ladies to inquire about their plans and to offer

them work. A great laundry was opened in 1867 to provide employment for

these women. Here washing is done for two classes: for the poor and

sick, to whom the service is given as a charity, and to those who pay

for the work and whose money enables the mission to be partly

self-supporting. Then the ladies extended their plans to take in the

children of the prisoners. A law was passed by Parliament which enabled

Mrs. Meredith and her associates to have the care of those children at

the Princess Mary Village Home until they are sixteen years of age. This

home was founded at Addlestone in 1870, and was named after the Princess

Mary, Duchess of Teck, who aided in obtaining funds to build it. The

institution takes not only the female children of criminal mothers, but

also little girls who are likely to drift into a career of crime. It is

conducted on the cottage plan, each little house having ten inmates and

a house mother to superintend it, and being complete in its own

arrangements. There are eighteen cottages, a large, generous

school-room, a small infirmary for the sick, and a little church. About

two hundred children of criminals and the unfortunate class are here

cared for. Instead of allowing them to drift away and to perpetuate

vice, crime, and immorality, they are taken entirely from their old

surroundings, and new influences of knowledge and purity are thrown

about them. There is no part of Mrs. Meredith's mission which has such

hope for the future and is so valuable in results as this preventive

work among the children.

There are also a woman's medical mission (1882), a Christian woman's

union, a girls' school, and a deaconess house in Jerusalem under the

control of the same association. How it arose is well intimated by the

following extract from a letter from Mrs. Meredith to the author, dated

March 9, 1889: "You will know that my course has been progressive with

regard to the mode of congregating the women who joined me in working.

At first we merely came together daily from our own homes, as those who

make a business concern do. Then to spare time and money we began to

live together. The next step was to admit useful and devoted women who

had no property, and to form an association with degrees of membership.

When we found ourselves becoming a corporation of importance, and having

combined to acquire property and to found institutions, we invited the

help and counsel of some men of known eminence. Our institutions are all

branches of a parent stock, and are now placed in the charge of these

good men, and we have taken the name of the Church of England Woman's

Missionary Association. I am daily persuaded of the value of such

organizations."

In connection with the London West Central Mission there is an

association of ladies called the Sisters of the People. "They are

expected to be worthy of the beautiful name they bear. They are true

sisters of the unprivileged and the disheartened; as ready to make a

bed, cook a dinner, or nurse a baby as to minister to the higher need of

the immortal spirit. The sisters live together in the neighborhood of

their work, and wear a distinctive dress as a protection and for other

reasons; but they take no vows, and are at liberty to withdraw from the

mission at any time. Their work is directed by Mrs. Hughes. Katherine

House, the residence of the Sisters of the People, was opened early in

November, 1887, and from that day the work of the sisters dates its

commencement. Their daily labors are very similar to those of the

deaconesses of Mildmay, who work among the London parishes. Each sister

has a district allotted to her, which she visits regularly and

systematically. The first object which she sets before herself is to get

to know the people, and to make them feel that she is their true sister

and friend, irrespective of the fact that they are themselves good or

bad, respectable or degraded. When once true friendliness is

established, the way is opened for direct religious influence; and many,

who in the first instance would never pay any attention to religion,

will listen to an appeal from one whom they love and respect."[64]

Katherine House accommodates twelve sisters. A second house is urgently

needed, and a strong plea is made for it in the Report.

There are besides "out sisters," who work with the sisters but reside at

their own homes. This is a valuable feature of this mission, as it

interests ladies who are living in their own homes, and yet who can be

very useful to those who devote their whole work to the sisters' labor.

In the Report a great many instances are given which show what an

intimate knowledge of the poor people is obtained by these sisters, and

in what practical ways they minister to the bodily and spiritual needs

of those whom they find in their house-to-house visitations. The term

"sister," as it is used in the report of the London West Central

Mission, is in all respects a synonym for "deaconess," as the name is

understood in the large deaconess establishment at Mildmay. To the study

of this we shall devote the following chapter.

[52] Daniel Neal's _History of the Puritans_, London, 1703, vol. i,

pp. 344-346.

[53] _Chronicles of the Pilgrim Fathers of the Colony of Plymouth,

from 1602 to 1625._ By Alex. Young. Second edition. Boston:

C. E. Little & J. Brown, 1844, pp. 455, 456.

[54] Schäfer, _Die Weibliche Diakonie_, vol. i, p. 207.

[55] _The Royal Guide to London Churches_ for 1866, 1867. By Herbert

Fry, p. 162.

[56] _Official Year-book of the Church of England_, 1889.

[57] _Andover Review_, June, 1888, art., "European Deaconesses,"

p. 578.

[58] _Deaconesses in the Church of England._ Griffith & Farran:

London, 1880, p. 22.

[59] _Official Year-book of the Church of England_, 1889.

[60] _Armen und Kranken Freund_, October, 1888.

[61] "Deaconess Work in England," _The Churchman_, May 19, 1888.

[62] I am indebted to the kindness of the Rt. Rev. the Bishop of

Wakefield for these numbers, upon whom the mantle of Dean Howson

seems to have fallen in caring for the deaconess cause.

[63] _London Diocesan Deaconess District Services._

[64] _First Annual Report of the London West Central Mission_,

pp. 14-42.

Deaconesses in Europe and their Lessons for America · 第 10 / 15 章