i. 49; Theocritus, xv. 132 _sqq._; Eustathius on Homer, _Od._ xi.
590.
669 Besides Lucian (cited below) see Origen, _Selecta in Ezechielem_
(Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, xiii. 800), δοκοῦσι γὰρ κατ᾽ ἐνιαυτὸν
τελετάς τινας ποιεῖν πρῶτον μὲν ὅτι θρηνοῦσιν αὐτὸν [scil. Ἄδωνιν]
ὡς τεθνηκότα, δεύτερον δὲ ὅτι χαίρουσιν ἐπ᾽ αὐτῷ ὡς ἀπὸ νεκρῶν
ἀναστάντι. Jerome, _Commentar. in Ezechielem_, viii. 13, 14 (Migne’s
_Patrologia Latina_, xxv. 82, 83): “_Quem nos_ Adonidem
_interpretati sumus, et Hebraeus et Syrus sermo_ THAMUZ (תמוז)
_vocat: unde quia juxta gentilem fabulam, in mense Junis amasius
Veneris et pulcherrimus juvenis occisus, et deinceps revixisse
narratur, eundem Junium mensem eodem appellant nomine, et
anniversariam ei celebrant solemnitatem, in qua plangitur a
mulieribus quasi mortuus, et postea reviviscens canitur atque
laudatur ... interfectionem et resurrectionem Adonidis planctu et
gaudio prosequens._” Cyril of Alexandria, _In Isaiam_, lib. ii.
tomus iii. (Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, lxx. 441), ἐπλάττοντο
τοίνυν Ἔλληνες ἑορτὴν ἐπὶ τούτῳ τοιαύτην. Προσεποιοῦντο μὲν γὰρ
λυπουμένῃ τῇ Ἀφροδίτῃ, διὰ τὸ τεθνάναι τὸν Ἄδωνιν, συνολοφύρεσθαι
καὶ θρηνεῖν; ἀνελθούσης δὲ ἐξ ᾅδου, καὶ μὴν καὶ ηὐρῆσθαι λεγούσης
τὸν ζητούμενον, συνήδεσθαι καὶ ἀνασκιρτᾶν; καὶ μεχρὶ τῶν καθ᾽ ἡμᾶς
καιρῶν ἐν τοῖς κατ᾽ Ἀλεξάνδρειαν ἱεροῖς ἐτελεῖτο τὸ παίγνιον τοῦτο.
From this testimony of Cyril we learn that the festival of the death
and resurrection of Adonis was celebrated at Alexandria down to his
time, that is, down to the fourth or even the fifth century, long
after the official establishment of Christianity.
670 Theocritus, xv.
671 W. Mannhardt, _Antike Wald- und Feldkulte_ (Berlin, 1877), p. 277.
672 Lucian, _De dea Syria_, 6. See above, p. 38. The flutes used by the
Phoenicians in the lament for Adonis are mentioned by Athenaeus (iv.
76, p. 174 F), and by Pollux (iv. 76), who say that the same name
_gingras_ was applied by the Phoenicians both to the flute and to
Adonis himself. Compare F. C. Movers, _Die Phoenizier_, i. 243 _sq._
We have seen that flutes were also played in the Babylonian rites of
Tammuz (above, p. 9). Lucian’s words, ἐς τὸν ἠέρα πέμπουσι, imply
that the ascension of the god was supposed to take place in the
presence, if not before the eyes, of the worshipping crowds. The
devotion of Byblus to Adonis is noticed also by Strabo (xvi. 2. 18,
p. 755).
M174 Date of the festival at Byblus. The anemone and the red rose the
flowers of Adonis. Festivals of Adonis at Athens and Antioch.
673 Lucian, _De dea Syria_, 8. The discoloration of the river and the
sea was observed by H. Maundrell on 17/27 March 1696/1697. See his
_Journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem, at Easter, __A.D.__ 1697_, Fourth
Edition (Perth, 1800), pp. 59 _sq._; _id._, in Bohn’s _Early Travels
in Palestine_, edited by Thomas Wright (London, 1848), pp. 411 _sq._
Renan remarked the discoloration at the beginning of February
(_Mission de Phénicie_, p. 283). In his well-known lines on the
subject Milton has laid the mourning in summer:—
“_Thammuz came next behind,_
_ Whose annual wound in Lebanon allur’d_
_ The Syrian damsels to lament his fate_
_ In amorous ditties all a summer’s day._”
674 Ovid, _Metam._ x. 735; Servius on Virgil, _Aen._ v. 72; J. Tzetzes,
_Schol. on Lycophron_, 831. Bion, on the other hand, represents the
anemone as sprung from the tears of Aphrodite (_Idyl._ i. 66).
675 W. Robertson Smith, “Ctesias and the Semiramis Legend,” _English
Historical Review_, ii. (1887) p. 307, following Lagarde. Compare W.
W. Graf Baudissin, _Adonis und Esmun_, pp. 88 _sq._
676 J. Tzetzes, _Schol. on Lycophron_, 831; _Geoponica_, xi. 17;
_Mythographi Graeci_, ed. A. Westermann, p. 359. Compare Bion,
_Idyl._ i. 66; Pausanias, vi. 24. 7; Philostratus, _Epist._ i. and
iii.
677 Plutarch, _Alcibiades_, 18; _id._, _Nicias_, 13. The date of the
sailing of the fleet is given by Thucydides (vi. 30, θέρους
μεσοῦντος ἤδη), who, with his habitual contempt for the superstition
of his countrymen, disdains to notice the coincidence. Adonis was
also bewailed by the Argive women (Pausanias, ii. 20. 6), but we do
not know at what season of the year the lamentation took place.
Inscriptions prove that processions in honour of Adonis were held in
the Piraeus, and that a society of his worshippers existed at Loryma
in Caria. See G. Dittenberger, _Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum_,2
Nos. 726, 741 (vol. ii. pp. 564, 604).
678 Ammianus Marcellinus, xxii. 9. 15.
M175 Resemblance of these rites to Indian and European ceremonies. The
death and resurrection of Adonis a mythical expression for the
annual decay and revival of plant life. Adonis sometimes taken for
the sun.
_ 679 The Dying God_, pp. 261-266.
680 In the Alexandrian ceremony, however, it appears to have been the
image of Adonis only which was thrown into the sea.
681 Apollodorus, _Bibliotheca_, iii. 14. 4; Scholiast on Theocritus, i.
109; Antoninus Liberalis, _Transform._ 34; J. Tzetzes, _Scholia on
Lycophron_, 829; Ovid, _Metamorph._ x. 489 _sqq._; Servius on
Virgil, _Aen._ v. 72, and on _Bucol._ x. 18; Hyginus, _Fab._ 58,
164; Fulgentius, iii. 8. The word Myrrha or Smyrna is borrowed from
the Phoenician (Liddell and Scott, _Greek Lexicon_, _s.v._ σμύρνα).
Hence the mother’s name, as well as the son’s, was taken directly
from the Semites.
682 W. Mannhardt, _Antike Wald- und Feldkulte_, p. 383, note 2.
683 Above, p. 9.
684 Jeremiah xliv. 17-19.
685 Scholiast on Theocritus, iii. 48; Hyginus, _Astronom._ ii. 7;
Lucian, _Dialog. deor._ xi. 1; Cornutus, _Theologiae Graecae
Compendium_, 28, p. 54, ed. C. Lang (Leipsic, 1881); Apollodorus,
_Bibliotheca_, iii. 14. 4.
686 The arguments which tell against the solar interpretation of Adonis
are stated more fully by the learned and candid scholar Graf
Baudissin (_Adonis und Esmun_, pp. 169 _sqq._), who himself formerly
accepted the solar theory but afterwards rightly rejected it in
favour of the view “_dass Adonis die Frühlingsvegetation darstellt,
die im Sommer abstirbt_” (_op. cit._ p. 169).
687 Bailly, _Lettres sur l’Origine des Sciences_ (London and Paris,
1777), pp. 255 _sq._; _id._, _Lettres sur l’Atlantide de Platon_
(London and Paris, 1779), pp. 114-125. Carlyle has described how
through the sleety drizzle of a dreary November day poor innocent
Bailly was dragged to the scaffold amid the howls and curses of the
Parisian mob (_French Revolution_, bk. v. ch. 2). My friend the late
Professor C. Bendall showed me a book by a Hindoo gentleman in which
it is seriously maintained that the primitive home of the Aryans was
within the Arctic regions. See Bâl Gangâdhar Tilak, _The Arctic Home
in the Vedas_ (Poona and Bombay, 1903).
688 Cornutus, _Theologiae Graecae Compendium_, 28, pp. 54 _sq._, ed. C.
Lang (Leipsic, 1881), τοιοῦτον γάρ τι καὶ παρ᾽ Αἰγυπτίοις ὁ
ζητούμενος καὶ ἀνευρισκόμενος ὑπὸ τῆς Ἴσιδος Ὄσιρις ἐμφαίνει καὶ
παρὰ Φοίνιξιν ὁ ἀνὰ μέρος παρ᾽ ἔξ μῆνας ὑπὲρ γῆν τε καὶ ὑπὸ γῆν
γινόμενος Ἄδωνις, ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀδεῖν τοῖς ἀνθρώποις οὔτως ὠνομασμένου τοῦ
Δημητριακοῦ καρποῦ. τοῦτον δὲ πλήξας κάπρος ἀνελεῖν λέγεται διὰ τὸ
τὰς ὗς δοκεῖν ληιβότειρας εἶναι ἢ τὸν τῆς ὕνεως ὀδόντα αἰνιττομένων
αὐτῶν, ὑφ᾽ οὖ κατὰ γῆς κρύπτεται τὸ σπέρμα. Scholiast on Theocritus,
iii. 48, ὁ Ἄδωνις, ἤγουν ὁ σῖτος ὁ σπειρόμενος, ἔξ μῆνας ἐν τῇ γῇ
ποιεῖ ἀπο τῆς σπορᾶς καὶ ἔξ μῆνας ἔχει αὐτὸν ἡ Ἀφροδίτη, τουτέστιν ἡ
εὐκρασία τοῦ ἀέρος. καὶ ἐκτότε λαμβάνουσιν αὐτὸν οἱ ἄνθρωποι.
Origen, _Selecta in Ezechielem_ (Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, xiii.
800), οἱ δὲ περὶ τὴν ἀναγωγὴν τῶν Ἑλληνικῶν μύθων δεινοὶ καὶ μυθικῆς
νομιζομένης θεολογίας, φασί τὸν Ἄδωνιν σύμβολον εἶναι τῶν τῆς γῆς
καρπῶν, θρηνουμένων μὲν ὅτε σπείρονται, ἀνισταμένων δέ, καὶ διὰ
τοῦτο χαίρειν ποιούντων τοὺς γεωργοὺς ὅτε φύονται. Jerome,
_Commentar. in Ezechielem_, viii. 13, 14 (Migne’s _Patrologia
Latina_, xxv. 83), “_Eadem gentilitas hujuscemodi fabulas poetarum,
quae habent turpitudinem, interpretatur subtiliter, interfectionem
et resurrectionem Adonidis planctu et gaudio prosequens: quorum
alterum in seminibus, quae moriuntur in terra, alterum in segetibus,
quibus mortua semina renascuntur, ostendi putat._” Ammianus
Marcellinus, xix. 1. 11, “_in sollemnibus Adonidis sacris, quod
simulacrum aliquod esse frugum adultarum religiones mysticae
docent_.” _Id._ xxii. 9. 15, “_amato Veneris, ut fabulae fingunt,
apri dente ferali deleto, quod in adulto flore sectarum est indicium
frugum_.” Clement of Alexandria, _Hom._ 6. 11 (quoted by W.
Mannhardt, _Antique Wald- und Feldkulte_, p. 281), λαμβάνουσι δὲ καὶ
Ἄδωνιν εἰς ὡραίους καρπούς. _Etymologieum Magnum_ _s.v._ Ἄδωνις
κύριον; δύναται καὶ ὁ καρπὸς εἶναι ἄδωνις; οἶον ἀδώνειος καρπός,
ἀρέσκων. Eusebius, _Praepar. Evang._ iii. II. 9, Ἄδωνις τῆς τῶν
τελείων καρπῶν ἐκτομῆς σύμβολον. Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et
mundo,” iv. _Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A.
Mullach, iii. 32, οἱ Αἰγύπτιοι ... αὐτὰ τὰ σώματα θεοὺς νομίσαντες
... Ἴσιν μὲν τὴν γῆν ... Ἄδωνιν δὲ καρπούς. Joannes Lydus, _De
mensibus_, iv. 4, τῷ Ἀδώνιδι, τουτέστι τῷ Μαΐῳ ... ἢ ὡς ἄλλοις,
δοκεῖ, Ἄδωνις μέν ἐστιν ὁ καρπός, κτλ. The view that Tammuz or
Adonis is a personification of the dying and reviving vegetation is
now accepted by many scholars. See P. Jensen, _Kosmologie der
Babylonier_ (Strasburg, 1890), p. 480; _id._,
_Assyrisch-babylonische Mythen und Epen_, pp. 411, 560; H. Zimmern,
in E. Schrader’s _Keilinschriften und das Alte Testament_,3 p. 397;
A. Jeremias, _s.v._ “Nergal,” in W. H. Roscher’s _Lexikon der
griech. und röm. Mythologie_, iii. 265; R. Wünsch, _Das
Frühlingsfest der Insel Malta_ (Leipsic, 1902), p. 21; M. J.
Lagrange, _Études sur les Religions Sémitiques_,2 pp. 306 _sqq._; W.
W. Graf Baudissin, “Tammuz,” _Realencyclopädie für protestantische
Theologie und Kirchengeschichte_; _id._, _Esmun und Adonis_, pp. 81,
141, 169, etc.; and Ed. Meyer, _Geschichte des Altertums_,2 i. 2.
pp. 394, 427. Prof. Jastrow regards Tammuz as a god both of the sun
and of vegetation (_Religion of Babylonia and Assyria_, pp. 547,
564, 574, 588). But such a combination of disparate qualities seems
artificial and unlikely.
M176 Tammuz or Adonis as a corn-spirit bruised and ground in a mill.
689 D. Chwolsohn, _Die Ssabier und der Ssabismus_ (St. Petersburg,
1856), ii. 27; _id._, _Ueber Tammûz und die Menschenverehrung bei
den alten Babylioniern_ (St. Petersburg, 1860), p. 38. Compare W. W.
Graf Baudissin, _Adonis und Esmun_, pp. 111 _sqq._
M177 The mourning for Adonis interpreted as a harvest rite.
690 M. J. Lagrange, _Études sur les Religions Sémitiques_2 (Paris,
1905), pp. 307 _sq._
691 Hence Philo of Alexandria dates the corn-reaping in the middle of
spring (Μεσοῦντος δὲ ἔαρος ἄμητος ἐνίσταται, _De special. legibus_,
i. 183, vol. v. p. 44, ed. L. Cohn). On this subject Professor W. M.
Flinders Petrie writes to me: “The Coptic calendar puts on April 2
beginning of wheat harvest in Upper Egypt, May 2 wheat harvest,
Lower Egypt. Barley is two or three weeks earlier than wheat in
Palestine, but probably less in Egypt. The Palestine harvest is
about the time of that in North Egypt.” With regard to Palestine we
are told that “the harvest begins with the barley in April; in the
valley of the Jordan it begins at the end of March. Between the end
of the barley harvest and the beginning of the wheat harvest an
interval of two or three weeks elapses. Thus as a rule the business
of harvest lasts about seven weeks” (J. Benzinger, _Hebräische
Archäologie_, Freiburg i. B. and Leipsic, 1894, p. 209). “The
principal grain crops of Palestine are barley, wheat, lentils,
maize, and millet. Of the latter there is very little, and it is all
gathered in by the end of May. The maize is then only just beginning
to shoot. In the hotter parts of the Jordan valley the barley
harvest is over by the end of March, and throughout the country the
wheat harvest is at its height at the end of May, excepting in the
highlands of Galilee, where it is about a fortnight later” (H. B.
Tristram, _The Land of Israel_, Fourth Edition, London, 1882, pp.
583 _sq._). As to Greece, Professor E. A. Gardner tells me that
harvest is from April to May in the plains and about a month later
in the mountains. He adds that “barley may, then, be assigned to the
latter part of April, wheat to May in the lower ground, but you know
the great difference of climate between different parts; there is
the same difference of a month in the vintage.” Mrs. Hawes (Miss
Boyd), who excavated at Gournia, tells me that in Crete the barley
is cut in April and the beginning of May, and that the wheat is cut
and threshed from about the twentieth of June, though the dates
naturally vary somewhat with the height of the place above the sea.
June is also the season when the wheat is threshed in Euboea (R. A.
Arnold, _From the Levant_, London, 1868, i. 250). Thus it seems
possible that the spring festival of Adonis coincided with the
cutting of the first barley in March, and his summer festival with
the threshing of the last wheat in June. Father Lagrange (_op. cit._
pp. 305 _sq._) argues that the rites of Adonis were always
celebrated in summer at the solstice of June or soon afterwards.
Baudissin also holds that the summer celebration is the only one
which is clearly attested, and that if there was a celebration in
spring it must have had a different signification than the death of
the god. See his _Adonis und Esmun_, pp. 132 _sq._
692 Diodorus Siculus, i. 14. 2. See below, vol. ii. pp. 45 _sq._
_ 693 Spirits of the Corn and of the Wild_, ii. 180 _sqq._, 204 _sqq._
M178 But probably Adonis was a spirit of fruits, edible roots, and grass
before he became a spirit of the cultivated corn.
M179 The propitiation of the corn-spirit may have fused with the worship
of the dead.
694 W. Mannhardt, _Mythologische Forschungen_ (Strasburg, 1884), pp. 1
_sqq._; _Spirits of the Corn and of the Wild_, i. 216 _sqq._
M180 The festival of the dead a festival of flowers.
695 T. B. Macaulay, _History of England_, chapter xx. vol. iv. (London,
1855) p. 410.
696 This explanation of the name _Anthesteria_, as applied to a festival
of the dead, is due to Mr. R. Wünsch (_Das Frühlingsfest der Insel
Malta_, Leipsic, 1902, pp. 43 _sqq._). I cannot accept the late Dr.
A. W. Verrall’s ingenious derivation of the word from a verb
ἀναθέσσασθαι in the sense of “to conjure up” (“The Name
Anthesteria,” _Journal of Hellenic Studies_, xx. (1900) pp.
115-117). As to the festival see E. Rohde, _Psyche_3 (Tübingen and
Leipsic, 1903), i. 236 _sqq._; Miss J. E. Harrison, _Prolegomena to
the Study of Greek Religion_2 (Cambridge, 1908), pp. 32 _sqq._ In
Annam people offer food to their dead on the graves when the earth
begins to grow green in spring. The ceremony takes place on the
third day of the third month, the sun then entering the sign of
Taurus. See Paul Giran, _Magie et Religion Annamites_ (Paris, 1912),
pp. 423 _sq._
697 E. Renan, _Mission de Phénicie_ (Paris, 1864), p. 216.
M181 Pots of corn, herbs, and flowers, called the gardens of Adonis.
698 For the authorities see Raoul Rochette, “Mémoire sur les jardins
d’Adonis,” _Revue Archéologique_, viii. (1851) pp. 97-123; W.
Mannhardt, _Antike Wald- und Feldkulte_, p. 279, note 2, and p. 280,
note 2. To the authorities cited by Mannhardt add Theophrastus,
_Hist. Plant._ vi. 7. 3; _id._, _De Causis Plant._ i. 12. 2;
Gregorius Cyprius, i. 7; Macarius, i. 63; Apostolius, i. 34;
Diogenianus, i. 14; Plutarch, _De sera num. vind._ 17. Women only
are mentioned as planting the gardens of Adonis by Plutarch, _l.c._;
Julian, _Convivium_, p. 329 ed. Spanheim (p. 423 ed. Hertlein);
Eustathius on Homer, _Od._ xi. 590. On the other hand, Apostolius
and Diogenianus (_ll.cc._) say φυτεύοντες ἢ φυτεύουσαι. The earliest
extant Greek writer who mentions the gardens of Adonis is Plato
(_Phaedrus_, p. 276 B). The procession at the festival of Adonis is
mentioned in an Attic inscription of 302 or 301 B.C. (G.
Dittenberger, _Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum_,2 vol. ii. p. 564,
No. 726). Gardens of Adonis are perhaps alluded to by Isaiah (xvii.
10, with the commentators).
M182 These gardens of Adonis were charms to promote the growth of
vegetation. The throwing of the “gardens” into water was a
rain-charm. Parallel European customs of drenching the corn with
water at harvest or sowing. Use of water as a rain-charm at harvest
and sowing.
699 In hot southern countries like Egypt and the Semitic regions of
Western Asia, where vegetation depends chiefly or entirely upon
irrigation, the purpose of the charm is doubtless to secure a
plentiful flow of water in the streams. But as the ultimate object
and the charms for securing it are the same in both cases, I have
not thought it necessary always to point out the distinction.
_ 700 The Dying God_, pp. 232, 233 _sqq._
_ 701 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, i. 272 _sqq._
702 W. Mannhardt, _Der Baumkultus der Germanen und ihrer Nachbarstämme_
(Berlin, 1875), p. 214; W. Schmidt, _Das Jahr und seine Tage in
Meinung und Branch der Romänen Siebenbürgens_ (Hermannstadt, 1866),
pp. 18 _sq._ The custom of throwing water on the last wagon-load of
corn returning from the harvest-field has been practised within
living memory in Wigtownshire, and at Orwell in Cambridgeshire. See
J. G. Frazer, “Notes on Harvest Customs,” _Folk-lore Journal_, vii.
(1889) pp. 50, 51. (In the first of these passages the Orwell at
which the custom used to be observed is said to be in Kent; this was
a mistake of mine, which my informant, the Rev. E. B. Birks,
formerly Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, afterwards
corrected.) Mr. R. F. Davis writes to me (March 4, 1906) from
Campbell College, Belfast: “Between 30 and 40 years ago I was
staying, as a very small boy, at a Nottinghamshire farmhouse at
harvest-time, and was allowed—as a great privilege—to ride home on
the top of the last load. All the harvesters followed the waggon,
and on reaching the farmyard we found the maids of the farm gathered
near the gate, with bowls and buckets of water, which they proceeded
to throw on the men, who got thoroughly drenched.”
703 G. A. Heinrich, _Agrarische Sitten und Gebräuche unter den Sachsen
Siebenbürgens_ (Hermanstadt, 1880), p. 24; H. von Wlislocki, _Sitten
und Brauch der Siebenbürger Sachsen_ (Hamburg, 1888), p. 32.
704 G. Drosinis, _Land und Leute in Nord-Euböa_ (Leipsic, 1884), p. 53.
705 Matthäus Prätorius, _Deliciae Prussicae_ (Berlin, 1871), p. 55; W.
Mannhardt, _Baumkultus_, pp. 214 _sq._, note.
706 M. Prätorius, _op. cit._ p. 60; W. Mannhardt, _Baumkultus_, p. 215,
note.
707 H. Prahn, “Glaube und Brauch in der Mark Brandenburg,” _Zeitschrift
des Vereins für Volkskunde_, i. (1891) p. 186.
708 O. Hartung, “Zur Volkskunde aus Anhalt,” _Zeitschrift des Vereins
für Volkskunde_, vii. (1897) p. 150.
709 W. Kolbe, _Hessische Volks-Sitten und Gebräuche_ (Marburg, 1888), p.
51.
_ 710 Bavaria, Landes- und Volkskunde des Königreichs Bayern_, ii.
(Munich, 1863) p. 297.
711 E. H. Meyer, _Badisches Volksleben_ (Strasburg, 1900), p. 420.
712 J. Walter Fewkes, “The Tusayan New Fire Ceremony,” _Proceedings of
the Boston Society of Natural History_, xxvi. (1895) p. 446.
713 “Lettre du curé de Santiago Tepehuacan à son évêque,” _Bulletin de
la Société de Géographie_ (Paris), Deuxième Série, ii. (1834) pp.
181 _sq._
M183 Gardens of Adonis among the Oraons and Mundas of Bengal.
_ 714 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, ii. 59 _sqq._
715 E. T. Dalton, _Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal_ (Calcutta, 1872), p.
259.
716 E. T. Dalton, _op. cit._ p. 188. As to the influence which trees are
supposed to exercise on the crops, see _The Magic Art and the
Evolution of Kings_, ii. 47 _sqq._
M184 Gardens of Adonis in Rajputana.
717 Lieut.-Col. James Tod, _Annals and Antiquities of Rajast’han_, i.
(London, 1829) pp. 570-572.
718 G. F. D’Penha, “A Collection of Notes on Marriage Customs in the
Madras Presidency,” _Indian Antiquary_, xxv. (1896) p. 144; E.
Thurston, _Ethnographic Notes in Southern India_ (Madras, 1906), p.
2.
M185 Gardens of Adonis in North-Western and Central India.
719 E. T. Atkinson, _The Himalayan Districts of the North-Western
Provinces of India_, ii. (Allahabad, 1884) p. 870.
720 W. Crooke, _Popular Religion and Folk-lore of Northern India_
(Westminster, 1896), ii. 293 _sq._ Compare Baboo Ishuree Dass,
_Domestic Manners and Customs of the Hindoos of Northern India_
(Benares, 1860), pp. 111 _sq._ According to the latter writer, the
festival of Salono [not Salonan] takes place in August, and the
barley is planted by women and girls in baskets a few days before
the festival, to be thrown by them into a river or tank when the
grain has sprouted to the height of a few inches.
721 Mrs. J. C. Murray-Aynsley, “Secular and Religious Dances,”
_Folk-lore Journal_, v. (1887) pp. 253 _sq._ The writer thinks that
the ceremony “probably fixes the season for sowing some particular
crop.”
_ 722 Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency_, xx. (Bombay, 1884) p. 454.
This passage was pointed out to me by my friend Mr. W. Crooke.
_ 723 Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency_, xx. 443, 460.
M186 Gardens of Adonis in Bavaria. Gardens of Adonis on St. John’s Day in
Sardinia.
_ 724 Bavaria, Landes- und Volkskunde des Königreichs Bayern_ (Munich,
1860-1867), ii. 298.
725 Antonio Bresciani, _Dei costumi dell’ isola di Sardegna comparati
cogli antichissimi popoli orientali_ (Rome and Turin, 1866), pp. 427
_sq._; R. Tennant, _Sardinia and its Resources_ (Rome and London,
1885), p. 187; S. Gabriele, “Usi dei contadini della Sardegna,”
_Archivio per lo Studio delle Tradizioni Popolari_, vii. (1888) pp.
469 _sq._ Tennant says that the pots are kept in a dark warm place,
and that the children leap across the fire.
M187 Gardens of Adonis on St. John’s Day in Sicily.
726 G. Pitrè, _Usi e Costumi, Credenze e Pregiudizi del Popolo
Siciliano_ (Palermo, 1889), ii. 271-278. Compare _id._, _Spettacoli
e Feste Popolari Siciliane_ (Palermo, 1881), pp. 297 _sq._ In the
Abruzzi also young men and young women become gossips by exchanging
nosegays on St. John’s Day, and the tie thus formed is regarded as
sacred. See G. Finamore, _Credenze, Usi e Costumi Abruzzesi_
(Palermo, 1890), pp. 165 _sq._
M188 In these Sardinian and Sicilian ceremonies St. John may have taken
the place of Adonis. Custom of bathing in water or washing in dew on
the Eve or Day of St. John (Midsummer Eve or Midsummer Day).
Petrarch at Cologne on St. John’s Eve.
727 R. Wünsch, _Das Frühlingsfest der Insel Malta_, pp. 47-57.
728 See above, pp. 10, note 1, 224 _sq._, 226.
729 J. Grimm, _Deutsche Mythologie_,4 i. 490.
730 G. Finamore, _Credenze, Usi e Costumi Abruzzesi_, pp. 156-160. A
passage in Isaiah (xxvi. 19) seems to imply that dew possessed the
magical virtue of restoring the dead to life. In this passage of
Isaiah the customs which I have cited in the text perhaps favour the
ordinary interpretation of טל אורת as “dew of herbs” (compare 2
Kings iv. 39) against the interpretation “dew of lights,” which some
modern commentators (Dillmann, Skinner, Whitehouse), following
Jerome, have adopted.
731 G. Pitrè, _Feste patronali in Sicilia_ (Turin and Palermo, 1900),
pp. 488, 491-493.
732 G. Pitrè, _Spettacoli e Feste Popolari Siciliane_, p. 307.
733 Petrarch, _Epistolae de rebus familiaribus_, i. 4 (vol. i. pp. 44-46
ed. J. Fracassetti, Florence, 1859-1862). The passage is quoted by
J. Grimm, _Deutsche Mythologie_,4 i. 489 _sq._
734 J. Grimm, _op. cit._ i. 489.
735 Letter of Dr. Otero Acevado, of Madrid, _Le Temps_, September 1898.
736 J. Lecœur, _Esquisses du Bocage Normand_ (Condé-sur-Noireau,
1883-1887), ii. 8; A. de Nore, _Coutumes, Mythes et Traditions des
provinces de France_ (Paris and Lyons, 1846), p. 150.
737 A. de Nore, _op. cit._ p. 20; Bérenger-Féraud, _Réminiscences
populaires de la Provence_ (Paris, 1885), pp. 135-141.
738 A. Breuil, “Du Culte de St. Jean Baptiste,” _Mémoires de la Société
des Antiquaires de Picardie_, viii. (1845) pp. 237 _sq._ Compare
_Balder the Beautiful_, i. 193 _sq._
739 Diego Duran, _Historia de las Indias de Nueva España_, edited by J.
F. Ramirez (Mexico, 1867-1880), ii. 293.
M189 The custom of bathing at midsummer is pagan, not Christian, in its
origin.
740 Augustine, _Opera_, v. (Paris, 1683) col. 903; _id._, Pars Secunda,
coll. 461 _sq._ The second of these passages occurs in a sermon of
doubtful authenticity. Both have been quoted by J. Grimm, _Deutsche
Mythologie_,4 i. 490.
741 E. Doutté, _Magie et Religion dans l’Afrique du Nord_ (Algiers,
1908), pp. 567 _sq._; E. Westermarck, “Midsummer Customs in
Morocco,” _Folk-lore_, xvi. (1905) pp. 31 _sq._; _id._, _Ceremonies
and Beliefs connected with Agriculture, Certain Dates of the Solar
Year, and the Weather_ (Helsingfors, 1913), pp. 84-86. See _Balder
the Beautiful_, i. 216.
M190 Old heathen festival of midsummer in Europe and the East.
M191 Midsummer fires and midsummer couples in relation to vegetation.
_ 742 Balder the Beautiful_, i. 160 _sqq._
_ 743 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, ii. 65 _sq._
_ 744 The Dying God_, p. 262.
745 L. Lloyd, _Peasant Life in Sweden_ (London, 1870), p. 257.
M192 Gardens of Adonis intended to foster the growth of vegetation, and
especially of the crops. Modes of divination at midsummer like the
gardens of Adonis.
_ 746 Balder the Beautiful_, i. 328 _sqq._, ii. 21 _sqq._
747 W. Mannhardt, _Baumkultus_, p. 464; K. von Leoprechting, _Aus dem
Lechrain_ (Munich, 1855), p. 183. For more evidence see _Balder the
Beautiful_, i. 165, 166, 166 _sq._, 168, 173, 174.
748 The use of gardens of Adonis to fertilize the human sexes appears
plainly in the corresponding Indian practices. See above, pp. 241,
242, 243.
749 G. Pitrè, _Spettacoli e Feste Popolari Siciliane_, pp. 296 _sq._
750 G. Pitrè, _op. cit._ pp. 302 _sq._; Antonio de Nino, _Usi e Costumi
Abruzzesi_ (Florence, 1879-1883), i. 55 _sq._; A. de Gubernatis,
_Usi Nuziali in Italia e presso gli altri Popoli Indo-Europei_
(Milan, 1878), pp. 39 _sq._ Compare L. Passarini, “Il Comparatico e
la Festa di S. Giovanni nelle Marche e in Roma,” _Archivio per lo
Studio delle Tradizioni Popolari_, i. (1882) p. 135. At Smyrna a
blossom of the _Agnus castus_ is used on St. John’s Day for a
similar purpose, but the mode in which the omens are drawn is
somewhat different. See Teofilo, “La notte di San Giovanni in
Oriente,” _Archivio per lo Studio delle Tradizioni Popolari_, vii.
(1888) pp. 128-130.
751 Matthäus Prätorius, _Deliciae Prussicae_ (Berlin, 1871), p. 56.
_ 752 The Dying God_, pp. 261 _sq._
_ 753 The Dying God_, pp. 233 _sqq._, 261 _sqq._
M193 Sicilian gardens of Adonis in spring.
754 G. Pitrè, _Spettacoli e Feste Popolari Siciliane_, p. 211.
755 Κήπους ὡσίουν ἐπιταφίους Ἀδώνιδι, Eustathius on Homer, _Od._ xi.
590.
756 Vincenzo Dorsa, _La tradizione Greco-Latina negli usi e nelle
credenze popolari della Calabria Citeriore_ (Cosenza, 1884), p. 50.
M194 Resemblance of the Easter ceremonies in the Greek Church to the
rites of Adonis.
757 C. Wachsmuth, _Das alte Griechenland im neuen_ (Bonn, 1864), pp. 26.
_sq._ The writer compares these ceremonies with the Eleusinian
rites. But I agree with Mr. R. Wünsch (_Das Frühlingsfest der Insel
Malta_, pp. 49 _sq._) that the resemblance to the Adonis festival is
still closer. Compare V. Dorsa, _La tradizione Greco-Latina negli
usi e nelle credenze popolari della Calabria Citeriore_, pp. 49
_sq._ Prof. Wachsmuth’s description seems to apply to Athens. In the
country districts the ritual is apparently similar. See R. A.
Arnold, _From the Levant_ (London, 1868), pp. 251 _sq._, 259 _sq._
So in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre at Jerusalem the death and
burial of Christ are acted over a life-like effigy. See Henry
Maundrell, _Journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem at Easter, __A.D.__
1697_, Fourth Edition (Perth, 1800), pp. 110 _sqq._; _id._, in Th.
Wright’s _Early Travels in Palestine_ (London, 1848), pp. 443-445.
M195 Resemblance of the Easter ceremonies in the Catholic Church to the
rites of Adonis.
758 G. Pitrè, _Spettacoli e Feste Popolari Siciliane_, pp. 217 _sq._
759 G. Finamore, _Credenze, Usi e Costumi Abruzzesi_, pp. 118-120; A. de
Nino, _Usi e Costumi Abruzzesi_, i. 64 _sq._, ii. 210-212. At
Roccacaramanico part of the Easter spectacle is the death of Judas,
who, personated by a living man, pretends to hang himself upon a
tree or a great branch, which has been brought into the church and
planted near the high altar for the purpose (A. de Nino, _op. cit._
ii. 211).
760 The drama of the death and resurrection of Christ was formerly
celebrated at Easter in England. See Abbot Gasquet, _Parish Life in
Mediaeval England_, pp. 177 _sqq._, 182 _sq._
M196 The Christian festival of Easter perhaps grafted on a festival of
Adonis.
761 The comparison has already been made by A. Maury, who also compares
the Easter ceremonies of the Catholic Church with the rites of
Adonis (_Histoire des Religions de la Grèce Antique_, Paris,
1857-1859, vol. iii. p. 221).
M197 The worship of Adonis at Bethlehem. The Morning Star, identified
with Venus, may have been the signal for the festival of Adonis. The
Star of Bethlehem.
762 Jerome, _Epist._ lviii. 3 (Migne’s _Patrologia Latina_, xxii. 581).
763 Bethlehem is בית-לחם, literally “House of Bread.” The name is
appropriate, for “the immediate neighbourhood is very fertile,
bearing, besides wheat and barley, groves of olive and almond, and
vineyards. The wine of Bethlehem (‘Talhamī’) is among the best of
Palestine. So great fertility must mean that the site was occupied,
in spite of the want of springs, from the earliest times” (George
Adam Smith, _s.v._ “Bethlehem,” _Encyclopaedia Biblica_, i. 560). It
was in the harvest-fields of Bethlehem that Ruth, at least in the
poet’s fancy, listened to the nightingale “amid the alien corn.”
764 John vi. 35.
765 Above, p. 227.
766 Ammianus Marcellinus, xxii. 9. 14, “_Urbique propinquans in speciem
alicujus numinis votis excipitur publicis, miratus voces
multitudinis magnae, salutare sidus inluxisse eois partibus
adclamantis._” We may compare the greeting which a tribe of South
American Indians used to give to a worshipful star after its
temporary disappearance. “The Abipones think that the Pleiades,
composed of seven stars, is an image of their ancestor. As the
constellation is invisible for some months in the sky of South
America, they believe that their ancestor is ill, and every year
they are mortally afraid that he will die. But when the said stars
reappear in the month of May, they imagine that their ancestor is
recovered from his sickness and has returned; so they hail him with
joyous shouts and the glad music of pipes and war-horns. They
congratulate him on his recovery. ‘How we thank you! At last you
have come back? Oh, have you happily recovered?’ With such cries
they fill the air, attesting at once their gladness and their
folly.” See M. Dobrizhoffer, _Historia de Abiponibus_ (Vienna,
1784), ii. 77.
767 M. Jastrow, _The Religion of Babylonia and Assyria_, pp. 370 _sqq._;
H. Zimmern, in E. Schrader’s _Die Keilinschriften und das Alte
Testament_,3 p. 424.
768 Sozomenus, _Historia Ecclesiastica_, ii. 5 (Migne’s _Patrologia
Graeca_, lxvii. 948). The connexion of the meteor with the festival
of Adonis is not mentioned by Sozomenus, but is confirmed by
Zosimus, who says (_Hist._ i. 58) that a light like a torch or a
globe of fire was seen on the sanctuary at the seasons when the
people assembled to worship the goddess and to cast their offerings
of gold, silver, and fine raiment into a lake beside the temple. As
to Aphaca and the grave of Adonis see above, pp. 28 _sq._
769 Matthew ii. 1-12.
M198 Attis the Phrygian counterpart of Adonis. His relation to Cybele.
His miraculous birth. The death of Attis.
770 Diodorus Siculus, iii. 59. 7; Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et
mundo,” iv., _Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A.
Mullach, iii. 33; Scholiast on Nicander, _Alexipharmaca_, 8;
Firmicus Maternus, _De errore profanarum religionum_, 3 and 22. The
ancient evidence, literary and inscriptional, as to the myth and
ritual of Attis has been collected and discussed by Mr. H. Hepding
in his monograph, _Attis, seine Mythen und sein Kult_ (Giessen,
1903).
771 Hippolytus, _Refutatio omnium haeresium_, v. 9, p. 168 ed. L.
Duncker and F. G. Schneidewin (Göttingen, 1859); Socrates, _Historia
Ecclesiastica_, iii. 23. 51 _sqq._
772 Ovid, _Fasti_, iv. 223 _sqq._; Tertullian, _Apologeticus_, 15;
_id._, _Ad Nationes_, i. 10; Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, iv. 35.
As to Cybele, the Great Mother, the Mother of the Gods, conceived as
the source of all life, both animal and vegetable, see Rapp, in W.
H. Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, _s.v._
“Kybele,” ii. 1638 _sqq._
773 Scholiast on Lucian, _Jupiter Tragoedus_, 8, p. 60 ed. H. Rabe
(Leipsic, 1906), (vol. iv. p. 173 ed. C. Jacobitz); Hippolytus,
_Refutatio omnium haeresium_, v. 9, pp. 168, 170 ed. Duncker and
Schneidewin.
774 Pausanias, vii. 17. 11; Hippolytus, _Refutatio omnium haeresium_, v.
9, pp. 166, 168 ed. Duncker and Schneidewin; Arnobius, _Adversus
Nationes_, v. 6.
775 See above, pp. 99 _sqq._
776 S. I. Curtiss, _Primitive Semitic Religion To-day_, pp. 115 _sq._
See above, pp. 78, 213 _sqq._
777 That Attis was killed by a boar was stated by Hermesianax, an
elegiac poet of the fourth century B.C. (Pausanias, vii. 17);
compare Scholiast on Nicander, _Alexipharmaca_, 8. The other story
is told by Arnobius (_Adversus Nationes_, v. 5 _sqq._) on the
authority of Timotheus, who professed to derive it from recondite
antiquarian works and from the very heart of the mysteries. It is
obviously identical with the account which Pausanias (_l.c._)
mentions as the story current in Pessinus. According to Servius (on
Virgil, _Aen._ ix. 115), Attis was found bleeding to death under a
pine-tree, but the wound which robbed him of his virility and his
life was not inflicted by himself. The Timotheus cited by Pausanias
may be the Timotheus who was consulted by Ptolemy Soter on religious
matters and helped to establish the worship of Serapis. See
Plutarch, _Isis et Osiris_, 28; Franz Cumont, _Les Religions
Orientales dans le Paganisme Romain_2 (Paris, 1909), pp. 77, 113,
335.
778 Pausanias, vii. 17. 10; Julian, _Orat._ v. 177 B, p. 229, ed. F. C.
Hertlein (Leipsic, 1875-1876). Similarly at Comana in Pontus, the
seat of the worship of the goddess Ma, pork was not eaten, and swine
might not even be brought into the city (Strabo, xii. 8. 9, p. 575).
As to Comana see above, p. 39.
779 S. Sophronius, “SS. Cyri et Joannis Miracula,” Migne’s _Patrologia
Graeca_, lxxxvii. Pars Tertia, col. 3624, πρὸς πλάνην Ἑλληνικὴν
ἀποκλίνουσαν [_scil._ τὴν Ἰουλίαν] καὶ ταύτῃ διὰ τὸν Ἀδώνιδος
Θάνατον τὰ κρέα παραιτεῖσθαι τὰ ὕεια.
780 Ovid, _Metam._ x. 103 _sqq._
M199 Worship of Cybele introduced into Rome in 204 B.C.
781 Livy, xxix. chs. 10, 11, and 14; Ovid, _Fasti_, iv. 259 _sqq._;
Herodian, ii. 11. As to the stone which represented the goddess see
Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, vii. 49.
782 Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xviii. 16.
M200 Attis and his eunuch priests the Galli at Rome.
783 Lucretius, ii. 598 _sqq._; Catullus, lxiii.; Varro, _Satir.
Menipp._, ed. F. Bücheler (Berlin, 1882), pp. 176, 178; Ovid,
_Fasti_, iv. 181 _sqq._, 223 _sqq._, 361 _sqq._; Dionysius
Halicarnasensis, _Antiquit. Rom._ ii. 19, compare Polybius, xxii. 18
ed. L. Dindorf (Leipsic, 1866-1868).
784 Joannes Lydus, _De mensibus_, iv. 41. See Robinson Ellis,
_Commentary on Catullus_ (Oxford, 1876), pp. 206 _sq._; H. Hepding,
_Attis_, pp. 142 _sqq._; Fr. Cumont, _Les Religions Orientales dans
le Paganisme Romain_2 (Paris, 1909), pp. 83 _sq._
It is held by Prof. A. von Domaszewski that the Claudius who
incorporated the Phrygian worship of the sacred tree in the Roman
ritual was not the emperor of the first century but the emperor of
the third century, Claudius Gothicus, who came to the throne in 268
A.D. See A. von Domaszewski, “Magna Mater in Latin Inscriptions,”
_The Journal of Roman Studies_, i. (1911) p. 56. The later date, it
is said, fits better with the slow development of the worship. But
on the other hand this view is open to certain objections. (1)
Joannes Lydus, our only authority on the point, appears to identify
the Claudius in question with the emperor of the first century. (2)
The great and widespread popularity of the Phrygian worship in the
Roman empire long before 268 A.D. is amply attested by an array of
ancient writers and inscriptions, especially by a great series of
inscriptions referring to the colleges of Tree-bearers
(_Dendrophori_), from which we learn that one of these colleges,
devoted to the worship of Cybele and Attis, existed at Rome in the
age of the Antonines, about a century before the accession of
Claudius Gothicus. (3) Passages of the Augustan historians (Aelius
Lampridius, _Alexander Severus_, 37; Trebellius Pollio, _Claudius_,
iv. 2) refer to the great spring festival of Cybele and Attis in a
way which seems to imply that the festival was officially recognized
by the Roman government before Claudius Gothicus succeeded to the
purple; and we may hesitate to follow Prof. von Domaszewski in
simply excising these passages as the work of an “impudent forger.”
(4) The official establishment of the bloody Phrygian superstition
suits better the life and character of the superstitious, timid,
cruel, pedantic Claudius of the first century than the gallant
soldier his namesake in the third century. The one lounged away his
contemptible days in the safety of the palace, surrounded by a hedge
of lifeguards. The other spent the two years of his brief but
glorious reign in camps and battlefields on the frontier, combating
the barbarian enemies of the empire; and it is probable that he had
as little leisure as inclination to pander to the superstitions of
the Roman populace. For these reasons it seems better with Mr.
Hepding and Prof. Cumont to acquiesce in the traditional view that
the rites of Attis were officially celebrated at Rome from the first
century onward.
An intermediate view is adopted by Prof. G. Wissowa, who, brushing
aside the statement of Joannes Lydus altogether, would seemingly
assign the public institution of the rites to the middle of the
second century A.D. on the ground that the earliest extant evidence
of their public celebration refers to that period (_Religion und
Kultus der Römer_,2 Munich, 1912, p. 322). But, considering the
extremely imperfect evidence at our disposal for the history of
these centuries, it seems rash to infer that an official cult cannot
have been older than the earliest notice of it which has chanced to
come down to us.
785 Arrian, _Tactica_, 33; Servius on Virgil, _Aen._ xii. 836.
786 On the festival see J. Marquardt, _Römische Staatsverwaltung_, iii.2
(Leipsic, 1885) pp. 370 _sqq._; the calendar of Philocalus, in
_Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, vol. i.2 Pars prior (Berlin,
1893), p. 260, with Th. Mommsen’s commentary (pp. 313 _sq._); W.
Mannhardt, _Antike Wald- und Feldkulte_, pp. 291 _sqq._; _id._,
_Baumkultus_, pp. 572 _sqq._; G. Wissowa, _Religion und Kultus der
Römer_,2 pp. 318 _sqq._; H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 147 _sqq._; J.
Toutain, _Les Cultes Païens dans l’Empire Romain_, ii. (Paris, 1911)
pp. 82 _sqq._
M201 The spring festival of Cybele and Attis at Rome. The Day of Blood.
787 Julian, _Orat._ v. 168 C, p. 218 ed. F. C. Hertlein (Leipsic,
1875-1876); Joannes Lydus, _De mensibus_, iv. 41; Arnobius,
_Adversus Nationes_, v. chs. 7, 16, 39; Firmicus Maternus, _De
errore profanarum religionum_, 27; Sallustius philosophus, “De diis
et mundo,” iv., _Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A.
Mullach, iii. 33. As to the guild of Tree-bearers (_Dendrophori_)
see Joannes Lydus, _l.c._; H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae
Selectae_, Nos. 4116 _sq._, 4171-4174, 4176; H. Hepding, _Attis_,
pp. 86, 92, 93, 96, 152 _sqq._; F. Cumont, _s.v._ “Dendrophori,” in
Pauly-Wissowa’s _Real-Encyclopädie der classischen
Altertumswissenschaft_, v. 1. coll. 216-219; J. Toutain, _Les Cultes
Païens dans l’Empire Romain_, ii. 82 _sq._, 92 _sq._
788 Julian, _l.c._ and 169 C, p. 219 ed. F. C. Hertlein. The ceremony
may have been combined with the old _tubilustrium_ or purification
of trumpets, which fell on this day. See Joannes Lydus, _De
mensibus_, iv. 42; Varro, _De lingua Latina_, vi. 14; Festus, pp.
352, 353 ed. C. O. Müller; W. Warde Fowler, _Roman Festivals of the
Period of the Republic_ (London, 1899), p. 62.
789 Trebellius Pollio, _Claudius_, 4; Tertullian, _Apologeticus_, 25.
790 Lucian, _Deorum dialogi_, xii. 1; Seneca, _Agamemnon_, 686 _sqq._;
Martial, xi. 84. 3 _sq._; Valerius Flaccus, _Argonaut._ viii. 239
_sqq._; Statius, _Theb._ x. 170 _sqq._; Apuleius, _Metam._ viii. 27;
Lactantius, _Divinarum Institutionum Epitome_, 23 (18, vol. i. p.
689 ed. Brandt and Laubmann); H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 158 _sqq._ As
to the music of these dancing dervishes see also Lucretius, ii. 618
_sqq._
_ 791 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, i. 90 _sq._, 101 _sq._
792 Minucius Felix, _Octavius_, 22 and 24; Lactantius, _Divin. Instit._
i. 21. 16; _id._, _Epitoma_, 8; Schol. on Lucian, _Jupiter
Tragoedus_, 8 (p. 60 ed. H. Rabe); Servius on Virgil, _Aen._ ix.
115; Prudentius, _Peristephan._ x. 1066 _sqq._; “Passio Sancti
Symphoriani,” chs. 2 and 6 (Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, v. 1463,
1466); Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, v. 14; Scholiast on Nicander,
_Alexipharmaca_, 8; H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 163 _sq._ A story told
by Clement of Alexandria (_Protrept._ ii. 15, p. 13 ed. Potter)
suggests that weaker brethren may have been allowed to sacrifice the
virility of a ram instead of their own. We know from inscriptions
that rams and bulls were regularly sacrificed at the mysteries of
Attis and the Great Mother, and that the testicles of the bulls were
used for a special purpose, probably as a fertility charm. May not
the testicles of the rams have been employed for the same purpose?
and may not those of both animals have been substitutes for the
corresponding organs in men? As to the sacrifices of rams and bulls
see G. Zippel, “Das Taurobolium,” _Festschrift zum fünfzigjährigen
Doctorjubiläum L. Friedlaender_ (Leipsic, 1895), pp. 498 _sqq._; H.
Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, Nos. 4118 _sqq._; J.
Toutain, _Les Cultes Païens dans l’Empire Romain_, ii. 84 _sqq._
793 Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, v. 5 _sq._
M202 Eunuch priests in the service of Asiatic goddesses.
794 Strabo, xiv. 1. 23, p. 641.
795 Lucian, _De dea Syria_, 15, 27, 50-53.
796 Lucian, _op. cit._ 10.
797 Lucian, _op. cit._ 15.
798 Lucian, _De dea Syria_, 49-51.
799 Catullus, _Carm._ lxiii. I agree with Mr. H. Hepding (_Attis_, p.
140) in thinking that the subject of the poem is not the mythical
Attis, but one of his ordinary priests, who bore the name and
imitated the sufferings of his god. Thus interpreted the poem gains
greatly in force and pathos. The real sorrows of our fellow-men
touch us more nearly than the imaginary pangs of the gods.
As the sacrifice of virility and the institution of eunuch priests
appear to be rare, I will add a few examples. At Stratonicea in
Caria a eunuch held a sacred office in connexion with the worship of
Zeus and Hecate (_Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum_, No. 2715).
According to Eustathius (on Homer, _Iliad_, xix. 254, p. 1183) the
Egyptian priests were eunuchs who had sacrificed their virility as a
first-fruit to the gods. In Corea “during a certain night, known as
_Chu-il_, in the twelfth moon, the palace eunuchs, of whom there are
some three hundred, perform a ceremony supposed to ensure a
bountiful crop in the ensuing year. They chant in chorus prayers,
swinging burning torches around them the while. This is said to be
symbolical of burning the dead grass, so as to destroy the field
mice and other vermin.” See W. Woodville Rockhill, “Notes on some of
the Laws, Customs, and Superstitions of Korea,” _The American
Anthropologist_, iv. (Washington, 1891) p. 185. Compare Mrs. Bishop,
_Korea and her Neighbours_ (London, 1898), ii. 56 _sq._ It appears
that among the Ekoi of Southern Nigeria both men and women are, or
used to be, mutilated by the excision of their genital organs at an
annual festival, which is celebrated in order to produce plentiful
harvests and immunity from thunderbolts. The victims apparently die
from loss of blood. See P. Amaury Talbot, _In the Shadow of the
Bush_ (London, 1912), pp. 74 _sqq._ Mr. Talbot writes to me: “A
horrible case has just happened at Idua, where, at the new yam
planting, a man cut off his own _membrum virile_” (letter dated
Eket, Nr Calabar, Southern Nigeria, Feb. 7th, 1913). Amongst the
Ba-sundi and Ba-bwende of the Congo many youths are castrated “in
order to more fittingly offer themselves to the phallic worship,
which increasingly prevails as we advance from the coast to the
interior. At certain villages between Manyanga and Isangila there
are curious eunuch dances to celebrate the new moon, in which a
white cock is thrown up into the air alive, with clipped wings, and
as it falls towards the ground it is caught and plucked by the
eunuchs. I was told that originally this used to be a human
sacrifice, and that a young boy or girl was thrown up into the air
and torn to pieces by the eunuchs as he or she fell, but that of
late years slaves had got scarce or manners milder, and a white cock
was now substituted” (H. H. Johnston, “On the Races of the Congo,”
_Journal of the Anthropological Institute_, xiii. (1884) p. 473;
compare _id._, _The River Congo_, London, 1884, p. 409). In India,
men who are born eunuchs or in some way deformed are sometimes
dedicated to a goddess named Huligamma. They wear female attire and
might be mistaken for women. Also men who are or believe themselves
impotent will vow to dress as women and serve the goddess in the
hope of recovering their virility. See F. Fawcett, “On Basivis,”
_Journal of the Anthropological Society of Bombay_, ii. 343 _sq._ In
Pegu the English traveller, Alexander Hamilton, witnessed a dance in
honour of the gods of the earth. “Hermaphrodites, who are numerous
in this country, are generally chosen, if there are enough present
to make a set for the dance. I saw nine dance like mad folks for
above half-an-hour; and then some of them fell in fits, foaming at
the mouth for the space of half-an-hour; and, when their senses are
restored, they pretend to foretell plenty or scarcity of corn for
that year, if the year will prove sickly or salutary to the people,
and several other things of moment, and all by that half hour’s
conversation that the furious dancer had with the gods while she was
in a trance” (A. Hamilton, “A New Account of the East Indies,” in J.
Pinkerton’s _Voyages and Travels_, viii. 427). So in the worship of
Attis the Archigallus or head of the eunuch priests prophesied;
perhaps he in like manner worked himself up to the pitch of
inspiration by a frenzied dance. See H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones
Latinae Selectae_, vol. ii. Pars i. pp. 142, 143, Nos. 4130, 4136;
G. Wilmanns, _Exempla Inscriptionum Latinarum_ (Berlin, 1873), vol.
i. p. 36, Nos. 119a, 120; J. Toutain, _Les Cultes Païens dans
l’Empire Romain_, ii. 93 _sq._ As to the sacrifice of virility in
the Syrian religion compare Th. Nöldeke, “Die Selbstentmannung bei
den Syrern,” _Archiv für Religionswissenschaft_, x. (1907) pp.
150-152.
M203 The sacrifice of virility. The mourning for Attis.
800 Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, v. 7 and 16; Servius on Virgil,
_Aen._ ix. 115.
801 Diodorus Siculus, iii. 59; Arrian, _Tactica_, 33; Scholiast on
Nicander, _Alexipharmaca_, 8; Firmicus Maternus, _De errore
profanarum religionum_, 3 and 22; Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, v.
16; Servius on Virgil, _Aen._ ix. 115.
802 See above, p. 267.
803 Arnobius, _l.c._; Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et mundo,” iv.,
_Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A. Mullach, iii. 33.
804 Above, p. 230.
805 See below, p. 274.
M204 The Festival of Joy (_Hilaria_) for the resurrection of Attis on
March 25th. The procession to the Almo.
806 Firmicus Maternus, _De errore profanarum religionum_, 22, “_Nocte
quadam simulacrum in lectica supinum ponitur et per numeros digestis
fletibus plangitur: deinde cum se ficta lamentatione satiaverint,
lumen infertur: tunc a sacerdote omnium qui flebant fauces
unguentur, quibus perunctis hoc lento murmure susurrat:_
θαρρεῖτε μύσται τοῦ θέου σεσωσμένου; ἔσται γὰρ ἡμῖν ἐκ πόνων
σωτήρια.
_Quid miseros hortaris gaudeant? quid deceptos homines laetari
compellis? quam illis spem, quam salutem funesta persuasione
promittis? Dei tui mors nota est, vita non paret.... Idolum sepelis,
idolum plangis, idolum de sepultura proferis, et miser cum haec
feceris, gaudes. Tu deum tuum liberas, tu jacentia lapidis membra
componis, tu insensibile corrigis saxum._” In this passage Firmicus
does not expressly mention Attis, but that the reference is to his
rites is made probable by a comparison with chapter 3 of the same
writer’s work. Compare also Damascius, in Photius’s _Bibliotheca_,
p. 345 A, 5 _sqq._, ed. I. Bekker (Berlin, 1824), τότε τῇ Ἱεραπόλει
ἐγκαθευδήσας ἐδόκουν ὄναρ ὁ Ἄττης γένεσθαι, καί μοι ἐπιτελεῖσθαι
παρὰ τῆς μητρὸς τῶν θεῶν τὴν τῶν ἱλαρίων καλουμένων ἑορτήν; ὅπερ
ἐδήλου τὴν ἐξ ᾅδου γεγονυῖαν ἡμῶν σωτηρίαν. See further Fr. Cumont,
_Les Religions Orientales dans le Paganisme Romain_2 (Paris, 1909),
pp. 89 _sq._
807 Macrobius, _Saturn_. i. 21. 10; Flavius Vopiscus, _Aurelianus_, i.
1; Julian, _Or._ v. pp. 168 D, 169 D; Damascius, _l.c._; Herodian,
i. 10. 5-7; Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et mundo,” _Fragmenta
Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A. Mullach, iii. 33. In like
manner Easter Sunday, the Resurrection-day of Christ, was called by
some ancient writers the Sunday of Joy (_Dominica Gaudii_). The
emperors used to celebrate the happy day by releasing from prison
all but the worst offenders. See J. Bingham, _The Antiquities of the
Christian Church_, bk. xx. ch. vi. §§ 5 _sq._ (Bingham’s _Works_
(Oxford, 1855), vii. 317 _sqq._).
808 Aelius Lampridius, _Alexander Severus_, 37.
_ 809 Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, i.2 Pars prior (Berlin, 1893), pp.
260, 313 _sq._; H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 51, 172.
810 Ovid, _Fasti_, iv. 337-346; Silius Italicus, _Punic._ viii. 365;
Valerius Flaccus, _Argonaut._ viii. 239 _sqq._; Martial, iii. 47. 1
_sq._; Ammianus Marcellinus, xxiii. 3. 7; Arnobius, _Adversus
Nationes_, vii. 32; Prudentius, _Peristephon._ x. 154 _sqq._ For the
description of the image of the goddess see Arnobius, _Adversus
Nationes_, vii. 49. At Carthage the goddess was carried to her bath
in a litter, not in a wagon (Augustine, _De civitate Dei_, ii. 4).
The bath formed part of the festival in Phrygia, whence the custom
was borrowed by the Romans (Arrian, _Tactica_, 33). At Cyzicus the
Placianian Mother, a form of Cybele, was served by women called
“marine” (Θαλάσσιαι), whose duty it probably was to wash her image
in the sea (Ch. Michel, _Recueil d’Inscriptions Grecques_, Brussels,
1900, pp. 403 _sq._, No. 537). See further J. Marquardt, _Römische
Staatsverwaltung_, iii.2 373; H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 133 _sq._
M205 The mysteries of Attis. The sacrament. The baptism of blood. The
Vatican a centre of the worship of Attis.
811 Clement of Alexandria, _Protrept._ ii. 15, p. 13 ed. Potter;
Firmicus Maternus, _De errore profanarum religionum_, 18.
812 Above, p. 272.
813 H. Hepding, _Attis_, p. 185.
814 Prudentius, _Peristephan._ x. 1006-1050; compare Firmicus Maternus,
_De errore profanarum religionum_, 28. 8. That the bath of bull’s
blood (_taurobolium_) was believed to regenerate the devotee for
eternity is proved by an inscription found at Rome, which records
that a certain Sextilius Agesilaus Aedesius, who dedicated an altar
to Attis and the Mother of the Gods, was _taurobolio criobolioque in
aeternum renatus_ (_Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, vi. No. 510; H.
Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, No. 4152). The phrase
_arcanis perfusionibus in aeternum renatus_ occurs in a dedication
to Mithra (_Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, vi. No. 736), which,
however, is suspected of being spurious. As to the inscriptions
which refer to the _taurobolium_ see G. Zippel, “Das Taurobolium,”
in _Festschrift zum fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläum L. Friedlaender
dargebracht von seinen Schülern_ (Leipsic, 1895), pp. 498-520; H.
Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, vol. ii. Pars i. pp.
140-147, Nos. 4118-4159. As to the origin of the _taurobolium_ and
the meaning of the word, see Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments
Figurés relatifs aux Mystères de Mithra_ (Brussels, 1896-1899), i.
334 _sq._; _id._, _Les Religions Orientales dans le Paganisme
Romain_,2 pp. 100 _sqq._; J. Toutain, _Les Cultes Païens dans
l’Empire Romain_, ii. 84 _sqq._; G. Wissowa, _Religion und Kultus
der Römer_,2 pp. 322 _sqq._ The _taurobolium_ seems to have formed
no part of the original worship of Cybele and to have been imported
into it at a comparatively late date, perhaps in the second century
of our era. Its origin is obscure. In the majority of the older
inscriptions the name of the rite appears as _tauropolium_, and it
has been held that this is the true form, being derived from the
worship of the Asiatic goddess Artemis Tauropolis (Strabo, xii. 2.
7, p. 537). This was formerly the view of Prof. F. Cumont (_s.v._
“Anaitis,” in Pauly-Wissowa’s _Real-Encyclopädie der classischen
Altertumswissenschaft_, i. 2. col. 2031); but he now prefers the
form _taurobolium_, and would deduce both the name and the rite from
an ancient Anatolian hunting custom of lassoing wild bulls.
815 Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et mundo,” iv., _Fragmenta
Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A. Mullach, iii. 33.
816 Sallustius philosophus, _l.c._
_ 817 Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, vi. Nos. 497-504; H. Dessau,
_Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, Nos. 4145, 4147-4151, 4153;
_Inscriptiones Graecae Siciliae et Italiae_, ed. G. Kaibel (Berlin,
1890), p. 270, No. 1020; G. Zippel, _op. cit._ pp. 509 _sq._, 519;
H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 83, 86-88, 176; Ch. Huelsen, _Topographie
der Stadt Rom im Alterthum, von H. Jordan_, i. 3 (Berlin, 1907), pp.
658 _sq._
_ 818 Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, xiii. No. 1751; H. Dessau,
_Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, No. 4131; G. Wilmanns, _Exempla
Inscriptionum Latinarum_ (Berlin, 1873), vol. ii. p. 125, No. 2278;
G. Wissowa, _Religion und Kultus der Römer_,2 p. 267; H. Hepding,
_Attis_, pp. 169-171, 176.
_ 819 Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, xiii. No. 1751; G. Wilmanns,
_Exempla Inscriptionum Latinarum_, vol. i. pp. 35-37, Nos. 119, 123,
124; H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, Nos. 4127, 4129,
4131, 4140; G. Wissowa, _Religion und Kultus der Römer_,2 pp. 322
_sqq._; H. Hepding, _Attis_, p. 191.
M206 The sanctity of the pine-tree in the worship of Attis.
820 As to the monuments see H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_,
Nos. 4143, 4152, 4153; H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 82, 83, 88, 89.
821 Firmicus Maternus, _De errore profanarum religionum_, 27.
_ 822 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, ii. 47 _sq._, 71;
_Spirits of the Corn and of the Wild_, i. 138, 143, 152, 153, 154,
155, 156, 157, 158.
823 Etymologicum Magnum, p. 220, line 20, Γάλλος, ὁ φιλοπάτωρ
Πτολεμαῖος; διὰ τὸ φύλλα κισσοῦ κατέστιχθαι, ὡς οἱ γάλλοι. ᾽Αεὶ γὰρ
ταῖς Διονυσιακαῖς τελεταῖς κισσῷ ἐστεφανοῦντο. But there seems to be
some confusion here between the rites of Dionysus and those of
Attis; ivy was certainly sacred to Dionysus (Pausanias, i. 31. 6
with my note). Compare C. A. Lobeck, _Aglaophamus_ (Königsberg,
1829), i. 657, who, in the passage quoted, rightly defends the
readings κατέστιχθαι and ἐστεφανοῦντο.
_ 824 Encyclopaedia Britannica_,9 xix. 105. Compare Athenaeus, ii. 49, p.
57. The nuts of the silver-pine (_Pinus edulis_) are a favourite
food of the Californian Indians (S. Powers, _Tribes of California_
(Washington, 1877), p. 421); the Wintun Indians hold a pine-nut
dance when the nuts are fit to be gathered (_ib._ p. 237). The
Shuswap Indians of British Columbia collect the cones of various
sorts of pines and eat the nutlets which they extract from them. See
G. M. Dawson, “Notes on the Shuswap People of British Columbia,”
_Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada_, ix.
(Montreal, 1892) Transactions, section ii. p. 22. With regard to the
Araucanian Indians of South America we read that “the great staple
food, the base of all their subsistence, save among the coast
tribes, was the _piñon_, the fruit of the Araucanian pine
(_Araucaria imbricata_). Every year during the autumn months
excursions are made by the whole tribe to the pine forests, where
they remain until they have collected sufficient for the following
year. Each tribe has its own district, inherited by custom from
generation to generation and inviolate, by unwritten law, from other
tribes, even in time of warfare. This harvest was formerly of such
supreme importance, that all inter-tribal quarrels and warfares were
suspended by mutual accord during this period.” See R. E. Latcham,
“Ethnology of the Araucanos,” _Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute_, xxxix. (1909) p. 341. The Gilyaks of the Amoor valley in
like manner eat the nutlets of the Siberian stone-pine (L. von
Schrenk, _Die Völker des Amur-Landes_, iii. 440). See also the
commentators on Herodotus, iv. 109 φθειροτραγέουσι.
825 Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xiv. 103.
826 Strabo, x. 3. 12 _sqq._, pp. 469 _sqq._ However, tipsy people were
excluded from the sanctuary of Attis (Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_,
v. 6).
827 Scholiast on Lucian, _Dial. Meretr._ ii. 1, p. 276 ed. H. Rabe
(Leipsic, 1906).
M207 Attis as a corn-god. Cybele as a goddess of fertility. The bathing
of her image either a rain-charm or a marriage-rite.
828 Hippolytus, _Refutatio omnium haeresium_, v. 8 and 9, pp. 162, 168
ed. Duncker and Schneidewin; Firmicus Maternus, _De errore
profanarum religionum_, 3; Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et
mundo,” _Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A. Mullach,
iii. 33. Others identified him with the spring flowers. See
Eusebius, _Praeparatio Evangelii_, iii. 11. 8 and 12, iii. 13. 10
ed. F. A. Heinichen (Leipsic, 1842-1843); Augustine, _De civitate
Dei_, vii. 25.
829 W. Helbig, _Führer durch die öffentlichen Sammlungen klassischer
Altertümer in Rom_2 (Leipsic, 1899), i. 481, No. 721.
830 The urn is in the Lateran Museum at Rome (No. 1046). It is not
described by W. Helbig in his _Führer_.2 The inscription on the urn
(_M. Modius Maxximus archigallus coloniae Ostiens_) is published by
H. Dessau (_Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, No. 4162), who does not
notice the curious and interesting composition of the cock’s tail.
The bird is chosen as an emblem of the priest with a punning
reference to the word _gallus_, which in Latin means a cock as well
as a priest of Attis.
831 Gregory of Tours, _De gloria confessorum_, 77 (Migne’s _Patrologia
Latina_, lxxi. 884). That the goddess here referred to was Cybele
and not a native Gallic deity, as I formerly thought (_Lectures on
the Early History of the Kingship_, p. 178), seems proved by the
“Passion of St. Symphorian,” chs. 2 and 6 (Migne’s _Patrologia
Graeca_, v. 1463, 1466). Gregory and the author of the “Passion of
St. Symphorian” call the goddess simply Berecynthia, the latter
writer adding “the Mother of the Demons,” which is plainly a
Christian version of the title “Mother of the Gods.”
832 Above, p. 265. In the island of Thera an ox, wheat, barley, wine,
and “other first-fruits of all that the seasons produce” were
offered to the Mother of the Gods, plainly because she was deemed
the source of fertility. See G. Dittenberger, _Sylloge Inscriptionum
Graecarum_,2 vol. ii. p. 426, No. 630.
833 H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 215-217; compare _id._ p. 175 note 7.
834 Ptolemaeus, _Nov. Hist._ i. p. 183 of A. Westermann’s _Mythographi
Graeci_ (Brunswick, 1843).
835 Pausanias, viii. 25. 5 _sq._
836 Aelian, _Nat. Anim._ xii. 30. The place was in Mesopotamia, and the
goddess was probably Astarte. So Lucian (_De dea Syria_) calls the
Astarte of Hierapolis “the Assyrian Hera.”
837 Pausanias, ii. 38. 2.
838 Julian, _Orat._ v. 173 _sqq._ (pp. 225 _sqq._ ed. F. C. Hertlein);
H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 155-157. However, apples, pomegranates, and
dates were also forbidden. The story that the mother of Attis
conceived him through contact with a pomegranate (above, pp. 263,
269) might explain the prohibition of that fruit. But the reasons
for tabooing apples and dates are not apparent, though Julian tried
to discover them. He suggested that dates may have been forbidden
because the date-palm does not grow in Phrygia, the native land of
Cybele and Attis.
M208 The name Attis seems to mean “father.”
839 P. Kretschmer, _Einleitung in die Geschichte der griechischen
Sprache_ (Göttingen, 1896), p. 355.
840 Diodorus Siculus, iii. 58. 4; Hippolytus, _Refutatio omnium
haeresium_, i. 9, p. 168 ed. Duncker and Schneidewin. A Latin
dedication to _Atte Papa_ has been found at Aquileia (F. Cumont, in
Pauly-Wissowa’s _Realencyclopädie der classischen
Altertumswissenschaft_, ii. 2180, _s.v._ “Attepata” H. Hepding,
_Attis_, p. 86). Greek dedications to Papas or to Zeus Papas occur
in Phrygia (H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 78 _sq._). Compare A. B. Cook,
“Zeus, Jupiter, and the Oak,” _Classical Review_, xviii. (1904) p.
79.
841 Arnobius, _Adversus Nationes_, v. 6 and 13.
842 (Sir) Edward B. Tylor, _Primitive Culture_2 (London, 1873), i. 223.
M209 Relation of Attis to the Mother Goddess. Attis as a Sky-god or
Heavenly Father. Stories of the emasculation of the Sky-god.
843 Rapp, _s.v._ “Kybele,” in W. H. Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und
röm. Mythologie_, ii. 1648.
844 She is called a “motherless virgin” by Julian (_Or._ v. 166 B, p.
215 ed. F. C. Hertlein), and there was a _Parthenon_ or virgin’s
chamber in her sanctuary at Cyzicus (Ch. Michel, _Recueil
d’Inscriptions Grecques_, p. 404, No. 538). Compare Rapp, in W. H.
Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, ii. 1648;
Wagner, _s.v._ “Nana,” _ibid._ iii. 4 _sq._ Another great goddess of
fertility who was conceived as a Virgin Mother was the Egyptian
Neith or Net. She is called “the Great Goddess, the Mother of All
the Gods,” and was believed to have brought forth Ra, the Sun,
without the help of a male partner. See C. P. Tiele, _Geschichte der
Religion im Altertum_, i. 111; E. A. Wallis Budge, _The Gods of the
Egyptians_ (London, 1904), i. 457-462. The latter writer says (p.
462): “In very early times Net was the personification of the
eternal female principle of life which was self-sustaining and
self-existent, and was secret and unknown, and all-pervading; the
more material thinkers, whilst admitting that she brought forth her
son Rā without the aid of a husband, were unable to divorce from
their minds the idea that a male germ was necessary for its
production, and finding it impossible to derive it from a being
external to the goddess, assumed that she herself provided not only
the substance which was to form the body of Rā but also the male
germ which fecundated it. Thus Net was the type of
partheno-genesis.”
845 Quoted by Eustathius on Homer, _Il._ v. 408; _Fragmenta Historicorum
Graecorum_, ed. C. Müller, iii. 592, Frag. 30.
846 (Sir) Edward B. Tylor, _Primitive Culture_,2 i. 321 _sqq._, ii. 270
_sqq._ For example, the Ewe people of Togo-land, in West Africa,
think that the Earth is the wife of the Sky, and that their marriage
takes place in the rainy season, when the rain causes the seeds to
sprout and bear fruit. These fruits they regard as the children of
Mother Earth, who in their opinion is the mother also of men and of
gods. See J. Spieth, _Die Ewe-Stämme_ (Berlin, 1906), pp. 464, 548.
In the regions of the Senegal and the Niger it is believed that the
Sky-god and the Earth-goddess are the parents of the principal
spirits who dispense life and death, weal and woe, among mankind.
The eldest son of Sky and Earth is represented in very various
forms, sometimes as a hermaphrodite, sometimes in semi-animal shape,
with the head of a bull, a crocodile, a fish, or a serpent. His name
varies in the different tribes, but the outward form of his
ceremonies is everywhere similar. His rites, which are to some
extent veiled in mystery, are forbidden to women. See Maurice
Delafosse, _Haut-Sénégal-Niger_ (Paris, 1912), iii. 173-175.
847 Hesiod, _Theogony_, 159 _sqq._
848 Porphyry, _De antro nympharum_, 16; Aristides, _Or._ iii. (vol. i.
p. 35 ed. G. Dindorf, Leipsic, 1829); Scholiast on Apollonius
Rhodius, _Argon._ iv. 983.
849 A. Lang, _Custom and Myth_ (London, 1884), pp. 45 _sqq._; _id._,
_Myth, Ritual, and Religion_ (London, 1887), i. 299 _sqq._ In
Egyptian mythology the separation of heaven and earth was ascribed
to Shu, the god of light, who insinuated himself between the bodies
of Seb (Keb) the earth-god and of Nut the sky-goddess. On the
monuments Shu is represented holding up the star-spangled body of
Nut on his hands, while Seb reclines on the ground. See A.
Wiedemann, _Religion of the Ancient Egyptians_ (London, 1897), pp.
230 _sq._; E. A. Wallis Budge, _The Gods of the Egyptians_, ii. 90,
97 _sq._, 100, 105; A. Erman, _Die ägyptische Religion_2 (Berlin,
1909), pp. 35 _sq._; C. P. Tiele, _Geschichte der Religion im
Altertum_, i. 33 _sq._ Thus contrary to the usual mythical
conception the Egyptians regarded the earth as male and the sky as
female. An allusion in the _Book of the Dead_ (ch. 69, vol. ii. p.
235, E. A. Wallis Budge’s translation, London, 1901) has been
interpreted as a hint that Osiris mutilated his father Seb at the
separation of earth and heaven, just as Cronus mutilated his father
Uranus. See H. Brugsch, _Religion und Mythologie der alten Aegypter_
(Leipsic, 1885-1888), p. 581; E. A. Wallis Budge, _op. cit._ ii. 99
_sq._ Sometimes the Egyptians conceived the sky as a great cow
standing with its legs on the earth. See A. Erman, _Die ägyptische
Religion_,2 pp. 7, 8.
850 Compare _The Dying God_, pp. 105 _sqq._
851 Julian, _Or._ v. pp. 165 B, 170 D (pp. 214, 221, ed. F. C.
Hertlein); Sallustius philosophus, “De diis et mundo,” iv.
_Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum_, ed. F. G. A. Mullach, iii. 33.
852 Drexler, _s.v._ “Men,” in W. H. Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und
röm. Mythologie_, ii. 2745; H. Hepding, _Attis_, p. 120, note 8.
853 H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, vol. ii. Pars i. pp.
145 _sq._, Nos. 4146-4149; H. Hepding, _Attis_, pp. 82, 86 _sq._, 89
_sq._ As to Men Tyrannus, see Drexler, _s.v._ “Men,” in W. H.
Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und röm. Myth._ ii. 2687 _sqq._
854 On the other hand Sir W. M. Ramsay holds that Attis and Men are
deities of similar character and origin, but differentiated from
each other by development in different surroundings (_Cities and
Bishoprics of Phrygia_, i. 169); but he denies that Men was a
moon-god (_op. cit._ i. 104, note 4).
M210 The high priest of Attis bore the god’s name and seems to have
personated him. The drawing of the high priest’s blood may have been
a substitute for putting him to death in the character of the god.
The name of Attis in the royal families of Phrygia and Lydia. The
Phrygian priests of Attis may have been members of the royal family.
855 In letters of Eumenes and Attalus, preserved in inscriptions at
Sivrihissar, the priest at Pessinus is addressed as Attis. See A.
von Domaszewski, “Briefe der Attaliden an den Priester von
Pessinus,” _Archaeologische-epigraphische Mittheilungen aus
Oesterreich-Ungarn_, viii. (1884) pp. 96, 98; Ch. Michel, _Recueil
d’Inscriptions Grecques_, pp. 57 _sq._ No. 45; W. Dittenberger,
_Orientis Graeci Inscriptiones Selectae_ (Leipsic, 1903-1905), vol.
i. pp. 482 _sqq._ No. 315. For more evidence of inscriptions see H.
Hepding, _Attis_, p. 79; Rapp, _s.v._ “Attis,” in W. H. Roscher’s
_Lexikon der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, i. 724. See also
Polybius, xxii. 18 (20), (ed. L. Dindorf), who mentions a priest of
the Mother of the Gods named Attis at Pessinus.
856 The conjecture is that of Henzen, in _Annal. d. Inst._ 1856, p. 110,
referred to by Rapp, _l.c._
_ 857 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, ii. 75 _sq._; _The Dying
God_, pp. 151 _sq._, 209.
858 Article “Phrygia,” in _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, 9th ed. xviii.
(1885) p. 853. Elsewhere, speaking of the religions of Asia Minor in
general, the same writer says: “The highest priests and priestesses
played the parts of the great gods in the mystic ritual, wore their
dress, and bore their names” (_Cities and Bishoprics of Phrygia_, i.
101).
859 Strabo, xii. 5. 3, p. 567.
860 (Sir) W. M. Ramsay, “A Study of Phrygian Art,” _Journal of Hellenic
Studies_, ix. (1888) pp. 379 _sqq._; _id._, “A Study of Phrygian
Art,” _Journal of Hellenic Studies_, x. (1889) pp. 156 _sqq._; G.
Perrot et Ch. Chipiez, _Histoire de l’Art dans l’Antiquité_, v. 82
_sqq._
861 Herodotus, i. 94. According to Sir W. M. Ramsay, the conquering and
ruling caste in Lydia belonged to the Phrygian stock (_Journal of
Hellenic Studies_, ix. (1888) p. 351).
862 Herodotus, i. 34-45. The tradition that Croesus would allow no iron
weapon to come near Atys suggests that a similar taboo may have been
imposed on the Phrygian priests named Attis. For taboos of this sort
see _Taboo and the Perils of the Soul_, pp. 225 _sqq._
863 H. Stein on Herodotus, i. 43; Ed. Meyer, _s.v._ “Atys,” in
Pauly-Wissowa’s _Real-Encyclopädie der classischen
Altertumswissenschaft_, ii. 2 col. 2262.
864 See above, pp. 13, 16 _sq._, 48 _sqq._
_ 865 The Dying God_, pp. 161 _sqq._
866 See (Sir) W. M. Ramsay, _s.v._ “Phrygia,” _Encyclopaedia
Britannica_, 9th ed. xviii. 849 _sq._; _id._, “A Study of Phrygian
Art,” _Journal of Hellenic Studies_, ix. (1888) pp. 350 _sq._ Prof.
P. Kretschmer holds that both Cybele and Attis were gods of the
indigenous Asiatic population, not of the Phrygian invaders
(_Einleitung in die Geschichte der griechischen Sprache_, Göttingen,
1896, pp. 194 _sq._).
M211 The way in which the representatives of Attis were put to death is
perhaps shown by the legend of Marsyas, who was hung on a pine-tree
and flayed by Apollo.
867 Diodorus Siculus, iii. 58 _sq._ As to Marsyas in the character of a
shepherd or herdsman see Hyginus, _Fab._ 165; Nonnus, _Dionys._ i.
41 _sqq._ He is called a Silenus by Pausanias (i. 24. 1).
868 Pausanias, x. 30. 9.
869 Apollodorus, _Bibliotheca_, i. 4. 2; Hyginus, _Fab._ 165. Many
ancient writers mention that the tree on which Marsyas suffered
death was a pine. See Apollodorus, _l.c._; Nicander,
_Alexipharmaca_, 301 _sq._, with the Scholiast’s note; Lucian,
_Tragodopodagra_, 314 _sq._; Archias Mitylenaeus, in _Anthologia
Palatina_, vii. 696; Philostratus, Junior, _Imagines_, i. 3; Longus,
_Pastor._ iv. 8; Zenobius, _Cent._ iv. 81; J. Tzetzes, _Chiliades_,
i. 353 sqq. Pliny alone declares the tree to have been a plane,
which according to him was still shown at Aulocrene on the way from
Apamea to Phrygia (_Nat. Hist._ xvi. 240). On a candelabra in the
Vatican the defeated Marsyas is represented hanging on a pine-tree
(W. Helbig, _Führer_,2 i. 225 _sq._); but the monumental evidence is
not consistent on this point (Jessen, _s.v._ “Marsyas,” in W. H.
Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, ii. 2442). The
position which the pine held in the myth and ritual of Cybele
supports the preponderance of ancient testimony in favour of that
tree.
870 Herodotus, vii. 26; Xenophon, _Anabasis_, i. 2. 8; Livy, xxxviii.
13. 6; Quintus Curtius, iii. 1. 1-5; Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ v. 106.
Herodotus calls the river the Catarrhactes.
871 Aelian, _Var. Hist_. xiii. 21.
M212 Marsyas apparently a double of Attis. The hanging and spearing of
Odin and his human victims on sacred trees. The hanging and spearing
of human victims among the Bagobos.
872 Catullus, lxiii. 22; Lucretius, ii. 620; Ovid, _Fasti_, iv. 181
_sq._, 341; Polyaenus, _Stratagem._ viii. 53. 4. Flutes or pipes
often appear on her monuments. See H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae
Selectae_, Nos. 4100, 4143, 4145, 4152, 4153.
873 Hippolytus, _Refutatio omnium haeresium_, v. 9, p. 168, ed. Duncker
and Schneidewin.
874 Adam of Bremen, _Descriptio insularum Aquilonis_, 27 (Migne’s
_Patrologia Latina_, cxlvi. 643).
875 S. Bugge, _Studien über die Entstehung der nördischen Götter- und
Heldensagen_ (Munich, 1889), pp. 339 _sqq._; K. Simrock, _Die Edda_8
(Stuttgart, 1882), p. 382; K. Müllenhoff, _Deutsche Altertumskunde_
(Berlin, 1870-1900), iv. 244 _sq._; H. M. Chadwick, _The Cult of
Othin_ (London, 1899), pp. 3-20. The old English custom of hanging
and disembowelling traitors was probably derived from a practice of
thus sacrificing them to Odin; for among many races, including the
Teutonic and Latin peoples, capital punishment appears to have been
originally a religious rite, a sacrifice or consecration of the
criminal to the god whom he had offended. See F. Liebrecht, _Zur
Volkskunde_ (Heilbronn, 1879), pp. 8 _sq._; K. von Amira, in H.
Paul’s _Grundriss der germanischen Philologie_,2 iii. (Strasburg,
1900) pp. 197 _sq._; G. Vigfusson and F. York Powell, _Corpus
Poeticum Boreale_ (Oxford, 1883), i. 410; W. Golther, _Handbuch der
germanischen Mythologie_ (Leipsic, 1895), pp. 548 _sq._; Th.
Mommsen, _Roman History_, bk. i. ch. 12 (vol. i. p. 192, ed. 1868);
_id._, _Römisches Strafrecht_ (Leipsic, 1899), pp. 900 _sqq._; F.
Granger, _The Worship of the Romans_ (London, 1895), pp. 259 _sqq._;
E. Westermarck, _The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas_, i.
(London, 1906) pp. 439 _sq._ So, too, among barbarous peoples the
slaughter of prisoners in war is often a sacrifice offered by the
victors to the gods to whose aid they ascribe the victory. See A. B.
Ellis, _The Tshi-speaking Peoples of the Gold Coast_ (London, 1887),
pp. 169 _sq._; W. Ellis, _Polynesian Researches_2 (London,
1832-1836), i. 289; Diodorus Siculus, xx. 65; Strabo, vii. 2. 3, p.
294; Caesar, _De bello Gallico_, vi. 17; Tacitus, _Annals_, i. 61,
xiii. 57; Procopius, De bello Gothico, ii. 15. 24, ii. 25. 9;
Jornandes, _Getica_, vi. 41; J. Grimm, _Deutsche Mythologie_4
(Berlin, 1875-1878), i. 36 _sq._; Fr. Schwally, _Semitische
Kriegsaltertümer_ (Leipsic, 1901), pp. 29 _sqq._
_ 876 Havamal_, 139 _sqq._ (K. Simrock, _Die Edda_,8 p. 55; K.
Müllenhoff, _Deutsche Altertumskunde_, v. 270 _sq._).
877 Fay-Cooper Cole, _The Wild Tribes of Davao District, Mindanao_
(Chicago, 1913), pp. 114 _sqq._ (_Field Museum of Natural History,
Publication 170_).
M213 The hanging of Artemis. The hanging of Helen. The hanging of animal
victims.
878 Pausanias, viii. 23. 6 _sq._ The story, mentioned by Pausanias, that
some children tied a rope round the neck of the image of Artemis was
probably invented to explain a ritual practice of the same sort, as
scholars have rightly perceived. See L. Preller, _Griechische
Mythologie_, i.4 305, note 2; L. R. Farnell, _The Cults of the Greek
States_ (Oxford, 1896-1909), ii. 428 _sq._; M. P. Nilsson,
_Griechische Feste_ (Leipsic, 1906), pp. 232 _sqq._ The Arcadian
worship of the Hanged Artemis was noticed by Callimachus. See
Clement of Alexandria, _Protrept._ ii. 38, p. 32, ed. Potter.
879 Eustathius on Homer, _Od._ xii. 85, p. 1714; I. Bekker, _Anecdota
Graeca_ (Berlin, 1814-1821), i. 336 _sq._, _s.v._ Ἄγαλμα Ἑκάτης. The
goddess Hecate was sometimes identified with Artemis, though in
origin probably she was quite distinct. See L. R. Farnell, _The
Cults of the Greek States_, ii. 499 _sqq._
880 Antoninus Liberalis, _Transform._ xiii.
881 Pausanias, iii. 19. 9 _sq._
882 H. von Fritze, “Zum griechischen Opferritual,” _Jahrbuch des kaiser.
deutsch. Archäologischen Instituts_, xviii. (1903) pp. 58-67. In the
ritual of Eleusis the sacrificial oxen were sometimes lifted up by
young men from the ground. See G. Dittenberger, _Sylloge
Inscriptionum Graecarum_,2 vol. ii. pp. 166 _sq._ No. 521 (ἤραντο δὲ
καὶ τοῖς μυστηρίοις τοὺς βοῦς ἐν Ἐλευσῖνι τῇ θυσίαι, κτλ.); E. S.
Roberts and E. A. Gardner, _Introduction to Greek Epigraphy_, ii.
(Cambridge, 1905) pp. 176 _sq._, No. 65. In this inscription the
word ἤραντο is differently interpreted by P. Stengel, who supposes
that it refers merely to turning backwards and upwards the head of
the victim. See P. Stengel, “Zum griechischen Opferritual,”
_Jahrbuch des kaiser. deutsch. Archäologischen Instituts_, xviii.
(1903) pp. 113-123. But it seems highly improbable that so trivial
an act should be solemnly commemorated in an inscription among the
exploits of the young men (_epheboi_) who performed it. On the other
hand, we know that at Nysa the young men did lift and carry the
sacrificial bull, and that the act was deemed worthy of
commemoration on the coins. See above, p. 206. The Wajagga of East
Africa dread the ghosts of suicides; so when a man has hanged
himself they take the rope from his neck and hang a goat in the
fatal noose, after which they slay the animal. This is supposed to
appease the ghost and prevent him from tempting human beings to
follow his bad example. See B. Gutmann, “Trauer und Begrabnissitten
der Wadschagga,” _Globus_, lxxxix. (1906) p. 200.
883 See above, p. 146.
M214 Use of the skins of human victims to effect their resurrection.
_ 884 The Scapegoat_, pp. 294 _sqq._
885 Herodotus, iv. 71 _sq._
M215 Skins of men and horses stuffed and set up at graves. Some tribes of
Borneo use the skulls of their enemies to ensure the fertility of
the ground and of women, the abundance of game, and so forth.
886 Jean du Plan de Carpin, _Historia Mongalorum_, ed. D’Avezac (Paris,
1838), cap. iii. § iii.
_ 887 Voyages d’Ibn Batoutah, texte Arabe accompagné d’une traduction_,
par C. Défrémery et B. R. Sanguinetti (Paris, 1853-1858), iv. 300
_sq._ For more evidence of similar customs, observed by Turanian
peoples, see K. Neumann, _Die Hellenen im Skythenlande_ (Berlin,
1855), pp. 237-239.
888 Captain R. Fitz-roy, _Narrative of the Surveying Voyages of His
Majesty’s Ships __“__Adventure__”__ and __“__Beagle__”_ (London,
1839), ii. 155 _sq._
889 Herodotus, iv. 103. Many Scythians flayed their dead enemies, and,
stretching the skin on a wooden framework, carried it about with
them on horseback (Herodotus, iv. 64). The souls of the dead may
have been thought to attend on and serve the man who thus bore their
remains about with him. It is also possible that the custom was
nothing more than a barbarous mode of wreaking vengeance on the
dead. Thus a Persian king has been known to flay an enemy, stuff the
skin with chaff, and hang it on a high tree (Procopius, _De bello
Persico_, i. 5. 28). This was the treatment which the arch-heretic
Manichaeus is said to have received at the hands of the Persian king
whose son he failed to cure (Socrates, _Historia Ecclesiastica_, i.
22; Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, lxvii. 137, 139). Still such a
punishment may have been suggested by a religious rite. The idea of
crucifying their human victims appears to have been suggested to the
negroes of Benin by the crucifixes of the early Portuguese
missionaries. See H. Ling Roth, _Great Benin_ (Halifax, 1903), pp.
14 _sq._
890 W. H. Furness, _Home-Life of Borneo Head-Hunters_ (Philadelphia,
1902), p. 59. According to Messrs. Hose and McDougall, the spirits
which animate the skulls appear not to be those of the persons from
whose shoulders the heads were taken. However, the spirits (called
_Toh_) reside in or about the heads, and “it is held that in some
way their presence in the house brings prosperity to it, especially
in the form of good crops; and so essential to the welfare of the
house are the heads held to be that, if through fire a house has
lost its heads and has no occasion for war, the people will beg a
head, or even a fragment of one, from some friendly house, and will
instal it in their own with the usual ceremonies.” See Ch. Hose and
W. McDougall, _The Pagan Tribes of Borneo_ (London, 1912), ii. 20,
23.
891 Spenser St. John, _Life in the Forests of the Far East_2 (London,
1863), i. 197.
892 Hugh Low, _Sarawak_ (London, 1848), pp. 206 _sq._ In quoting this
passage I have taken the liberty to correct a grammatical slip.
893 Spenser St. John, _op. cit._ i. 204. See further G. A. Wilken, “Iets
over de schedelvereering,” _Bijdragen tot de Taal- Land- en
Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië_, xxxviii. (1889) pp. 89-129;
_id._, _Verspreide Geschriften_ (The Hague, 1912), iv. 37-81. A
different view of the purpose of head-hunting is maintained by Mr.
A. C. Kruyt, in his essay, “Het koppensnellen der Toradja’s van
Midden-Celebes, en zijne Beteekenis,” _Verslagen en Mededeelingen
der koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen_, Afdeeling Letterkunde,
Vierde Reeks, iii. 2 (Amsterdam, 1899), pp. 147 _sqq._
The natives of Nias, an island to the west of Sumatra, think it
necessary to obtain the heads of their enemies for the purpose of
celebrating the final obsequies of a dead chief. Their notion seems
to be that the ghost of the deceased ruler demands this sacrifice in
his honour, and will punish the omission of it by sending sickness
or other misfortunes on the survivors. Thus among these people the
custom of head-hunting is based on their belief in human immortality
and on their conception of the exacting demands which the dead make
upon the living. When the skulls have been presented to a dead
chief, the priest prays to him for his blessing on the sowing and
harvesting of the rice, on the fruitfulness of women, and so forth.
See C. Fries, “Das ‘Koppensnellen’ auf Nias,” _Allgemeine
Missions-Zeitschrift_, February, 1908, pp. 73-88. From this account
it would seem that it is not the spirits of the slain men, but the
ghost of the dead chief from whom the blessings of fertility and so
forth are supposed to emanate. Compare Th. C. Rappard, “Het eiland
Nias en zijne bewoners,” _Bijdragen tot de Taal- Land- en
Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië_, lxii. (1909) pp. 609-611.
M216 The stuffed skin of the human representative of the Phrygian god may
have been used for like purposes.
_ 894 Spirits of the Corn and of the Wild_, ii. 4-7.
_ 895 Spirits of the Corn and of the Wild_, ii. 169 _sqq._
M217 Popularity of the worship of Cybele and Attis in the Roman Empire.
896 H. Dessau, _Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae_, Nos. 4099, 4100, 4103,
4105, 4106, 4116, 4117, 4119, 4120, 4121, 4123, 4124, 4127, 4128,
4131, 4136, 4139, 4140, 4142, 4156, 4163, 4167; H. Hepding, _Attis_,
pp. 85, 86, 93, 94, 95, Inscr. Nos. 21-24, 26, 50, 51, 52, 61, 62,
63. See further, J. Toutain, _Les Cultes Païens dans l’Empire
Romain_ (Paris, 1911), pp. 73 _sqq._, 103 _sqq._
897 S. Dill, _Roman Society in the Last Century of the Western Empire_2
(London, 1899), p. 16.
898 Augustine, _De civitate Dei_, vii. 26.
899 But the two were publicly worshipped at Dyme and Patrae in Achaia
(Pausanias, vii. 17. 9, vii. 20. 3), and there was an association
for their worship at Piraeus. See P. Foucart, _Des Associations
Religieuses chez les Grecs_ (Paris, 1873), pp. 85 _sqq._, 196; Ch.
Michel, _Recueil d’Inscriptions Grecques_, p. 772, No. 982.
900 Rapp, _s.v._ “Kybele,” in W. H. Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und
röm. Mythologie_, ii. 1656.
901 As to the savage theory of inspiration or possession by a deity see
(Sir) Edward B. Tylor, _Primitive Culture_,2 ii. 131 _sqq._ As to
the savage theory of a new birth see _Balder the Beautiful_, ii. 251
_sqq._ As to the use of blood to wash away sins see _The Magic Art
and the Evolution of Kings_, ii. 107 _sqq._; _Psyche’s Task_, Second
Edition, pp. 44 _sq._, 47 _sqq._, 116 _sq._ Among the Cameroon
negroes accidental homicide can be expiated by the blood of an
animal. The relations of the slayer and of the slain assemble. An
animal is killed and every person present is smeared with its blood
on his face and breast. They think that the guilt of manslaughter is
thus atoned for, and that no punishment will overtake the homicide.
See Missionary Autenrieth, “Zur Religion der Kamerun-Neger,” in
_Mitteilungen der geographischen Gesellschaft zu Jena_, xii. (1893)
pp. 93 _sq._ In Car Nicobar a man possessed by devils is cleansed of
them by being rubbed all over with pig’s blood and beaten with
leaves. The devils are thus transferred to the leaves, which are
thrown into the sea before daybreak. See V. Solomon, “Extracts from
diaries kept in Car Nicobar,” in _Journal of the Anthropological
Institute_, xxxii. (1902) p. 227. Similarly the ancient Greeks
purified a homicide by means of pig’s blood and laurel leaves. See
my note on Pausanias, ii. 31. 8 (vol. iii. pp. 276-279). The
original idea of thus purging a manslayer was probably to rid him of
the angry ghost of his victim, just as in Car Nicobar a man is rid
of devils in the same manner. The purgative virtue ascribed to the
blood in these ceremonies may be based on the notion that the
offended spirit accepts it as a substitute for the blood of the
guilty person. This was the view of C. Meiners (_Geschichte der
Religionen_, Hanover, 1806-1807, ii. 137 _sq._) and of E. Rohde
(_Psyche_,3 Tübingen and Leipsic, 1903, ii. 77 _sq._).
902 A good instance of such an attempt to dress up savagery in the garb
of philosophy is the fifth speech of the emperor Julian, “On the
Mother of the Gods” (pp. 206 _sqq._ ed. F. C. Hertlein, Leipsic,
1875-1876).
M218 The spread of Oriental faiths over the Roman Empire contributed to
undermine the fabric of Greek and Roman civilization by inculcating
the salvation of the individual soul as the supreme aim of life.
903 As to the diffusion of Oriental religions in the Roman Empire see G.
Boissier, _La Religion Romaine d’Auguste aux Antonins_5 (Paris,
1900), i. 349 _sqq._; J. Reville, _La Religion à Rome sous les
Sévères_ (Paris, 1886), pp. 47 _sqq._; S. Dill, _Roman Society in
the Last Century of the Western Empire_2 (London, 1899), pp. 76
_sqq._
904 Compare Servius on Virgil, _Aen._ ii. 604, vi. 661; Origen, _Contra
Celsum_, viii. 73 (Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, xi. 1628); G.
Boissier, _La Religion Romaine d’Auguste aux Antonins_5 (Paris,
1900), i. 357 _sq._; E. Westermarck, _The Origin and Development of
the Moral Ideas_ (London, 1906-1908), i. 345 _sq._; H. H. Milman,
_History of Latin Christianity_,4 i. 150-153, ii. 90. In the passage
just cited Origen tells us that the Christians refused to follow the
Emperor to the field of battle even when he ordered them to do so;
but he adds that they gave the emperor the benefit of their prayers
and thus did him more real service than if they had fought for him
with the sword. On the decline of the civic virtues under the
influence of Christian asceticism see W. E. H. Lecky, _History of
European Morals from Augustus to Charlemagne_3 (London, 1877), ii.
139 _sqq._
905 To prevent misapprehension I will add that the spread of Oriental
religions was only one of many causes which contributed to the
downfall of ancient civilization. Among these contributory causes a
friend, for whose judgment and learning I entertain the highest
respect, counts bad government and a ruinous fiscal system, two of
the most powerful agents to blast the prosperity of nations, as may
be seen in our own day by the blight which has struck the Turkish
empire. It is probable, too, as my friend thinks, that the rapid
diffusion of alien faiths was as much an effect as a cause of
widespread intellectual decay. Such unwholesome growths could hardly
have fastened upon the Graeco-Roman mind in the days of its full
vigour. We may remember the energy with which the Roman Government
combated the first outbreak of the Bacchic plague (Th. Mommsen,
_Roman History_, iii. 115 _sq._, ed. 1894). The disastrous effects
of Roman financial oppression on the industries and population of
the empire, particularly of Greece, are described by George Finlay
(_Greece under the Romans_,2 Edinburgh and London, 1857, pp. 47
_sqq._).
M219 Popularity of the worship of Mithra; its resemblance to Christianity
and its rivalry with that religion. The festival of Christmas
borrowed by the Church from the religion of Mithra.
906 See Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments figurés relatifs aux Mystères
de Mithra_ (Brussels, 1896-1899); _id._, _s.v._ “Mithras,” in W. H.
Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, ii. 3028 _sqq._
Compare _id._, _Les Religions Orientales dans le Paganisme Romain_2
(Paris, 1909), pp. 207 _sqq._
907 Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments_, i. 333 _sqq._
908 E. Renan, _Marc-Aurèle et la Fin du Monde Antique_ (Paris, 1882),
pp. 576 _sqq._; Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments_, i. 339 _sqq._
909 Tertullian, _De corona_, 15; _id._, _De praescriptione
haereticorum_, 40; Justin Martyr, _Apologia_, i. 66; _id._,
_Dialogus cum Tryphone_, 78 (Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, vi. 429,
660). Tertullian explained in like manner the resemblance of the
fasts of Isis and Cybele to the fasts of Christianity (_De jejunio_,
16). Justin Martyr thought that by listening to the words of the
inspired prophets the devils discovered the divine intentions and
anticipated them by a series of profane and blasphemous imitations.
Among these travesties of Christian truth he enumerates the death,
resurrection, and ascension of Dionysus, the virgin birth of
Perseus, and Bellerophon mounted on Pegasus, whom he regards as a
parody of Christ riding on an ass. See Justin Martyr, _Apology_, i.
54.
910 J. de Acosta, _Natural and Moral History of the Indies_, translated
by E. Grimston (London, 1880), bk. v. chs. 11, 16, 17, 18, 24-28,
vol. ii. pp. 324 _sq._, 334 _sqq._, 356 _sqq._
911 Compare S. Dill, _Roman Society in the Last Century of the Western
Empire_2 (London, 1899), pp. 80 _sqq._; _id._, _Roman Society from
Nero to Marcus Aurelius_ (London, 1904), pp. 619 _sqq._
912 E. Renan, _Marc-Aurèle et la Fin du Monde Antique_ (Paris, 1882),
pp. 579 _sq._; Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments_, i. 338.
913 Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xviii. 221; Columella, _De re rustica_, ix. 14.
12; L. Ideler, _Handbuch der mathematischen und technischen
Chronologie_ (Berlin, 1825-1826), ii. 124; G. F. Unger, in Iwan
Müller’s _Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft_, i.1
(Nördlingen, 1886) p. 649.
914 In the calendar of Philocalus the twenty-fifth of December is marked
_N. Invicti_, that is, _Natalis Solis Invicti_. See _Corpus
Inscriptionum Latinarum_, i.2 Pars prior (Berlin, 1893), p. 278,
with Th. Mommsen’s commentary, pp. 338 _sq._
915 Cosmas Hierosolymitanus, _Commentarii in Sancti Gregorii Nazianzeni
Carmina_ (Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, xxxviii. 464): ταύτην
[Christmas] ἧγον ἔκπαλαι δὲ τὴν ἡμέραν ἑορτὴν Ἔλληνες, καθ᾽ ἤν
ἐτελοῦντο κατὰ τὸ μεσονύκτιον, ἐν ἀδύτοις τισὶν ὑπεισερχόμενοι, ὄθεν
ἐξιόντες ἔκραζον: “Ἡ παρθένος ἕτεκεν, αὔξει φῶς.” ταύτην Ἐπιφάνιος ὁ
μέγας τῆς Κυπρίων ἱερεύς φησι τὴν ἑορτὴν καὶ Σαῤῥακηνούς ἄγειν
τῇπαρ᾽ αὐτῶν σεβομένῃ Ἀφροδίτῃ, ἤν δὴ Χαμαρᾶ τῇ αὐτῶν προσαγορεύουσι
γλώττῃ. The passage is quoted, with some verbal variations, by Ch.
Aug. Lobeck, _Aglaophamus_ (Königsberg, 1829), ii. 1227 note 2. See
Franz Cumont, “Le Natalis Invicti,” _Comptes Rendus de l’Académie
des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 1911_ (Paris, 1911), pp.
292-298, whose learned elucidations I follow in the text. That the
festival of the Nativity of the Sun was similarly celebrated in
Egypt may be inferred from a Greek calendar drawn up by the
astrologer Antiochus in Lower Egypt at the end of the second or the
beginning of the third century A.D.; for under the 25th December the
calendar has the entry, “Birthday of the Sun, the light waxes”
(Ἡλίου γενέθλιον; αὔξει φῶς). See F. Cumont, _op. cit._ p. 294.
916 Macrobius, _Saturnalia_, i. 18. 10.
917 F. Cumont, _s.v._ “Caelestis,” in Pauly-Wissowa’s _Real-Encyclopädie
der classischen Altertumswissenschaft_, v. i. 1247 _sqq._ She was
called the Queen of Heaven (Jeremiah vii. 18, xliv. 18), the
Heavenly Goddess (Herodotus, iii. 8; Pausanias, i. 14. 7), or the
Heavenly Virgin (Tertullian, _Apologeticus_, 23; Augustine, _De
civitate Dei_, ii. 4). The Greeks spoke of her as the Heavenly
Aphrodite (Herodotus, i. 105; Pausanias, i. 14. 7). A Greek
inscription found in Delos contains a dedication to Astarte
Aphrodite; and another found in the same island couples Palestinian
Astarte and Heavenly Aphrodite. See G. Dittenberger, _Sylloge
Inscriptionum Graecorum_,2 vol. ii. pp. 619 _sq._, No. 764; R. A.
Stewart Macalister, _The Philistines, their History and
Civilization_ (London, 1913), p. 94.
918 Dedications to Mithra the Unconquered Sun (_Soli invicto Mithrae_)
have been found in abundance. See Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments_,
ii. 99 _sqq._ As to the worship of the Unconquered Sun (_Sol
Invictus_) see H. Usener, _Das Weihnachtsfest_2 (Bonn, 1911), pp.
348 _sqq._
919 Fr. Cumont, _op. cit._ i. 325 _sq._, 339.
920 J. Bingham, _The Antiquities of the Christian Church_, bk. xx. ch.
iv. (Bingham’s _Works_, vol. vii. pp. 279 _sqq._, Oxford, 1855); C.
A. Credner, “De natalitiorum Christi origine,” _Zeitschrift für die
historische Theologie_, iii. 2 (1833), pp. 236 _sqq._; Mgr. L.
Duchesne, _Origines du Culte Chrétien_3 (Paris, 1903), pp. 257
_sqq._; Th. Mommsen, in _Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, i.2 Pars
prior, p. 338. The earliest mention of the festival of Christmas is
in the calendar of Philocalus, which was drawn up at Rome in 336
A.D. The words are _VIII. kal. jan._, _natus Christus in Betleem
Judee_ (L. Duchesne, _op. cit._ p. 258).
M220 Motives for the institution of Christmas.
921 Quoted by C. A. Credner, _op. cit._ p. 239, note 46; by Th. Mommsen,
_Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, i.2 Pars prior, pp. 338 _sq._; and
by H. Usener, _Das Weihnachtsfest_2 (Bonn, 1911), pp. 349 _sq._
922 Augustine, _Serm._ cxc. 1 (Migne’s _Patrologia Latina_, xxxviii.
1007).
923 Leo the Great, _Serm._ xxii. (_al._ xxi.) 6 (Migne’s _Patrologia
Latina_, liv. 198). Compare St. Ambrose, _Serm._ vi. 1 (Migne’s
_Patrologia Latina_, xvii. 614).
M221 The Easter celebration of the death and resurrection of Christ
appears to have been assimilated to the celebration of the death and
resurrection of Attis, which was held at Rome at the same season.
Heathen festivals displaced by Christian.
924 A. Credner, _op. cit._ pp. 236 _sqq._; E. B. Tylor, _Primitive
Culture_,2 ii. 297 _sq._; Fr. Cumont, _Textes et Monuments_, i. 342,
355 _sq._; Th. Mommsen, in _Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, i.2
Pars prior, pp. 338 _sq._; H. Usener, _Das Weihnachtsfest_2 (Bonn,
1911), pp. 348 _sqq._ A different explanation of Christmas has been
put forward by Mgr. Duchesne. He shows that among the early
Christians the death of Christ was commonly supposed to have fallen
on the twenty-fifth of March, that day having been “chosen
arbitrarily, or rather suggested by its coincidence with the
official equinox of spring.” It would be natural to assume that
Christ had lived an exact number of years on earth, and therefore
that his incarnation as well as his death took place on the
twenty-fifth of March. In point of fact the Church has placed the
Annunciation and with it the beginning of his mother’s pregnancy on
that very day. If that were so, his birth would in the course of
nature have occurred nine months later, that is, on the twenty-fifth
of December. Thus on Mgr. Duchesne’s theory the date of the Nativity
was obtained by inference from the date of the Crucifixion, which in
its turn was chosen because it coincided with the official equinox
of spring. Mgr. Duchesne does not notice the coincidence of the
vernal equinox with the festival of Attis. See his work, _Origines
du Culte Chrétien_3 (Paris, 1903), pp. 261-265, 272. The tradition
that both the conception and the death of Christ fell on the
twenty-fifth of March is mentioned and apparently accepted by
Augustine (_De Trinitate_, iv. 9, Migne’s _Patrologia Latina_, xlii.
894).
925 See above, pp. 253 _sqq._
926 However, the lament for Adonis is mentioned by Ovid (_Ars Amat._ i.
75 _sq._) along with the Jewish observance of the Sabbath.
927 See above, pp. 268 _sqq._
928 Columella, _De re rustica_, ix. 14. 1; Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xviii.
246; Macrobius, _Saturn._ i. 21. 10; L. Ideler, _Handbuch der
mathematischen und technischen Chronologie_, ii. 124.
929 Mgr. L. Duchesne, _Origines du Culte Chrétien_,3 pp. 262 _sq._ That
Christ was crucified on the twenty-fifth of March in the year 29 is
expressly affirmed by Tertullian (_Adversus Judaeos_, 8, vol. ii. p.
719, ed. F. Oehler), Hippolytus (_Commentary on Daniel_, iv. 23,
vol. i. p. 242, ed. Bonwetsch and Achelis), and Augustine (_De
civitate Dei_, xviii. 54; _id._, _De Trinitate_, iv. 9). See also
_Thesaurus Linguae Latinae_, iv. (Leipsic, 1906- 1909) col. 1222,
_s.v._ “Crucimissio”: “_POL. SILV.__ fast. Mart 25 aequinoctium.
principium veris. crucimissio gentilium. Christus passus hoc die._”
From this last testimony we learn that there was a gentile as well
as a Christian crucifixion at the spring equinox. The gentile
crucifixion was probably the affixing of the effigy of Attis to the
tree, though at Rome that ceremony appears to have taken place on
the twenty-second rather than on the twenty-fifth of March. See
above, p. 267. The Quartodecimans of Phrygia celebrated the
twenty-fifth of March as the day of Christ’s death, quoting as their
authority certain acts of Pilate; in Cappadocia the adherents of
this sect were divided between the twenty-fifth of March and the
fourteenth of the moon. See Epiphanius, _Adversus Haeres._ l. 1
(vol. ii. p. 447, ed. G. Dindorf; Migne’s _Patrologia Graeca_, xli.
884 _sq._). In Gaul the death and resurrection of Christ were
regularly celebrated on the twenty-fifth and twenty-seventh of March
as late as the sixth century. See Gregory of Tours, _Historia
Francorum_, viii. 31. 6 (Migne’s _Patrologia Latina_, lxxi. 566); S.
Martinus Dumiensis (bishop of Braga), _De Pascha_, 1 (Migne’s
_Patrologia Latina_, lxxii. 50), who says: “_A plerisque Gallicanis
episcopis usque ante non multum tempus custoditum est, ut semper
VIII. Kal. April. diem Paschae celebrent, in quo facta Christi
resurrectio traditur._” According to this last testimony, it was the
resurrection, not the crucifixion, of Christ that was celebrated on
the twenty-fifth of March; but Mgr. Duchesne attributes the
statement to a mistake of the writer. With regard to the Roman
practice the twenty-fifth and twenty-seventh of March are marked in
ancient Martyrologies as the dates of the Crucifixion and
Resurrection. See _Vetustius Occidentalis Ecclesiae Martyrologium_,
ed. Franciscus Maria Florentinus (Lucca, 1667), pp. 396 _sq._, 405
_sq._ On this subject Mgr. Duchesne observes: “Hippolytus, in his
Paschal Table, marks the Passion of Christ in a year in which the
fourteenth of Nisan falls on Friday twenty-fifth March. In his
commentary on Daniel he expressly indicates Friday the twenty-fifth
of March and the consulship of the two Gemini. The Philocalien
Catalogue of the Popes gives the same date as to day and year. It is
to be noted that the cycle of Hippolytus and the Philocalien
Catalogue are derived from official documents, and may be cited as
evidence of the Roman ecclesiastical usage” (_Origines du Culte
Chrétien_,3 p. 262).
930 Mgr. L. Duchesne, _op. cit._ p. 263.
931 Mgr. L. Duchesne, _l.c._ A sect of the Montanists held that the
world began and that the sun and moon were created at the spring
equinox, which, however, they dated on the twenty-fourth of March
(Sozomenus, _Historia Ecclesiastica_, vii. 18). At Henen-Su in Egypt
there was celebrated a festival of the “hanging out of the heavens,”
that is, the supposed reconstituting of the heavens each year in the
spring (E. A. Wallis Budge, _The Gods of the Egyptians_, ii. 63).
But the Egyptians thought that the creation of the world took place
at the rising of Sirius (Porphyry, _De antro nympharum_, 24;
Solinus, xxxii. 13), which in antiquity fell on the twentieth of
July (L. Ideler, _Handbuch der mathematischen und technischen
Chronologie_, i. 127 _sqq._).
932 See above, pp. 263, 281 _sqq._
_ 933 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, ii. 324 _sqq._
934 Above, pp. 246 _sqq._
_ 935 The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings_, i. 14 _sqq._
936 See below, vol. ii. pp. 81 _sqq._
937 Above, pp. 302 _sqq._
938 Another instance of the substitution of a Christian for a pagan
festival may be mentioned. On the first of August the people of
Alexandria used to commemorate the defeat of Mark Antony by Augustus
and the entrance of the victor into their city. The heathen pomp of
the festival offended Eudoxia, wife of Theodosius the Younger, and
she decreed that on that day the Alexandrians should thenceforth
celebrate the deliverance of St. Peter from prison instead of the
deliverance of their city from the yoke of Antony and Cleopatra. See
L. Ideler, _Handbuch der mathematischen und technischen
Chronologie_, i. 154.
M222 Coincidence between the pagan and the Christian festivals of the
divine death and resurrection.
939 Lactantius, _De mortibus persecutorum_, 2; _id._, _Divin. Institut._
iv. 10. 18. As to the evidence of the Gallic usage see S. Martinus
Dumiensis, quoted above, p. 307 note.
M223 Different theories by which pagans and Christians explained the
coincidence.
940 The passage occurs in the 84th of the _Quaestiones Veteris et Novi
Testamenti_ (Migne’s _Patrologia Latina_, xxxv. 2279), which are
printed in the works of Augustine, though internal evidence is said
to shew that they cannot be by that Father, and that they were
written three hundred years after the destruction of Jerusalem. The
writer’s words are as follows: “_Diabolus autem, qui est satanas, ut
fallaciae suae auctoritatem aliquam possit adhibere, et mendacia sua
commentitia veritate colorare, primo mense quo sacramenta dominica
scit celebranda, quia non mediocris potentiae est, Paganis quae
observarent instituit mysteria, ut animas eorum duabus ex causis in
errore detineret: ut quia praevenit veritatem fallacia, melius
quiddam fallacia videretur, quasi antiquitate praejudicans veritati.
Et quia in primo mense, in quo aequinoctium habent Romani, sicut et
nos, ea ipsa observatio ab his custoditur; ita etiam per sanguinem
dicant expiationem fieri, sicut et nos per crucem: hac versutia
Paganos detinet in errore, ut putent veritatem nostram imitationem
potius videri quam veritatem, quasi per aemulationem superstitione
quadam inventam. Nec enim verum potest, inquiunt, aestimari quod
postea est inventum. Sed quia apud nos pro certo veritas est, et ab
initio haec est, virtutum atque prodigiorum signa perhibent
testimonium, ut, teste virtute, diaboli improbitas innotescat._” I
have to thank my learned friend Professor Franz Cumont for pointing
out this passage to me. He had previously indicated and discussed it
(“La Polémique de l’Ambrosiaster contre les Païens,” _Revue
d’Histoire et de Littérature religieuses_, viii. (1903) pp. 419
_sqq._). Though the name of Attis is not mentioned in the passage, I
agree with Prof. Cumont in holding that the bloody expiatory rites
at the spring equinox, to which the writer refers, can only be those
of the Day of Blood which formed part of the great aequinoctial
festival of Attis. Compare F. Cumont, _Les Religions Orientales dans
le Paganisme Romain_2 (Paris, 1909), pp. 106 _sq._, 333 _sq._
M224 Compromise of Christianity with paganism. Parallel with Buddhism.
941 On the decadence of Buddhism and its gradual assimilation to those
popular Oriental superstitions against which it was at first
directed, see Monier Williams, _Buddhism_2 (London, 1890), pp. 147
_sqq._
942 The historical reality both of Buddha and of Christ has sometimes
been doubted or denied. It would be just as reasonable to question
the historical existence of Alexander the Great and Charlemagne on
account of the legends which have gathered round them. The great
religious movements which have stirred humanity to its depths and
altered the beliefs of nations spring ultimately from the conscious
and deliberate efforts of extraordinary minds, not from the blind
unconscious co-operation of the multitude. The attempt to explain
history without the influence of great men may flatter the vanity of
the vulgar, but it will find no favour with the philosophic
historian.
M225 The Greek Hyacinth interpreted as the vegetation which blooms and
withers away.
943 G. F. Schömann, _Griechische Alterthümer_4 (Berlin, 1897-1902), ii.
473; L. Preller, _Griechische Mythologie_, i.4 (Berlin, 1894) pp.
248 _sq._; Greve, _s.v._ “Hyakinthos,” in W. H. Roscher’s _Lexikon
der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, i. 2763 _sq._ Other views of
Hyacinth have been expressed by G. F. Welcker (_Griechische
Götterlehre_, Göttingen, 1857-1862, i. 472), G. F. Unger (“Der
Isthmientag und die Hyakinthien,” _Philologus_, xxxvii. (1877) pp.
20 _sqq._), E. Rohde (_Psyche_,3 i. 137 _sqq._) and S. Wide
(_Lakonische Kulte_, Leipsic, 1893, p. 290).
944 Apollodorus, _Bibliotheca_, i. 3. 3, iii. 10. 3; Nicander, _Ther._
901 _sqq._, with the Scholiast’s note; Lucian, _De saltatione_, 45;
Pausanias, iii. 1. 3, iii. 19. 5; J. Tzetzes, _Chiliades_, i. 241
_sqq._; Ovid, _Metam._ x. 161-219; Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xxi. 66.
945 Theophrastus, _Histor. Plant._ vi. 8. 1 _sq._ That the hyacinth was
a spring flower is plainly indicated also by Philostratus (_Imag._
i. 23. 1) and Ovid (_Metam._ x. 162-166). See further Greve, _s.v._
“Hyakinthos,” in W. H. Roscher’s _Lexikon der griech. und röm.
Mythologie_, i. 2764; J. Murr, _Die Pflanzenwelt in der griechischen
Mythologie_ (Innsbruck, 1890), pp. 257 _sqq._; O. Schrader,
_Reallexikon der Indogermanischen Altertumskunde_ (Strasburg, 1901),
pp. 383 _sq._ Miss J. E. Harrison was so kind as to present me with
two specimens of the flower (_Delphinium Ajacis_) on which the woful
letters were plainly visible. A flower similarly marked, of a colour
between white and red, was associated with the death of Ajax
(Pausanias, i. 35. 4). But usually the two flowers were thought to
be the same (Ovid, _Metam._ xiii. 394 _sqq._; Scholiast on
Theocritus, x. 28; Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ xxi. 66; Eustathius on Homer,
_Iliad_, ii. 557, p. 285).
946 Xenophon, _Hellenica_, iv. 5. 7-17; Pausanias, iii. 10. 1.
M226 The tomb and the festival of Hyacinth at Amyclae.
947 Pausanias, iii. 1. 3, iii. 19. 1-5.
948 Hesychius, _s.v._ Ἑκατομβεύς; G. F. Unger in _Philologus_, xxxvii.
(1877) pp. 13-33; Greve, _s.v._ “Hyakinthos,” in W. H. Roscher’s
_Lexikon der griech. und röm. Mythologie_, i. 2762; W. Smith,
_Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities_,3 i. 339. From Xenophon
(_Hellenica_, iv. 5) we learn that in 390 B.C. the Hyacinthian
followed soon after the Isthmian festival, which that year fell in
spring. Others, however, identifying Hecatombeus with the Attic
month Hecatombaeon, would place the Hyacinthia in July (K. O.
Müller, _Dorier_,2 Breslau, 1844, i. 358). In Rhodes, Cos, and other
Greek states there was a month called Hyacinthius, which probably
took its name from the Hyacinthian festival. The month is thought to
correspond to the Athenian Scirophorion and therefore to June. See
E. Bischof, “De fastis Graecorum antiquioribus,” _Leipziger Studien
für classische Philologie_, vii. (1884) pp. 369 _sq._, 381, 384,
410, 414 _sq._; G. Dittenberger, _Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum_,2
vol. i. pp. 396, 607, Nos. 614, note 3, 744, note 1. If this latter
identification of the month is correct, it would furnish an argument
for dating the Spartan festival of Hyacinth in June also. The
question is too intricate to be discussed here.
949 Athenaeus, iv. 17, pp. 139 _sq._ Strabo speaks (vi. 3. 2, p. 278) of
a contest at the Hyacinthian festival. It may have been the chariot
races mentioned by Athenaeus.
950 Hesychius, _s.v._ Πολύβοια.
M227 Hyacinth an aboriginal god, perhaps a king, who was worshipped in
Laconia before the invasion of the Dorians. His sister Polyboea may
perhaps have been his spouse.
951 E. Rohde, _Psyche_,3 i. 137 _sqq._
952 Pausanias, iii. 19. 3. The Greek word here used for sacrifice
(ἐναγίζειν) properly denotes sacrifices offered to the heroic or
worshipful dead; another word (θύειν) was employed for sacrifices
offered to gods. The two terms are distinguished by Pausanias here
and elsewhere (ii. 10. 1, ii. 11. 7). Compare Herodotus, ii. 44.
Sacrifices to the worshipful dead were often annual. See Pausanias,
iii. 1. 8, vii. 19. 10, vii. 20. 9, viii. 14. 11, viii. 41. 1, ix.
38. 5, x. 24. 6. It has been observed by E. Rehde (_Psyche_,3 i.
139, note 2) that sacrifices were frequently offered to a hero
before a god, and he suggests with much probability that in these
cases the worship of the hero was older than that of the deity.
953 Pausanias, iii. 19. 14.
954 See above, p. 44; and below, vol. ii. pp. 213 _sqq._