Mme. Jeritza is not only the foremost feminine personality in grand

opera in America today, but by her concert tours she has become known

throughout the United States. Her _Sunlight and Song_ is a book pretty

certain to interest everyone who has heard her—or heard of her. It is

written with directness, in a thoroughly popular vein, and is utterly

free from affectations or pose. An Austrian by birth, she sang in Olmütz

while in her teens, living on the hope of an engagement in Vienna. At

length she came to the capital and waited her turn in the trying-out

of voices. She was engaged for the municipal opera and afterward for

the Court Opera House. Her rôles from operas by Richard Strauss and

Puccini were rehearsed under the personal direction of the composers;

she met Caruso and dozens of other musical celebrities; she sang before

and met the Emperor; and in 1921 she came to America. One of the most

interesting bits of her book concerns a rehearsal of “Tosca” at which

she slipped and fell. She sang “Vissi d’arte” where she lay, exciting

Puccini’s enthusiasm. He exclaimed that always he had needed something

to make the aria stand out and command attention; and this did it! When

it was announced that Jeritza was to sing in “Tosca” in New York, there

was a noticeable wave of hostility from those who associated the rôle

exclusively with Geraldine Farrar. It vanished after she had appeared.

Among the photographs with which Jeritza’s book is illustrated are many

extremely beautiful pictures of the singer in her various rôles. The

chapters on “How an Opera Singer Really Lives,” “Studying with Sembrich,”

“Singing for the Phonograph,” and “Some Guest Performances” will

especially repay students of the voice.

The book by Mrs. Keyes, wife of the United States Senator from New

Hampshire, is in a class by itself. _Letters from a Senator’s Wife_

consists entirely of actual letters written to old friends who were some

distance away from Washington and who had a full feminine curiosity about

life there. Taken as they stand, Mrs. Keyes’s letters form a pretty

complete record of social and political life in the capital as seen

from the inner official circle. Beginning with her first impressions of

Washington, Mrs. Keyes goes on to describe the Harding inauguration, the

burial of the Unknown Soldier, the arms conference, the agricultural

conference in 1922 and the industrial conference in 1923; the dedication

of the Lincoln Memorial; the presentation of a gram of radium to Madame

Curie; the diplomatic and New Year’s receptions at the White House; the

convention of women’s organizations at which Lady Astor was conspicuous;

dinners, teas, an afternoon cruise as Mrs. Harding’s guest on the

Mayflower and social affairs innumerable.

The result is a picture of Washington exactly as a woman in Mrs. Keyes’s

place would be privileged to see it; women readers will have a sense of

participating in the things described. It is, I should say, exclusively a

woman’s book; but no one who appreciates the average woman’s enjoyment of

social detail will underestimate what Mrs. Keyes has accomplished. But in

addition to telling the reader what she would have to do, whom she would

meet, and what functions she would attend if she were in the Washington

circle, the book does really constitute an attractive record of current

history in the making and as made. Women who read it can scarcely fail to

become more intelligent than before.

v

Fortunately Maurice Francis Egan, one of the most beloved of Americans,

lived to complete for us his _Recollections of a Happy Life_. The author

of _Everybody’s St. Francis_, _Ten Years Near the German Frontier_,

_Confessions of a Book-Lover_ and other volumes had a scroll of memories

which began in Philadelphia in the 1850s and which included political

and social Washington in the Civil War period. In _Recollections of a

Happy Life_ the New York of the Henry George era is touched in with

delightful anecdotes of Richard Watson Gilder and the group that

surrounded him; there is a crisp picture of Indiana where Dr. Egan was

professor of English at Notre Dame; and the book fairly launches itself

with a full record of life in Washington and of the author’s close

association with Presidents McKinley, Roosevelt, Taft and Wilson, under

the last three of whom Dr. Egan held the post of Minister to Denmark.

Scholar, poet, critic, and most winning of companions, Dr. Egan’s

autobiography reflects a good deal of America in the past half-century as

well as his own varied experiences here and abroad.

Of even more definitely literary interest is _C. K. S. An Autobiography_,

by Clement K. Shorter. An indefatigable book collector whose library is

rich in first editions, original manuscripts, and autograph letters, Mr.

Shorter is probably best known as an editor and dramatic critic. He has

had thirty years in each rôle, and still writes weekly causeries which

carry, on occasion, a provocative sting. George Meredith, Stevenson,

Andrew Lang, Thomas Hardy, and Gissing each are the subject of a chapter

founded primarily on personal impressions of the man.

Such personal impressions, mixed with estimates of the writer’s work,

form the substance of _The Literary Spotlight_, edited, with an

introduction, by John Farrar, editor of The Bookman. These anonymous

literary portraits have been aptly called “Mirrors of Literature.”

The anonymity has made possible a great deal of frankness, humor, and

penetration worth having, and Mr. Farrar has added bibliographies,

biographical facts and such data as make the volume handy for reference.

Edna Ferber, Sinclair Lewis, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Floyd Dell, Mary

Johnston, Edwin Arlington Robinson and others of high contemporary

interest are presented.

THE TRUTH AT LAST!

_Robert Louis Stevenson: A Critical Biography_, by John A. Steuart.

Two volumes. This new biography, by an English writer, will throw much

new light on Stevenson. From unpublished documents in Edinburgh and

elsewhere, and from several people who knew Stevenson, Mr. Steuart has

obtained facts never before printed—so the portrait he draws is somewhat

different from those which have already appeared. This biography will

be of much interest to the many admirers of Stevenson’s work who are

not afraid to see the man as he actually was in his strength and his

weakness, his gaiety and his gloom. Photogravure frontispieces.

_The Truth at Last_, by Charles Hawtrey, edited, with an introduction,

by W. Somerset Maugham. The amusing, frankly self-revealing memoirs of

a famous English actor, well remembered in America for his tours in “A

Message from Mars” and “The Man from Blankley’s.” Illustrated.

_Forty Years in Washington_, by David S. Barry. Reminiscences of

Presidents, Cabinet members, Senators and Congressmen, by the

Sergeant-at-Arms of the Senate, who was Washington correspondent of The

Sun, New York, when Charles A. Dana was its editor. Illustrated.

_The Life of Olive Schreiner_, by S. C. Cronwright-Schreiner. The

biography, by her husband, of the brilliant author of _Dreams_ and _The

Story of an African Farm_, a woman of extraordinary personality who was

not only a writer of genius but a pioneer advocate of woman’s freedom.

Illustrated.

_Remembered Yesterdays_, by Robert Underwood Johnson. Mr. Johnson’s

reminiscences are unusually entertaining and novel, and their diversity

is exceptional. As a stripling he went to New York to join the staff

of Scribner’s Monthly, afterward known as the Century Magazine, with

which he was connected for forty years, as associate editor and as

editor-in-chief. Highly interesting are his touch-and-go reminiscences of

famous Americans and foreign visitors, his anecdotes of travel abroad,

and the account of his service as Ambassador to Italy in Wilson’s second

term. The portraits of American men of letters from the Civil War to the

present are vividly drawn. No recent volume of American recollections

keeps the reader in a more tolerant and gracious atmosphere. Illustrated.

_Three Generations_, by Maud Howe Elliott. A charming book of

reminiscences by the daughter of Julia Ward Howe, covering the life and

events of the past six decades. After her marriage to John Elliott, the

artist, she lived for long periods in Rome, and to her salon came hosts

of travelers and world-famous celebrities. It is a volume of memoirs of

international interest and a fascinating account of the most interesting

people in the world, in literature, art, drama, diplomacy and society,

covering sixty years of “glorious life.” Illustrated.

_Poincaré: The Man of the Ruhr_, by Sisley Huddleston. Raymond Poincaré,

twice French Prime Minister and wartime President of the French Republic,

has been the storm center of Continental politics in connection with

the French occupation of the Ruhr. The author gives a vivid account of

his career, his strength and his limitations, brightly written, with a

considerable spice of wit. Frontispiece.

_A Woman’s Quest: The Life of Marie E. Zakrzewska, M.D._, edited by

Agnes C. Vietor. The story of a woman whose courage and perseverance

probably did more than was accomplished by any other single person to

open the medical profession to women. Dr. Zakrzewska was born in 1829,

of Polish-German ancestry, and came to America when she was twenty-four.

She had already, in Germany, made her way against bitter and unceasing

opposition; in America she was to find herself without any standing at

all. After a period of struggle she met Dr. Elizabeth Blackwell who gave

her encouragement and in the face of every imaginable difficulty, Marie

Zakrzewska studied medicine at Cleveland. She was refused admission

at Harvard, but met Emerson, William Lloyd Garrison, Theodore Parker

and other noted men and women. Eventually she founded the New England

Hospital for Women and Children. Her autobiography is of profound

interest and considerable historical importance.

_The Life of Anne Boleyn_, by Philip W. Sergeant. A full and carefully

documented biography of the mother of Queen Elizabeth, written with charm

of style and sincerity, and constituting a vindication of Anne. Its view

of her is therefore exactly antithetical to the one advanced in the first

essay in _Post Mortem: Essays, Historical and Medical_, by C. MacLaurin.

_Robert Owen_, by Frank Podmore. The incomparable story of the shop boy

who became a rich and famous inventor of machines that revolutionized

the cotton mills, a mill owner, and a business builder—but whose eager

spirit caused him to found an Utopia in America, to work for labor

betterment and world peace, to question religious creeds and to become

a spiritualist. Few lives show so well the industrial and intellectual

transformation that went on in the nineteenth century.

_The Truth About My Father_, by Count Leon L. Tolstoi. By the one son

who sympathized with his father to the extent of accepting his doctrines

and endeavoring to work them out. The author says that his mother was

the source of his father’s greatest happiness and the real author of

his greatness; in old age, a will, secretly made under the influence of

Tchertkoff, came between the parents (more as a matter of deceit than of

the alienation of property).

_The Manuscript of St. Helena_, translated by Willard Parker. This is the

document mentioned in Napoleon’s will. He disavowed it as his work. It

must, however, have been inspired if not dictated by him. It reads like

a private diary, telling of Napoleon’s life and achievements in a terse,

clear style and showing him as he saw and judged himself. The document

was published in French in 1817 but has never before been translated into

English.

_The Letters of Madame, 1661-1708_, by Elizabeth-Charlotte of Bavaria,

edited and translated by Gertrude Scott Stevenson. “Madame” was the usual

way of referring to Elizabeth-Charlotte, Princess Palatine, a sturdy,

outspoken German girl who, at nineteen, was married to Philippe, Duc

d’Orleans, only brother of Louis XIV. of France. Philippe was thirty-one,

effeminate, extravagant, and debauched; suspected of complicity in the

supposed poisoning of his first wife. “Madame” was the most prodigious

letter writer of an age fond of correspondence, a keen observer, and

much franker than most others dared to be. Her letters are not only a

great source for historians but breath-taking reading in themselves. The

picture of the court of Louis XIV. is unmatched except in the pages of

Saint-Simon.

_David Wilmot, Free Soiler_, by Charles Buxton Going. At last we have an

adequate account of the author of the Wilmot Proviso, offered in 1846 and

barring slavery in territory acquired from Mexico—the chief political

issue from then to the Civil War, and the chief instrument in creating

the Republican Party. Lincoln wrote that he had voted for the Wilmot

Proviso more than forty times while he was in Congress, and on becoming

President he offered Wilmot a place in his Cabinet.

_Servant of Sahibs_, by Ghulam Rassul Galwan, with an introduction by Sir

Francis Younghusband. Written in quaint English by a man who accompanied

Younghusband and who has worked for many years in the service of English

and American travelers in the Himalayas, Central Asia, and Tibet. An

adventurous and novel book which will delight everyone who cares for

Kipling’s fiction or for tales of India.

_Nell Gwyn_, by Lewis Melville. Her career from orange girl to King’s

favorite; her youthful troubles, her lovers, her stage success, her

rivals in royal favor, her vast popularity and later years in Pall Mall.

Illustrated in color.

13. That Literary Wanderer, E. V. Lucas

i

For a man whose air is so leisurely—whose literary air, that is, gives

every aspect of leisure—Edward Verrall Lucas has written a perplexingly

large number of books. Perhaps he is the living witness of the efficacy

of making haste slowly. If one were a murderer, for example, one would do

well to move away without haste (circumstances at all permitting) from

the scene of his crime. How often is haste, or even the appearance of

haste, fatal! In the unchanging words of the changing Fire Commissioners

of the City of New York, in case of murder, walk, do not run, to the

nearest exit.

Mr. Lucas’s murder was committed at the outset of his career and he

has been traveling from it by easy stages ever since. After close on

thirty years, the dark moment may be said to be below the horizon. But

in his literary youth he called in and slew his first book, a volume of

poems. And although the number and variety of his books since is such

that he has had to put them, for the reader’s guidance, under eight

classifications, he has still to give us a book of his own verse.

What, then, has he given us? What not were more quickly answered. His ten

novels, being of a special character, he very fittingly designates as

ENTERTAINMENTS, his thirteen volumes of ESSAYS slightly outnumber his

books in any other class; he has compiled eight ANTHOLOGIES and written

eight BOOKS FOR CHILDREN; has four collections of SELECTED WRITINGS,

two EDITED WORKS and five works of BIOGRAPHY to his account; and is the

author of seven books of TRAVEL, the well-known “Wanderer” series. The

most scholarly of his fifty-seven books—total as above—is _The Life of

Charles Lamb_, which is definitive. The most popular must be _A Wanderer

in London_ and _More Wanderings in London_, unless it be his first

published book of all, the anthology called _The Open Road_, put forth in

1899 and republished in England and America in 1923. The most amusing—?

There could be no agreement, though it is possible that later a majority

might decide upon his newest novel, _Advisory Ben_.

(Something is wrong with the reckoning. For the total of fifty-seven

and the eight classes do not contain the little treatise on _Vermeer of

Delft_, with its charming reproductions of paintings by Vermeer. There

is, besides, no way at hand of accounting for at least fifty-seven more

books in which Mr. Lucas has had some hand[64]—as, for one instance,

the English edition of Christopher Morley’s _Chimneysmoke_, where Lucas

provided the striking preface. However!)

Very evidently the work of E. V. Lucas must be examined in categories

and by considering one or two examples under several of the heads; and

then, perhaps, the glimpse of his personality afforded us may be lit from

within as well as without. It will perhaps clear the ground if we point

out in preliminary that Mr. Lucas is one of the editors of Punch and has

for long been a publisher’s reader and adviser for the English publishing

firm of Methuen & Company, Ltd.—a house of much distinction. He has done

much journalistic work. As would be inferred from _Vermeer of Delft_, he

is something of a connoisseur of painting, and as will be shown he is

much more distinctly a connoisseur of literary curiosities.

ii

In providing his “entertainments,” as he terms his novels, Mr. Lucas has

had in mind a structure always consistent, always graceful, generally

amusing but of very real strength. His fictions may be compared to

trellises set up with care to support as a rule no more serious burden

than rambler roses or some other innocent vine. But it has occasionally

happened that the trellis has been climbed upon by a plant of more

rugged growth and heavier weight, and the trellis has never failed to

sustain the spreading story. It might be apter to say that the plant has

sometimes put forth an unexpected flower—instead of the unpretending

rambler blossom a rose more disdainful—and still the frame has seemed

eminently in keeping with the whole design. For there is this about such

brightly elaborated, cheerfully artificial story structures: like the

trellis they are never concealed, though completely hid, their outline or

form remains exposed to every eye; yet both the eye and the mind receive

them naturally. The truth is, of course, that their absence or apparent

absence would throw us off. A climbing vine unsupported and unformed, its

tendrils thrown about distractedly and frozen in mid-air, would freeze

us with repulsion. And an ingenious, expanding, flowering tale without

its evident slight pretexts, its amiable excuse of ingenuity, would be an

equal monstrosity. Even artifice may be an art.

Characteristic is the device employed by Mr. Lucas in his most recent

book of this sort, _Advisory Ben_. Benita Stavely is an attractive girl

who struggles with cooks and other domestic matters until her father

remarries, when she finds herself free to select an occupation. She

starts an advisory bureau to assist harassed householders. The Beck

and Call, as her office is styled, soon justifies Ben’s venture by its

popularity. It is approached through a bookshop below and to it come

all manner of persons for counsel as to dogs, cooks, birthday presents

and matrimony. The bookshop is kept by two young men. Ben’s crowning

performance before she says “Yes” to one of the young men in the bookshop

is the finding and furnishing in three weeks of a large house for a rich

American. Now there are present in this engaging novel the two requisites

of Mr. Lucas’s art as a fictioner: first, the amiable pretext or excuse

for the tale, the slight but bright invention, which is of course the

notion of The Beck and Call itself, and second, the strength, erectile,

tensile and otherwise in the elaborated structure. For although the

scheme of the story is slender and the design of a gay simplicity, the

situations developed by Ben’s venture sometimes enable the author to

touch considerable depths of human feeling. But the airy scheme, the

graceful trellis, does not break. I do not mean that no strength is due

to the character portrayal; much is due to it. Obviously, if Ben were a

flitter-brain, if Mr. Lucas could give her no depth of feeling or not

enough personal sincerity, his story would crash. But Ben without The

Beck and Call would be Ben without opportunities to enable us to realize

her quality. An idea is at the bottom of all.

The same virtue of idea or scheme is the technical triumph of _The

Vermilion Box_, in which Mr. Lucas uses the familiar red letter box of

England as his device. He says, secretly, Open Sesame, and the mail box

opens to give us a series of letters between friends, acquaintances,

lovers, relatives who are all entangled in the web of the World War.

“Through these documents we meet the boy who will falsify his age, so

eager is he to serve his country; the ‘slacker’ who is eager to serve his

country by staying at home and drawing a salary for being secretary to a

league to enforce economy—but finds the office routine very irksome to

his artistic spirit. We meet the unoccupied clubman who has nothing to

do but listen to rumors of spies in the Cabinet and disaffection in the

field—and who writes of his discoveries to the papers; the old ladies who

work and save, and who wait for war office telegrams telling the fate of

the sons they have given to England. And then we meet the young English

officer who, jokingly, ran an advertisement asking women to correspond

with him: who realized the bad taste of his joke when a bereaved mother

sent him the letter she had partly written to her soldier son when the

news of his death came, but who thanked the fates for his folly when it

brought the acquaintance of Portia Grey.... But this is much more than a

love tale told in letters; behind that and behind the often occurring and

charming humor of the book there is a seriously conceived and accurately

painted picture of public opinion and feeling. A correspondent has been

telling of a clergyman friend who has enlisted as a combatant, but who

intends to resume his clerical duties after the war is over. The writer

has composed some verses satirizing the view that Christianity is

something thus to be put off or on, as circumstances dictate:

“‘Three or four men to whom I have shown these verses have complimented

me on the effort which they make to get at the truth. But none of these

men would sign a document calling for a close time for the creeds until

the war is over, or suggesting that our archbishops were not at the

moment earning their not inconsiderable salaries. That is one of the odd

things about England—that private conscience and the public conscience

are so different. In France a typical private individual’s view of things

is, when multiplied indefinitely, also the view of the State. Not so

here, where as individuals we practice or subscribe to many liberties

which would not be good for the general public.’”[65]

iii

_Verena in the Midst_ also employed effectively the device of

interchanged letters to develop the tale, and surely not even the

expedient of The Beck and Call in _Advisory Ben_ is more well-conceived

than the tale of the adventures of Uncle Cavanagh in giving away his

wife’s property (_Genevra’s Money_). There are bits about the Barbizon

school of painting and there is a surprising deal about religious

concepts in _Genevra’s Money_, but I have yet to hear it said that this

informative and speculative matter obtrudes itself or overweights the

book. It dwells comfortably alongside the high comedy of Uncle Giles

(whose sole intellectual accomplishment is the verdict, general and

specific, upon persons he doesn’t understand: “He’s a nasty feller”)

because Mr. Lucas had the courage, not of his convictions but of his

ingenuity.

That he has convictions can scarcely be doubted by the careful reader;

the nature of them can scarcely be missed by the thoughtful one. They

may now and then be stated more plainly in his books of essays, for

the nature of the essay exacts that, but they cannot be put with more

poignancy. In the excellent Introduction to his _Essays of To-Day: An

Anthology_, (itself a worthy essay), Mr. F. H. Pritchard reminds us of

Montaigne’s instruction that an essay must be “consubstantial” with its

author, of Mr. Gosse’s dictum that its style must be “confidential,” and

adds—what is true and striking—that the lyric and the essay are both “the

most intimate revelations of personality that we have in literature.”

He adds: “The difference, indeed, is one of temperature.”[66] But the

material, or at least its base, is identical.

Cargoes for Crusoes · 第 13 / 28 段