CHAPTER XII.

THE MARMOSETS AND TAMARINS.[107]

The Dentition of the Genus Hapale, or the Marmosets, or

Ouistitis--The Face--The Paw-like Hands and Feet--Their Claws--The

Skull and Brain, and the Nature of the Diet--THE COMMON

MARMOSET--Its Habits--THE CLOAKED MARMOSET--THE GENUS MIDAS--THE

TAMARINS--Their Dentition--THE NEGRO TAMARIN--Its Habits--MIDAS

ARGENTATUM--DEVILLE’S MIDAS--THE SILKY TAMARIN--Notes on the

Arctopithecini in general.

The second division of the Monkeys of the New World is characterised

by there bring thirty-two teeth, and the tail is not prehensile. It is

generally termed that of the Marmosets, or in scientific language, the

Arctopithecini, a word which means Bear-Monkey. There are two genera

in this division: the first is that of the Marmosets proper, or genus

Hapale; and the second is that of the Tamarins, or genus Midas.

THE MARMOSETS, OR OUISTITIS.[108]

In this genus the thirty-two teeth are so arranged that instead of

there being three back teeth, or true molars, on the side of each

jaw, they have only two. But there are false molars placed in front

of these two crushing molars, and this has a direct relation to the

insectivorous diet of the animal. The outer edge of these false molars

has one sharp point, admirably adapted to pierce a hard-coated Beetle,

or to smash up a grub. The incisor, or front teeth, differ in the two

genera. They are long (especially the lower ones), narrow, and are

curved outwards, and they stick out forwards from the jaw in the genus

Hapale. Those of the Tamarins are short and broad, the lower ones being

stuck out and close together. The lower canine teeth of the Hapale, or

Ouistitis, are very small, and those of the other genus are larger.

The face of the Marmoset is short, and the broad division between the

nostrils, which open widely apart and outwards, is very evident. Very

remarkable are the feet, for in these Monkeys the toe-thumb is not

widely separated from the other digits, but is close to and parallel

with them, so that they resemble the human foot more than the human

hand. The insectivorous and carnivorous propensities of these little

creatures are shown in the form of their nails, which are claws. They

are curved, compressed from side to side, and sharp, except that of

the great toe, which is broad. In the hand the thumb is not capable of

being separated widely from the other fingers, and it has a sharp claw

on it, so the resemblance to a true hand is small, and the likeness to

a “paw” is great; and to conclude this part of the subject, the soles

are much longer than the toes. Hence, with paws and long feet with

claws, these little creatures, which have been termed Hapale--from

ἁπαλός (soft, gentle)--are not unlike Bears in their extremities, and

have been called Bear-Monkeys, or _Arctopithecini_. The intelligence

of these Monkeys is certainly not very great, hence the examination of

their brain is sure to be interesting, for one would expect that it

could not be like that of the intelligent Cebus, or even that of the

Spider Monkey. The mouth appears to be large, and it really has a wide

gape.

[Illustration: 1. HAND-BONES OF MARMOSET.

2. FOOT-BONES OF MARMOSET.]

First, then, the skull is remarkable for the relative size of the

brain-case, and the back part projects far behind. The outside of the

skull is smooth and rounded, and the brow-ridges are very slight, the

orbits being large. Inside, and accommodating itself to this long head,

is a very long brain, whose back part projects past the cerebellum.

But this is not all the unusual part of it, for instead of there

being convolutions, or packings-in of the surface of the brain, it

is almost smooth, the great fissures being alone marked. Here, then,

is the lowest form of brain yet noticed in the Quadrumana, and it

approaches to the form seen in the lower animals. What the great back

part of the brain-case means is hardly yet known, but if it refers to

the affections it will render the story told by Broderip all the more

valuable. He says that a lady kept two of these Marmosets, and that she

was impressed with their great affection for each other. “They had no

family, but they were very happy, and were all in all to each other.

One of them unfortunately died. The other seemed to be unwilling to

believe the change that had taken place, and continued to caress the

body, until it became absolutely necessary to remove it. Everything

was done to console the widow that its fond and distressed mistress

could think of, but as soon as its mate was taken away the poor widowed

creature pressed its little hands to its eyes, refused to be comforted,

and remained pining in that attitude till death relieved it of its

sufferings.”

The teeth and claws indicate a carnivorous or insectivorous diet in

these Monkeys, and the brain does not deny it, and many anecdotes

may be told of their love of something alive. Every one may see the

Marmosets at the Zoological Gardens making usually very successful

dashes at flies with their fingers, and enjoying their tiny prey; and

there is little doubt that the following story is true:--One of them,

which was kept by the “Sage Femme” of the Royal Family about a hundred

years since, took a great fancy to fish, and made a dash at a Goldfish

he saw swimming round and round in its globe. He caught it, and ate it,

so the lady observing his fondness for something lively gave him an

Eel, and as the little Monkey was not more than eight or nine inches in

length without his tail, this lively gift frightened him at first by

twisting round his body and neck; but he soon killed it, and enjoyed

the treat.

THE COMMON MARMOSET.[109]

These little, gentle, pretty creatures, usually so readily tamed, are

made great pets of, and attract much attention in all collections of

animals, and one kind has been often brought from the tropical woods of

the Brazils and kept in England, so that its habits during captivity

have been watched from birth until death in adult age. Many years

since F. Cuvier had some of the common Marmosets born whilst under his

care, and he watched them and their parents well. The young ones had

their eyes open on coming into the world, and their skins were covered

with very smooth hair of a deep grey colour, but which was scarcely

perceptible on the tail. They instantly crept into their mother’s

nice warm fur, and clung on with their little hands and feet, and

they attracted the intense admiration and curiosity of the father and

mother, who were in the same cage. There were three little ones, and

the mother indeed did not know what to do with them. Broderip suggests

that what followed was because the lady Ouistiti had no experienced

female friend to direct her in her first confinement. At any rate,

the mother seized the first by the head, and proceeded to bite this

important part of the body off, and, luckily for the other two, whilst

she was thus finishing off her offspring, they managed to get to her

breasts, and to begin to suck. From that moment she bestowed upon

them the natural attention of a parent, and became all affection. The

father was even more affectionate than the mother, and assisted most

assiduously in the nursing department. The favourite position of the

young ones was upon the back and bosom of the mother, and when she

was tired of nursing she would come up to her mate with a shrill cry,

which Broderip writes said as plainly as any one could speak, “Here,

do take the children!” He immediately stretched forth his hands, and

placed the little ones on his back, or under his body, where they held

on whilst he carried them about, and amused them. At last they used

to get hungry, and whined for their mother, who took them, and after

having nursed them returned them to their “papa.” In fact, the father

did all the hard work, and the mother merely fed them. In this instance

this domestic happiness was cut short, for the mother was weakly, no

wet-nurse was to be had, and the little ones sank and died. In their

native state they lead an arboreal life, and assemble in groups of

six or seven, climbing up the tallest trees, and jumping from bough

to bough, showing the greatest activity, like and greater than that

of Squirrels. So rapidly do they move from branch to branch, and from

tree to tree, that the eye fails to follow them readily. They are

recognised at once by their long tuft of whitish hair, which sticks out

from the side of the head, and almost hides the ears. The size of the

whole animal is about that of a small Squirrel, and the tail is very

long, bushy, and prettily marked with alternate rings of ash-colour

and of black fur. The head is small, the eyes are gentle-looking, and

the nose is flat, the face being black. The fur of the body is darkish

brown, with different shades of colour for each hair, which is dusky at

its root, reddish in the middle, and grey at the tip. There are very

different stories told regarding their intelligence and affection. Some

naturalists assert that they are incapable of affection towards man,

even to the hand that feeds them. Swainson says “it mistrusts all,

and treats as indifferently those whom one would think it well knew

and those who are strangers; neither does it show much intelligence,

although it is attentive, and suspicious of everything that is passing.

When under the influence of fear it strives to conceal itself, uttering

a short but piercing cry; at other times it hisses.” The name Ouistiti

has been given to this Monkey, and the Portuguese of the Amazon

districts called it the Sanglain, whilst Europeans term it a Marmoset.

THE CLOAKED MARMOSET.[110]

The word “humerale” is to be translated a part of the harness on the

shoulders, or a graduate’s cloak, according to an old Latin dictionary,

and thus far a fit name has been given to a little Monkey thus noticed

by Mr. Bates in his work on the Amazons:--

“I saw in the woods on one occasion a small flock of Monkeys. They

belonged to a very pretty and rare species, a kind of Marmoset, I think

the _Hapale humeralifer_ described by Geoffroy St. Hilaire. I did not

succeed in obtaining a specimen, but saw a living example afterwards in

the possession of a shopkeeper, at Santarem. It seems to occur nowhere

else except in the dry woods bordering the campos in the interior

parts of Brazil. The colours of its fur are beautifully varied; the

fore part of the body is white, with the hands grey; the hind part

black, with the rump and underside deadish-tawny; the tail is banded

with grey and black. Its face is partly naked, and flesh-coloured, and

the ears are fringed with long hairs. The specimen was not more than

eight inches in length, exclusive of the tail. Altogether I thought it

the prettiest species of its family I had yet seen. One would mistake

it at first sight for a kitten, from its small size, varied colours,

and the softness of its fur. It was a most timid creature, screaming

and biting when any one attempted to handle it. It became familiar,

however, with the people of the house a few days after it came into

their possession. When hungry or uneasy it uttered a weak, querulous

cry, a shrill note, which was sometimes prolonged so as to resemble the

stridulation of a Grasshopper.”

THE TAMARINS.[111]

The Tamarins have the upper front teeth placed close together; and

the lower, which are broad and truncated, project forwards. The lower

canines are longer and larger than in the Marmosets. Living in the

forests of the Isthmus of Panama, Peru, and of the Brazils, they

sometimes collect in troops. They are very restless, active, and

probably indulge in a very mixed diet of fruit, eggs, insects, and

small birds. The smaller they are the more violent are they in their

gesticulations and rage. They appear, when annoyed, bristling up their

hair in a very fierce manner. They are, however, easily tamed, and are

made great pets of by the natives.

THE NEGRO TAMARIN.[112]

Bates gives some interesting details regarding the little Midas, or

Tamarin Monkeys, which he saw during his long residence on the Amazons.

He writes:--

“They are small in size, and more like Squirrels than true Monkeys in

their manner of climbing. The nails, except those of the hind thumbs,

are long and claw-shaped, like those of Squirrels, and the thumbs

of the fore extremities, or hands, are not opposable to the other

fingers. I do not mean to convey that they have a near relationship to

Squirrels, which belong to the Rodents, an inferior order of Mammals;

their resemblance to those animals is merely a superficial one. The

body is long and slender, clothed with soft hair, and the tail,

which is nearly twice the length of the trunk, is not prehensile.

The hind limbs are much larger in volume than the anterior pair. The

_Midas ursulus_ is never seen in large flocks; three or four is the

greatest number observed together. It seems to be less afraid of the

neighbourhood of man than any other Monkey. I sometimes saw it in

the woods which border the suburban streets, and once I espied two

individuals in a thicket behind the English Consul’s house at Nazareth.

Its mode of progression along the main boughs of the lofty trees is

like that of the Squirrels; it does not ascend to the slender branches,

or take wonderful flying leaps like those Monkeys whose prehensile

tails and flexible hands fit them for such headlong travelling. It

confines itself to the larger boughs and trunks of trees, the long

nails being of great assistance to the creature, enabling it to cling

securely to the bark, and it is often seen passing rapidly round the

perpendicular cylindrical trunks. It is a quick, restless, timid little

creature, and has a great share of curiosity, for when a person passes

by under the trees along which a flock is running, they always stop for

a few moments to have a stare at the intruder. In Para, the _Ursulus_

is often seen in a tame state in the houses of the inhabitants. When

full grown it is about nine inches long, independently of the tail,

which measures fifteen inches. The fur is thick, and black in colour,

with the exception of a reddish-brown streak down the middle of the

back. When first taken, or when kept tied up, it is very timid and

irritable. It will not allow itself to be approached, but keeps

retreating backwards in a querulous humour, uttering a twittering,

complaining noise, its dark, watchful eyes, expressive of distrust,

observant of every movement which takes place near it. When treated

kindly, however, as it generally is in the houses of the natives,

it becomes very tame and familiar. I once saw one as playful as a

kitten, running about the house after the negro children, who fondled

it to their hearts’ content. It acted somewhat differently towards

strangers, and seemed not to like them to sit on the hammock which was

slung in the room, leaping up, trying to bite, and otherwise annoying

them. It is generally fed on sweet fruits, such as the banana,

but it is also fond of insects, especially soft-bodied Spiders and

Grasshoppers, which it will snap up with eagerness when within reach.

The expression of countenance in these small Monkeys is intelligent

and pleasing. This is partly owing to the open facial angle which is

given as one of 60°; but the quick movements of the head, and the way

they have of inclining it on one side when their curiosity is excited,

contribute very much to give them a knowing expression. Anatomists

who have dissected species of Midas tell us that the brain is of a

very low type, from there being few convolutions, the surface being as

smooth as that of a Squirrel’s. I should conclude, at once, that this

character is an unsafe guide in judging on the mental qualities of

these animals. In mobility of expression of countenance, intelligence,

and general manners, these small Monkeys resemble the higher Apes far

more than they do any rodent animal with which I am acquainted. On the

Upper Amazon I once saw a tame individual of the _Midas leoninus_, a

species first described by Humboldt, which was still more playful and

intelligent than the one just described. This rare and beautiful little

Monkey is only seven inches in length, exclusive of the tail. It is

named _leoninus_ on account of the long brown mane which depends from

the neck, and which gives it very much the appearance of a diminutive

Lion. In the house where it was kept it was familiar with every one;

its greatest pleasure seemed to be to climb about the bodies of

different persons who entered. The first time I went in it ran across

the room straightway to the chair on which I sat down, and climbed up

to my shoulder. Arrived there it turned round and looked into my face,

showing its little teeth, and chattering, as though it would say,

‘Well, and how do you do?’ It showed more affection towards its master

than towards strangers, and would climb up to his head a dozen times

in the course of an hour, making a great show every time of searching

there for certain animalculæ. Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire relates of a

species of this genus, that it distinguished between different objects

depicted on an engraving. M. Audouin showed it the portraits of a Cat

and a Wasp. At these it became much terrified; whereas, at the sight

of a figure of a Grasshopper or Beetle, it precipitated itself on the

picture, as if to seize the objects there represented.“

MIDAS ARGENTATUM.

Bates is the authority for the following short notice of this pretty

Monkey:--“The little Tamarin is one of the rarest of the American

Monkeys. I have not heard of its being found anywhere except near

Cameta. I once saw three individuals together running along a branch

in a cacao grove near Cameta. They looked like white kittens. In their

motions they resembled precisely the _Midas ursulus_ already described.

I saw afterwards a pet animal of this species, and heard that there

were many so kept, and that they were esteemed as choice treasures.

The one I saw was full-grown, but it measured only seven inches in

length of body. It was covered with long white silky hairs, the tail

was blackish, and the flesh nearly naked and flesh-coloured. It was a

most timid and sensitive little thing. The woman who owned it carried

it constantly in her bosom, and no money would induce her to part with

her pet. She called it ‘Mico.’ It fed from her mouth, and allowed her

to fondle it freely, but the nervous little creature would not permit

strangers to touch it. If any one attempted to do so it shrank back,

the whole body trembling with fear, and its teeth chattered, whilst it

uttered its tremulous frightened tones. The expression of its features

was like that of its more robust brother, the _ursulus_; the eyes,

which were black, were full of curiosity and mistrust, and it always

kept them fixed on the person who attempted to advance towards it.”

DEVILLE’S MIDAS.[113]

[Illustration: DEVILLE’S MIDAS. (From the _Proceedings of the

Zoological Society_.)]

This pretty Monkey is plentiful everywhere on the Peruvian Amazons, but

is extremely delicate in constitution. It will not bear the least cold,

and it is kept with great difficulty. The Indian women make great pets

of them, and put them into the long hair on their heads. They are thus

kept warm, and are not without interesting occupation. Having become

tame they frequently hop out of their odd home and feed, or having

captured a Spider or two, scamper back and hide under the luxuriant

crop of their owners, who are generally unwilling to part with them.

THE SILKY TAMARIN.[114]

This is one of the prettiest of the Tamarins, and has long silky fur

and soft yellow hair. This is arranged like a mane around the neck

and face, near to which its tint is redder than usual, and, to make

a contrast, the face itself, and also the hands and feet, are dark

purple. The beauty of the hair is very striking, and when the sun

shines upon it there is a great display of colour, and a rich gloss

over all. Like all the Tamarins, it has a tail about the same length as

the body, which is not prehensile, but it is in this instance tufted at

the end. The habits are pretty evident when the sharp, claw-like nails

are examined. They are admirably adapted for seizing and killing small

birds and insects, as well as for assisting the hands to hold fruit.

[Illustration: SKULL OF MARMOSET.]

In the Brazilian forests they assemble in small parties, and,

like the other Marmosets, bound from tree to tree, and keep up a

great chattering and whistling, and they cry out with alarm, and

soon disperse on the appearance of man within their usual haunts.

This fondness for being high up in the woods is carried into their

captivity, where they prefer having their little nest up at the top of

the cage. In descending from this favourite spot they usually climb

down backwards, the tail hanging down. They do not try to stand erect,

and, indeed, the position is not natural to them.

They like to be caressed and fondled, but they give no such return, and

they know those who are kind to them. They dislike strangers usually,

and hiss at them. They are very delicate in Europe, as they require a

constant high temperature. Cuvier states that these Monkeys have an air

sac in the throat, resembling in situation that of the Spider Monkey

(_Ateles paniscus_).

The Arctopithecini, as a group, have a smooth and rounded skull, large

orbits, small brow-ridges, and a large brain-case. The skull is large

behind, and the opening for the spinal cord (foramen magnum) is at the

junction of the hind third with the two fore thirds of the length of

the brain. They have numerous vertebræ in their back-bone, and those

in the back and loins number usually nineteen. It is stated by Cuvier

that there is an air sac in the neck of the _Midas ursulus_, which

communicates with the organ of voice through a space between two of its

cartilages. It appears that the hands and feet of the Marmosets have

thumbs and toe-thumbs so slightly separable from the fingers and toes

that the resemblance to “feet” is decided. This is increased by the

fact that the thumbs have claws on them, and the toe-thumb is the only

digit with a flat nail, all the rest having claw-like ones. The thumb

is really not opposable, but nevertheless the muscles are there to give

it movement; the opponens muscle of the thumb is doubtfully present,

but the adductors, abductor, and long and short flexors are all there.

There is much union of the deeper muscles of the fingers, indicating

less independence of movement. In the foot the toe-thumb has no special

abductor, and the transversus pedis is absent.

Cassell's Natural History, Vol. 1 (of 6) · 第 13 / 21 章