"And I said: '_Sprichst du Deutsch?_' very loud as we passed," was

Donoghue's story. "And he answered as loud as he could: '_Nichts!

Nichts!_' And I said: '_Zwei Bier_,' and of course the Americans took us

for Germans. Then we hid in the shadows a little further on and we both

yelled together at the top of our voices, 'Three cheers for Cleveland!'

and the Americans jumped, and they forgot the moon, and they wouldn't

listen to the guide, and I tell you it was just great."

I was not overcome myself with the wit or humour of the jest, but

Donoghue was, and he roared with laughter until none of us could help

roaring with him in sheer sympathy. He was as enchanted with his method

of learning Italian. He was reading Wilkie Collins and Bret Harte in an

Italian translation, and when he yawned in our faces and left the _café_

early, it was because the night before the Dago's _Woman in White_ or

_Luck of Roaring Camp_ had kept him up until long after dawn, though

really he knew it was a waste of time since anybody had only to get

himself half seas over and he'd talk any darned lingo in the world.

He joined us less often after he gave up the hopeless hunt for the model

who never was found and whom it would have been useless anyway to find,

for Donoghue always spent his quarter's allowance the day he got it, and

most models could not wait three months to be paid. To this conclusion

he came soon after the first of the year and settled down seriously to

posing for himself and, as the world knows, the Young Sophocles was

finished in the course of time and a very fine statue it is said to be.

But even if he did desert our table he would still seem to me in memory

the centre of the little group gathered about it, had it not been for

Forepaugh.

Of course his name was not Forepaugh--though something very like it--but

Forepaugh answers my every purpose. For though I did know his name I did

not know then, and I do not know now, who he was and why he was. I do

not think anybody ever knew anything about him except that he was

Forepaugh, which meant, according to his own reckoning, the most

wonderful person on earth. He was one of the sort of men whose habit is

to turn up wherever you may happen to be, in whatever part of the world,

with no apparent reason for being there except to talk to you,--the last

time we met was in a remote corner of Kensington Gardens in London,

where he took up the talk just where we had left off at the _Nazionale_

in Rome--and as it is years since he has turned up anywhere to talk to

us, I fear he has joined the Philadelphia Architect and Donoghue where

he will talk no more.

In sheer physical power of speech he was without a rival and none

surpassed him in appreciation of his eloquence. His interest never

flagged so long as he held the floor, though when we wanted him to

listen to us, he did not attempt to conceal his indifference. We could

not tell him anything, for there was nothing about which he did not know

more than we could hope to. He, at any rate, had no doubt of his own

omniscience. Judging from the intimate details with which he regaled us,

he was equally in the confidence of the Vatican and the Quirinal,

equally at home with the Blacks and the Whites. The secrets of the Roman

aristocracy were his, he was the first to hear the scandals of the

foreign colony. The opera depended upon his patronage and balls

languished without him, though I could never understand how or why, so

rarely did he leave us to enjoy them. Every archæologist, every scholar,

every historian in Rome appealed to him for help, and as for art, it was

folly for others to pretend to speak of it in his presence. He called

himself an artist and for a time he used to go with J. to Gigi's, the

life school where artists then in Rome often went of an afternoon to

draw from the model. But J. never saw him there with as much as a scrap

of paper or a pencil in his hands, and nobody ever saw him at work

anywhere. For what he did not do he made up by telling us of what he

might do. His were the pictures unpainted which, like the songs unsung,

are always the best. He condescended to approve of the Old Masters,

assured that the masterpieces he might choose to produce must rank with

theirs, but he never forgot the great gulf fixed between himself and the

Modern Masters, whose pictures were worthy of his approval only when he

had been their inspiration. It was fortunate for American Art that

scarcely an American artist could be named whom Forepaugh had not

inspired. And if he praised Abbey and Millet more than most, it was

because he had posed for both and could answer for it that Millet's

porch, or studio, or dining-room, which had had the honour of serving as

his background, was as true as the figure of himself set against it.

Like all talkers who know too much, Forepaugh had, what Carlyle called,

a terrible faculty for developing into a bore. Some of our little group

would run when they saw him at the door, others took malicious pleasure

in interrupting him and suddenly changing the conversation in the hope

to catch him tripping. But out of all such tests he came triumphantly. I

never thought him more wonderful than the evening when somebody abruptly

began to talk about Theosophy in the middle of one of his confidences

about the Italian Court. It was no use. Without stopping to take breath,

at once Forepaugh began to tell us the most marvellous theosophical

adventures, which he knew not by hearsay, but because he had passed

through them himself. We might express an opinion: he stated facts. And

it seemed that he had no more intimate friend than Sinnett, and that to

Sinnett he had confessed his scepticism, asking for a sign, a

manifestation, and that one afternoon when they were smoking over their

coffee and cognac after lunch in Sinnett's chambers, then on the third

floor of a house near the Oxford Street end of Bond Street--Forepaugh

was carefully exact in his details--Sinnett smiled mysteriously but said

nothing except to warn him to hold on tight to the table. And up rose

the table, with the litter of coffee cups, cigars, and cognac, up rose

the two chairs, one at either end with Sinnett and Forepaugh sitting on

them, and away they floated out of the open window--it was a June

afternoon--and along Bond Street, above the carriages and the hansoms

and omnibuses and the people as far as Piccadilly, and round the lamp

post by Egyptian Hall, up Bond Street again, and in at the window. "Hold

on," said Sinnett, and "I never held on to anything as tight in my life

as I did to that table," said Forepaugh in conclusion.

He always reminded me of the man who so annoyed my Uncle, Charles

Godfrey Leland, by always knowing, doing, or having everything better or

bigger than anybody else. "Why, if I were to tell him I had an elephant

in my back yard," my Uncle used to say, "he would at once invite me to

see the mastodon in his." Forepaugh had a mastodon up his sleeve for

everybody else's elephant.

V

[Illustration: By Courtesy of Houghton Mifflin Company

ELIHU VEDDER]

If Forepaugh gave us a great deal of information we had no possible use

for and talked us to despair, he was really a good fellow whom we should

have missed from our table. And it was through him J. and I were first

made welcome in that one house open to us, to which I have been all this

time in coming. For it was Forepaugh who told Vedder we were in Rome,

and Vedder, once he knew it, would not hear of our shutting his door

in our own faces, nor would Mrs. Vedder, whatever the condition of our

wardrobe.

Vedder may have revealed many things in his recent _Digressions_, but

not the extent of the hospitality he and his wife showed to the American

who was a stranger in Rome, where, even then, they had been long at

home. Mrs. Vedder carried her amiability to the point of climbing our

six flights of stairs and calling on me in the rooms that suited us

admirably for our work but were less adapted to afternoon receptions,

and she would have gone further and shown me how to adapt them by moving

every bit of furniture from where it was and arranging it all over

again. Not the least part of her friendliness was not to mind when I did

not fall in with her plans, as I couldn't, since so long as the sun

shone in at the windows all was right with the rooms as far as I could

see. I was in the absurd stage of industry when I did not care where my

Roman furniture stood so long as my Roman tasks got done. Even our

_padrona_ told me her surprise that, foreigner as I was, I seemed to do

as much work as she did, which I accepted as a compliment. After that

first attempt Mrs. Vedder did not return to climb our six flights, but

she would not let us off from climbing her four or five.

Often as we took advantage of their hospitality, we never found the

Vedders alone and, chiefly American as was the group at their fireside,

it was never without a foreigner or two. The first person we were

introduced to on the first visit was the Englishman who would have

deserted us in the _Ghetto_ had we let him have his way, and who, when

he saw us, looked as if he wished the Vedders had learned to be less

indiscriminate in their hospitality. We had the satisfaction of knowing

that we made him supremely uncomfortable. He frowned upon us then as he

continued to all through the winter. He could not forgive us for having

found him out and was evidently afraid we were going to tell everybody

about it. He was something very learned and was occupied in writing a

book on Ancient Rome; later he became something more important at South

Kensington. But no degree of learning and importance helped him to

forget, or anyway to forgive. At chance meetings years afterwards in

London he frowned, as no doubt he would still had he not long since gone

to the land where I hope all frowns are smoothed from his frowning brow.

If he frowned, there was another Englishman who smiled: an elderly man

with the imperturbable serenity of a Buddha. He also had written books,

I believe. I remember articles by him, with art for subject, in the

_Portfolio_ at a time when everybody had taken to writing about art, and

I think his name was Davies. But it would be more in character to forget

that he ever worked or had a name. When I was in Rome he had risen above

activity and toil to the contemplative life and, I suppose, to the

income that made it possible. One night he explained his philosophy to

me. Men could not be happy without sunshine, he thought. The sun was

house, food, clothes, furniture, identity, everything, and as most of

the year in England sunshine was not to be had at any price, he had come

to live in Rome where almost all the year it was his for nothing. He sat

on the Pincian or in other gardens during the day, doing nothing in the

sunshine--that was living. And he urged me to follow his example and not

to wait until half my life had been wasted in the pursuit of happiness

where it was not to be found. He may have been right, but I never needed

to become a philosopher to value the virtue of indolence,--my trouble is

that I have never had the money to pay for it. Any man has the ability

to do nothing, a great authority has said, and I can answer for one

woman who has more than her fair share of it. I have always envied the

North American Indians for their enjoyment of what it seems Burke

attributed to them: "the highest boon of Heaven, supreme and perpetual

indolence."

As regular a visitor was a huge long-bearded Norwegian who looked a

prophet and was an artist, and who spent most of the winter in the study

of Marion Crawford's novels, I cannot imagine why, as they roused him to

fury.

"Marion Crawford," he would thunder at us as if somehow we were

responsible, "Bah! He is a weak imitator of Bulwer, that is all, and he

has not Bulwer's power of construction. He is not Bulwer. No. He is a

weakling. Bah!"

My only quarrel with Marion Crawford's books was that they never excited

strong emotion in me, one way or the other, and I was so puzzled by his

excitement that I remember I went to the trouble of getting out _Mr.

Isaacs_ and _A Roman Singer_ from Piali's Library in the _Piazza di

Spagna_, that centre of learning and literature for the English in Rome

where, one day when I asked for Pepys's Diary, they offered me Marcus

Ward's. A new course of Marion Crawford left me as puzzled as ever for

the reason of the Norwegian's rage, and I was the more impressed with

the possibilities of a temperament that could heat itself to such a

degree at so lukewarm a fire.

We were as certain to find this fiery Norseman and the two Englishmen

any night we called as Vedder himself. Other men came and went, amongst

them a few Italians and Frenchmen and more Americans, Coleman for one

among them, but none could have appeared as regularly, so much fainter

is the impression they have left with me. Naturally, they were mostly

artists and at Vedder's, as at the _café_, the talk was chiefly of art.

There was little of his work to see, for his studio was some distance

from his apartment. But it was enough to see Vedder himself or, for that

matter, enough to hear him. In his own house he led the talk, even

Forepaugh having small chance against him. He was as prolific, a

splendidly determined and animated talker. It was stimulating just to

watch him talk. He was never still, he rarely sat down, he was always

moving about, walking up and down, at times breaking into song and even

dance. He was then in his prime, large, with a fine expressive face, and

as American in his voice, in his manner, in his humour as if he had

never crossed the Atlantic. The true American never gets Europeanized,

nor does he want to, however long he may stay on the wrong side of the

Atlantic. When I was with Vedder, Broadway always seemed nearer than the

_Corso_.

He had recently finished the illustrations for the _Rubaiyat_ and the

book was published while we were in Rome. It was never long out of his

talk. He would tell us the history of every design and of every model or

pot in it. He exulted in the stroke of genius by which he had invented a

composition or a pose. I have heard him describe again and again how he

drew the flight of a spirit from a model, outstretched and flopping up

and down on a feather bed laid upon the studio floor, until she almost

fainted from fatigue, while he worked from a hammock slung just above. I

recall his delight when a friend of Fitzgerald's sent him Fitzgerald's

photograph with many compliments, asking for his in return. And he

rejoiced in the story of Dr. Chamberlain filling a difficult tooth for

the Queen and all the while singing the praises of the _Rubaiyat_ until

she ordered a copy of the _édition de luxe_. In looking back, I always

seem to see Mrs. Vedder pasting notices into a scrap book, and to hear

Vedder declaiming Omar's quatrains and describing his own drawings.

There was one evening when he came to a dead stop in his walk and his

talk, and shaking a dramatic finger at us all, said:

"I tell you what it is. I am not Vedder. I am Omar Khayyam!"

"No," drawled the voice of a disgusted artist who had not got a word in

for more than an hour, "No, you're not. You're the Great I Am!"

Vedder laughed with the rest of us, but I am not sure he liked it. He

could and did enjoy a joke, even if at his expense. I remember his

delight one night in telling the story of an old lady who had visited

his studio during the day and who sat so long in front of one of his

pictures he thought it was having its effect, but whose only comment at

the end of several minutes was: "That's a pretty frame you have there!"

He was sensitive to criticism, however, though he carried it off with a

laugh. Clarence Cook was one of the critics of his Omar who offended

him.

"It's funny," Vedder said, "all my life I've hurt Clarence's feelings.

He always has been sure I have done my work for no other reason than to

irritate him, and now that's the way he feels about the Omar."

The laugh was not so ready when Andrew Lang--I think it was Lang--wrote

that Vedder's Omar Khayyam was not of Persia, but of Skaneateles. And

after I suggested that it was really of Rome, and some mistaken friend

at home sent my article to Vedder, I never thought him quite so cordial.

VI

And so the winter passed. For us there was always a refuge from our cold

rooms at the _café_ or at Vedder's, and it was seldom we did not profit

by it.

Occasionally during our rambles we stumbled unexpectedly upon old

friends "doing Italy" and genuinely glad to see us, as we were to see

them, inviting us to their hotels at every risk of the disapproval of

manager and porters and waiters; and so powerful was the influence of

Rome and the _café_ that now the marvel was to sit and listen to talk

about Philadelphia, and where everybody was going for the summer, and

who was getting married, and who had died, and what Philadelphia was

thinking and doing, as if, after all, there were still benighted people

in the world who believed not in art, but in Philadelphia as of supreme

importance.

Occasionally we made new friends outside of our pleasant _café_ life. I

have forgotten how, though I have not forgotten it was in Rome, thanks

to a letter of introduction from Dr. Garnett of the British Museum, that

we first met Miss Harriet Waters Preston, who, for her part, had already

introduced me to Mistral--how many Americans had heard of Mistral before

she translated _Mirèio_?--and who now accepted us, cycling tweeds and

all, notwithstanding the shock they must have been to the admirably

appointed _pension_ where she stayed. She also climbed our six flights,

her niece and collaborator, Miss Louise Dodge, with her, probably both

busy that winter collecting facts for their _Private Life of the

Romans_, and where could they have found a more perfect background for

the past they were studying than when they looked down from our windows

over Rome, to the _Campagna_ beyond, and upon the horizon the shining

line that we knew was the Mediterranean,--over all the beauty that has

not changed in the meanwhile, though old streets and old villas and old

slums have vanished. And at these times, in the talk, not Philadelphia,

but literature was for a while art's rival.

And there were days when we played truant and climbed down in the

morning's first freshness from the high room overlooking Rome and the

work that had to be done in it, and loafed all day in Roman galleries

and at Roman ceremonies, or strayed to places further afield--Tivoli,

Albano, Ostia, Marino, Rocca di Papa,--getting back to Rome with feet

too tired to take us anywhere except up our six flights again. And there

were nights when the affairs of Rome drew us from the _café_. I remember

once our little group interrupted their interminable arguments long

enough to see the Tiber in flood, down by the _Ripetta_, where people

were going about in boats, and Rome looked like the Venice to which I

had then never been, and we met King Humbert and Queen Margherita in his

American trotting wagon driving down alone so as to show their sympathy,

for, whatever they may not have done, they always appeared in person

when their people were in trouble: not so many weeks before we had

watched the enthusiasm with which the Romans greeted King Humbert on his

return from visiting the cholera-stricken town of Naples. And I remember

on _Befana_ Night we adjourned to the _Piazza Navona_ to blow horns and

reed whistles into other people's ears and to have them blown into ours.

For the humours of the Carnival there was no need to leave the _café_,

where one _Pulcinello_ after another broke into our talk with witticisms

that kept the _café_ in an uproar, and for me destroyed whatever

sentiment there might have been in the thought that this was my last

night in Rome--the last of the friendly nights of talk in the

_Nazionale_ to which we always returned no matter how far we might

occasionally stray from it--the friendly nights of talk when I learned

my folly in ever having believed that anything in the world mattered,

that anything in the world existed, save art.

_Pulcinello_, the newest of our Roman friends, went with us from Rome,

following us to Naples, a familiar face to lighten our homesickness for

the rooms full of sunshine at the top of the high house on the top of

the high hill, and for the blue plush and the gilding and the mirrors

and the talk of the _Nazionale_.

And _Pulcinello_ went with us to Pompeii, reappearing during our nights

at the _Albergo del Sole_, that most delightful and impossible of all

the inns that ever were. It may have vanished in the quarter of a

century that has passed since the February day I came to it, when the

sky was as blue as the sea, and a soft cloud hung over Vesuvius, and

flowers were sweet in the land--can anyone who ever smelt it forget the

sweetness of the flowering bean in the wide fields near the Bay of

Naples? But Pompeii could never be the same without the _Sole_. And it

was made for our shabbiness, its three tumbled-down little houses ranged

round the three sides of an unkempt, mud-floored court; our bedroom

without lock or latch and with a mirror cracked from side to side like

the Lady of Shalott's, though for other reasons; the dining-room with

earthen floor, walls decorated by a modern-primitive fresco of the

_padrone_ holding a plate of _maccheroni_ in one hand and a flask of

_Lachrima Christi_ in the other, a central column spreading out branches

like a tree and bearing for fruit row upon row of still unopened

bottles, a door free to all the stray monks and beggars of Pompeii--to

all the fowls too, including the gorgeous peacock that strolled in after

its evening walk with the young Swiss artist on the flat roof of the inn

where, together, they went before dinner to watch the sunset.

Throughout dinner, at the head of the long table where we sat with the

Swiss artist and an old German professor of art and an older Italian

archæologist, the talk, as at the _Nazionale_, was of art, so that it

also, like _Pulcinello_, crying his jests through the window or at our

elbow, made me feel at home. While we helped ourselves from that amazing

dish into which you stuck a fork and pulled out a bit of chicken or

duck or beef or mutton or sausage; while the old professor and

archæologist absent-mindedly stretched a hand to the column behind them,

and plucked from it bottle after bottle of wine; while the beggars

whined at the open door, and the monks begged at our side, and

_Pulcinello_ capered and jested and sang; while the American tourists at

the other end of the table deplored the disorder and noise until we sent

them the longest and most expensive way up Vesuvius to get rid of them;

while the fowls fought for the crumbs;--the talk was still of art and

again of art, in the end as in the beginning. I might not understand

half of it, coming as it did in a confused torrent of German, Italian,

French, and English, but the nights at the _Sole_, like the nights at

the _Nazionale_, made this one truth clear: that nothing matters in the

world, that nothing exists in the world, save art.

III

NIGHTS

IN VENICE

IN VENICE

I

We reached Venice at an unearthly hour of a March morning and the first

thing I knew of it somebody was shouting, "_Venezia!_" and I was

startled from a sound sleep, and porters were scrambling for our bags,

and we were stumbling after them, up a long platform, between a crowd of

men in hotel caps yelling: "_Danieli!_" "_Britannia!_" and I hardly

heard what, out into a fog as impenetrable as night or London. The

muffled, ghostly cries of "_gundola! gundola!_" from invisible

gondoliers on invisible waters would have sent me back into the station

even had there been a chance to find so modest a hotel as the _Casa

Kirsch_ open so preposterously early, and my first impressions of Venice

were gathered in the freezing, foggy station restaurant where J. and I

drank our coffee and yawned, and I would have thought Ruskin a fraud

with his purple passage describing the traveller's arrival in Venice

upon which I had based my expectations, had I been wide enough awake to

think of anything at all, and the hours stretched themselves into

centuries before a touch of yellow in the fog suggested a sun shining

in some remote world, and we crawled under the cover of one of the dim

black boats that emerged vaguely, a shadow from the shadows.

I had looked forward to my first _gondola_ ride for that "little first

Venetian thrill" that Venice owes to the stranger. But I did not thrill,

I shivered with cold and damp and fog as the _gondola_ pushed through

the yellow gloom in the sort of silence you can feel, and tall houses

towered suddenly and horribly above us, and strange yells broke the

stillness before and behind, when another black boat with a black figure

at the stern, came out of the gloom, scraped and bumped our side, and

was swallowed up again.

Nights: Rome, Venice, in the Aesthetic Eighties; London, Paris, in the Fighting Nineties · 第 2 / 14 段