Look what is inside of this letter—look! I gathered it for you to-day

when I was walking in the Regent’s Park. Are you surprised? Arabel and

Flush and I were in the carriage—and the sun was shining with that green

light through the trees, as if he carried down with him the very essence

of the leaves, to the ground, ... and I wished so much to walk through

a half open gate along a shaded path, that we stopped the carriage and

got out and walked, and I put both my feet on the grass, ... which was

the strangest feeling! ... and gathered this laburnum for you. It hung

quite high up on the tree, the little blossom did, and Arabel said that

certainly I could not reach it—but you see! It is a too generous return

for all your flowers: or, to speak seriously, a proof that I thought of

you and wished for you—which it was natural to do, for I never enjoyed

any of my excursions as I did to-day’s—the standing under the trees and

on the grass, was so delightful. It was like a bit of that Dreamland

which is your especial dominion,—and I felt joyful enough for the moment,

to look round for you, as for the cause. It seemed _illogical_, not to

see you close by. And you were not far after all, if thoughts count as

bringers near. Dearest, we shall walk together under the trees some day!

And all those strange people moving about like phantoms of life. How

wonderful it looked to me!—and only you, ... the idea of you ... and

myself seemed to be real there! And Flush a little, too!—

Ah—what ... _next_ to nonsense, ... in the first letter, this morning! So

you think that I meant to complain when we first met, of your ‘_loving

me only for my poetry_’! Which I did not, simply because I did not

believe that _you loved me!—for any reason_. For the rest, I am not

over-particular, I fancy, about what I may be loved for. There is no good

reason for loving me, certainly, and my earnest desire (as I have said

again and again) is, that there should be by profession no reason at

all. But if there is to be any sort of reason, why one is as welcome as

another ... you may love me for my shoes, if you like it ... except that

they wear out. I thought you did not love me at all—you loved out into

the air, I thought—a love _a priori_, as the philosophers might say, and

not _by induction_, any wise! Your only knowledge of me was by the poems

(or most of it)—and what knowledge could _that_ be, when I feel myself so

far below my own aspirations, morally, spiritually? So I thought you did

not love me at all—I did not believe in miracles _then_, nor in ‘Divine

Legations’—but _my_ miracle is as good as Constantine’s, you may tell

your bishop on Wednesday when he has delivered his charge.

Is it _eight_ o’clock, or _three_? You write a [figure] which looks like

both, or at least either.

Love me, my only beloved; since you _can_. May God bless you!

I am ever and wholly your

BA.

_Say how you are._

_R.B. to E.B.B._

Tuesday.

[Post-mark, May 12, 1846.]

My Ba, your flower is the one flower I have seen, or see or shall

see—when it fades ‘I will bless it till it shine,’ and when I can bless

you no longer it shall fade with me and my letters and ... perhaps ...

my ring. Ba, if ... I was going to say, _if_ you meant to make me most

exquisitely happy ... and you _did_ surely mean it ... well, you succeed,

as you know! And I see you on the grass, and am with you as you properly

acknowledge. And by this letter’s presence and testimony, I may judge

you to be not much the worse,—not fatigued ... is it so? Oh, it was a

good inspiration that led you through the half-opened gate and under the

laburnum, and, better still, that made you see us ‘one day walking by

the trees together’—when all I shall say is,—I hope, in spite of that

felicity to remember and feel _this_, as vividly as now.

‘For the chain you hear rattle’ ... _there_ comes the earthly mood again

and the inspiration goes away altogether! So you being Miss Barrett

and not my Ba for the moment, I will give you none of my, and Ba’s,

syren-island illustrations, but ask you, what a fine lady would say if

you caught at her diamond necklace and cried—‘You shall wear no such

chains,—indeed you shall not!’ Why even Flush is proud of his corals and

blue beads, you tell me! As for me,—being used to bear sundry heavier

chains than this of writing to you—owning the degradation of being, for

instance, forced to respire so many times a minute in order to live—to

go out into the open air so as to continue well—with many similarly

affronting impositions on a free spirit ... on the whole, I can very

patiently submit to write a letter which is duly read, and forgiven for

its imperfections, and interpreted into a rationality (sometimes) not

its own, and then answered by the sweetest hand that ever ministered to

the dearest, dearest Ba that ever was imagined, or can be! Ba,—there are

three Syren’s Isles, you know: I shall infallibly get into the farthest

of them, a full thirty yards from you and the tower,—so as to need being

written to—for the _cicale_ make such a noise that you will not be able

to call to me—which is as well, for you may ... that is, _I_ might—break

my neck by a sudden leap on the needles of rocks ... as I remember the

boatman told me.

As for what you wish yesterday ... the _mode_ of my expressing my love

... I never think of it,—I _have_ none—no system, nor attempt at such a

thing—I begin and end by saying _I love you—whatever comes of it_. There

is one obvious remark to make however ... that unless I _had_ loved you

and felt that every instant of my life depended on you for its support

and comfort,—I should never have dreamed of what has been proposed and

accepted ... Your own goodness at the very beginning would have rendered

that superfluous; for I was put in possession of your friendship,—might

write to you, and receive letters—might even hope to see you as often as

anybody—would not this have sufficed a reasonable friendship? May not Mr.

Kenyon be your satisfied friend?... But all was different—and so——

So I am blessed now—and can only bless you. But goodbye, dearest, till

to-morrow—and next day, which is ours. At 8—eight I conjecture my

martyrdom may take place ... oh, think of me and help me! I shall feel

you,—as ever. You forgot the letter after all ... can you send it? It may

be convenient to produce, as I know nobody of them all—terrible it is

altogether! ‘At six’ the dinner begins— —I shall get behind my brother

Dramatists ... and say very little about them, even.

Kiss me, in any case, of failure, or success,—and the one will be

forgotten, and the other doubled, centupled—to your own—

_E.B.B. to R.B._

Tuesday.

[Post-mark, May 13, 1846.]

When you began to speak of the islands, the three islands, I thought you

were going to propose that you should live in one, and Flush in one, and

I in the third: and almost it was so, ... only that you took, besides,

the ‘_farthest_’ for yourself! Observe!—always I write nonsense, when you

send me a letter which moves me like this, ... dearest, ... my own!

To-day Mrs. Jameson has been here, and having left with me a proof about

Titian, she comes again to-morrow to take it. I think her quite a lovable

person now—I like her more and more. How she talked of you to-day, and

called you the most charming companion in the world, setting you too

on your right throne as ‘poet of the age.’ Wouldn’t it have been an

‘_effect_’ in the midst of all, if I had burst out crying? And what with

being flurried, frightened, and a little nervous from not sleeping well

last night, I assure you it was quite possible—but happily, on every

account, I escaped that ‘dramatic situation.’ I wish ... no, I can’t

wish that she wouldn’t talk of you as she does whenever she comes here.

And then, to make it better, she told me how you had recited ‘in a voice

and manner as good as singing,’ my ‘Catarina.’ How are such things to be

borne, do you think, when people are not made of marble? But I took a

long breath, and held my mask on with both hands.

You will tell me of the Marc Antonio prints,—will you not? Remember

them on Thursday. Raffael’s—are they not? I shall expect ever so much

teaching, and showing, and explaining ... I, who have seen and heard

nothing of pictures and music, from you who know everything ... so the

cicale must not be too loud for _that_. Did ever anyone say to you

that you were like Raffael’s portrait—not in the eyes, which are quite

different, but in the lower part of the face, the mouth, and also the

brow? It has struck me sometimes—and I had it on my lips to-day as a

question to Mrs. Jameson. I think I was mad to-day altogether. But she

did not see it—(I mean my madness ... not your likeness!) [and] went away

unconsciously.

Here, at last, is the letter! Careless that I was yesterday!—

And you take me to be too generous if you fancy that I proposed giving up

the daily letter which is my daily bread. I meant only that you should

not, for the sake of a particular post, tire yourself, hurry yourself,

... do what you did yesterday. As for the daily letter, I am Ba—not Miss

Barrett. Now, am I Miss Barrett? am I not Ba rather, and your Ba? I

should like to hear what will be heard to-morrow. Oh—I should like to be

under the table, or in a pasty, after the fashion of the queen’s dwarf

when Elizabeth was queen and Shakespeare poet. Shall you be nervous, as

_I_ was with Mrs. Jameson? Oh no,—why should you be nervous? You will do

it all well and gracefully—I am not afraid for you. It is simply out of

vain-glory that I wish to be there! Only ... the dramatists of England

... where in the world are they just now? Or will somebody prove _ten_ of

them,—because _nought_ after _one_, makes exactly ten? Mr. Horne indeed.

But I wish the toast had been ‘the poets of England,’ rather. May God

bless you, any way! ‘_I love you whatever comes of it._’ Yes, unless

sorrow of yours should come of it, _that_ is what I like to hear. Better

it is, than a thousand praises of this thing and that thing, which never

were mine ... alas!—Also, loving me _so_, you can be made happy with

laburnum-leaves!—Dearest—most dear! Dare I speak, do you think?

Exactly at eight to-morrow, and exactly at three the next day, I shall be

with you—being at any hour

Your very own.

The walk did me no harm. But you say nothing of yourself!

_R.B. to E.B.B._

Wednesday.

[Post-mark, May 13, 1846.]

Dearest, dearest, I shall be with you to-morrow and be comforted—and will

tell you all about everything. I am a little tired (but _very_ well,

altogether well, singularly so)—and I _do_ feel a little about to-night’s

affair, though you may not. _You_, indeed, to judge me by yourself! But,

after all I do not greatly care ... I can but get up and stammer and

say ‘thank you’ and sit down again, like my betters,—and—as I say and

say,—_you_ are at the end of everything ... so long as I find _you_!

I hoped that Tennyson was to have been Poet-respondent—but Moxon says

‘no’ ... and, moreover, that the Committee had meant (and he supposed

had acted upon their meaning) to offer me the choice of taking either

qualification, of Poetry or the Drama, as mine ... but they have altered

their mind. As it _is_ ... observe—(you will find a list of Stewards in

last _Athenæum_)—observe that they are all Bishops or Deans or Doctors

... and that all will be grave and heavy enough, I dare say. So I shall

try and speak for about five minutes on the advantages of the Press over

the Stage as a medium of communication of the Drama ... and so get done,

if Heaven please!

I saw Tennyson last night—and ... oh, let me tell you to-morrow. Also,

Severn, I saw ... Keats’ Severn, who bought his own posthumous picture

of Keats, and talked pleasantly about him and Shelley (Tennyson asked

me ‘what I thought of Shelley’—in so many words). Moxon’s care of

him,—Tennyson, not Severn,—is the charmingest thing imaginable, and he

seems to need it all—being in truth but a LONG, hazy kind of a man, at

least just after dinner ... yet there is something ‘naif’ about him,

too,—the genius you see, too.

May God bless you, my dearest dearest,—to-morrow repays for all—

_E.B.B. to R.B._

Friday.

[Post-mark, May 15, 1846.]

The treader on your footsteps was Miss Bayley, who left a card and

‘would come another day.’ She must have seen you.... One of these days,

‘scirocco’ will be ‘loose’—we may as well be prepared for it. To keep it

off as long as possible is all that can be. But when it comes it will not

uproot my palm-trees, I think, though it should throw flat the olives.

Papa brought me some flowers yesterday when he came home ... and they

went a little to my heart as I took them. I put them into glasses near

yours, and they look faded this morning nevertheless, while your roses,

for all your cruelty to them, are luxuriant in beauty as if they had

just finished steeping themselves in garden-dew. I look gravely from

one set of flowers to the other—I cannot draw a glad omen—I wish he had

not given me these. Dearest, there seems little kindness in teazing you

with such thoughts ... but they come and I write them: and let them come

ever so sadly, I do not for a moment doubt ... hesitate. One may falter,

where one does not fail. And for the rest, ... it is my fault, and not my

sorrow rather, that we act so? It is by choice that we act so? If he had

let me I should have loved him out of a heart altogether open to him. It

is not my fault that he would not let me. Now it is too late—I am not his

nor my own, any more.

This morning I have had American letters of the kindest ... from

Massachusetts—and a review on my poems, quite extravagant indeed, in the

_Methodist Quarterly_. One of these letters is so like another, that

I need only tell you of them ... written too by people ... Lydias and

Richards ... never heard of before by either of us. The review repeats

the fabulous story in the ‘Spirit of the Age,’ about unknown tongues

and a seven years’ eclipse in total darkness—but I say to myself ...

after all, the real myth is scarcely less wonderful. If I have not all

this knowledge ... I have _you_ ... which is greater, better! ‘Not less

wonderful’ did I say? when it is the miracle....

Oh, these people!—I am seized and bound. More to-night! from

Your own

BA.

_Say how you are._

_R.B. to E.B.B._

Friday.

[Post-mark, May 15, 1846.]

The sun is warm, and the day, I suppose, is fine,—but my Ba will have

been kept at home by the vile wind—most vile—even I feel it! So the

spring passes away without the true spring feeling—all the blossoms are

fast going already—and one’s spirits are affected, I dare say. Did you

not think me intolerable yesterday with my yawning and other signs of

fatigue you noticed? Well now—I _do_ think a little is _said_ by all

that: might one not _like_ or even _love_ ... just short of _true_ love,

so long as the spirits were buoyant and the mind cheerful,—and when the

contrary befell, some change might appear, surely!

The more I need you the more I love you, Ba—and I need you _always_—in

joy, to make the joy seem what it is—and in any melancholy that I can

imagine, _more_ still, infinitely more, I need you—though _melancholy_,

I certainly was not—only tired a little ... all I mean to say is, that

at times when I could, I think, shut up Shelley, and turn aside from

Beethoven, and look away from my noble Polidoro,—my Ba’s ring—not to say

the hand—ah, you know, Ba, what they are to me!

I have to go out to-day, to my sorrow—to the Garrick Club, and a friend

there. (My sister tells me we have to go to the Flower-show next

Wednesday unless the day be rainy. I shall hear from Mr. Kenyon, I

expect.)

Let me end the chapter we began yesterday, about speech-making and adepts

in it of various kinds, by telling you what my father made me laugh

by an account of, the other day ... only it should be really _told_,

and not written. He had a curiosity to know how would-be Parliamentary

members _canvassed_ ... and as the Chamberlain of the City, Sir James

Shaw, came into the Bank for that purpose (there being Livery men there,

or whatever they are called, with votes) my father followed to hear how

he would address people. Sir James, a gigantic man, went about as his

friends directed ... or rather pushed and shoved him ... and whenever

they reached an Elector the whole cortège stopped, Sir James made his

speech, the friends, book and pencil in hand, recorded the promise the

moment it was made, and forthwith wheeled round their candidate to the

next man ... no word of speechification being to be wasted once its

object accomplished, since time pressed—so now fancy. _Friends_ (to Sir

J) ‘Mr. Snooks, Sir James!’ Sir J. (_with his eyes shut, and head two

feet above Snooks_) ‘When Charles Fox came into Parliament, he came into

Parliament with a profusion of promises, of which I’ll defy Charles Fox’s

best friends to say that he ever kept a single one’—(Friends twitch

him)—‘Thankee Sir,’—‘Mr. Smith.’ ‘When Charles Fox came into Parliament

... thankee, Sir’—‘Mr. Thompson’—‘When Charles Fox ... thankee!’ &c. &c.

And so on from man to man, never getting beyond this instructive piece of

anecdotical history—till at the very last a little Elector, reaching to

the great man’s elbow, let him go to the full length of the sentence’s

tether from admiration of such an orator ... did not say briefly ‘yes’

or ‘no’ as the others had done. So Sir James arrived duly at ... ‘kept a

single one. Thus—if ... as it were ... eh? oh!’ Here he opened his eyes

with a start, missing the pushing and driving from his friends in the

rear—and finding it was only this little man; he abruptly stopped ...

was not going to spend more eloquence on _him_! There, Ba; _you tell_ me

you write nonsense ... _I do_ the thing, the precise thing! But no more

nonsense because I am going to kiss you, which is wise, and love you with

my whole heart and soul forever, which is wiser, and pray you to love me,

dear, dear Ba, which is the wisest! Sweetest, may God bless you,—

Your very own.

_E.B.B. to R.B._

Friday Evening.

[Post-mark, May 16, 1846.]

Not even do you yawn in vain then, O you! And this, then, is what Cicero

called ‘oscitans sapientia?’ The _argument of the yawn_ ought in fact, to

be conclusive!

But, dearest, if it was ‘intolerable’ to see you yawn yesterday, still

less supportable was it to-day when I had all the yawning to myself, and

proved nothing by it. Tired I am beyond your conceiving of ... tired!

You saw how I broke off in my letter to you this morning. Well—that

was Miss Heaton, who came yesterday and left the packet you saw, and

came again to-day and sate here exactly three hours. Now imagine that!

Three hours of incessant restless talking. At the end I was _blanched_,

as everybody could see, and Mrs. Jameson who came afterwards for five

minutes and was too unwell herself to stay, seriously exhorted me not to

exert myself too much lest I should pay the penalty. And I had not been

down-stairs even—only been ground down in the talking-mill. Arabel told

her too, before she came up-stairs, that I was expecting a friend—‘Oh’

... said she to me, ‘I shall go away directly anyone comes.’ And again

presently ... ‘Pray tell me when I ought to go away’! (As if I could

say _Go_. She deserved it, but I _couldn’t_!) And then ... ‘How good

of you to let me sit here and talk!’ So good of me, when I was wishing

her ... only at Leeds in the High Street, between a dissenter and a

churchman—anywhere but opposite to my eyes! Yet _she_ has very bright

ones, and cheeks redder than your roses; and she is kind and cordial ...

as I thought in the anguish of my soul, when I tried to be grateful to

her. Certainly I should have been more so, if she had stayed a little

less, talked a little less—it is awful to think how some women can talk!

Happily she leaves London to-morrow morning, and will not be here again

till next year, if then. She talked biography too ... ah, I did not mean

to tell you—but it is better to tell you at once and have done ... only

she desired me not to mention it ... only she little knew what she was

doing! You will not mention it. She told me that ‘her informant about Mr.

Browning, ... was a lady _to whom he had been engaged_ ... that there

had been a very strong attachment on both sides, but that everything

was broken off by _her_ on the ground of religious differences—that it

happened years ago and that the lady was married.’ At first I exclaimed

imprudently enough (but how could it be otherwise?) that it was not

true—but I caught at the bridle in a minute or two and let her have it

her own way. Do not answer this—it is nonsense, I know—but it helped to

tire me with the rest. Wasn’t it a delightful day for me? At the end of

the three hours, she threw her arms round me and kissed me some half

dozen times and wished me ‘goodbye’ till next year. Wilson found me

standing in the middle of the room, looking as she said, ‘like a ghost.’

And no wonder! The ‘vile wind’ out of doors was nothing to it.

Dearest, you are well? Your letter says nothing. Only one more letter,

and then Monday. Ah—it is the sweetest of flattery to say that you ‘need’

me—but isn’t it difficult to understand? Yet while you even fancy that

you have such a need, you may be sure (let Charles Fox break his promises

ever so!) of your own

BA.

_R.B. to E.B.B._

Saturday.

[Post-mark, May 16, 1846.]

Then, dearest-dearest, _do_ take Mrs. Jameson’s advice—_do_ take care of

the results of this fatigue—why should you see any woman that pleases to

ask to come? I am certain that some of the men you have refused to admit,

would be more considerate—and Miss Heaton must be a kind of fool into the

bargain with her inconsiderateness ... though _that_ is the folly’s very

self. As for her ‘Yorkshire Tragedy,’ I hold myself rather aggrieved by

it—they used to get up better stories of Lord Byron,—and even _I told_

you, anticipatingly, that I caused that first wife of mine to drown and

hang herself ... whereas, now, it turns out she did neither, but bade me

do both ... nay, was not my wife after all! I hope she told Miss Heaton

the story in the presence of the husband who had no irreligious scruples.

But enough of this pure nonsense—I had, by this post that brings me

your last letter, one from Horne—he leaves to-day for Ireland, and says

kind things about my plays—and unkind things of Mr. Powell ‘a dog he

repudiates for ever.’ So our ‘clique’ is deprived of yet another member!

For me, love,—I am pretty well—but _rather_ out of spirits,—for no

earthly cause. I shall take a walk and get better presently—your dear

letters have their due effect, all that effect!

So, dear,—all my world, my life, all I look to or live for, my own Ba—I

will bless you and bid you goodbye for to-day—to-morrow I will write

more—and on Monday—return, my Ba, this kiss ... my dearest above all

dearness!

_E.B.B. to R.B._

Saturday Morning.

[Post-mark, May 16, 1846.]

You shall hear from me on this Sunday, though it cannot be as an answer,

dearest, to your letter of to-night. But I being so wretchedly tired last

night, and ‘yawning’ being, to your mind, so ‘intolerable,’ it is as well

to leave a better impression with you than _that_ ... though there is

nothing to say, and the east wind blows on virulently.

The _Athenæum_ has put me out of humour for the day ... besides. Not a

word of ‘Luria’—not a word of the Literary Fund dinner, and a great,

drawling carrying out of the ‘Poetry for the Million’ article ... as

if all this trash could not die of itself!—as if it were not _dead_ of

itself!—That the critics of a country should set themselves to such

work ... is as if the Premier of England took his official seat in the

window to kill flies, ... talking, with his first finger out, of ‘my

administration.’ Only flies are flies and have fly-life in them: they are

nobler game than those.

Mrs. Jameson, while she was here the five minutes yesterday, talked,

in an under-breath to my under-breath opposition, her opinion about

the present age. ‘That the present age did not, could not, ought not,

to express itself by Art, ... though the next age would.’ She is

surprisingly wrong, it appears to me. There is no predominant character

in the age, she says, to be so expressed! there is no unity, to bear

expression.

But art surely, if art is anything, is the expression, not of the

characteristics of an age except accidentally, ... essentially it is the

expression of Humanity in the individual being—and unless we are men no

longer, I cannot conceive how such an argument as hers can be upheld for

a moment. Also it is exasperating to hear such things.

The letters of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Barrett, Vol. 2 (of 2) 1845-1846 · 第 11 / 43 段