The Universal Postal Union as at first constituted provided only for the

transmission of what may be regarded in the broad sense as letter post

traffic. It made no provision for the transmission in the international

service of packages of ordinary merchandise. Such packets could in

strictness only be forwarded at the letter rate, which was almost

prohibitive; although frequently they were forwarded at the sample rate,

in which case the weight of the packet was strictly limited. The French

administration proposed, in the project of the Congress of Paris of

1878, to extend in that direction the facilities provided by the Union,

by amplifying the definition of samples to include small parcels of

ordinary goods,[599] a proposal which was rejected by a majority of the

administrations. It was, however, submitted to the Congress under

another form. The German administration proposed, not the extension of

the sample privilege, but the establishment of a new service, which

should provide for the transmission of parcels of general merchandise

not exceeding 3 kilogrammes in weight, the parcels to be charged a rate

of postage sufficient to reimburse the administrations for the expenses

of transmission. Although this proposal was favourably received, many of

the delegates had no power to enter into any arrangement of that nature.

The question was therefore referred to the International Bureau, with

instructions to call a special Conference for its consideration, if on

investigation that course should be found desirable.

At this time the circumstances in the different countries in regard to

the transmission of small parcels varied. In some a service was provided

by the Post Office; in others, the majority, the business was left to

the railways or other forms of commercial transport. In all cases the

services between different countries were regulated by conventions and

agreements on such terms as could be mutually arranged between the

contracting parties. In general the rates of postage were based on the

rates for inland transmission in each of the countries concerned. They

were often extremely complicated, and several administrations had

mutually agreed to a uniform rate for parcels not exceeding 5

kilogrammes in weight.

The suggestion for a special Conference was, in general, well received,

and the Conference met in Paris in 1880. All the countries of Europe

(except Greece), Canada, the United States, Egypt, British India and

Persia, were represented. The fact that in many of the countries the

Post Office had not at that time undertaken the transmission of parcels

was a serious obstacle to the adoption of any sort of general agreement;

and on the question of rates there was divergence of opinion whether the

principle of uniformity should be accepted, and a fairly high maximum

limit of weight conceded at a low uniform rate of postage, in order that

the service might be of real advantage to the public, or whether the

rates should be graduated according to scales of weight and distance.

The original suggestion had been for a limit of 3 kilogrammes, but at

the Conference a proposal for a limit of 5 kilogrammes was submitted.

Several delegates were unable to accept the higher maximum, and the

limit originally proposed was retained.[600] As regards the rates of

postage to be charged there was also diversity of opinion. Some

delegates held that the rate should be so fixed as to avoid the

possibility of the service involving an administration in loss, while

others, in view of the public benefits to be derived from the

establishment of the service, were prepared to agree to rates which

might prove insufficient to cover the expenses.[601] Simple uniform

rates were regarded as a cardinal feature of a postal service for

parcels.[602]

After prolonged discussion agreement was finally arrived at, and a

Convention was signed by all the delegates, with the exception of those

representing Great Britain, British India, Holland, and Persia, to be

brought into operation on the 1st October 1881.

Financial considerations were the chief obstacle in the way of the

participation of Great Britain.[603]

The contracting parties undertook to provide a mutual service for the

interchange of parcels not exceeding 3 kilogrammes in weight. Liberty of

transit was guaranteed throughout the territory of each contracting

country, and for transit services the respective countries were to be

remunerated as follows: The administration of the country of origin was

required to pay to the administration of each other country concerned in

the transmission, and to that of the country of destination, 50 centimes

for each parcel in respect of land transit. In cases where a sea transit

was involved, the sum of 25 centimes for each parcel was payable on sea

routes not exceeding 500 nautical miles; 50 centimes for routes between

500 and 1,000 nautical miles; 1 fr. for routes between 1,000 and 3,000

nautical miles; 2 fr. for routes between 3,000 and 6,000 nautical

miles; and 3 fr. for all routes exceeding 6,000 nautical miles. The rate

of postage was based on the foregoing payments, and amounted to as many

times 50 centimes as there might be administrations concerned in the

transmission, with the addition of all rates for sea transit, and with

the reservation that each country might charge an additional 25 centimes

(raised in certain cases to 50, to 75 centimes, or to 1 fr.). In

addition, the country of destination might charge a delivery fee of 25

centimes. It was not anticipated that these rates would in all cases be

sufficient to cover the expenses of carrying on the service, but the

general advantages were regarded as adequate compensation for any

monetary sacrifice which might be entailed.[604] Any administration

which did not at that time conduct a parcel post service was authorized

to arrange for the international service to be undertaken on its behalf

by railway and steamship companies.

At the Lisbon Congress in 1886 the maximum limit of weight was raised to

5 kilogrammes, at which point it remains, and special rates were

established for parcels which, on account of their size, shape or

fragility, were inconvenient for transmission.[605] Such parcels, which

had previously been excluded altogether from the service, were now

admitted, subject to a rate of postage 50 per cent. greater than the

rate on ordinary parcels.

At the Congress of Washington in 1897, power to charge special rates was

given to the administration of British India, viz. a rate not exceeding

1 fr. for land transit, a surtax not exceeding 1 fr. 25 on each parcel

posted or delivered in British India, and a scale of rates graduated

according to weight on all parcels posted in British India, provided

that the average receipt of the Indian administration did not exceed 1

fr. 75 for each parcel.[606] The special transit charge was abandoned at

the Rome Congress of 1906.

No changes of importance were made at the Rome Congress of 1906. Several

proposals in regard to the maximum limit of weight were discussed. The

Bulgarian delegates proposed an increase of the maximum to 50

kilogrammes, but the proposal found no support.[607] The Swiss delegate

proposed an increase to 10 kilogrammes. This met with some support; but

in view of the practical difficulties which would have been imposed on

certain administrations in dealing with parcels of so great a weight,

the proposal was negatived.

The Indian delegate proposed the insertion of a provision enabling any

country to charge postage on parcels originating in that country

according to a scale of weights of its own choice, in substitution for

the existing single rate.[608]

The general proposal was rejected,[609] but a clause was added

provisionally according to India the faculty of applying to parcels

posted in India a tariff graduated by weight, provided the mean of the

rates was not in excess of the normal rate of the Union.

The land transit rate remained unchanged, viz. 50 centimes for each

country participating in the territorial transit.

Russia was given power to collect a transit fee of 1 fr. 25 per parcel

in respect of both Russia-in-Europe and Russia-in-Asia, separately; and

Turkey to collect a transit rate of 1 fr. 25 on a parcel sent across

Turkey-in-Asia. Owing to the undeveloped state of the transport services

in Persia, that administration was empowered provisionally to decline

the transport of parcels for and from other countries.

The maritime transit rates were reduced to the following:--

25 centimes for transits not exceeding 500 nautical miles

50 centimes " 500-2,500 " "

1 fr. " 2,500-5,000 " "

1-1/2 fr. " 5,000-8,000 " "

2 fr. " exceeding 8,000 " "

For parcels not exceeding 1 kilogramme the transit rate should in no

case exceed 1 fr.

* * * * *

VII

AN ANALYSIS OF COST

METHOD

The Post Office[610] performs but one service in respect of the ordinary

postage paid on a packet, under whatever rate or regulations the packet

is posted. Whether the packet be a letter, a postcard, a halfpenny

packet, a newspaper packet or a parcel,[611] the service performed in

respect of the ordinary postage is simply to transmit the packet without

delay to the place of its address.[612]

There are, of course, several intermediate stages in the progress of the

packet from the place of posting to the place of delivery. Under the

most favourable circumstances, as in the case of a letter from one small

town to another small town for which there is a direct mail, the packet

is handled two or three times by various officers; and in many cases, as

with the letters from a suburb of one large town to a suburb of another

large town, or to a place in a rural district or vice vers[^a], as many as

ten or twelve times.

Although the character of the service to be performed, viz. transmission

to the place of its address, is identical in every case, the character

of the packet naturally has considerable influence on the nature and

cost of handling at the various stages, and the methods adopted in

dealing with the packet. But the operations are in essence the same, and

the chief difference is in the amount of time occupied and the nature of

the office fittings employed.

This variation of cost and method does not correspond with variation in

the rate of postage paid on the packets. Except in the case of parcels,

all distinction on the basis of rates of postage disappears once the

sorting office is reached.

In regard to the chief indoor operations there is, except at the

smallest offices, complete separation between packets sent by parcel

post and all other packets; but parcels are in some cases taken out with

other packets for delivery at the same time and by the same officer.

Except in rural districts they are, however, generally taken out

separately for the first morning delivery, and frequently for the last

evening delivery. Speaking broadly, there is as regards delivery, as for

other operations, essential separation between parcels and all other

classes of packets.

In regard to packets other than parcels, the chief, and in many cases

the only, separation in actual handling is as between those packets

which can be passed through the stamping machine and those which

cannot; and between those packets which can conveniently be dealt with

at the ordinary letter-sorting frames, and tied in bundles for enclosure

in the mail-bags, and those which on account of their irregular size and

shape are sorted at pigeon-hole frames, and cannot be tied in bundles,

but are forwarded loose in the mail-bags. The dividing line is almost

identical in both cases, and is determined by the size and shape of the

packet. In the largest offices more divisions are made, in some cases as

many as five.[613]

The more usual number is three, "short letters," "long letters," and

other packets.[614] The division of the packets is made in all cases,

not with reference to the various rates of postage under which the

packets may have been posted, but with the view simply of securing that

packets of the same shape and size shall, as far as possible, be brought

together, and their subsequent handling thereby facilitated.

In cases where there are four or five such divisions of the packets, the

separation is likewise made from considerations independent of the rates

of postage, although it happens that, as a rule, a large proportion of

the packets posted under a given rate fall into a certain group. Thus

all postcards fall to be handled with the short letters; all newspapers

fall to be handled with the heavier packets sent at the letter rate; and

a large proportion of the halfpenny packets, viz. the short halfpenny

packets, fall to be handled with the short letters.

There are in general three methods of handling. The sorting is done

either at the ordinary open frames, or at the newspaper frames, or

directly into the mail-bags, the two latter methods being alternative.

Short letters are dealt with at the ordinary sorting frames. Long

letters (which include a large proportion of "circulars") are dealt with

in some cases at the ordinary frames, and in some cases at the frames

provided for the larger packets (the "newspaper" frames). All other

packets are dealt with at the newspaper frames, or are sorted directly

into the mail-bags in those cases where frames for hanging the bags are

provided. Stamping is performed either by hand or by machine.

When first brought into the sorting office the packets are placed on an

open table, and the ordinary letters, circular letters, and postcards

are arranged in order with the addresses in the same direction, or, as

it is termed, "faced." Simultaneously, all other packets are picked out

for treatment separately. The postage labels affixed to the letters and

other packets are then obliterated with a dated stamp. After stamping,

the letters and packers are taken to the respective sorting tables,

where they are separated (in one or more operations) into groups

corresponding to the various towns to which they will be despatched.

Before enclosure in the mail-bags, all short letters, postcards, and

short halfpenny packets, and some of the long letters, are tied in

bundles, other packets being sent loose.

From the first office of destination many of the packets are sent

forward to another office, since it is naturally not possible always to

enclose a packet in a direct mail-bag for the town to which it is

addressed. These packets are resorted and despatched. The letters, etc.,

for immediate delivery do not require to be faced, as they are received

in bundles, in which they are arranged with the addresses in the same

direction. But, except when received for the first morning delivery,

letters are stamped to show the date and time of receipt, after which

they are sorted in the order of delivery, and delivered by the postmen.

In the delivery of the packets one division is made, viz. between the

short letters, postcards, and short halfpenny packets, which are tied in

bundles; and the letter packets and halfpenny packets of irregular size

and shape, and the newspapers, which are carried loose in the delivery

bag. The postman takes out of his bag a bundle of letters, etc., from

which he delivers in order. These have been sorted up in the order of

delivery at the sorting office, so that no time is lost in finding the

proper letter for delivery. It is not possible, however, to arrange the

irregular-shaped packets in this manner. When the postman has such a

packet to deliver, he has first to find it among those in his bag. He

then frequently finds that it is too large to be put through the

letter-box, and further time is lost in gaining the attention of the

householder.[615]

There is, therefore, in the matter of delivery, a heavy balance against

the heavier and more bulky packets, as compared with the short letters,

postcards, and short halfpenny packets.

As regards the actual transmission from post office to post office,

there is only one real division of the whole of the packets, viz. that

between the parcel post on the one hand, and the whole of the remaining

classes of packets on the other. In a number of cases separate mails are

made up for newspapers and large packets; but compared with the total

number of mails, the number of such separate mails is small, and the

arrangement may be regarded as exceptional. In a considerable number of

cases, however, packets sent at the parcel post rate are enclosed in the

same mail-bag with packets sent at other rates. The arrangement is made

somewhat extensively for mails from a post town to subordinate and other

small offices in the immediate neighbourhood, but only exists in those

cases where the number of parcels to be enclosed is small. As in every

case where on the average as many as eight parcels are available at the

time of despatch a separate mail may be made up, the arrangement does

not exist extensively between any large centres with any considerable

traffic; but it has been extended in recent years, and the total number

of parcels forwarded in this way forms an appreciable proportion of the

total number of parcels sent by post. There is in these cases, so far as

mails conveyed by railway are concerned, complete separation in regard

to one important element of cost, viz. the cost of conveyance. Separate

payment for the conveyance of parcels is made under the arrangement

established by the Parcel Post Act; while comprehensive payments are

made for the conveyance of all other packets, arranged by negotiation

with the individual railway companies or, failing agreement, fixed by

the Court of Railway and Canal Commission in the manner prescribed by

statute.[616]

The handling of a postal packet from posting to delivery therefore

comprises the following operations in order:--

Collection,

Facing,

Stamping,

Sorting,

Conveyance,

Stamping,[617]

Sorting,

Delivery;

and in the case of those packets which pass through more than one office

there are, for every such office, the additional operations of sorting

and conveyance.[618]

The bags are conveyed between the various post offices by mail-van

(horse-drawn or motor), by mail-cart, by railway, or in a few cases by

carrier-cycle, tricycle, or motor-cycle.

The vans, carts, or cycles of course convey the bags from office to

office, but when the bags are sent by railway it is necessary to provide

for their conveyance to and from the railway stations. This is largely

done by mail-van, mail-cart, or carrier-tricycle; but in a great number

of cases throughout the country, where only two or three small bags are

concerned, their conveyance between the station and the post office is

provided for by cycle postman or "runner" service; that is to say, the

bags are fetched or taken by a postman or porter.

COST

In order to ascertain the cost of dealing with postal packets of the

various classes, the relative cost, and the actual cost, of the various

operations must be ascertained, and all general charges apportioned.

The cost of the "postal" service, shown in Table B,[619] i.e. the cost

of the whole of the services controlled by the Post Office, less the

cost of the telegraphs and telephones, may be grouped, as shown in Table

C, under the following main headings:--

(1) Cost of Staff,

(2) Cost of Conveyance of Mails,

(3) Cost of Buildings,

(4) Cost of Stores, and Miscellaneous Expenditure.

STAFF

Since parcels are, to a considerable extent, dealt with separately, it

has been possible to estimate the relative cost of the manipulative

services in regard to parcels on the one hand, and all other postal

packets (letters, postcards, halfpenny packets, and newspapers) on the

other. The ratios of cost are shown in Table D, and the total cost of

the manipulative services in respect of parcels calculated on this basis

is shown in Table F.

No similar ratios of relative cost have been estimated in regard to the

various classes of packets other than parcels, since they are dealt with

together, and it is necessary, therefore, to ascertain the actual cost

for staff under the various headings of collection, stamping, sorting,

and delivery. As regards collection, it is difficult to discover a basis

on which a computation of the relative cost for the different classes of

packets may be made, because the cost varies greatly, not only as

between each class, but from place to place, in regard to any particular

class of packet. Many of the ordinary letter packets are posted in large

numbers at head post offices, and in respect of packets so posted there

is no cost of collection. Light letter packets and halfpenny packets

(especially halfpenny packets) are, moreover, handed in at post offices

in considerable numbers for prepayment of postage in cash. In that case

the cost of subsequent handling is slightly reduced, because under the

regulations for such prepayment the packets must be tied in bundles with

the addresses in the same direction, that is to say, the operation of

facing must be performed by the person who posts the packets. Against

this, however, must be set the very considerable expense incurred both

in towns and rural areas for the collection of ordinary light letter

packets, postcards, halfpenny packets, and newspaper packets from

posting boxes, and the cost of van services, which are frequently

provided for the collection of letters from business premises. Very

little of the cost of these services can be attributed to the heavier

letter packets, which are to a large extent handed in at the post office

counter to be weighed. This involves considerable expense, which

corresponds to cost of collection, and may be dealt with under that

heading. The best estimate that can be made is that the cost of

collection per packet is approximately the same in all cases.

Facing and stamping may be regarded as one operation, the one being

really preparatory to the other. Here there is less difficulty. The

relative cost per packet may fairly be taken as the ratio of the time

taken in performing the operation in the case of each class of packet.

In regard to facing and stamping, and also in regard to sorting, the

letter packets proper, that is to say packets sent at the ordinary

letter rate of postage, fall in general into three classes according to

the facility with which they can be handled, viz. (1) "short letters,"

(2) "long letters," (3) "letter packets" (that is, the bulky packets

sent at the letter rate).[620] In order to complete the calculation, the

number of packets which fall respectively into these three classes must

be estimated.

It has been indicated that the actual division is made according to the

size and shape of the packets. The division corresponds approximately

with variation in weight. Few packets weighing more than 3/4 ounce would

come within the class of short letters, that is, of letters which can be

dealt with at the ordinary sorting frames; but as there is no analysis

of the number of packets of less than 1 ounce weight, there is no

alternative to the adoption of 1 ounce as the limit of this class.[621]

The effect of this is slightly adverse to the short letters and

favourable to the heavier packets. As between long letters and the

heavier packets the limit is less definite. In many cases packets of the

same weight fall into one or other class according to their size or

shape, but the mean weight of such indeterminate packets is roughly 4

ounces, and that weight is adopted as giving the mean upper line of

division for long letters.

In Table H are shown the relative rates of stamping and sorting for each

of the various classes of packets.

The proportionate cost per packet of stamping and of sorting, based on

the rates shown in Table H, is given in Table J.[622] The actual cost is

shown in Table L.

The Development of Rates of Postage: An Historical and Analytical Study · 第 20 / 42 段