The arrangements for the exchange of such traffic between different

countries had been conducted under conventions and agreements entered

into by the countries immediately concerned, and the rates to be charged

were prescribed by these conventions or agreements. Foreign rates were

often built up by the addition of a rate for the transmission abroad to

the ordinary rate chargeable for the inland transmission. The fact that

numerous rates were chargeable for one and the same letter in respect of

its transmission within the same country thus naturally made the rates

charged for transmission abroad likewise numerous. In many cases there

was an additional variation in the rate of postage between two countries

according as one or other route was followed. And not only were the

international rates of postage high and complicated. The methods

employed for accounting between the countries respectively concerned in

regard to the proceeds of postage on international letters were equally

complicated and burdensome.

In 1850 the necessity for some simplification of the arrangements for

the interchange of correspondence led to the formation of the

Austro-German Postal Union by Prussia and Austria. The chief feature of

the arrangement was the adoption of a common rate of postage for the

whole territory of the Union, moderate in amount, and based on a small

number of zones of distances. The advantages resulting from the Union

were soon apparent. Other German States joined, and within a short time

the question of extending it to foreign countries was mooted. At a

Conference held in Berlin in 1851, a general European Postal Union was

adumbrated.

The first definite suggestion for the general re-organization of

international postal traffic on a common basis came, however, from

America. In 1863, Mr. Blair, Postmaster-General of the United States, in

a note to the postal administrations of the world, suggested the

assembling of a Congress representative of all nations for the

discussion of the subject. The proposal was favourably received by

fifteen administrations,[575] representing nine-tenths of the commerce

and nineteen-twentieths of the correspondence of the world. The

representatives of these administrations (with the exception of Ecuador)

met at Paris in May 1863.

The Conference was not empowered to enter into any definite arrangement

for the amelioration of the system of international postal traffic. Its

function was simply to discuss and proclaim general principles

applicable to the conduct of the traffic, with a view to their ultimate

adoption by the nations of the world. The discussions centred on the

three fundamental questions of uniformity of weights, uniformity of

rate, and simplification of accounting.[576] Thirty-one articles of

agreement were adopted.[577] These articles recommended, _inter alia_,

the adoption for ordinary letters of a unit of weight and a progression

of weight of 15 grammes; and for corrected proofs, samples, and

documents not in the nature of a letter, a unit and progression of 40

grammes. The Conference was convinced that transit charges were often an

invincible obstacle to the establishment of a really advantageous

international system, and recommended that the transit rate for each

country should never exceed half the postage reckoned at the inland rate

of the country traversed, and that for small countries it should be

even less. For sea transit the Conference recommended that in no case

should the charge against an administration in respect of such transport

be greater than the actual charge made on the country of destination by

the shipping agency by whom the mails were conveyed.

Although its conclusions were without the sanction of authority, the

Conference was nevertheless of great assistance to the development of an

international system. It brought into prominence the obstacles in the

way of international postal intercourse, and the difficulties which must

be removed before a common system could be founded. And it formulated

general principles which might with advantage be observed in the making

of fresh agreements between individual countries, and might serve as a

basis for a common agreement. Its conclusions were, as a matter of fact,

so used in numerous instances.

Towards the end of 1868 Dr. von Stephan, of the postal administration of

the North German Union, published in the official journal of the Union a

definite project for a postal union between all civilized nations, and

proposed a discussion of the project at a universal Congress. The

proposal was taken up by the administration of the North German Union.

The diplomatic arrangements for calling a Conference were, however,

interrupted by the Franco-German War of 1870. After the conclusion of

peace, the proposal was again taken up, and the Swiss Government

undertook the task of inviting the administrations of the chief

countries to send representatives to a Congress at Berne. The invitation

was readily accepted, and the Congress met in 1874.

The proposal submitted to the Conference was that the Union should cover

the following categories of postal traffic:--

(1) Letters.

(2) Postcards.

(3) Newspapers and other printed matter.

(4) Samples.

(5) Commercial papers.

Each contracting State should fix its own international rates, under

the limitation that for letters the rate should not exceed 4d., or 40

centimes; and for newspapers or other printed matter, for samples or

commercial papers, should not be less than 1d., or 10 centimes. There

should be no division of postage, but each State should retain the

postage which it collected. Each State should give liberty of transit,

and transit charges should be abolished, except in the case of

extraordinary charges or services.[578]

The proposals which gave rise to most discussion were those for the

establishment of a uniform rate, and for the gratuitous transit of mails

across the territory of intermediate countries. The vast number of rates

actually existing was made an argument in favour of the uniform rate;

and a low rate was recommended on the ground that it was well known

that, although low rates imposed a temporary monetary loss, they were in

a broad view profitable to the finances of the State.[579] It was urged

that as all rates were already tending to equality, the Congress, by

establishing uniformity, would only be advancing by a few years an

existing tendency. The principle of uniformity of rate and of weight was

adopted unanimously, the rate of charge being fixed at 25 centimes, and

the unit of weight, and progression in the scale of weight, at 15

grammes. The rate of charge, 25 centimes (with the reservations[580]),

was arrived at by consideration of the case of the most unfavourably

situated country as regards conditions of transit, viz. a case in which

there would be five intermediate countries, and consequently five

transit rates. As most, if not all, of the countries represented had

already adopted inland penny postage, this rate, assuming 10 centimes

(or 1d.) to be a reasonable charge for the inland service at both ends,

left 15 centimes (1-1/2d.) to cover the cost of transmission from

country of origin to country of destination; and there was in addition

the optional margin up to 32 centimes which might be taken advantage of,

if a charge of 25 centimes was thought by any administration to be too

little. A proviso was added that for all sea transits exceeding 300

nautical miles a surtax not exceeding half the general rate of the Union

might be added to the postage charge, whether for letters, samples,

printed matter, or commercial papers.

A reduced rate for commercial papers, samples of merchandise,

newspapers, books, pamphlets, catalogues, etc., was adopted without

discussion, the delegates no doubt basing their action on the existence

of similar reduced rates in many countries. The minimum rate for such

packets was fixed at 7 centimes, and the unit of weight and the

progression of weight at 50 grammes. The maximum weight for samples was

fixed at 250 grammes, and that for other articles at 1,000 grammes. A

proposal to increase the weight for samples was opposed by Dr. von

Stephan on the ground that it would cause practical inconvenience in the

post offices.

M. Radoikovitch, the Serbian delegate, proposed a modification of the

progression of rate. He suggested that the packets should be divided

into two categories--those not exceeding 300 grammes, and those over 300

grammes in weight. For the lighter packets he proposed a progression of

50 grammes, and for the heavier packets a greater progression. For the

sake of simplicity it was considered preferable to retain the single

progression, and the proposal, which met with no support, was

withdrawn.[581] All packets (samples, etc.) sent at the lower rate must

be sent under band or in open envelopes, or made up in such a way as to

admit of their being easily examined.[582]

The proposal for gratuity of transit was advanced with a view to

simplification of the administration of the Union. Its adoption would

have made all countries independent, so far as expenses and accounting

were concerned, of intermediate countries, and would have assisted the

adoption of a low rate of postage. It was, however, resolutely opposed

by those countries which, owing to their geographical situation and the

means of communication which they controlled, were called upon to serve

as intermediaries to a special degree. The case of Belgium was of

particular importance. It naturally resulted from her situation that she

was called upon to perform for other countries a transit business much

greater than that performed by other countries for Belgium. The net

revenue accruing to the Belgian administration from this source was very

considerable.[583] France and Italy were in a somewhat similar position,

mainly owing to the transmission of the mails between England and India

by the overland route. France rejected entirely the principle of

gratuitous transit.

It was feared that if an administration derived no benefit from transit

traffic it might be led to discourage it, to the detriment of general

facilities for the transmission of mails, and the Congress arrived at

the conclusion that some method of specially remunerating all countries

for transit services ought to be devised. A simple reservation as

regards special expenses caused by transit traffic was objected to on

the ground that in most cases the international traffic was forwarded by

the ordinary means and no special expense was caused--the real causes of

Post Office expenses being the services of despatch and delivery.[584]

Indeed, it was contended on this ground that the transit of

international mails could not be regarded as a service rendered.

Agreement was reached on most of the points raised by the proposals, and

a Convention constituting an International Postal Union, under the title

"L'Union g['e]n['e]rale des Postes,"[585] was signed on the 9th October

1874, to become operative on the 1st July 1875. The chief provisions of

the Convention in regard to the rates of postage were as follows:--

(1) The rate of postage for the Union was fixed--

(_a_) At 25 centimes for single letters, with liberty for each

country, as might be necessary on account of its monetary system or

for other reasons, to fix a higher or lower rate, provided that

such rate was not greater than 32 centimes, and not less than 20

centimes.

The unit of weight for a single letter was fixed at 15 grammes, and

the scale of progression was by steps of 15 grammes.

(_b_) For postcards, half the rate for letters.

(_c_) For printed matter, samples, and commercial papers the unit

rate was fixed at 7 centimes, with liberty for each country to fix

a rate not exceeding 11 centimes or less than 5 centimes.

The unit weight was fixed at 50 grammes, and the progression of

weight was by steps of 50 grammes. The maximum limit of weight for

samples was fixed at 250 grammes, and for printed matter and

commercial papers at 1,000 grammes.[586]

(2) In cases where letters were forwarded by sea for distances over

300 miles, a surtax not exceeding half the general Union rate of

prepaid postage might be added to the normal rate.

(3) The proposal as to the division of postage was accepted, with

slight amplification.

(4) Transit payments, that is, rates of payment by one

administration to another administration in respect of the

transmission of closed mails over the territory of the second

administration by means which it provided, were fixed at 2 fr. per

kilogramme for mails containing letters and postcards, and 25

centimes per kilogramme for mails containing other articles. The

rates were increased to 4 fr. and to 50 centimes, respectively,

when the distance of transmission exceeded 750 kilometres on the

territory of one administration. In the case of sea transits

exceeding 300 nautical miles, the despatching country was required

to pay to the administration which provided the service, the

expenses of the transportation, not exceeding 6 fr. 50 per

kilogramme for letters and 50 centimes per kilogramme for other

articles.

In November 1875 the Indian Post Office administration applied for

admission to the Union. A further Conference at Berne was thereupon

called to consider this request. Representatives of a large majority of

the signatories of the Treaty of 1874 attended the Conference, and other

questions were raised. France, Spain, and Holland asked for the

admission of their respective colonies; Brazil submitted a declaration

of adhesion; and Great Britain intimated that Canada and Newfoundland

would submit applications. The original Union had been limited to the

European countries, Turkey (including Turkey-in-Asia), Russia-in-Asia,

Northern Africa, Egypt, and the United States of America; and these

further developments widened the problem before the Congress. Instead of

merely considering the question of admitting India, it was called upon

to face the possible extension of the Union to the remotest parts of the

globe.

The question of transit rates, particularly of transit rates by sea,

became therefore one of very great importance and difficulty, since it

was necessary to fix such rates as would permit of the maintenance of

that uniformity and lowness of the rates of postage which were the

fundamental bases of the Union. On this point there were prolonged and

difficult discussions. The French delegates submitted a proposal for the

application of the treaty of Berne to all quarters of the globe, with a

uniform transit rate of 6 fr. 50 per kilogramme for letters and 50

centimes for printed matter, etc.[587]

The countries which maintained the more important and costly maritime

services were not, however, prepared to submit to the loss of revenue

which the adoption of the proposed transit rates would entail.[588]

Germany submitted a scheme for classifying all countries of the world

outside the Union into four groups with four graduated maritime transit

rates of 6 fr. 50, 25 fr., 40 fr. and 60 fr. per kilogramme,

respectively, for letters, and 50 centimes, 1 fr., 1 fr., and 2 fr. per

kilogramme for printed matter, etc.,[589] a proposal which was opposed

as contrary to the fundamental principle of uniformity, and calculated

to give rise to difficulties and complications. Moreover, the zones,

being reckoned as from Europe, were not applicable as between the

distant countries themselves, e.g. between Mexico and the West

Indies.[590]

The Conference was able to arrive at an agreement only as regards the

admission of British India and the French Colonies in Asia, Africa,

America and the Pacific. The entry of these territories was fixed for

the 1st July 1876, and the general international rates of postage and

transit rates, fixed under the Convention of 1874, were made applicable

to the new territories of the Union, except that for transit by sea for

distances exceeding 300 nautical miles a surtax equal to the full

postage rates (32 centimes and 11 centimes) was authorized, instead of a

surtax of half rates fixed under the original treaty; and the transit

rates in respect of mails for or from these territories for distances of

more than 300 nautical miles were made 25 fr. per kilogramme for letters

and postcards, and 1 fr. per kilogramme for printed matter, samples, and

commercial papers.

The later Congresses have added numerous services to those provided

under the original scheme, such as, e.g., reply-paid postcards. For the

most part, however, these additional services are of minor importance,

and concern only a small part of the international traffic,[591] the

bulk of which still passes under the main divisions established at the

first Congress.

In connection with the rates applied to those classes of the traffic

there are three chief points of importance--the initial charge, the

scale of weights, and the transit rates. The question of modifying the

international letter rate, which had remained unchanged since the

foundation of the Union, was raised at the Washington Congress in 1897.

The Austrian delegate proposed, not indeed that the initial charge

should be reduced below 25 centimes, but that the maximum weight allowed

for the single letter should be increased from 15 grammes to 20 grammes.

The British and French delegates opposed the proposal.[592] The French

delegates said it would involve a loss of more than a million francs to

their administration. In some cases, e.g., Italy, the raising of the

limit would have had the effect of rendering the international service

cheaper than the internal service. In the end the proposal was rejected.

The subject of transit rates, which had not been seriously considered

since the first Congress, was also raised at the Congress of Washington

(1897), two proposals in regard to it, by Germany and by Austria-Hungary

respectively, being under discussion. In the original project of the

Union, gratuitous transit had been proposed, with the reservation that

remuneration should be paid in cases of special expenses occasioned to

an intermediary by the transit of foreign mails. The new German proposal

was for the abolition of all transit payments except in those cases

where, according to the statistics of the international service, a

payment of more than 50,000 fr. a year was due, and in those cases the

actual amount due to be reduced by 25 per cent., or at least by 50,000

fr.; to make the amount payable only by those countries whose share

exceeded 10,000 fr.; and the reduction of the maritime transit rate from

15 fr. to 10 fr. This proposal was avowedly a step towards completely

gratuitous territorial transit. The Austrian proposal was for gratuitous

transit for all correspondence sent _[a'] d['e]couvert_, and a reduction of

the transit rates for closed mails. Gratuitous transit, to which, as

already stated, the German proposal admittedly tended, was advocated by

the delegates of the South American countries, but was opposed by

several other countries, especially by Belgium, France, and Italy. As at

the first Congress, the delegates of the latter countries called

attention to the great expense to which they were put in providing

transport for transit mails, and rejected altogether the idea of

gratuitous transit. In face of this opposition, the proposals could not

be carried in their entirety. The transit rates were, however,

considerably reduced, and simplifications in the method of ascertaining

the amounts payable in respect of transit were introduced. The land

rates were reduced from 2 fr. per kilogramme for letters and postcards

and 25 centimes per kilogramme for other articles, to 1 fr. 90 and to

23-3/4 centimes for the years 1899 and 1900, to 1 fr. 80 and to 22-1/2

centimes for the years 1901 and 1902, and to 1 fr. 70 and to 21-1/4

centimes for and after 1903. The maritime transit rates were similarly

reduced. Countries whose expenses for the transit of foreign mails

exceeded the receipts, and those whose combined receipts and expenses

for that purpose did not exceed 5,000 fr. per year, were excused all

payment under this head.

At the next Congress, held at Rome in 1906, the question of reducing the

letter rate and transit rates was again discussed. Proposals to raise

the limit of weight for single letters from 15 grammes to 20 grammes

were submitted by several States. It was pointed out that, although in

general sufficient, the limit of 15 grammes was often exceeded, and

frequently the weight of letters required to be tested, causing

inconvenience both to the public and the postal administrations. The

German delegate expressed the opinion that the public were anticipating

some concession, and that as reduction of the initial rate of 25

centimes was impossible, an increased limit of weight would no doubt be

appreciated.[593] The British delegates pointed out that the equivalent

of 20 grammes in British weight was 2/3 or 3/4 ounce, a unit which would

be highly inconvenient and could not be adopted. They would have

accepted a limit of 30 grammes; but in many countries the existing limit

of weight for the initial letter rate in the inland service was 20

grammes, and the introduction of a higher initial weight in the

international service might lead to difficulties in the case of those

administrations which desired to retain the lower limit in the inland

service. On these grounds they inclined to the maintenance of the

_status quo_. The delegates of the United States, Italy, and Turkey

supported the British view. The Italian delegates pointed out that the

result would in effect be to compel those countries in which the limit

was 15 grammes to introduce modifications into their internal service--a

position which it was obviously undesirable for the Congress to take up.

Japan advocated the maintenance of the existing limit, because the

effect of raising it would be to render further reduction of transit

rates still more difficult. In the end the proposal was adopted by

thirteen votes against twelve.[594] Countries using the avoirdupois

system were to regard 1 ounce as the initial weight limit.

Gratuitous transit was still unacceptable to the majority,[595] but both

land and sea charges were reduced. The land transit rates were reduced

to 1 fr. 50 per kilogramme for letters and postcards and 20 centimes per

kilogramme for other articles, for distances not exceeding 3,000

kilometres; to 3 fr. per kilogramme for letters and postcards and 40

centimes per kilogramme for other articles, for distances between 3,000

and 6,000 kilometres; to 4 fr. 50 per kilogramme for letters and

postcards and 60 centimes per kilogramme for other articles, for

distances between 6,000 kilometres and 9,000 kilometres; and to 6 fr.

per kilogramme for letters and postcards and 80 centimes per kilogramme

for other articles, for distances exceeding 9,000 kilometres.

The sea transit rates were reduced to 1 fr. 50 per kilogramme for

letters and postcards and to 20 centimes for other articles, for

distances not exceeding 300 nautical miles; to 4 fr. per kilogramme for

letters and postcards and to 50 centimes for other articles, for

distances exceeding 300 nautical miles, between countries of Europe,

between parts of Europe, Africa, and Asia on the Mediterranean and Black

Seas, and between Europe and North America; to 8 fr. per kilogramme for

letters and postcards and to 1 fr. for other articles, for all routes

not falling under the above headings.

At this Congress the question of reducing the international letter rate

was raised by Sir J. G. Ward, the Australasian delegate. In 1901 New

Zealand had introduced a universal penny rate for letters, and the

financial results of the change had been regarded as satisfactory. The

loss of revenue was some [L]80,000 in the first year, reduced to [L]50,000

in the second. There was an increase of 35 per cent. in the number of

foreign letters posted in the first year, as compared with an increase

of 1.76 per cent. for the last year under the 2-1/2d. rate.[596]

The proposal met with strong opposition and little support. The

opposition was based entirely on financial considerations, many of the

delegates stating that their administrations were unable to face the

sacrifice of revenue involved. In this connection the term "sacrifice of

revenue" means sacrifice of gross revenue, and not necessarily that the

carrying of foreign letters at a penny would on the whole result in

actual loss through the cost of service being greater than a penny,

although it is probable that the cost of a foreign letter weighing as

much as an ounce would be slightly more than a penny.[597] The proposal

was defeated by eighteen votes to three.[598]

(II) INTERNATIONAL PARCEL POST

The Development of Rates of Postage: An Historical and Analytical Study · 第 19 / 42 段