CRITICISM IN EXCELSIS.

There was a good deal of excitement in the Elysian Fields when the

news went round that the Committee had exercised their power of

electing a certain distinguished Shade to full membership of the

Asphodel Club without a ballot. The general opinion seemed to be that

the Committee had acted wisely, and that the election was in every way

justified. A few members, however, expressed disapproval, not so

much on account of any demerits of his own as of the effect that his

election might produce on the sensitive minds of some who were already

members.

"This Dr. SAMUEL JOHNSON," said one who had been busy in canvassing

opinions, "is fully qualified for membership, but I fear he may have a

deleterious effect on JOHN MILTON and THOMAS GRAY. Did he not roughly

criticise them in his _Lives of the Poets_, and do you think that

MILTON is one who will sit down tamely under the affront? MILTON has

been for years and is still one of our most distinguished members.

Indeed, he has almost the standing amongst us of a highly-respected

Bishop. He uses the Club a great deal, and I fear his comfort will be

much reduced by the admission of one who regards his poetry with a

hostile eye."

"In what way," said another, "has the denouncer of SALMASIUS become

entitled to complain of rough attacks? Nor has his character been

assailed. In that he remains episcopal. Only in his poetry is he made

to suffer."

"But he is made to suffer pretty heavily," said a third. "Hear what

JOHNSON said with regard to our friend's _Lycidas_:--

"'One of the poems on which much praise has been bestowed is

_Lycidas_; of which the diction is harsh, the rhymes uncertain and the

numbers unpleasing. What beauty there is we must therefore seek in the

sentiments and images. It is not to be considered as the effusion of

real passion; for passion runs not after remote allusions and obscure

opinions. Passion plucks no berries from the myrtle and ivy, nor calls

upon Arethuse and Mincius, nor tells of rough _satyrs_ and _fauns

with cloven heel_. Where there is leisure for fiction there is little

grief.

"'In this poem there is no nature for there is no truth; there is no

art for there is nothing new. Its form is that of a pastoral: easy,

vulgar and therefore disgusting.'

"Do you call that criticism?"

"Ah, but listen," said another and much agitated Shade, "to what he

says of our respected THOMAS GRAY. The Committee must have forgotten

how it goes:--

"These odes are marked by glittering accumulation of ungraceful

ornaments; they strike rather than please; the images are magnified by

affectation, the language is laboured into harshness. The mind of the

writer seems to work with unnatural violence. _Double, double, toil

and trouble_. He has a kind of strutting dignity and is tall by

walking on tiptoe."

The agitated Shade was about to proceed further with his protest when

a sound of cheering stopped him. And lo and behold! an approving

throng was circling round the new member, and in the thick of it were

JOHN MILTON and THOMAS GRAY.

* * * * *

"FOR THIS RELIEF," ETC.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, April 16, 1919 · 第 42 / 44 题