CHAPTER X

THE BATTLE OF HOLY RIVER AND THE PILGRIMAGE TO ROME

1026-1027

One of the notable results of the expedition to the South Baltic in 1022

was that a reconciliation was effected with Thurkil the Tall. "And he

gave Denmark into the keeping of Thurkil and his son; and the King

brought Thurkil's son with him to England."[303] The son who was thus

made regent was probably Sweyn; it was scarcely Harthacanute, as this

Prince was present at the translation of Saint Alphege from London to

Canterbury that same year (1023); of Canute's other son, Harold

Harefoot, we hear nothing until after the King's death. The hostage that

Canute took with him to England may have been Harold who played an

important part in Northern history two decades later. Thurkil cannot

have lived long after his promotion to the vice-royalty, for three years

later (1026), we find Harthacanute representing royal authority in

Denmark with Earl Ulf as guardian and actual wielder of power. This

change in the regency we may, perhaps, ascribe to the activities of

Queen Emma, one of whose chief purposes in life was to disinherit her

husband's illegitimate offspring.

The next few months seem to have witnessed a revolution in Denmark: Earl

Ulf appears to have summoned a national assembly at Viborg, an old

sanctuary in the north central part of Jutland, where he announced that

it was Canute's desire to have his young eight-year-old son chosen and

proclaimed King of Denmark. With evident success he argued that the

ancient kingdom, which always had had a ruler within its borders, was

poorly served by the present arrangement of subjection to an

absentee-king. He also called attention to the threatened invasion from

the allied kingdoms of Norway and Sweden. The sagas assert that Queen

Emma had plotted with Earl Ulf to secure the royal name for her son and

that she had even forged a document to support the move. The assembly

assented and Harthacanute was proclaimed King.[304]

There are suggestions that Ulf at this time was in communication with

the allied monarchs and that he had even encouraged them to invade the

Danish territories. Evidence is wanting, but it is clear that Ulf's

activities in 1026 were not of the proper sort.[305] The Earl was an

ambitious and turbulent man, closely connected with both the Danish and

the Swedish dynasties. He was a man of the type that finds service

difficult; it is clear that Canute suspected him of treason.

After Canute's departure for England the Northern kings had their

conference at Kingscrag where a closer alliance was formed and offensive

operations were probably determined upon. Soon afterwards King Olaf was

on his way to his northern capital to raise the host for a grand effort.

It seems that the chiefs quite generally obeyed the summons; of the

leaders in the northern shires Einar Thongshaker alone remained at home

on his estates. A considerable fleet gathered at the rendezvous at the

mouth of Throndhjem Firth; as it sailed southward there were constant

additions, till it finally counted 480 ships. The royal flagship was the

_Bison_, a longship that had been built the winter before, the prow of

which bore the head of a bison adorned with gold.

On the journey southward, King Olaf learned that Canute was still in

England, but that he was making preparations for a grand attack. He also

learned that Erling Skjalgsson was now with his sons in the enemy's

service. But no one knew when the English host might be expected; time

passed and the Norsemen began to tire of inaction. Accordingly King Olaf

dismissed the least effective part of his forces and with the remainder,

sixty large and well-manned ships, sailed for the coast of Zealand,

expecting later to join the Swedish armament that had gathered on the

Scanian coast.[306]

Meanwhile, Canute had hastened his preparations. One of his Scanian

subjects, Hakon of Stangeby, had, when the plans of the enemy had become

evident, hastened to England to warn his King. It is said that Canute

rewarded him with an estate in Scania for his loyalty and

promptness.[307] It was a mighty fleet that sailed from southern England

that summer; Canute led the expedition in person with Earl Hakon

apparently as second in command. Snorre reports that Canute's ship had

one hundred and twenty oars, while that of the Earl had eighty. Both

ships were provided with golden figureheads; but their sails were

counted particularly splendid with their stripes of blue and red and

green.

Earl Ulf had by this time come to realise that Denmark could not afford

to ignore the Lord of England. There was evidently much dissatisfaction

with the Earl's régime, for we find that the Danes in large numbers

accepted the invaders. Ulf and Harthacanute soon retreated to Jutland,

and left the islands and Scania to the enemy.

The situation that Canute found when he sailed into the Lime Firth was

perhaps not wholly a surprise; he must have known something about what

his deputy had been plotting and doing. That he was angry is evident;

that his wrath was feared is also clear. Harthacanute was advised to

submit; he knelt before his father and obtained forgiveness, as the King

realised that no responsibility could lodge with a witless boy. Ulf also

tried to make terms with the offended monarch, but was merely told to

collect his forces and join in the defence of the kingdom; later he

might propose terms.

Such is Snorre's account[308]; it may be inaccurate in details, but the

main fact that Earl Ulf was faithless to his trust seems to be correctly

stated. Elsewhere, too, Ulf is accused of opposition to his King: Saxo

charges him with treason[309]; and an entry in the _Anglo-Saxon

Chronicle_ tells us that Canute went east to fight Ulf and Eglaf.[310]

There has been some dispute as to the identity of these chiefs, but

unless evidence to the contrary is forthcoming, we shall have to

conclude that they were the two brothers who were earls in England in

the early days of Canute as English king. Shortly before this (1024),

Eglaf's name disappears from the English sources. The Chronicler was

evidently not informed as to the situation in the North; but he knew

that the two brothers were among the opponents of the King and recorded

what he knew.

Meanwhile, Olaf was on the shores of Zealand with his longships. Saxo

relates that one day while he was addressing the Danes at a public

assembly with a view to winning them to his own allegiance, spies rushed

up and reported that they had seen several ships approaching. An aged

Dane assured the King that the ships were merchantmen only; but when

sails in growing numbers began to cross the horizon, he added that they

were merchantmen who had come to buy Denmark with iron.[311]

From the Lime Firth, Canute must have sailed his fleet southeastward to

the upper entrance of the Sound; at any rate, King Olaf soon discovered

that the homeward route had been effectually blocked. There was now

nothing to do but to continue the journey eastward and to form a

junction with King Anund's fleet which was harrying the Scanian coast.

Canute must have followed in hot pursuit, for before the enemies could

form a junction he seems to have found and defeated a part of the

Swedish fleet at Stangeberg.[312] A little later, he came up with the

combined strength of the allied Kings near the mouth of Holy River.

Holy River is a short stream in the eastern part of Scania that serves

as the outlet of a group of lakes not far inland. Between these lakes

and the sea the forest was heavy enough to conceal any activities

inland. When the Kings learned that the Danish fleet was approaching,

they took counsel and decided to draw up their ships in battle order

east of the river mouth, but to act on the defensive. King Anund was to

remain in charge of the fleet while King Olaf, who is reputed to have

been something of a military engineer, went inland to prepare a trap for

the enemy. Where the river left the lakes he is said to have built a

temporary dam of trees and turf, and he also improved the outlets of

some of the smaller lakes, so as to increase the water masses behind the

dam. Many days the work continued under Olaf's direction. Then came the

message that Canute had arrived and the Norsemen hastened to their

ships.

It was late in the afternoon when Anund's spies finally caught sight of

the great armament approaching from the west. Swift-footed couriers at

once left for the lakes to inform Olaf, who immediately prepared to

break the dam, at the same time filling the course with large trees.

Canute saw the enemy drawn up in line and ready for the fight; but it

was then too late to proceed to the attack; moreover, the enemy had the

advantage of a carefully chosen position. The Dane therefore refused

battle that day. Finding the harbour at the river mouth empty, he sailed

into it with as many ships as could be accommodated; the remainder were

left just outside.

At dawn the next morning, a large part of Canute's forces was found

to have landed; some were conversing, others seeking amusement.

Then without the least warning the waters came down in torrents,

dashing the floating trees against the ships. The ships were

injured and the waters overflowed the river banks, drowning the men

who had gone on land and also many who were still on the ships.

Those who were able to do so cut the ropes and allowed their ships

to drift, each in its own direction. The great dragon that Canute

himself commanded was among these; it was not easily managed by the

oars alone and drifted out toward the hostile fleet. But when the

allies recognised the ship, they immediately surrounded it; but it

was not easily attacked, for the ship was high like a castle and

had a number of men on board, who were carefully chosen, thoroughly

armed, and very reliable. It was not long before Earl Ulf came up

alongside with his ships and men and the battle was now joined in

earnest. Canute's forces now came up from all sides. Then the Kings

Olaf and Anund realised that they had now won as much as fate had

allowed them for this time; so they ordered a retreat, withdrew

from Canute's fleet, and separated from the fight.[313]

In its disorganised condition Canute's host could make no effective

pursuit. The Danes and English had suffered heavy losses, while those of

the Swedes and Norsemen were slight; still their combined forces were

yet inferior to those of Canute. It was, therefore, agreed to avoid

further battle. Eastward the course continued, the intention being to

stop for the night in the harbour of Barwick on the coast of Bleking.

However, a large part of the Swedish fleet did not enter the harbour,

but continued the journey eastward and northward; nor were the sails

lowered before the chiefs had reached their respective homes.

Early the following morning, King Anund ordered the signal to be sounded

for a council of the remaining chiefs. The entire army landed and the

assembly proceeded to discuss the situation. King Anund announced that

of 420 ships that had joined him in the preceding summer only 120 were

now in the harbour. These with the sixty Norwegian ships did not make a

force sufficient for successful operations against Canute. The Swedish

King therefore proposed to Olaf that he should spend the winter in

Sweden, and in the spring, perhaps, they might be able to renew

hostilities. Olaf demurred: the former viking could not surrender his

purposes so readily; it would still be possible, he argued, to defeat

Canute as his large fleet would soon be compelled to scatter in search

of provisions, his eastern coasts having been too recently harried to

afford much in the way of supplies. But the outcome was that Olaf left

his ships in Sweden and returned to Norway overland.

Canute kept informed as to the situation in the enemies' fleet and army

but did not attempt pursuit. It would seem that a great opportunity was

thus permitted to slip past; but the King probably did not so regard it.

To fight the Swedes was not a part of his present plan; his hope was to

detach King Anund from his more vigorous ally. When he learned that the

hostile fleet was about to dissolve, he returned to Zealand and blocked

the Sound, hoping, no doubt, to intercept the Norwegian King on his

return northward. As we have seen, however, Olaf appreciated the danger

and refused to risk an ambush. That same season saw him on the march

through south-western Sweden to his manors on the shores of the great

Firth. On his arrival in his own land, he dismissed the larger part of

his host; only a small body of trusted men including several prominent

magnates remained with him at Sarpsborg, where he prepared to spend the

winter.[314]

Of this campaign we have, broadly speaking, but one detailed

account,--the one given in the sagas. As these are far from

contemporary, doubts have been cast upon the story, but in the main it

seems reliable. That there was a battle at Holy River we know from the

_Anglo-Saxon Chronicle_, which states that Canute was defeated at that

place by Ulf and Eglaf supported by a large force of Swedes. As to the

strategic device of King Olaf, we cannot be so sure; but the account in

the sagas reveals a topographical knowledge so specific as to argue

strongly for the belief that the authors must have had access to

reliable sources. There is also a question as to the date of the battle:

Snorre seems to place it in 1027; the _Old English Chronicle_ has it in

1025. The battle seems to have been fought some time in September, 1026.

It evidently occurred before Canute made his pilgrimage to Rome, where

we find him at Easter, 1027.

Though Canute suffered a defeat at Holy River, the outcome gave no

advantage to his enemies. The Swedes were discouraged and tired of a

conflict which, after all, did not seem to concern them. King Olaf was

discredited: a King who had abandoned his ships was not in position to

claim a victory. From that day he found disloyalty everywhere. The

pretender had only to appear on the Norwegian coasts with ships and men

to secure the enthusiastic allegiance of the rebellious Norsemen.

Canute was not prepared, however, to move against Olaf at this time.

Autumn was coming on, a season that was far too short for naval

operations. And soon a tragedy was enacted at the Danish court, the

consequences of which probably caused a complete rearrangement of

Canute's immediate plans. The day before Michaelmas the King proceeded

to Roeskild, where Earl Ulf had prepared an elaborate entertainment for

him and his train. According to the sagas Ulf was aggressive, vigorous,

and brave; but he was also tactless and careless in speech, and

possessed a temper that was not easily controlled. The festivities did

not seem to please the King--he was moody and silent. In the evening Ulf

suggested a game of chess, hoping, no doubt, that the play would help

to restore the royal good humour.

But as they were playing at chess, King Canute and Earl Ulf, the

King made a wrong move and the Earl took one of his knights. The

King moved his opponent's chessman back and told him to make

another play; this angered the Earl; he overturned the chessboard,

rose, and left the table. Then said the King, "Are you running away

now, timid Wolf!" The Earl turned in the doorway and replied,

"Farther you would have run at Holy River, if you had been able.

You did not then call Ulf timid, when I rushed up to help you, when

the Swedes were threshing you and your men like dogs." With that

the Earl left the room and went to sleep.[315]

It is not likely, however, that the Earl's rest was wholly undisturbed

that night, for in the morning he was found to have sought sanctuary in

Holy Trinity Church. Nor did sleep appease the King's anger; while he

was dressing the next morning, he ordered his shoe-swain to go at once

and slay Ulf. But the servant dared not strike him within the sacred

precincts. Then the King called Ivar White, one of his guardsmen, a

Norseman who is said to have been Earl Eric's nephew,[316] and sent him

with similar orders. Ivar soon returned to the King with a bloody sword

as evidence that his sister's husband was no more.

[Illustration: Lines from the oldest fragment of Snorre's History

(written about 1260). The fragment tells the story of the battle of Holy

River and the murder of Ulf.]

[Illustration: A LONGSHIP--Model of the Gokstad ship on the waves.]

Tales of chess games that have resulted seriously for at least one of

the players appear elsewhere in mediæval literature; hence it would not

be safe to accept this account without question. Still, there is nothing

improbable about the tale; the insult that Ulf offered was evidently

seized upon by the King as a pretext for ridding himself of a man whom

he believed to be a traitor. An independent English tradition credits

Canute with a passion for the game: the historian of Ramsey tells us

that Bishop Ethelric once found him "relieving the wearisomeness of the

long night with games of dice and chess."[317] Nor is there any reason

to doubt that Ulf was actually assassinated at the time; his name

disappears from the sources.

A life had been taken in God's own house; blood had been shed before the

very altar; even though the King had ordered it, the Church could not

overlook the crime. The priests immediately closed the church; but on

the King's command, it was again opened and mass was said as before. It

is recorded that large possessions were added to the church when

services were resumed. To his sister the widowed Estrid, the King also

owed satisfaction; we are told that she, too, received large landed

estates. But her young son Sweyn, who was at this time scarcely more

than eight years old, she prudently seems to have removed from her

brother's kingdom; for twelve years the future King of Denmark was a

guest at the Swedish court.[318]

It seems that the scene of his recent guilt had small attraction for

Canute after that fateful Michaelmas season. He is said to have left the

city and to have taken up his abode on his longship. But not many months

later we find him on a pilgrimage to the capital of Christendom. The

journey must have been planned during the autumn of 1026; it was

actually undertaken during the early months of the following year;

apparently the pilgrims arrived in Rome toward the end of March.

We cannot be sure what induced King Canute to make this journey at this

particular time. In his message to the English people he says that he

went to seek forgiveness for his sins; but this pious phrase is almost a

rhetorical necessity in mediæval documents and must not be regarded too

seriously. Nor can we trust the statement that the King had earlier

vowed to make such a pilgrimage, but had hitherto been prevented by

business of state; for the year 1027 had surely but little to offer in

the way of leisure and peace. The motive must be sought in the political

situation that had developed in the North in the year of the Holy River

campaign, and in the strained relations that must have arisen between

the King and the Church.

No doubt the eyes of the Christian world looked approvingly on the

persistent efforts that Olaf of Norway, who was canonised four years

later, was making to extirpate heathendom in the North. Especially must

the English priesthood have looked with pride and pleasure on the

vigorous growth of the Norse daughter Church. But here comes the

Christian King of England with hostile forces to interfere in behalf of

King Olaf's enemies. Canute probably protested that he would carry on

the work; but it is clear that an absent monarch with wide imperial

interests could scarcely hope to carry out successfully a policy that

implied revolution both socially and religiously. His hand had also been

raised against the Christian ruler of Sweden, which was yet a heathen

land, against a prince in whom the Church doubtless reposed confidence

and hope. Perhaps worst of all, Canute's hand was red with the blood of

his sister's husband, his support at Holy River, whose life had been

taken in violation of the right of sanctuary and sacred peace. The

mediæval Church was a sensitive organism and offences of this sort were

not easily atoned for. It was time to pray at Saint Peter's tomb. It is

also likely that Canute hoped to gain certain political advantages from

the journey: in a strife with the Northern powers it would be well to

have the Emperor a passive if not an active ally; and this was the year

of the imperial coronation.

Norse tradition remembers Canute's pilgrimage as that of a penitent: "he

took staff and scrip, as did all the men who travelled with him, and

journeyed southward to Rome; and the Emperor himself came out to meet

him and he accompanied him all the way to the Roman city."[319] Sighvat

the Scald, who was both Canute's and Olaf's friend, also mentions the

pilgrim's staff in his reference to the royal pilgrimage.[320] Still, it

is not to be thought that gold was overlooked in preparing for the

journey: the saga adds that "King Canute had many horses with him laden

with gold and silver," and that alms were distributed with a free hand.

The Encomiast, who saw the King in the monastery of Saint Bertin in the

Flemish city of Saint-Omer, also gives us a picture, though one that is

clearly exaggerated, of a penitent who is seeking forgiveness and

reconciliation. With humble mien the royal pilgrim entered the holy

precincts; his eyes cast down and streaming with tears, he implored the

suffrages of the saints; beating his breast and heaving sighs, he passed

from altar to altar, kissed the sacred stones, and left large gifts upon

each, even upon the smallest. In addition alms were distributed among

the needy.[321]

The route followed was the old one from Denmark south-westward along the

German coast to Flanders, whence the journey went southward through

Lorraine and the Rhone country. It seems to have been Canute's

intention to visit King Rudolf of Burgundy on the way; but he was found

to have departed on a similar journey to the Eternal City. The progress

was one that was doubtless long remembered in the monasteries along the

route. Important institutions at some distance from the chosen route

seem also to have been remembered in a substantial way; it may have been

on this occasion that a gift was sent to the monastic foundation at

Chartres, of which we have grateful acknowledgment in the Epistles of

Bishop Fulbert[322]; and another to the church at Cologne, a costly

psalter and sacramentary which some time later found their way back to

England.[323]

On Easter Day (March 26), King Canute assisted at the imperial

coronation ceremony; on that day King Conrad and Queen Gisela received

the imperial crowns in the Church of the Holy Apostles.[324] The

assembly was large and splendid and the visiting sovereigns held places

of conspicuous honour. When the Emperor at the close of the ceremony

left the Church, Canute and Rudolf walked beside him. It was a day of

great rejoicing among Conrad's German followers, ending, as was

customary, with a fight between them and their Roman hosts.

On the 6th of April, a great synod met at the Lateran to consider

various weighty matters and to settle certain important controversies.

It may have been at this meeting, though preliminary negotiations must

have prepared the matter to some extent, that King Canute or his

spokesman stated the complaints of the English Church. For one thing he

urged that the price extorted from the English archbishops for the

pallium was too high. The Pope promised to reduce the charges on

condition that Peter's pence be regularly paid. Apparently the curia

urged reform in church dues generally, for a little later Canute sent

his English subjects a sharp reminder on this point. The Pope also

agreed to exempt the English school at Rome from the customary tribute.

On the whole it seems, however, that the more substantial results of the

negotiations remained with the Roman curia.

The English King had another set of grievances which seem to have been

discussed in the same synod, but which particularly interested the ruler

of Burgundy. English and Danish pilgrims, he asserted, were not given

fair and considerate treatment on their journeys to Rome: they were

afflicted with unjust tolls and with overcharges at the inns; evidently

Canute also felt that the highways should be made safer and justice

more accessible to those who travelled on holy errands. In the matter

of undue charges, the Burgundians appear to have been especially guilty.

The reasonableness of Canute's request was apparent to the synod, and it

was decreed that the treatment of pilgrims should be liberal and just:

and all the princes have engaged by their edict, that my men,

whether merchants or other travellers for objects of devotion,

should go and return in security and peace, without any constraint

of barriers or tolls.[325]

From Rome, Canute hurried back to Denmark, following the same route, it

seems, as on the journey south. Soon after his return he sent a message

to the English clergy and people, advising them as to his absence and

doings in Italy.[326] From the use of the phrase, "here in the East" in

speaking of the Scandinavian difficulties, it seems likely that the

message was composed in Denmark or somewhere on the route not far from

that kingdom. It was carried to England by Bishop Lifing of Crediton. In

this document Canute also recounts the honours bestowed upon him in

Italy; especially does he recall the presents of Emperor Conrad: "divers

costly gifts, as well in golden and silver vessels as in mantles and

vestments exceedingly precious."

The document also asks that the lawful church-dues be regularly

paid,--Peter's pence, plough alms, church scot, and tithes of the

increase of animals and of farm products. This admonition was later

enacted into law. At the same time he forbids his sheriffs and other

officials to do injustice to any one, rich or poor, either in the hope

of winning the royal favour or to gain wealth for the King. He has no

need of wealth that has been unjustly acquired. But this lofty assertion

of principle looks somewhat strange in the light of the fact that the

King was in those very days engaged in bribing a nation.

There can be no doubt that the visit to the Eternal City was of

considerable importance for the future career of the Anglo-Danish King.

Doubtless Rome began to realise what a power was this young monarch who

up to this time had probably been regarded as little better than a

barbarian, one of those dreaded pirates who had so long and so often

terrorised the Italian shores. Here he was next to the Emperor the most

redoubtable Christian ruler in Europe. Probably Canute returned to the

North with the Pope's approval of his plans for empire in

Scandinavia,--tacit if not expressed. John XIX. was a Pope whose ideal

of a church was one that was efficiently administered and he may have

seen in Canute a ruler of his own spirit.

FOOTNOTES:

[303] _Anglo-Saxon Chronicle_, 1023.

[304] Snorre, _Saga of Saint Olaf_, c. 148.

[305] Steenstrup, _Normannerne_, iii., 349.

[306] Snorre, _Saga of Saint Olaf_, c. 144.

[307] Saxo, _Gesta Danorum_, 347-348. There seems to be no reason to

doubt that Saxo here reports a reliable tradition.

[308] _Saga of Saint Olaf_, c. 148.

[309] _Gesta Danorum_, 347 ff.

[310] Entry for the year 1025; this should be corrected to 1026.

[311] _Gesta Danorum_, 348.

[312] _Ibid._

[313] Snorre, _Saga of Saint Olaf_, c. 150.

[314] Snorre, _Saga of Saint Olaf_, cc. 154-159.

[315] Snorre, _Saga of Saint Olaf_, c. 153.

[316] Munch, _Det Norske Folks Historie_, I., ii., 737.

[317] _Historia Rameseiensis_, 137.

[318] Adamus, _Gesta_, ii., c. 71.

[319] _Fagrskinna_, c. 33.

[320] _Corpus Poeticum Boreale_, ii., 136. The statement in _Fagrskinna_

is probably based on Sighvat's verses.

[321] _Encomium Emmæ_, ii., c. 20.

[322] Migne, _Patrologia Latina_, cxli, col. 231. As to its date the

letter furnishes no clue. Bishop Fulbert died, according to Migne's

calculations, in April, 1029, two years after Canute's journey.

[323] Wharton, _Anglia Sacra_, ii., 249; William of Malmesbury's _Vita

Wulstani_. The manuscripts were illuminated by Erven, scholasticus of

Peterborough.

[324] Giesebrecht, _Geschichte der deutschen Kaiserzeit_, ii., 241-243.

For a collection of the relevant texts, see Bresslau's _Jahrbücher des

deutschen Reichs unter Konrad II._, i., 139.

[325] See Appendix ii.: Canute's Charter of 1027.

[326] The Anglo-Saxon original of Canute's Charter has been lost. Our

oldest version is a Latin translation inserted into the Chronicle of

Florence of Worcester (see Liebermann, _Gesetze der Angelsachsen_, i.,

276, 277). Most of our information as to Canute's pilgrimage comes from

this document.

Canute the Great, 995 (circa)-1035, and the Rise of Danish Imperialism during the Viking Age · 第 10 / 15 章