When the chest and the head fall forward, the most common method of

trying to correct the stoop is to put on some instrument by which the

shoulders and the head are held back. To operate upon the shoulders,

the common back-collar is applied, and to hold back the head, a

riband is brought over the forehead and fastened to the collar.

While these instruments are kept on, the figure looks straight,

though stiff and constrained; but the moment they are taken off,

both the head and the shoulders fall more forward, than before

their application. Many examples of the bad effect of artificially

supporting the head might be offered. The following, although

observed in the figure of a horse, is very demonstrative. When the

rein (called the bearing-rein), by which the head of a carriage-horse

is reared up, with the intention of giving him a showy figure, is

loosened, the head immediately falls forward, and the neck, instead

of preserving the fine arch that is so much admired, droops between

the shoulders. Looking to this effect, we should at first be inclined

to condemn the practice followed by horse-dealers, of reining up

the head of a young horse in the stable, by means of the apparatus

called a dumb-jockey. But on examining into this mode of fixing

the head, it will be found to operate on a different principle from

the bearing-rein. Instead of a [p238] simple bit, such as the horse

in harness can lean his head upon, without suffering pain, a bit,

calculated to tease and fret, is put into the young horse’s mouth.

To relieve himself from the irritation produced by this, and which

is increased by the constant pull of the elastic piece of iron to

which the rein is fastened, he curls up his neck, and thus brings

all the muscles of the back of the neck into strong action, instead

of allowing their power to be superseded by the artificial support

afforded by the bearing-rein to the horse in harness[38].

Many different contrivances, but all acting nearly on the same

principle as the _bearing-rein_, have been proposed as means for

obliging a girl to keep her head erect.

[Illustration]

There is one mode which, to a person ignorant of anatomy, seems to be

particularly well adapted for this purpose; but it is, in fact, more

objectionable than the plan of tying the head back with a riband. A

piece of lead, of some pounds weight, [p239] is slung over the back

in such a way that it must be supported by a riband put around the

head.

Although this contrivance prevents the head for a time from falling

forwards, its bad effects may be demonstrated. When the weight is on,

the muscles of the back of the spine are passive, while those on the

fore-part of the neck are necessarily brought into action to prevent

the head from being pulled too far back: this is easily proved; for

if we put the fingers on the sternal portions of the sterno-cleido

muscle, which, with the small muscles on the fore-part of the throat,

pull the head forwards, we shall feel them tense and in action. The

increased activity of the muscles on the fore part, and the passive

condition of those of the back, may be further exemplified by raising

the weight when the girl is not aware of our doing so; the head will

then be immediately poked forwards.

We have many opportunities of observing the incorrectness of the

principle on which all similar plans for the cure of a stoop have

been founded. For instance, porters who carry burthens on the back,

by the assistance of a band round the forehead, always stoop; while

those who carry baskets before them suspended by a band round the

back of the neck, are peculiarly erect. But the most remarkable

example of the effect of the head being pulled back by a weight hung

behind, is the condition of the women who carry salt in the streets

of Edinburgh, for they may be recognised as much by their miserable

Sardonic grin, which is caused by the constant excitement of the

platysma myoides muscle, as by their stoop.

Very annoying and even distressing consequences may ensue from any

system of treatment where a constant resistance to the muscles of

the fore-part of the neck is kept up. A gentleman had for many

years worn one of the collars invented by Mr. Chesher; after some

time, the muscles of the back became so weak, as to be incapable

of supporting the column, while those on the fore-part of the neck

were so disproportionately increased in strength, by the constant

resistance opposed to them by the strap passing from the suspending

rod under the chin, that whenever the strap was loosened, the chin

was forcibly drawn towards the chest. As the muscles of the back part

of the neck did not offer any counteracting resistance, the [p240]

windpipe was now pressed down, or almost doubled itself. As soon as

this took place (and it was almost immediate on the attempt to sit

up without the collar,) the patient was seized with such a sense of

suffocation, as to be obliged to throw himself on his back. As he was

able to breathe with ease as he lay on his back, his advisers were

led to believe that it was the weight of the head which pressed down

the windpipe. To counteract this pressure, various contrivances had

been proposed to support the head. Indeed, the patient himself was

so convinced, from what he had heard, that it was the weight of the

head which pressed down the windpipe, and so alarmed had he become

from the certainty of having a fit of suffocation when the head was

left unsupported, that there was much difficulty in persuading him

to believe that if the head could be made _heavier_, the sense of

suffocation would be relieved. He was at length induced, although

with great dread of the consequence, to allow about fourteen pounds

of shot to be placed on the top of his head. He was very much

alarmed, but it was highly gratifying to witness his surprise and

pleasure in finding that, instead of his head being weighed down, he

could support it, and could breathe with ease while in the upright

posture. The following is the principle on which this plan was

proposed:—the muscles of the back part of the neck had been brought

into such a state, that their ordinary stimulus was not sufficient

to excite them to the action necessary to counteract the efforts

of those on the fore-part of the neck, which had been evidently

increased in strength. The placing a weight on a certain spot on the

head formed an additional stimulus to the muscles of the back part

of the neck; a fact which the reader may prove by an experiment on

himself.

By proceeding on this principle, by combining a variety of exercises,

and by gradually diminishing the weight carried on the head, this

gentleman was soon able to walk and sit in a state of great comfort,

without being obliged to use any artificial support.

It is well known, that the neck-collars support almost the whole

weight of the head and shoulders by the strap which passes under

the chin. It must also have been observed, that the wearer very

frequently pushes down the head against the [p241] chin strap. In

this way, the muscles on the fore-part necessarily become stronger,

while those of the back, being deprived of their natural stimulus to

action, in consequence of the rod superseding their office, become

diminished in power. Even were there no change in the degree of

strength in the muscles on the fore-part, the head would naturally

fall, if the support afforded by the chin strap were removed; but as

these muscles are increased in power, while those of the back are

diminished, the head must not only fall, but even be pulled down.

However, although the collars and the lead weight, as they are

generally used, are not only inefficacious; but even hurtful,

they may occasionally be useful in keeping the head in a certain

position, after it has been brought to it by such exercises as tend

to strengthen those muscles of the back which support the shoulders

and head. But the opinions commonly entertained, as to the means of

counteracting an habitual stoop, are so erroneous, that even the

position of a tailor sitting on his shopboard is better than the

plans generally recommended. This at first appears ridiculous; but

the manner a tailor holds his body when he walks, proves that there

is something in his habits which tends to the correction of a stoop;

for he is quite a caricature of a strutting erect figure, especially

in the way he bends in his loins and carries his head.

The peculiarity of the tailor’s gait proceeds, in a certain degree,

from the bent position in which he sits: but this explanation is not

at first satisfactory, since it may be observed that other tradesmen,

who also stoop while at work, generally have their head inclined

forwards, and have also a distinct and habitual bend in the neck;

such, especially, is the condition of persons who sit at a table and

stoop forwards, as watchmakers, engravers, &c. It is not difficult

to explain the cause of the difference, and the inquiry will assist

in directing us to the principles which we ought to recollect in our

operations upon the spine.

In the sitting position of the tailor, the head hangs so low, and

so complete an arch is formed between it and the pelvis, that the

muscles of the spine are called into strong action to support the

head; the necessary consequence of this is, that these muscles become

even unnaturally strong, or at least so strong as to predominate

over those by which the spine is [p242] pulled forward. But the

bent position is not the only cause of increase in the strength of

the muscles, for it depends also on the exercise given by frequently

jerking the head backwards. In those who stoop from the middle of

the body, as in writing or working at a table, the muscles of the

spine are not called into action; for, while the head is in this

position, it rests or is supported by the ligament of the neck.

The ligament, being thus kept constantly on the stretch, becomes

lengthened, instead of being made more contractile, as muscles would

be; and hence the stoop is increased. When this is combined with the

consequences of the want of muscular action, the deeper ligaments,

which bind the upper vertebræ, gradually yield; if the operation of

these causes continues for a certain time, the bones and cartilages

themselves become altered in shape, and consequently an almost

irremediable stoop is produced[39].

This view derives confirmation, from what may be observed in the

shape of the tailors in some parts of Germany, who, instead of having

the erect figures of London tailors, are quite bent. On inquiring

into the cause, we find that, instead of sitting as tailors do in

this country, a hole is cut in the table, and a seat is placed within

it; so that their position, while working, becomes nearly the same as

that of persons who stoop while sitting at a table.

It may, perhaps, be objected, that labourers, and especially the

vine-dressers in France, are remarkable for the complete arch which

their body forms, although they bend while at work as much as the

tailor does. This may also be explained; for in the labourer the bend

is produced by the pelvis rolling on the head of the thigh bones,

while in a person sitting as a tailor the pelvis continues nearly

fixed, and the bend is in the vertebræ on the pelvis.

The erect figure of the Turk perhaps comes from the manner of sitting

which is common among Eastern nations; but the heavy turban, and the

spice box slung from the back of the neck, may account in a great

measure for the fine figures of the Turkish Jews who frequent the

streets of London. [p243]

We may even take the shoemaker as an example of the effect of a

particular manner of sitting, and of frequently using the muscles

of the shoulders. He is also a little in caricature, but he carries

himself better than the tailor, and the cause is obvious. The

tailor’s figure is very erect, but the right shoulder is generally

a little higher or larger than the left, from the constant exercise

given to the right arm, while the left rests upon the knee: this

inequality of the shoulders is not observed in the shoemaker, because

he not only uses both arms equally, but the muscles by which the

scapulæ are supported, become so strong by the habit of jerking back

his elbows while he works, that his shoulders always appear more

braced back than those of any other class of persons: indeed, so

characteristic are the figures of tailors and shoemakers, that they

may be easily distinguished in a crowd.

These circumstances are mentioned, as they afford familiar examples

of the principles on which we ought to proceed, in endeavouring

to correct deformities; but it would be ridiculous to propose the

position either of the tailor or of the shoemaker, as the best

adapted to correct a stoop or falling forward of the shoulders.

The preceding observations apply also to the contrivances usually

employed to keep the shoulders back, and particularly to the question

of the propriety of using the common back-collar. The effect which

this instrument produces in ordinary cases may be easily comprehended

by the following diagram.

[Illustration]

[p244]

The part of the back formed by the ribs is not a flat, but rather a

round surface; and as the shoulder-blades rest on this, they would

fall forwards were they not prevented by the collar-bones; but as

these bones are united to the breast-bone by a moveable joint, and

as the weight of the arms operates principally on the anterior

angles of the scapulæ, both the collar-bones and the shoulders would

fall forwards, were it not for the action of several strong muscles

which pass from the spine to the scapulæ. But these muscles may be

destroyed by any contrivance which supersedes their use. For example,

let A A be the shoulder-blades, and B B the muscles which support

them. If the scapulæ be brought close to the spine by the straps

of the collar, and kept constantly so, there can be no use for the

muscles B B. They must consequently waste and become nearly useless,

while those on the fore-part of the chest, being excited to resist

the straps, will become increased in power; and hence, when the

collar is taken off, not only will the shoulders fall forward as in a

delicate person, but the muscles on the fore-part of the chest will

predominate over those by which the scapulæ should be held back, and

_pull_ the shoulders forwards.

The spine and the ribs are occasionally bent so as to have some

resemblance to the back of a spoon. In such cases, the shoulders

not only appear high and round, but the lower angles of the scapulæ

project in an extraordinary manner, because the upper and anterior

angle is not only unsupported by the ribs, but is dragged forwards

by the clavicles which are carried in the same direction with the

sternum. When this is to a considerable extent, it constitutes

the _contracted chest_ or the _chicken breast_. This, in a slight

degree, is common in London, and especially among young lads; it

may be discovered by the coat having the appearance of being more

worn opposite the lower angle of the scapula than at any other part.

Such a condition of the chest can only be completely remedied by

appropriate exercises; but a collar is here necessary for a time, to

keep the bones in the improved condition into which they are brought

by the exercises.

These arguments will probably appear sufficiently well founded to

prove that a girl, under ordinary circumstances, [p245] cannot hold

her head or shoulders back, unless the muscles by which they are

naturally supported are in a proper condition. Various contrivances

have been proposed to strengthen these muscles. Dumb bells, if

managed in a particular manner, are good; skipping, when the arms are

thrown backwards and over the head, is still better; the exercises,

called Spanish exercises, performed with two long poles, are also

useful, but to each of these there may be objections, as they all

operate more or less on the spine or ribs, which, in case of a bad

stoop, are generally affected.

The following anecdote will, perhaps, set the question of the

propriety of wearing the back collar in a correct point of view. A

surgeon was consulted by a gentleman, who is now one of our first

tragedians, as to the best mode of correcting a stoop which he had

acquired. The surgeon told him that neither stays nor straps would do

him any essential good; and that the only method of succeeding was to

recollect to keep his shoulders braced back by a voluntary effort.

But the tragedian replied, that this he could not do, as his mind was

otherwise occupied. The surgeon then told him that he could give him

no further assistance. Shortly after this conversation, the actor

ordered his tailor to make a coat of the finest kerseymere, so as to

fit him very tightly, when his shoulders were thrown back. Whenever

his shoulders fell forward he was reminded by a pinch under the arms,

that his coat cost him six guineas, and that it was made of very

fragile materials; being thus forced, for the sake of his fine coat,

to keep his shoulders back, he soon cured himself of the stoop. The

surgeon was much obliged to him for the hint, and afterwards, when

consulted whether young ladies should wear shoulder straps, permitted

them, on condition that they were made of fine muslin, or valuable

silk, for tearing which there should be a forfeit.

An inquiry into the manner a girl should sit may appear trifling

to those who have not been in the habit of seeing many cases of

distortion of the spine, but it is intimately connected with the

present subject, and is really of considerable importance. The

question has been disputed; one party insisting that girls should

always sit erect, while others are advocates for a lounging position.

It is not difficult to show that both are [p246] wrong;—when a

delicately formed girl is supposed to be sitting erect, she is

generally sitting crooked: to a superficial observer she may appear

quite straight; but any one who will sit on a music stool, and

endeavour to keep his body in a perpendicular line for ten minutes,

will be convinced that it is difficult for even a strong man to sit

as long as a delicate girl is expected to do, without allowing the

spine to sink to one side or to fall forwards.

The attempt to sit erect beyond a certain time is injurious, for

although bending the spine occasionally is useful rather than

hurtful, yet when it is done involuntarily, and when the bend is

attempted to be concealed by an endeavour to keep the head straight,

there is danger of the spine becoming twisted. Indeed, a double curve

is generally the consequence; there is first a bend to one side, to

give ease to the fatigued muscles; and then, to conceal this, there

is a second curve that is necessarily accompanied by a slight twist

in the vertical line of the whole column.

The proposal to allow children to sit in a crooked or lounging

position seems to have been founded on the idea that all the muscles

are more relaxed in this way than even when the child lies at full

length on its back. This notion is certainly incorrect, and such a

mode of sitting is injurious; for even were the muscles more relaxed

by it, the bones and ligaments acquire such a shape as necessarily

produces distortion.

It may naturally be asked how a girl should sit, since it would

appear, that whether she is in an erect or stooping posture, she is

equally in danger of becoming crooked. As sitting, in the manner

generally recommended, affords little or no support to one who is

weak, the safest answer would be, that a delicate girl should not sit

for even more than five or ten minutes without having some support

to her back, and when she is fatigued, that she should lie down or

recline on a couch. But as it would be very annoying to a girl not to

be allowed to sit up except for so short a time, and as a couch is

not always at hand, we must endeavour to show how a delicate girl may

remain in an upright posture, for a reasonable time without incurring

any risk of becoming crooked. This leads to an inquiry into the

merits of the chairs which are at present generally used by children.

[p247]

Young ladies are often obliged, while at their music lessons, to

sit upon those chairs, which have high backs, long legs, and small

seats. These chairs are said to have been invented by a very eminent

surgeon, and are intended, either to prevent distortion, by some

supposed operation on the spine, or as the most effectual means of

supporting the body. It is difficult to imagine how a chair of this

description can effect the first purpose; and to discover how far it

is calculated for the second, the reader should make the experiment

on a chair of the same proportion to his figure, as the chair in

question is to that of a little girl. He will find that if the seat

or surface on which he rests is small in proportion to his body, the

chest will, after a time, either fall forward or to one side, unless

he exert himself to a degree that is very fatiguing. Indeed, if the

seat be at the same time so high, that the feet do not rest fairly

on the ground, but dangle under the chair, a forward position of the

head is almost necessary to preserve the balance of the figure[40].

The objections to such chairs have been met with the assertion, that

girls feel remarkably comfortable in them. This is no argument in

favour of their use, for it is not uncommon for a girl who has seven

or eight pounds of iron strapped upon her body and next to her skin,

to say the machine annoys her so little, that she does not care how

long she wears it.

But whether this chair is agreeable or not, it is easy to show that

it is not calculated to give much proper support to the body, and

that it is almost impossible for a delicate girl to sit long in a

natural or easy position upon it.

It may be allowed, that the chair which we consider the most

comfortable, that is, the chair which affords the most support to

the body, should, if made in proper proportions, be the best for a

delicate girl. In such a chair, the _seat_ should be scarcely higher

than the knees (thus permitting the whole of the foot to rest on

the floor), and of such a size, that on sitting back, the upper

part of the calves nearly touch it. This form of _seat_ is very

different from that of the chair alluded to, the _back_ of which is

also equally objectionable, for, instead of being in [p248] some

degree shaped to the natural curves of the spine, it is made nearly

straight, and projects so as to push the head forwards. A delicate

girl should always sit so as to rest against the back of the chair,

and, if the lower part of her spine is weak, a small cushion will

afford great relief. As it is quite a mistake to suppose that the

shoulders, if raised in any other way than by the action of the

muscles, or by the curvature of the spine and ribs, will continue

high, there is no real objection to a girl who is delicate being

supported by an arm-chair; for, by occasionally resting on the

elbows, a considerable weight is taken off from that part of the

spine which is the most likely to yield.

These observations refer only to the manner in which delicate girls,

whose spines are still straight, should sit: when the spine is

actually distorted, it will be necessary to use other means.

FOOTNOTES:

[37] For this, and some other communications upon the same

subject, we are chiefly indebted to our much-lamented friend and

correspondent, the late Mr. Shaw, Surgeon to the Middlesex Hospital.

[38] When the Russians wish to give a horse high action in trotting,

they accustom him, while young, to wear heavy shoes on the fore

feet. The resistance to be overcome necessarily increases the

strength of certain muscles; and hence, when shoes of the common

size are put on, the horse lifts his feet higher than one which has

not been subjected to this discipline. Some opera dancers practise

with lead weights on.

[39] Elderly persons may recollect how often the girls who worked

at _tambouring_ were crooked: the present fashionable amusement of

embroidering seems to have, in some instances, the same effect.

[40] It must be almost unnecessary to remind the reader, that if the

knees are bent in standing or walking, there is a curve in the spine

at the same time.

_A Critique on the Aplanatic Object-Glasses, for diverging Rays, of_

Vincent Chevalier, ainé et fils. _By_ C. R. Goring, M.D.

The Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and the Arts, July-December, 1827 · 第 24 / 51 段