Your letter of the 8th was received on the 25th, and I proceed to state

to you my views of the present state and prospect of foreign affairs,

under the confidence that you will use them for your own government and

opinions only, and by no means let them get out as from me. With France

we are in no immediate danger of war. Her future views it is impossible

to estimate. The immediate danger we are in of a rupture with England,

is postponed for this year. This is effected by the embargo, as the

question was simply between that and war. That may go on a certain time,

perhaps through the year, without the loss of their property to our

citizens, but only its remaining unemployed on their hands. A time would

come, however, when war would be preferable to a continuance of the

embargo. Of this Congress may have to decide at their next meeting. In

the mean time, we have good information, that a negotiation for peace

between France and England is commencing through the medium of Austria.

The way for it has been smoothed by a determination expressed by France

(through the Moniteur, which is their government paper), that herself

and her allies will demand from Great Britain no renunciation of her

maritime principles; nor will they renounce theirs. Nothing shall be

said about them in the treaty, and both sides will be left in the next

war to act on their own. No doubt the meaning of this is, that all

the Continental powers of Europe will form themselves into an armed

neutrality, to enforce their own principles. Should peace be made, we

shall have safely rode out the storm in peace and prosperity. If we have

any thing to fear, it will be after that. Nothing should be spared from

this moment in putting our militia into the best condition possible,

and procuring arms. I hope, that this summer, we shall get our whole

sea-ports put into that state of defence, which Congress has thought

proportioned to our circumstances and situation; that is to say, put

_hors d’insulte_ from a maritime attack, by a moderate squadron. If

armies are combined with their fleets, then no resource can be provided,

but to meet them in the field. We propose to raise seven regiments only

for the present year, depending always on our militia for the operations

of the first year of war. On any other plan, we should be obliged always

to keep a large standing army. Congress will adjourn in about three

weeks. I hope Captain McComb is going on well with your defensive works.

We shall be able by mid-summer, to give you a sufficient number of

gun-boats to protect Charleston from any vessels which can cross the

bar; but the militia of the place must be depended on to fill up the

complement of men necessary for action in the moment of an attack, as we

shall man them, in ordinary, but with their navigating crew of eight or

ten good seamen. I salute you with great esteem and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER LXIX.--TO DOCTOR LEIB, June 23, 1808

TO DOCTOR LEIB.

Washington, June 23, 1808.

Sir,

I have duly received your favor covering a copy of the talk to the

Tammany society, for which I thank you, and particularly for the

favorable sentiments expressed towards myself. Certainly, nothing will

so much sweeten the tranquillity and comfort of retirement, as the

knowledge that I carry with me the good will and approbation of my

republican fellow-citizens, and especially of the individuals in unison

with whom I have so long acted. With respect to the federalists, I

believe we think alike; for when speaking of them, we never mean to

include a worthy portion of our fellow-citizens, who consider themselves

as in duty bound to support the constituted authorities of every branch,

and to reserve their opposition to the period of election. These having

acquired the appellation of federalists, while a federal administration

was in place, have not cared about throwing off their name, but,

adhering to their principle, are the supporters of the present order

of things. The other branch of the federalists, those who are so in

principle as well as in name, disapprove of the republican principles

and features of our constitution, and would, I believe, welcome any

public calamity (war with England excepted) which might lessen the

confidence of our country in those principles and forms. I have

generally considered them rather as subjects for a madhouse. But they

are now playing a game of the most mischievous tendency, without perhaps

being themselves aware of it. They are endeavoring to convince England,

that we suffer more by the embargo than they do, and that, if they will

but hold out a while, we must abandon it. It is true, the time will come

when we must abandon it. But if this is before the repeal of the orders

of council, we must abandon it only for a state of war. The day is not

distant, when that will be preferable to a longer continuance of the

embargo. But we can never remove that, and let our vessels go out and be

taken under these orders, without making reprisal. Yet this is the very

state of things which these federal monarchists are endeavoring to bring

about; and in this it is but too possible they may succeed. But the

fact is, that if we have war with England, it will be solely produced by

their manoeuvres. I think that in two or three months we shall know what

will be the issue. I salute you with esteem and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER LXX.--TO ROBERT L. LIVINGSTON, October 15, 1808

TO ROBERT L. LIVINGSTON.

Washington, October 15, 1808.

Sir,

Your letter of September the 22nd waited here for my return, and it is

not till now that I have been able to acknowledge it. The explanation

of his principles, given you by the French Emperor, in conversation,

is correct as far as it goes. He does not wish us to go to war with

England, knowing we have no ships to carry on that war. To submit to pay

to England the tribute on our commerce which she demands by her orders

of council, would be to aid her in the war against him, and would give

him just ground to declare war with us. He concludes, therefore,

as every rational man must, that the embargo, the only remaining

alternative, was a wise measure. These are acknowledged principles, and

should circumstances arise, which may offer advantage to our country in

making them public, we shall avail ourselves of them. But as it is not

usual nor agreeable to governments to bring their conversations before

the public, I think it would be well to consider this on your part as

confidential, leaving to the government to retain or make it public,

as the general good may require. Had the Emperor gone further, and said

that he condemned our vessels going voluntarily into his ports in breach

of his municipal laws, we might have admitted it rigorously legal,

though not friendly. But his condemnation of vessels taken on the high

seas by his privateers, and carried involuntarily into his ports, is

justifiable by no law, is piracy, and this is the wrong we complain of

against him.

Supposing that you may be still at Clermont, from whence your letter is

dated, I avail myself of this circumstance to request your presenting my

friendly respects to Chancellor Livingston.

I salute you with esteem and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER LXXI.--TO DOCTOR JAMES BROWN, October 27, 1808

TO DOCTOR JAMES BROWN.

Washington, October 27, 1808.

Dear Sir,

You will wonder that your letter of June the 3rd should not be

acknowledged till this date. I never received it till September the

12th, and coming soon after to this place, the accumulation of business

I found here has prevented my taking it up till now. That you ever

participated in any plan for a division of the Union, I never for one

moment believed. I knew your Americanism too well. But as the enterprise

against Mexico was of a very different character, I had supposed what I

heard on that subject to be possible. You disavow it; that is enough for

me, and I for ever dismiss the idea. I wish it were possible to extend

my belief of innocence to a very different description of men in New

Orleans; but I think there is sufficient evidence of there being there a

set of foreign adventurers, and native malcontents, who would concur

in any enterprise to separate that country from this. I did wish to

see these people get what they deserved; and under the maxim of the law

itself, that _inter arma silent leges_, that in an encampment expecting

daily attack from a powerful enemy, self-preservation is paramount to

all law, I expected that instead of invoking the forms of the law to

cover traitors, all good citizens would have concurred in securing them.

Should we have ever gained our Revolution, if we had bound our hands by

manacles of the law, not only in the beginning, but in any part of the

revolutionary conflict? There are extreme cases where the laws become

inadequate even to their own preservation, and where the universal

resource is a dictator, or martial law. Was New Orleans in that

situation? Although we knew here that the force destined against it was

suppressed on the Ohio, yet we supposed this unknown at New Orleans at

the time that Burr’s accomplices were calling in the aid of the law to

enable them to perpetrate its suppression, and that it was reasonable,

according to the state of information there, to act on the expectation

of a daily attack. Of this you are the best judge.

Burr is in London, and is giving out to his friends that that government

offers him two millions of dollars the moment he can raise an ensign of

rebellion as big as an handkerchief. Some of his partisans will believe

this, because they wish it. But those who know him best will not believe

it the more because he says it. For myself, even in his most flattering

periods of the conspiracy, I never entertained one moment’s fear. My

long and intimate knowledge of my countrymen satisfied and satisfies me,

that, let there ever be occasion to display the banners of the law,

and the world will see how few and pitiful are those who shall array

themselves in opposition. I as little fear foreign invasion. I have

indeed thought it a duty to be prepared to meet even the most powerful,

that of a Bonaparte, for instance, by the only means competent, that of

a classification of the militia, and placing the junior classes at the

public disposal: but the lesson he receives in Spain extirpates all

apprehensions from my mind. If, in a peninsula, the neck of which is

adjacent to him, and at his command, where he can march any army without

the possibility of interception or obstruction from any foreign power,

he finds it necessary to begin with an army of three hundred thousand

men, to subdue a nation of five millions, brutalized by ignorance, and

enervated by long peace, and should find constant reinforcements of

thousands after thousands necessary to effect at last a conquest as

doubtful as deprecated, what numbers would be necessary against eight

millions of free Americans, spread over such an extent of country

as would wear him down by mere marching, by want of food, autumnal

diseases, &c.? How would they be brought, and how reinforced, across an

ocean of three thousand miles, in possession of a bitter enemy, whose

peace, like the repose of a dog, is never more than momentary? And for

what? For nothing but hard blows. If the Orleanese Creoles would but

contemplate these truths, they would cling to the American Union, soul

and body, as their first affection, and we should be as safe there as

we are every where else. I have no doubt of their attachment to us in

preference of the English.

I salute you with sincere friendship and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER LXXII.--TO LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR LINCOLN, November 13, 1808

TO LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR LINCOLN.

Washington, November 13, 1808.

Dear Sir,

I enclose you a petition from Nantucket, and refer it for your decision.

Our opinion here is, that that place has been so deeply concerned in

smuggling, that if it wants, it is because it has illegally sent away

what it ought to have retained for its own consumption. Be so good as to

bear in mind that I have asked the favor of you to see that your State

encounters no real want, while, at the same time, where applications are

made merely to cover fraud, no facilities towards that be furnished. I

presume there can be no want in Massachusetts, as yet, as I am informed

that Governor Sullivan’s permits are openly bought and sold here and

in Alexandria, and at other markets. The Congressional campaign is just

opening: three alternatives alone are to be chosen from. 1. Embargo. 2.

War. 3. Submission and tribute. And, wonderful to tell, the last will

not want advocates. The real question, however, will lie between the two

first, on which there is considerable division. As yet the first seems

most to prevail; but opinions are by no means yet settled down. Perhaps

the advocates of the second may, to a formal declaration of war, prefer

general letters of mark and reprisal, because, on a repeal of their

edicts by the belligerent, a revocation of the letters of mark restores

peace without the delay, difficulties, and ceremonies of a treaty. On

this occasion, I think it fair to leave to those who are to act on them,

the decisions they prefer, being to be myself but a spectator. I should

not feel justified in directing measures which those who are to execute

them would disapprove. Our situation is truly difficult. We have been

pressed by the belligerents to the very wall, and all further retreat is

impracticable. I salute you with sincere friendship.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER LXXIII.--TO THOMAS JEFFERSON RANDOLPH, November 24, 1808

TO THOMAS JEFFERSON RANDOLPH.

Washington, November 24, 1808.

My Dear Jefferson,

Your situation, thrown at such a distance from us and alone, cannot but

give us all great anxieties for you. As much has been secured for you,

by your particular position and the acquaintance to which you have been

recommended, as could be done towards shielding you from the dangers

which surround you. But thrown on a wide world, among entire strangers,

without a friend or guardian to advise, so young, too, and with so

little experience of mankind, your dangers are great, and still your

safety must rest on yourself. A determination never to do what is

wrong, prudence, and good humor, will go far towards securing to you the

estimation of the world. When I recollect that at fourteen years of age,

the whole care and direction of myself was thrown on myself entirely,

without a relation or friend qualified to advise or guide me, and

recollect the various sorts of bad company with which I associated from

time to time, I am astonished I did not turn off with some of them, and

become as worthless to society as they were. I had the good fortune to

become acquainted very early with some characters of very high standing,

and to feel the incessant wish that I could ever become what they were.

Under temptations and difficulties, I would ask myself what would Dr.

Small, Mr. Wythe, Peyton Randolph do in this situation? What course

in it will insure me their approbation? I am certain that this mode

of deciding on my conduct, tended more to its correctness than any

reasoning powers I possessed. Knowing the even and dignified line they

pursued, I could never doubt for a moment which of two courses would

be in character for them. Whereas, seeking the same object through

a process of moral reasoning, and with the jaundiced eye of youth, I

should often have erred. From the circumstances of my position, I

was often thrown into the society of horse-racers, card-players,

fox-hunters, scientific and professional men, and of dignified men; and

many a time have I asked myself, in the enthusiastic moment of the

death of a fox, the victory of a favorite horse, the issue of a question

eloquently argued at the bar, or in the great council of the nation,

well, which of these kinds of reputation should I prefer? That of a

horse-jockey? a fox-hunter? an orator? or the honest advocate of my

country’s rights? Be assured, my dear Jefferson, that these little

returns into ourselves, this self-catechizing habit, is not trifling,

nor useless, but leads to the prudent selection and steady pursuit of

what is right.

I have mentioned good humor as one of the preservatives of our peace and

tranquillity. It is among the most effectual, and its effect is so well

imitated and aided, artificially, by politeness, that this also becomes

an acquisition of first-rate value. In truth, politeness is artificial

good humor, it covers the natural want of it, and ends by rendering

habitual a substitute nearly equivalent to the real virtue. It is the

practice of sacrificing to those whom we meet in society, all the little

conveniences and preferences which will gratify them, and deprive us of

nothing worth a moment’s consideration; it is the giving a pleasing and

flattering turn to our expressions, which will conciliate others, and

make them pleased with us as well as themselves. How cheap a price for

the good will of another! When this is in return for a rude thing said

by another, it brings him to his senses, it mortifies and corrects

him in the most salutary way, and places him at the feet of your good

nature, in the eyes of the company. But in stating prudential rules for

our government in society I must not omit the important one of never

entering into dispute or argument with another. I never yet saw an

instance of one of two disputants convincing the other by argument. I

have seen many, of their getting warm, becoming rude, and shooting one

another. Conviction is the effect of our own dispassionate reasoning,

either in solitude, or weighing within ourselves, dispassionately, what

we hear from others, standing uncommitted in argument ourselves. It was

one of the rules, which, above all others, made Doctor Franklin the most

amiable of men in society, ‘never to contradict any body.’ If he was

urged to announce an opinion, he did it rather by asking questions, as

if for information, or by suggesting doubts. When I hear another express

an opinion which is not mine, I say to myself, he has a right to his

opinion, as I to mine; why should I question it? His error does me no

injury, and shall I become a Don Quixote, to bring all men by force of

argument to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable he is

gratified by a belief of it, and I have no right to deprive him of the

gratification. If he wants information, he will ask it, and then I will

give it in measured terms; but if he still believes his own story, and

shows a desire to dispute the fact with me, I hear him, and say nothing.

It is his affair, not mine, if he prefers error. There are two classes

of disputants most frequently to be met with among us. The first is of

young students, just entered the threshold of science, with a first view

of its outlines, not yet filled up with the details and modifications

which a further progress would bring to their knowledge. The other

consists of the ill-tempered and rude men in society, who have taken up

a passion for politics. (Good humor and politeness never introduce

into mixed society a question on which they foresee there will be a

difference of opinion.) From both of those classes of disputants, my

dear Jefferson, keep aloof, as you would from the infected subjects of

yellow fever or pestilence. Consider yourself, when with them, as among

the patients of Bedlam, needing medical more than moral counsel. Be

a listener only, keep within yourself, and endeavor to establish with

yourself the habit of silence, especially on politics. In the fevered

state of our country, no good can ever result from any attempt to set

one of these fiery zealots to rights, either in fact or principle. They

are determined as to the facts they will believe, and the opinions on

which they will act. Get by them, therefore, as you would by an angry

bull: it is not for a man of sense to dispute the road with such an

animal. You will be more exposed than others to have these animals

shaking their horns at you, because of the relation in which you stand

with me. Full of political venom, and willing to see me and to hate me

as a chief in the antagonist party, your presence will be to them what

the vomit-grass is to the sick dog, a nostrum for producing ejaculation.

Look upon them exactly with that eye, and pity them as objects to whom

you can administer only occasional ease. My character is not within

their power. It is in the hands of my fellow-citizens at large, and will

be consigned to honor or infamy by the verdict of the republican mass of

our country, according to what themselves will have seen, not what

their enemies and mine shall have said. Never, therefore, consider these

puppies in politics as requiring any notice from you, and always show,

that you are not afraid to leave my character to the umpirage of

public opinion. Look steadily to the pursuits which have carried you

to Philadelphia, be very select in the society you attach yourself

to, avoid taverns, drinkers, smokers, idlers, and dissipated persons

generally; for it is with such that broils and contentions arise; and

you will find your path more easy and tranquil. The limits of my paper

warn me that it is time for me to close with my affectionate adieu.

Th: Jefferson.

P. S. Present me affectionately to Mr. Ogilvie, and in doing the same to

Mr. Peale, tell him I am writing with his polygraph, and shall send him

mine the first moment I have leisure enough to pack it. T. J.

LETTER LXXIV.--TO DOCTOR EUSTIS, January 14, 1809

TO DOCTOR EUSTIS.

Washington, January 14, 1809.

Sir,

I have the pleasure to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of

December the 24th, and of the resolutions of the republican citizens

of Boston, of the 19th of that month. These are worthy of the ancient

character of the sons of Massachusetts, and of the spirit of concord

with her sister States, which, and which alone, carried us successfully

through the revolutionary war, and finally placed us under that national

government, which constitutes the safety of every part, by uniting for

its protection the powers of the whole. The moment for exerting these

united powers, to repel the injuries of the belligerents of Europe,

seems likely to be pressed upon us. They have interdicted our commerce

with nearly the whole world. They have declared it shall be carried on

with such places, in such articles, and in such measure only, as they

shall dictate; thus prostrating all the principles of right, which

have hitherto protected it. After exhausting the cup of forbearance

and conciliation to its dregs, we found it necessary, on behalf of that

commerce, to take time to call it home into a state of safety, to put

the towns and harbors which carry it on into a condition of defence, and

to make further preparation for enforcing the redress of its wrongs, and

restoring it to its rightful freedom. This required a certain measure of

time, which, although not admitting specific limitation, must, from its

avowed objects, have been obvious to all: and the progress actually made

towards the accomplishment of these objects, proves it now to be near

its term.

While thus endeavoring to secure, and preparing to vindicate that

commerce, the absurd opinion has been propagated, that this temporary

and necessary arrangement was to be a permanent system, and was intended

for its destruction. The sentiments expressed in the paper you were so

kind as to enclose me, show that those who have concurred in them, have

judged with more candor the intentions of their government, and

are sufficiently aware of the tendency of the excitements and

misrepresentations which have been practised on this occasion. And such,

I am persuaded, will be the disposition of the citizens of Massachusetts

at large, whenever truth can reach them. Associated with her sister

States in a common government, the fundamental principle of which is,

that the will of the majority is to prevail, sensible, that in the

present difficulty, that will has been governed by no local interests

or jealousies, that to save permanent rights, temporary sacrifices

were necessary, that these have fallen as impartially on all, as in a

situation so peculiar they could be made to do, she will see, in the

existing measures, a legitimate and honest exercise of the will and

wisdom of the whole. And her citizens, faithful to themselves and

their associates, will not, to avoid a transient pressure, yield to the

seductions of enemies to their independence, foreign or domestic, and

take a course equally subversive of their well-being, as of that of

their brethren.

The approbation expressed by the republican citizens of the town of

Boston, of the course pursued by the national government, is truly

consoling to its members: and, encouraged by the declaration of the

continuance of their confidence, and by the assurance of their support,

they will continue to pursue the line of their high duties according

to the best of their understandings, and with undeviating regard to

the good of the whole. Permit me to avail myself of this occasion of

tendering you personally the assurances of my great esteem and respect.

Th: Jefferson.

LETTER LXXV.--TO COLONEL MONROE, January 28, 1809

TO COLONEL MONROE.

Washington, January 28, 1809.

Dear Sir,

Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, From the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 4 · 第 11 / 54 段