VI

The five plays, that are but one play, have, when played one after

another, something extravagant and superhuman, something almost

mythological. Those nobles with their indifference to death and their

immense energy seem at times no nearer the common stature of men

than do the Gods and the heroes of Greek plays. Had there been no

Renaissance and no Italian influence to bring in the stories of other

lands English history would, it may be, have become as important to

the English imagination as the Greek Myths to the Greek imagination;

and many plays by many poets would have woven it into a single story

whose contours, vast as those of Greek myth, would have made living men

and women seem like swallows building their nests under the architrave

of some Temple of the Giants. English literature, because it would

have grown out of itself, might have had the simplicity and unity of

Greek literature, for I can never get out of my head that no man, even

though he be Shakespeare, can write perfectly when his web is woven of

threads that have been spun in many lands. And yet, could those foreign

tales have come in if the great famine, the sinking down of popular

imagination, the dying out of traditional phantasy, the ebbing out of

the energy of race, had not made them necessary? The metaphors and

language of Euphuism, compounded of the natural history and mythology

of the classics, were doubtless a necessity also that something might

be poured into the emptiness. Yet how they injured the simplicity and

unity of the speech! Shakespeare wrote at a time when solitary great

men were gathering to themselves the fire that had once flowed hither

and thither among all men, when individualism in work and thought

and emotion was breaking up the old rhythms of life, when the common

people, no longer uplifted by the myths of Christianity and of still

older faiths, were sinking into the earth.

The people of Stratford-on-Avon have remembered little about him, and

invented no legend to his glory. They have remembered a drinking-bout

of his, and invented some bad verses for him, and that is about

all. Had he been some hard-drinking, hard-living, hard-riding,

loud-blaspheming Squire they would have enlarged his fame by a legend

of his dealings with the devil; but in his day the glory of a Poet,

like that of all other imaginative powers, had ceased, or almost

ceased, outside a narrow class. The poor Gaelic rhymer leaves a

nobler memory among his neighbours, who will talk of Angels standing

like flames about his death-bed, and of voices speaking out of

bramble-bushes that he may have the wisdom of the world. The Puritanism

that drove the theatres into Surrey was but part of an inexplicable

movement that was trampling out the minds of all but some few thousands

born to cultivated ease.

May, 1901.

The Collected Works in Verse and Prose of William Butler Yeats, Vol. 6 (of 8) Ideas of Good and Evil · 第 45 / 72 题