K. searched the book again, and again began to read:--

“‘In sober verity I will confess a truth to thee, reader. I love a

Fool--as naturally as if I were of kith and kin to him. When a child,

with child-like apprehensions, that dived not below the surface of the

matter, I read those Parables--not guessing at the involved wisdom--I

had more yearnings towards that simple architect, that built his house

upon the sand, than I entertained for his more cautious neighbor: I

grudged at the hard censure pronounced upon the quiet soul that kept

his talent; and--prizing their simplicity beyond the more provident,

and, to my apprehension, somewhat unfeminine wariness of their

competitors--I felt a kindliness, that almost amounted to a _tendre_,

for those five thoughtless virgins.’

“Who is going to turn his back for ever on that passage? No,” K.

went on, “it won’t do. It is not possible to name one essay and one

only. But I have an amendment to propose. Instead of being permitted

to retain only one essay, why should we not be allowed a series of

passages equal in length to the longest essay--say ‘The Old Actors’?

Then we should not be quite so hopeless. That, for example, would

enable one to keep the page on Bensley’s Malvolio, the description of

Bridget Elia, a portion of the ‘Mrs. Battle,’ Ralph Bigod, a portion

of ‘Captain Jackson,’ the passages I have read, and--what I personally

should insist upon including, earlier almost than anything--the

Fallacies on rising with the Lark and retiring with the Lamb.”

“Well,” said the suggester of the original problem, “it’s a compromise

and therefore no fun. But you may play with it if you like. The

sweepingness of the first question was of course its merit. James is

the only one of you with the courage really to make a choice.”

“Oh, no,” said our host. “I chose one and one only instantly--‘Old

China.’”

“Nonsense!” said James; “you chose ‘Mackery End.’”

“There you are,” said K. “That shows.”

“Well, I refuse to be deprived of ‘Old China’ anyway,” said our host,

“even if I named ‘Mackery End.’ How could one live without ‘Old China’?

Our discussion reminds me,” he added, “of a very pretty poem--a kind of

poem that is no longer written. It is by an American who came nearer

Lamb in humour and ‘the tact of humanity’ than perhaps any writer--the

Autocrat. Let me read it to you.”

Old lamps for new · 第 67 / 151 题