Increasing years brought an interest in the old portraits. Our childhood

acquaintance with the pictorial features of the Atheneum was chiefly

confined to Trumbull's paintings of the Revolutionary battles. These

seemed to us at the time perfect representations of what really happened

at Bunker Hill, Princeton and Quebec. But the inevitable development of

a more catholic artistic sense led us to dwell with a growing interest

on the work of some of the great masters displayed in the art gallery.

With these the portraits of state and local worthies in the historical

society's rooms could not compete very successfully from the standpoint

of workmanship, but these local portraits acquired a new importance as

the story of the state and the old town took its place in our enlarging

appreciation of relative values. At least we could gather from them some

idea of what the people looked like who had walked the streets where we

had played as children and who had taken their parts in the building of

the city, the state and the nation.

We heard the story of Elizabeth Whitman and the portraits of her father

and mother became something more than merely faded old pictures. Oliver

Ellsworth was no longer only a name--there he was, sitting at a table

with his wife, his familiar house visible in the distance. And when

curiosity grew as to Daniel Wadsworth, the founder of the Atheneum, we

were able to satisfy this in some degree by hunting up the two portraits

of him--one as a boy, leaning on his father's shoulder, the other

Ingham's painting of him in middle life.

[Illustration: THE WATKINSON LIBRARY]

ii

It is strange that so little has been written about Daniel Wadsworth. He

was the original Maecenas of Hartford. But he had no Horace to celebrate

him and he would have abhorred the publicity which the Roman patron of

the arts and letters seems rather to have enjoyed. His modesty is well

illustrated by the fact that he requested that Dr. Hawes should at his

funeral services attempt no formal eulogy, in the fashion of the day. He

died at ten minutes past one on the morning of July 28, 1848, a few days

before his seventy-seventh birthday. Though he lived to this advanced

age his health was always frail and this fact may account, in part, for

his rather retiring disposition.

He was, however, by no means a recluse. His home, altered, but still

standing at the southwest corner of Prospect Street and Atheneum

Street--formerly "Wadsworth's Alley,"--now laboring under the

alliterative title of "Atheneum Annex," was the center of a simple and

delightful social life. In its notice of Mr. Wadsworth after his death

the "Courant" said of this home that it "has remained for half a century

a scene of cheerful hospitality, where persons of humble worth as well

as those of distinction, have been received with kindness and courtesy,

and cheered by the unclouded sunshine of Mrs. Wadsworth's benevolence

and lovely manners."

Mrs. Wadsworth was the daughter of the second Governor Trumbull. "Her

mind," says Dr. Hawes, in the funeral sermon which in his wife's case

Mr. Wadsworth did not prohibit, "was sprightly, inquisitive,

well-balanced and excellently cultivated; her temper was uncommonly

mild, affectionate and cheerful, often exhibiting a pleasant playfulness

of spirit, enlivening conversation and intercourse, but never light,

censorious or severe; her heart replete with tenderness, and alive to

every social and sympathetic feeling." She died two years before her

husband. Their married life extended over fifty-three years.

After her death a Miss Sarah McClellan, who seems to have been a

connection of Mrs. Wadsworth, appeared in the character of secretary for

Mr. Wadsworth, who was very feeble during the last two years of his

life. She kept a diary, now in the possession of the Connecticut

Historical Society, through which we get contemporary glimpses of the

kindly life of the old street, though most of the references are in the

nature of a catalogue of visits paid and received, such as,--

"Jan. 1, 1848. Received a beautiful book as a New

Year's present from Mrs. Sigourney . . . Judge

Ellsworth, Doctor Grant, Mr. Clair [Clerc?] and Mr.

Barnard called in the morning. P. M. Judge Williams,

Mr. Smith [Alfred?], Mr. Roswell and John Parsons

called. Went down to see Mrs. Hudson--found her

better."

On another occasion she records how Dr. Grant brought to the house four

children, aged from nine to thirteen, known as the "Apollonians," who

were to give a concert in the evening and who sang to Mr. Wadsworth at

his home as he was not well enough to attend the concert. After they had

left Miss McClellan went to Dr. Grant's "and took a galvanic shock for

my painful arm."

The most valuable part of the diary historically, however, relates to

the last illness of Mr. Wadsworth and his death on a night of midsummer

thunderstorms, and this is rather long and rather intimate for

quotation.

In fact most of our knowledge of the founder of the Atheneum comes more

from memories and traditions than from exact data. These legends picture

him as a fragile man with a stoop, fond of wearing even in the house, an

artist's cap and a cloak, partly to protect himself from drafts, of

which he had an exaggerated dread, partly, we fancy, to exemplify in his

person his artistic ideals.

[Illustration: DANIEL WADSWORTH

BY PERMISSION OF

THE CONNECTICUT HISTORICAL SOCIETY]

For art was his great interest in life and his wealth enabled him to

gratify his artistic inclinations and to perpetuate in the city he loved

a center for the humanities which to him seemed so far above riches. In

a way he was a cosmopolitan, for he had been educated in France and

England, accompanying his father, Jeremiah Wadsworth, there when he was

twelve years old. Many of the paintings and prints, of which he was an

inveterate collector, came from Europe--as most examples of good art

then did.

He was himself an illustrator and painter. The illustrations of his

friend's--Professor Benjamin Silliman's--"Tour From Hartford to Quebec,"

are by him and they include two views of his beautiful country seat,

"Monte Video," on Talcott Mountain. It is characteristic of Professor

Silliman's regard for what were doubtless his friend's wishes that Mr.

Wadsworth's name is not mentioned in his description of the spot. We

know of at least one home, and there are probably several, where

attractive and interesting sketches and paintings by Mr. Wadsworth

are still cherished.

As the years increased upon him the care of his health seems to have

become something of a pre-occupation. It is related that he had a series

of capes of differing colors and sizes which he superimposed one upon

another, as the weather grew colder, attracting thus considerable

attention in his walks abroad. In his big yellow coach he installed a

stove in cold weather, and a smoke-stack, which may have caused our

fellow citizens of that day to wonder whether they were beholding a

steamboat on wheels--or even a motor vehicle of the period. Into his pew

in the southwest corner of the Center Church he invariably had a foot

stove carried when attending service in winter.

Looking back through the years the life of his time seems to have had a

more friendly and neighborly element than our urgent affairs today

appear to permit. Perhaps there is something of fancy in this, but it is

not all fancy to believe that in the institution that bears his name

Daniel Wadsworth has transmitted to succeeding generations a flavor and

memory of this old life, as well as an opportunity to know the

refreshment of certain things that can not be measured in money--the

things of the mind and the spirit.

iii

On the whole, the portion of the Atheneum that was the most popular with

the children of an older day, and became through familiarity the least

mysterious, was the reading room. In retrospect this room seems to have

had a distinct quality of its own. For one thing it appears, in memory,

to have been characterized by a pervading aroma of wet umbrellas,

rubbers and damp clothing. Probably this is due to the fact that one

generally frequented it on rainy days when out-of-door pursuits were

impossible. Somebody was always opening a window to let in a little air.

At that time the room was in the northeast corner of the main building.

Its chief furnishings were the many rows of oak reading desks, shaped

like inverted V's, raised on standards to a convenient height. To these

slanting surfaces the papers were clamped by wooden contrivances which

materially interfered with a comprehensive view of all double page

pictures.

Nevertheless one rather approved of these old oak reading desks. They

gave a studious air to the room and separated the floor space into

sections that contributed a certain effect of privacy. Also they

concealed the upper portions of readers on opposite sides, or in

different sections, from one another. It was rather diverting to peek

underneath and endeavor to construct mentally from the shoes, trousers

and skirts--they were long enough in those days--thus visible, the

respectively corresponding upper sections of anatomy. After a creative

effort of this kind it was interesting to move around to the other side

and see how nearly right you were.

On the whole the English illustrated papers were the most popular of the

periodicals and sometimes in the attempt to secure exclusive possession

of these there was a good deal of squabbling which had to be terminated

by the young woman in charge, who, however, was reasonably tolerant and

far more popular than the dragon who guarded the historical museum

upstairs.

The first real war any of us remembered was then in progress and the

"Illustrated London News" and the London "Graphic" were full of

pictures of British warships bombarding Alexandria and of charging

Highlanders at Tel-el-Kebir. Though soon supplanted by our own "Life,"

"Punch," too, was something of a favorite, with its drawings by Du

Maurier of tall, wasp-waisted, beautiful ladies with remarkable

coiffures and trailing skirts, and of men with Dundreary whiskers, frock

coats, top hats and monocles--all engaged in what seemed to us

singularly inane conversation. Most of us had "St. Nicholas" at home and

of the other American publications "Harper's Young People" easily held

first place, with "Harper's Weekly" a close second. The girls were often

discovered poring over "Harper's Bazaar"--an inexplicable thing to the

masculine mind. That seemed to us a silly paper.

In time certain habitués of the reading room became familiar to us--by

sight, that is. There was, of course, the nondescript crowd of persons

out of employment, or idlers, who came in to get warm or to pass an hour

or two. These were the floating population, as it were, and the

individuals varied with the seasons. Some of them seemed to be searching

the advertising columns of the dailies for a job. Others read strange

technical papers--engineering magazines or trade journals. One has

often wondered since what perennial hopes, what latent ambitions, what

undiscovered geniuses, were concealed amid this rather drab clientele of

the reading room.

But that some definite purposes animated certain devotees could not be

doubted--though what the exact individual motives were was not always

apparent. There was, for example, the queer old man--short, stocky, with

gray beard and spectacles--whose specialty seemed to be the New York

papers and the political and economic magazines. He was generally

supposed to be a little "off" and he had Doctor Johnson's habit when

walking along the street of tapping with his stick every post and tree

he passed. If he abstractedly missed one he would go back and rap it. We

often noticed unkind urchins of our own age following him and reminding

him of any omissions, for the intense joy of seeing him invariably

return and perform this rite. Let us hope that none of us attempted

this, though it can not be asserted that the temptation was always

resisted, even if no memory of succumbing to it remains.

Then there was another frequenter of the reading room who was generally

supposed to be not quite normal mentally. He was a kindly, gentle soul,

however, and it is pleasant to remember that he was never the subject of

ridicule. Indeed his deprecating manner, his invariable courtesy, even

to children, effectually disarmed any suggestion of the sort. We all

liked him and perhaps he did not dislike us. He would come softly in,

with bent head and humble air, put his umbrella in the rack, look about

to ascertain what favorite papers of his had not been pre-empted, slide

with the effect of an apology into some empty place, put on his

spectacles, get out his note book and pencil and begin to transcribe.

During each of his visits he was continually taking notes and the

imagination is appalled at any effort to compute the number of note

books he must have filled, for he was a constant visitor. The occupation

was of course an obsession, a phase, no doubt, of various mental

vagaries he harbored. Probably as children we missed something of the

pathos of the fine mind thus clouded, but it is a comfort to remember

that we did not altogether fail in appreciation of the spirit of the

gentleman.

There comes dimly to memory the figure of a rather elderly woman who

wore an old-fashioned bonnet and rather odd clothing of a bygone style.

She was a busy person, flitting from paper to paper, forever in quest of

some apparently elusive data. It seemed to be necessary for her to hold

frequent consultations with the attendant. These were carried on, for

her part, in loud, hissing whispers that were far more penetrating and

distracting than ordinary conversation would have been and the

good-natured presiding genius of the room spent much of her time looking

up references for this curious and acquisitive visitor. What she was

seeking we never knew, but, though it was manifestly of the utmost

importance to her, one could not escape the impression of futility.

Surely a public reference or reading room is an excellent place in which

to study the caprices of the human mind.

This person's audible conferences with the attendant bring to mind the

notice that was prominently posted in various parts of the room,--

LOUD TALKING OR PROLONGED

CONVERSATION WILL NOT BE

ALLOWED IN THIS ROOM

Now that the statute of limitations has barred civil, if not criminal

proceedings, the writer will confess that some years later, when an

undergraduate of Yale College, he abstracted, after the unoriginal

fashion of his kind, one of these notices and took great pride in

displaying it in a prominent place on the wall of his room at college

where its apt and ironic message aroused great envy and admiration.

But to return to our memories of the reading room's habitués--there was

Cousin George. This vicarious relative was an unattached Congregational

minister who sojourned in the city from time to time. The nomadic

character of his ministry was due partly to principle, partly to a kind

of wanderlust. In this old bachelor there was a wandering streak--he was

not happy for long in one place. But he had a strong social instinct and

a keen interest in and affection for his friends and was greatly beloved

by them. A great purveyor of news, he was an insatiable reader of the

papers and toward the middle of the morning he invariably came into the

reading room, as into a club, to look through the news of the day. His

soft, black hat, overcoat with short shoulder cape, eyeglasses with

black ribbon and mutton-chop whiskers gave a distinct individuality to

his appearance. About his looks there was an effect of oddity--and

indeed, like most of us, he had his whimseys and peculiarities. There

was little externally to indicate his kindly sympathy, his talent for

friendship, his thoughtfulness for others, particularly for the sick.

For that reason, doubtless, it was not until maturer years that that

side of his character fully dawned on one. There was nothing to denote

this in the picture of him, seated in a good reading light, in one

corner of the room, his cape-overcoat thrown back on his shoulders, his

thin legs crossed, absorbed in last night's "New York Evening Post."

Like the others we have mentioned he will never come to the reading room

again. Did they, we wonder, surmise that certain small eyes were

observing them, that certain youthful personalities were conferring

about them, that certain immature minds were striving to grasp what

manner of men and women they were? Truly memories of us all may live

long in unsuspected places.

_XI: The Friend of Youth_

IT was announced the other day in the public prints that the Private

Coachman's Benevolent Association had filed its certificate of

dissolution. Over this laconic statement in the morning paper one

reader, at least, paused and let his thoughts wander. To him there

seemed a significant and, indeed, a rather melancholy interest in the

announcement. The incident thus briefly mentioned not only marked the

end of an ancient brotherhood; it furnished a striking commentary on

changing social conditions.

As a type the private coachman is disappearing, and with him vanish the

coaches, landeaus and victorias, the well-matched pairs of reliable

family horses with shining harnesses and jingling chains, the snappy

trotters, the buggy rides and the horse in general as a voucher of

social responsibility and standing.

The possession of a motor car and the services of a chauffeur, though

generally involving more financial outlay than a stable and coachman

necessitated, somehow do not quite confer the reflected glory in which

the employer of a coachman used to shine. Everybody has a motor and the

very prevalence and numerousness of the chauffeur, capable and loyal

soul though he be, necessarily detract from the distinction which the

rarer coachman used to give.

One usually stood rather in awe of the coachman--particularly in

boyhood, the period with which he is chiefly associated in the memories

of most of us. He was a person of strange and exalted attainments. He

held mysterious and telepathetic communication with his horses. He

understood them, and they him. He had theories about shoeing, he could

prescribe for most of their ailments, he hissed at them queerly as he

groomed them. Moreover, he had the real sporting spirit. He knew all

about the performances of Maud S. and John L. Sullivan. He called the

firemen and policemen by their first names and the fire bell would send

him running out of the stable at any hour.

If the boy wanted to acquire a puppy he got the coachman to select it

and to clip its ears (without anæsthetic) behind the stable--or, if the

coachman was wise, he persuaded a friend to do this surgical work at

some livery stable, out of earshot of the family. Probably when the

puppy was grown the coachman surreptitiously staged fights with him

against rival dogs, chaperoned by brother coachmen, late at night after

the boy and his elders were asleep, thus occasionally providing a

precarious addition to his wages if the dog came up to expectation. To

tell the truth, it was generally selected for its fighting qualities.

He had strange tales of adventure, many of them doubtless fictitious,

but showing the swift imagination of the race from which he generally

sprang. The great event of his life was his trip to Philadelphia at the

time of the Centennial when he was temporarily a soldier and had charge

of the major's horse. For years brilliant lithographs of the exhibition

buildings were tacked to the stable wall above the shelf where stood

bottles of horse liniment and harness dressing. He had seen men and

cities and out of his experience had grown a practical and homely

wisdom that was by no means lost upon his young admirers. He was the

friend of youth.

And now it seems that the guild is officially extinct. Hail and

farewell, private coachman! Though legally dissolved you are not

forgotten, but remain ever enshrined in our memories of an older and

simpler day.

In those memories the coachman assumes multiform incarnations. The

individuals varied as the years of childhood lengthened, but they all

conformed to type.

At the end of one of those dim vistas of childish recollections,

illumined by the mellow light that always plays about our earliest

remembrances, stands the figure of Patrick, the first coachman of them

all. His first appearance was so very long ago--as a life-time is

measured--that the vision, emerging from the mists in which the first

consciousness of the world is enveloped, is painted somewhat vaguely on

the retina of the mind. How much of it is real, how much an idealized

memory, can not perhaps be definitely determined. After all, it is only

a picture and a feeling.

One seems to remember being enthroned on a rug spread on the grass of

the garden, beneath the big apple tree, in the level sunlight of a late

afternoon in spring. It must have been spring for the apple tree was in

bloom. About one, seated on the grass, was grouped a circle of the maids

of the household and their visitors. No experience of later years has

ever given the slightest intimation that one could possibly be or became

such a center of interest and admiration as that microcosm of dawning

intelligence then consciously was to that laudatory audience. There was

a distinct sense of being the source of the happiness and laughter that

composed the mental atmosphere of that golden afternoon. Such an

assurance that the world was entirely good and beautiful has not since

been attained.

Then, suddenly, Patrick was added to the circle--a smooth-shaven,

apple-cheeked, merry man--having doubtless strolled over from the

neighboring stable yard. Was it partly because a masculine note of

admiration was added to the feminine chorus that the effect of general

well-being and of mirth seemed, with his arrival, to be emphasized and

confirmed? At all events there was an instinctive perception between

Patrick and the center of interest that they understood each other, and

Patrick was welcomed from the rug with evidences of the recognition of

this bond which precipitated another wave of delightful worship.

It was the beginning of a firm friendship. Patrick soon shared with the

nurse of those Elysian days the early confidences, the awakening and

absurd aspirations, of the childish mind. In the first cloud of trouble,

which after some years grew from the marriage and departure of the

nurse, he was a never failing solace. He received with serious

consideration a carefully thought-out plan to compel her return by

engaging one of the hook and ladder companies to pull down her new home,

thus presumably leaving her without any abiding place but the parental

roof. Seated on the front seat of the old carriage with his young

friend, taking the air about the city, he assisted in plotting the

details of this scheme. It was so subtly diluted by other interests, and

disappeared so gradually, that no particular disillusion resulted.

Why Patrick left and when remain a mystery. He was succeeded by a

Scotchman with reddish whiskers and for long was lost to sight. Then,

unexpectedly, he re-appeared.

One afternoon, years afterward, while calling at a friend's home and

talking over old days, it developed that Patrick was still alive--a very

old man now--that he was employed by these friends as gardener--that, as

a matter of fact, he was at the moment at work in the garden. It was,

indeed, possible to see him from the window. What was the meaning of

that instant sense of doubt as to whether it would be well to walk over

to the window? At least this hesitancy did not prevail and there, in a

far corner, raking among the shrubbery, could be discerned the figure of

a little, bowed old man in blue denim overalls and a weather-beaten felt

hat. One could not see his face--his back was toward the window. How

small he looked! Why, Patrick had been a fine figure of a young

Irishman, not tall, perhaps, but of a respectable height.

The suggestion was inevitable that it would be interesting to go over

and talk to him. Indeed a start was made, but again came that impulse of

hesitation, stronger this time and not to be gainsaid. Was Patrick

well--was he happy? On the whole the answer was in the affirmative. He

had, it appeared, touches of rheumatism, but he could still do light

work, and he liked to putter about the lawns and the flower beds. At

home he was comfortable. Generally speaking, it seemed that life had

treated him not too harshly. It was clear that he was with kindly

people--and there one left him.

The Friendly Club and Other Portraits · 第 6 / 8 段