CHAPTER IV.

LANDMARKS.

IN the chaotic sea of warrants, correspondence, and orders which

represents the old MSS. of the Board of Ordnance prior to the formation

of the Royal Regiment of Artillery, there are two documents which stand

out like landmarks, pointing to the gradual realization of the fact that

a train of Artillery formed when wanted for service, and disbanded at

the end of the campaign, was not the best way of making use of this arm;

and that the science of gunnery, and the technical details attending the

movement of Artillery in the field, were not to be acquired intuitively,

nor without careful study and practice during time of peace.

The first relates to the company of a hundred fee'd gunners at the Tower

of London, whose knowledge of artillery has already been described as

most inadequate, and whose discipline was a sham. By a Royal Warrant

dated 22nd August, 1682, this company was reduced to sixty in number by

weeding out the most incapable; the pay, which had up to this time

averaged sixpence a day to each man, was increased to twelve-pence; but

in return for this augmentation, strict military discipline was to be

enforced; in addition to their ordinary duties at the Tower, they were

to be constantly exercised once a week in winter, and twice a week in

summer by the Master-Gunner of England; they were to be dismissed if at

any time found unfit for their duties; and a blow was struck at the

custom of men holding these appointments, and also working at their

trades near the Tower, by its being distinctly laid down that they were

liable for duty not merely in that Fortress, but also "in whatever other

place or places our Master-General of the Ordnance shall think fit."

This was the first landmark, proclaiming that a nucleus and a permanent

one of a trained and disciplined Artillery force was a necessity. Money

was not plentiful at the Ordnance Board under the Stuarts, as has

already been stated; so as time went on, and it was found necessary to

increase the educated element,—the fireworkers, petardiers, and

bombardiers,—it was done first by reducing the number of gunners, and,

at last, in 1686, by a grudgingly small increase to the establishment.

In 1697, after the Peace of Ryswick, there was in the English service a

considerable number of comparatively trained artillerymen, whose

services during the war entitled them to a little consideration. This

fact, coupled with the gradual growth in the minds of the military and

Ordnance authorities of the sense of the dangers that lay in the

spasmodic system, and the desirability of having some proportion of

artillerymen always ready and trained for service and emergency, brought

about the first—albeit short-lived—permanent establishment, in a

regimental form, of artillery in England. The cost of the new regiment

amounted to 4482_l._ 10_s._ per annum, in addition to the pay which some

of them drew as being part of the old Ordnance permanent establishment.

But before a year had passed, the regiment was broken up, and a very

small provision made for the officers. Some of the engineers, gentlemen

of the Ordnance, bombardiers, and gunners were added to the Tower

establishment, and seventeen years passed before this premature birth

was succeeded by that of the Royal Regiment of Artillery.

But this landmark is a remarkable one; and in a history like the present

deserves special notice. Some of the officers afterwards joined the

Royal Artillery; most of them fought under Marlborough; and all had

served in William's continental campaign either by sea or land. Two of

the captains of companies, Jonas Watson and William Bousfield, had

served in the train in Flanders in 1694, and Albert Borgard, its

adjutant, was afterwards the first Colonel of the Royal Artillery.

The staff of the little regiment consisted of a Colonel, Jacob Richards,

a Lieutenant-Colonel, George Browne, a Major, John Sigismund Schmidt, an

Adjutant, Albert Borgard, and a Comptroller: of these the first four had

been serving on active service in Flanders. There were four companies,

very weak, certainly, and containing men paid both on the old and new

establishments. Each contained 1 captain, 1 first-lieutenant, 1 second-

lieutenant, 2 gentlemen of the Ordnance, 2 sergeants, and 30 gunners. Of

these the gentlemen of the Ordnance and 15 gunners per company were on

the old Tower establishment. The names of the captains not mentioned

above were Edward Gibbon, and Edmund Williamson.

There were also in the Regiment six engineers, four sub-engineers, two

firemasters, twelve fireworkers, and twelve bombardiers.

When the regiment was reduced, the captains received 60_l._ per annum,

the first and second lieutenants 50_l._ and 40_l._ per annum, the

firemasters 60_l._, and the fireworkers 40_l._ These officers were

described as belonging to the new establishment, in contradistinction to

the old.

The time had now come when there was to be an establishment of Artillery

in addition to these, whose school and arena were the campaigns of a

great master of war, one who was to be the means, after a victorious

career, of placing the stamp of permanence on what had as yet had but an

ephemeral existence,—the regimental character as applied to Artillery

forces in England.

History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery, Vol. 1 Compiled from the Original Records · 第 4 / 30 章