CHAPTER XXIV

THE EMPIRE AT ITS HEIGHT

THE TWELVE CAESARS

=The Emperor.=--In the new regime absolute authority was lodged in a

single man; he was called the emperor (imperator--the commander). In

himself alone he exercised all those functions which the ancient

magistrates distributed among themselves: he presided over the Senate;

he levied and commanded all the armies; he drew up the lists of

senators, knights, and people; he levied taxes; he was supreme judge;

he was pontifex maximus; he had the power of the tribunes. And to

indicate that this authority made him a superhuman being, it was

decreed that he should bear a religious surname: Augustus (the

venerable).

The empire was not established by a radical revolution. The name of

the republic was not suppressed and for more than three centuries the

standards of the soldiers continued to bear the initials S.P.Q.R.

(senate and people of Rome). The emperor's power was granted to him

for life instead of for one year, as with the old magistrates. The

emperor was the only and lifelong magistrate of the republic. In him

the Roman people was incarnate; this is why he was absolute.

=Apotheosis of the Emperor.=--As long as the emperor lived he was sole

master of the empire, since the Roman people had conveyed all its

power to him. But at his death the Senate in the name of the people

reviewed his life and passed judgment upon it. If he were condemned,

all the acts which he had made were nullified, his statues thrown

down, and his name effaced from the monuments.[145] If, on the

contrary, his acts were ratified (which almost always occurred), the

Senate at the same time decreed that the deceased emperor should be

elevated to the rank of the gods. The majority of the emperors,

therefore, became gods after their death. Temples were raised to them

and priests appointed to render them worship. Throughout the empire

there were temples dedicated to the god Augustus and to the goddess

Roma, and persons are known who performed the functions of flamen

(priest) of the divine Claudius, or of the divine Vespasian. This

practice of deifying the dead emperor was called Apotheosis. The word

is Greek; the custom probably came from the Greeks of the Orient.

=The Senate and the People.=--The Roman Senate remained what it had

always been--the assembly of the richest and most eminent personages

of the empire. To be a senator was still an eagerly desired honor; in

speaking of a great family one would say, "a senatorial family." But

the Senate, respected as it was, was now powerless, because the

emperor could dispense with it. It was still the most distinguished

body in the state, but it was no longer the master of the government.

The emperor often pretended to consult it, but he was not bound by its

advice.

The people had lost all its power since the assemblies (the Comitia)

were suppressed in the reign of Tiberius. The population of 2,000,000

souls crowded into Rome was composed only of some thousands of great

lords with their slaves and a mob of paupers. Already the state had

assumed the burden of feeding the latter; the emperors continued to

distribute grain to them, and supplemented this with donations of

money (the congiarium). Augustus thus donated $140 apiece in nine

different distributions, and Nero $50 in three. At the same time to

amuse this populace shows were presented. The number of days regularly

appointed for the shows under the republic had already amounted to 66

in the year; it had increased in a century and a half, under Marcus

Aurelius, to 135, and in the fourth century to 175 (without counting

supplementary days). These spectacles continued each day from sunrise

to sunset; the spectators ate their lunch in their places. This was a

means used by the emperors for the occupation of the crowd. "It is for

your advantage, Caesar," said an actor to Augustus, "that the people

engage itself with us." It was also a means for securing popularity.

The worst emperors were among the most popular; Nero was adored for

his magnificent spectacles; the people refused to believe that he was

dead, and for thirty years they awaited his return.[146]

The multitude of Rome no longer sought to govern; it required only to

be amused and fed: in the forceful expression of Juvenal--to be

provided with bread and the games of the circus (panem et circenses).

=The Praetorians.=--Under the republic a general was prohibited from

leading his army into the city of Rome. The emperor, chief of all the

armies, had at Rome his military escort (praetorium), a body of about

10,000 men quartered in the interior of the city. The praetorians,

recruited among the veterans, received high pay and frequent

donatives. Relying on these soldiers, the emperor had nothing to fear

from malcontents in Rome. But the danger came from the praetorians

themselves; as they had the power they believed they had free rein,

and their chief, the praetorian prefect, was sometimes stronger than

the emperor.

=The Freedmen of the Emperor.=--Ever since the monarchy had superseded

the republic, there was no other magistrate than the emperor. All the

business of the empire of 80,000,000 people originated with him. For

this crushing task he required assistants. He found them, not among

the men of great family whom he mistrusted, but among the slaves of

whom he felt sure. The secretaries, the men of trust, the ministers of

the emperor were his freedmen, the majority of them foreigners from

Greece or the Orient, pliant people, adepts in flattery,

inventiveness, and loquacity. Often the emperor, wearied with serious

matters, gave the government into their hands, and, as occurs in

absolute monarchies, instead of aiding their master, they supplemented

him. Pallas and Narcissus, the freedmen of Claudius, distributed

offices and pronounced judgments; Helius, Nero's freedman, had

knights and senators executed without even consulting his master. Of

all the freedmen Pallas was the most powerful, the richest, and the

most insolent; he gave his orders to his underlings only by signs or

in writing. Nothing so outraged the old noble families of Rome as

this. "The princes," said a Roman writer, "are the masters of citizens

and the slaves of their freedmen." Among the scandals with which the

emperors were reproached, one of the gravest was governing Roman

citizens by former slaves.

=Despotism and Disorder.=--This regime had two great vices:

1. _Despotism._--The emperor was invested for life with a power

unlimited, extravagant, and hardly conceivable; according to his fancy

he disposed of persons and their property, condemned, confiscated, and

executed without restraint. No institution, no law fettered his will.

"The decree of the emperor has the force of law," say the

jurisconsults themselves. Rome recognized then the unlimited despotism

that the tyrants had exercised in the Greek cities, no longer

circumscribed within the borders of a single city, but gigantic as the

empire itself. As in Greece some honorable tyrants had presented

themselves, one sees in Rome some wise and honest monarchs (Augustus,

Vespasian, Titus). But few men had a head strong enough to resist

vertigo when they saw themselves so elevated above other men. The

majority of the emperors profited by their tremendous power only to

make their names proverbial: Tiberius, Nero, Domitian by their

cruelty, Vitellius by his gluttony, Claudius by his imbecility. One

of them, Caligula, was a veritable fool; he had his horse made consul

and himself worshipped as a god. The emperors persecuted the nobles

especially to keep them from conspiring against them, and the rich to

confiscate their goods.

2. _Disorder._--This overweening authority was, moreover, very ill

regulated; it resided entirely in the person of the emperor. When he

was dead, everything was in question. It was well known that the world

could not continue without a master, but no law nor usage determined

who was to be this master. The Senate alone had the right of

nominating the emperor, but almost always it would elect under

pressure the one whom the preceding emperor had designated or the man

who was pleasing to the soldiers.

After the death of Caligula, some praetorians who were sacking the

palace discovered, concealed behind the tapestry, a poor man trembling

with fear. This was a relative of Caligula; the praetorians made him

emperor (it was the emperor Claudius). After the death of Nero, the

Senate had elected Galba; the praetorians did not find him liberal

enough and so they massacred him to set up in his place Otho, a

favorite of Nero. In their turn the soldiers on the frontier wished to

make an emperor: the legions of the Rhine entered Italy, met the

praetorians at Bedriac near Cremona, and overthrew them in so furious a

battle that it lasted all night; then they compelled the Senate to

elect Vitellius, their general, as emperor. During this time the army

of Syria had elected its chief Vespasian, who in turn defeated

Vitellius and was named in his place; thus in two years three emperors

had been created and three overthrown by the soldiers. The new

emperor often undid what his predecessor had done; imperial despotism

had not even the advantage of being stable.

=The Twelve Caesars.=--This regime of oppression interrupted by

violence endured for more than a century (31 B.C. to 96 A.D.).

The twelve emperors who came to the throne during this time are called

the Twelve Caesars, although only the first six were of the family of

Augustus. It is difficult to judge them equitably. Almost all of them

persecuted the noble families of Rome of whom they were afraid, and it

is the writers of these families that have made their reputation. But

it is quite possible that in the provinces their government was mild

and just, superior to that of the senators of the republic.

THE CENTURY OF THE ANTONINES

=The Antonines.=--The five emperors succeeding the twelve Caesars,

Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus, and Marcus Aurelius (96-180), have

left a reputation for justice and wisdom. They were called the

Antonines, though this name properly belongs only to the last two.

They were not descended from the old families of Rome; Trajan and

Hadrian were Spaniards, Antoninus was born at Nimes in Gaul. They were

not princes of imperial family, destined from their birth to rule.

Four emperors came to the throne without sons and so the empire could

not be transmitted by inheritance. On each occasion the prince chose

among his generals and his governors the man most capable of

succeeding him; he adopted him as his son and sought his confirmation

by the Senate. Thus there came to the empire only experienced men, who

without confusion assumed the throne of their adoptive fathers.

=Government of the Antonines.=--This century of the Antonines was the

calmest that the ancient world had ever known. Wars were relegated to

the frontier of the empire. In the interior there were still military

seditions, tyranny, and arbitrary condemnations. The Antonines held

the army in check, organized a council of state of jurisconsults,

established tribunals, and replaced the freedmen who had so long

irritated the Romans under the twelve Caesars by regular functionaries

taken from among the men of the second class--that is, the knights.

The emperor was no longer a tyrant served by the soldiers; he was

truly the first magistrate of the republic, using his authority only

for the good of the citizens. The last two Antonines especially,

Antoninus and Marcus Aurelius, honored the empire by their integrity.

Both lived simply, like ordinary men, although they were very rich,

without anything that resembled a court or a palace, never giving the

impression that they were masters. Marcus Aurelius consulted the

Senate on all state business and regularly attended its sessions.

=Marcus Aurelius.=--Marcus Aurelius has been termed the Philosopher on

the Throne. He governed from a sense of duty, against his disposition,

for he loved solitude; and yet he spent his life in administration and

the command of armies. His private journal (his "Thoughts") exhibits

the character of the Stoic--virtuous, austere, separated from the

world, and yet mild and good. "The best form of vengeance on the

wicked is not to imitate them; the gods themselves do good to evil

men; it is your privilege to act like the gods."

=Conquests of the Antonines.=--The emperors of the first century had

continued the course of conquest; they had subjected the Britons of

England, the Germans on the left bank of the Rhine, and in the

provinces had reduced several countries which till then had retained

their kings--Mauretania, Thrace, Cappadocia. The Rhine, the Danube,

and the Euphrates were the limits of the empire.

The emperors of the second century were almost all generals; they had

the opportunity of waging numerous wars to repel the hostile peoples

who sought to invade the empire. The enemies were in two quarters

especially:

1. On the Danube were the Dacians, barbarous people, who occupied

the country of mountains and forests now called Transylvania.

2. On the Euphrates was the great military monarchy of the

Parthians which had its capital at Ctesiphon, near the ruins of

Babylon, and which extended over all Persia.

Trajan made several expeditions against the Dacians, crossed the

Danube, won three great battles, and took the capital of the Dacians

(101-102). He offered them peace, but when they reopened the war he

resolved to end matters with them: he had a stone bridge built over

the Danube, invaded Dacia and reduced it to a Roman province (106).

Colonies were transferred thither, cities were built, and Dacia became

a Roman province where Latin was spoken and Roman customs were

assimilated. When the Roman armies withdrew at the end of the third

century, the Latin language remained and continued throughout the

Middle Ages, notwithstanding the invasions of the barbarian Slavs. It

is from Transylvania (ancient Dacia) that the peoples came from the

twelfth to the fourteenth century who now inhabit the plains to the

north of the Danube. It has preserved the name of Rome (Roumania) and

speaks a language derived from the Latin, like the French or Spanish.

Trajan made war on the Parthians also. He crossed the Euphrates, took

Ctesiphon, the capital, and advanced into Persia, even to Susa, whence

he took away the massive gold throne of the kings of Persia. He

constructed a fleet on the Tigris, descended the stream to its mouth

and sailed into the Persian Gulf; he would have delighted, like

Alexander, in the conquest of India. He took from the Parthians the

country between the Euphrates and the Tigris--Assyria and

Mesopotamia--and erected there two Roman provinces.

To commemorate his conquests Trajan erected monuments which still

remain. The Column of Trajan on the Roman Forum is a shaft whose

bas-reliefs represent the war against the Dacians. The arch of triumph

of Benevento recalls the victories over the Parthians.

Of these two conquests one alone was permanent, that of Dacia. The

provinces conquered from the Parthians revolted after the departure of

the Roman army. The emperor Hadrian retained Dacia, but returned their

provinces to the Parthians, and the Roman empire again made the

Euphrates its eastern frontier. To escape further warfare with the

highlanders of Scotland, Hadrian built a wall in the north of England

(the Wall of Hadrian) extending across the whole island. There was no

need of other wars save against the revolting Jews; these people were

overthrown and expelled from Jerusalem, the name of which was changed

to obliterate the memory of the old Jewish kingdom.

Marcus Aurelius, the last of the Antonines, had to resist the invasion

of several barbarous peoples of Germany who had crossed the Danube on

the ice and had penetrated even to Aquileia, in the north of Italy. In

order to enroll a sufficient army he had to enlist slaves and

barbarians (172). The Germans retreated, but while Marcus was occupied

with a general uprising in Syria, they renewed their attacks on the

empire, and the emperor died on the banks of the Danube (180). This

was the end of conquest.

IMPERIAL ADMINISTRATION

=Extent of the Empire in the Second Century.=--The Roman emperors were

but little bent on conquest. But to occupy their army and to secure

frontiers which might be easily defended, they continued to conquer

barbarian peoples for more than a century. When the course of conquest

was finally arrested after Trajan, the empire extended over all the

south of Europe, all the north of Africa and the west of Asia; it was

limited only by natural frontiers--the ocean to the west; the

mountains of Scotland, the Rhine, the Danube, and the Caucasus to the

north; the deserts of the Euphrates and of Arabia to the east; the

cataracts of the Nile and the great desert to the south. The empire,

therefore, embraced the countries which now constitute England, Spain,

Italy, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Bavaria, Austria, Hungary,

European Turkey, Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, Egypt, Syria, Palestine, and

Asiatic Turkey. It was more than double the extent of the empire of

Alexander.

This immense territory was subdivided into forty-eight provinces,[147]

unequal in size, but the majority of them very large. Thus Gaul from

the Pyrenees to the Rhine formed but seven provinces.

=The Permanent Army.=--In the provinces of the interior there was no

Roman army, for the peoples of the empire had no desire to revolt. It

was on the frontier that the empire had its enemies, foreigners always

ready to invade: behind the Rhine and the Danube the barbarian

Germans; behind the sands of Africa the nomads of the desert; behind

the Euphrates the Persian army. On this frontier which was constantly

threatened it was necessary to have soldiers always in readiness.

Augustus had understood this, and so created a permanent army. The

soldiers of the empire were no longer proprietors transferred from

their fields to serve during a few campaigns, but poor men who made

war a profession. They enlisted for sixteen or twenty years and often

reenlisted. There were, then, thirty legions of citizens--that is,

180,000 legionaries, and, according to Roman usage, a slightly larger

number of auxiliaries--in all about 400,000 men. This number was small

for so large a territory.

Each frontier province had its little army, garrisoned in a permanent

camp similar to a fortress. Merchants came to establish themselves in

the vicinity, and the camp was transformed into a city; but still the

soldiers, encamped in the face of the enemy, preserved their valor and

their discipline. There were for three centuries severe wars,

especially on the banks of the Rhine and of the Danube, where Romans

fought fierce barbarians in a swampy country, uncultivated, covered

with forests and bogs. The imperial army exhibited, perhaps, as much

bravery and energy in these obscure wars as the ancient Romans in the

conquest of the world.

=Deputies and Agents of the Emperor.=--All the provinces belonged to

the emperor[148] as the representative of the Roman people. He is

there the general of all the soldiers, master of all persons, and

proprietor of all lands.[149] But as the emperor could not be

everywhere at once, he sent deputies appointed by himself. To each

province went a lieutenant (called a deputy of Augustus with the

function of praetor); this official governed the country, commanded the

army, and went on circuit through his province to judge important

cases, for he, like the emperor, had the right of life and death.

The emperor sent also a financial agent to levy the taxes and return

the money to the imperial chest. This official was called the

"procurator of Augustus." These two men represented the emperor,

governing his subjects, commanding his soldiers, and exploiting his

domain. The emperor always chose them among the two nobilities of

Rome, the praetors from the senators, the procurators from the knights.

For them, as for the magistrates of old Rome, there was a succession

of offices: they passed from one province to another, from one end of

the empire to the other,[150] from Syria to Spain, from Britain to

Africa. In the epitaphs of officials of this time we always find

carefully inscribed all the posts which they have occupied;

inscriptions on their tombs are sufficient to construct their

biographies.

=Municipal life.=--Under these omnipotent representatives of the

emperor the smaller subject peoples continued to administer their own

government. The emperor had the right of interfering in their local

affairs, but ordinarily he did not exercise this right. He only

demanded of them that they keep the peace, pay their taxes regularly,

and appear before the tribunal of the governor. There were in every

province several of these little subordinate governments; they were

called, just as at other times the Roman state was called, "cities,"

and sometimes municipalities. A city in the empire was copied after

the Roman city: it also had its assembly of the people, its

magistrates elected for a year and grouped into colleges of two

members, its senate called a curia, formed of the great proprietors,

people rich and of old family. There, as at Rome, the assembly of the

people was hardly more than a form; it is the senate--that is to say,

the nobility, that governs.

The centre of the provincial city was always a town, a Rome in

miniature, with its temples, its triumphal arches, its public baths,

its fountains, its theatres, and its arenas for the combats. The life

led there was that of Rome on a small scale: distributions of grain

and money, public banquets, grand religious ceremonies, and bloody

spectacles. Only, in Rome, it was the money of the provinces that paid

the expenses; in the municipalities the nobility itself defrayed the

costs of government and fetes. The tax levied for the treasury of the

emperor went entirely to the imperial chest; it was necessary, then,

that the rich of the city should at their own charges celebrate the

games, heat the baths, pave the streets, construct the bridges,

aqueducts, and circuses. They did this for more than two centuries,

and did it generously; monuments scattered over the whole of the

empire and thousands of inscriptions are a witness to this.

=The Imperial Regime.=--After the conquest three or four hundred

families of the nobility of Rome governed and exploited the rest of

the world. The emperor deprived them of the government and subjected

them to his tyranny. The Roman writers could groan over their lost

liberty. The inhabitants of the provinces had nothing to regret; they

remained subject, but in place of several hundreds of masters,

ceaselessly renewed and determined to enrich themselves, they had now

a single sovereign, the emperor, interested to spare them. Tiberius

stated the imperial policy in the following words: "A good shepherd

shears his sheep, but does not flay them." For more than two centuries

the emperors contented themselves with shearing the people of the

empire; they took much of their money, but they protected them from

the enemy without, and even against their own agents. When the

provincials had grounds of complaint on account of the violence or the

robbery of their governor, they could appeal to the emperor and secure

justice. It was known that the emperor received complaints against his

subordinates; this was sufficient to frighten bad governors and

reassure subjects. Some emperors, like Marcus Aurelius, came to

recognize that they had duties to their subjects. The other emperors

at least left their subjects to govern themselves when they had no

interest to prevent this.

The imperial regime was a loss for the Romans, but a deliverance for

their subjects: it abased the conquerors and raised the vanquished,

reconciling them and preparing them for assimilation in the empire.

SOCIAL LIFE UNDER THE EMPIRE

=Moral Decay Continues at Rome.=--Seneca in his Letters and Juvenal in

his Satires have presented portraits of the men and women of their

time so striking that the corruption of the Rome of the Caesars has

remained proverbial. They were not only the disorders left over from

the republic--the gross extravagance of the rich, the ferocity of

masters against their slaves, the unbridled frivolity of women. The

evil did not arise with the imperial regime, but resulted from the

excessive accumulation of the riches of the world in the hands of some

thousands of nobles or upstarts, under whom lived some hundreds of

free men in poverty, and slaves by millions subjected to an

unrestrained oppression. Each of these great proprietors lived in the

midst of his slaves like a petty prince, indolent and capricious. His

house at Rome was like a palace; every morning the hall of honor (the

atrium) was filled with clients, citizens who came for a meagre salary

to salute the master[151] and escort him in the street. For fashion

required that a rich man should never appear in public unless

surrounded by a crowd; Horace ridicules a praetor who traversed the

streets of Tibur with only five slaves in his following. Outside Rome

the great possessed magnificent villas at the sea-shore or in the

mountains; they went from one to the other, idle and bored.

These great families were rapidly extinguished. Alarmed at the

diminishing number of free men, Augustus had made laws to encourage

marriage and to punish celibacy. As one might expect, his laws did not

remedy the evil. There were so many rich men who had not married that

it had become a lucrative trade to flatter them in order to be

mentioned in their will; by having no children one could surround

himself with a crowd of flatterers. "In the city," says a Roman

story-teller, "all men divide themselves into two classes, those who

fish, and those who are angled for." "Losing his children augments the

influence of a man."

=The Shows.=--In the life of this idle people of Rome the spectacles

held a place that we are now hardly able to conceive. They were, as

in Greece, games, that is to say, religious ceremonies. The games

proceeded throughout the day and again on the following day, and this

for a week at least. The amphitheatre was, as it were, the rendezvous

of the whole free population; it was there that they manifested

themselves. Thus in 196, during the civil wars, all the spectators

cried with one voice, "Peace!" The spectacle was the passion of the

time. Three emperors appeared in public, Caligula as a driver, Nero as

an actor, Commodus as a gladiator.

=The Theatre.=--There were three sorts of spectacles: the theatre, the

circus, and the amphitheatre.

The theatre was organized on Greek models. The actors were masked and

presented plays imitated from the Greek. The Romans had little taste

for this recreation which was too delicate for them. They preferred

the mimes, comedies of gross character, and especially the pantomimes

in which the actor without speaking expressed by his attitudes the

sentiments of the character.

=The Circus.=--Between the two hills of the Aventine and the Palatine

extended a field filled with race courses surrounded by arcades and

tiers of seats rising above them. This was the Circus Maximus. After

Nero enlarged it it could accommodate 250,000 spectators; in the

fourth century its size was increased to provide sittings for 385,000

people.

Here was presented the favorite spectacle of the Roman people, the

four-horse chariot race (quadrigae); in each race the chariot made a

triple circuit of the circus and there were twenty-five races in a

single day. The drivers belonged to rival companies whose colors they

wore; there were at first four of these colors, but they were later

reduced to two--the Blue and the Green, notorious in the history of

riots. At Rome there was the same passion for chariot-races that there

is now for horse-races; women and even children talked of them. Often

the emperor participated and the quarrel between the Blues and the

Greens became an affair of state.

=The Amphitheatre.=--At the gates of Rome the emperor Vespasian had

built the Colosseum, an enormous structure of two stories,

accommodating 87,000 spectators. It was a circus surrounding an arena

where hunts and combats were represented.

For the hunts the arena was transformed into a forest where wild

beasts were released and men armed with spears came into combat with

them. Variety was sought in this spectacle by employing the rarest

animals--lions, panthers, elephants, bears, buffaloes, rhinoceroses,

giraffes, tigers, and crocodiles. In the games presented by Pompey had

already appeared seventeen elephants and five hundred lions; some of

the emperors maintained a large menagerie.

Sometimes instead of placing armed men before the beasts, it was found

more dramatic to let loose the animals on men who were naked and

bound. The custom spread into all cities of the empire of compelling

those condemned to death to furnish this form of entertainment for the

people. Thousands of persons of both sexes and of every age, and among

them Christian martyrs, were thus devoured by beasts under the eyes of

the multitude.

=The Gladiators.=--But the national spectacle of the Romans was the

fight of gladiators (men armed with swords). Armed men descended into

the arena and fought a duel to the death. From the time of Caesar[152]

as many as 320 pairs of gladiators were fought at once; Augustus in

his whole life fought 10,000 of them, Trajan the same number in four

months. The vanquished was slain on the field unless the people wished

to show him grace.

Sometimes the condemned were compelled to fight, but more often slaves

and prisoners of war. Each victory thus brought to the amphitheatre

bands of barbarians who exterminated one another for the delight of the

spectators.[153] Gladiators were furnished by all countries--Gauls,

Germans, Thracians, and sometimes negroes. These peoples fought with

various weapons, usually with their national arms. The Romans loved to

behold these battles in miniature.

There were also, among these contestants in the circus, some who

fought from their own choice, free men who from a taste for danger

submitted to the terrible discipline of the gladiator, and swore to

their chief "to allow themselves to be beaten with rods, be burned

with hot iron, and even be killed." Many senators enrolled themselves

in these bands of slaves and adventurers, and even an emperor,

Commodus, descended into the arena.

These bloody games were practised not only at Rome, but in all the

cities of Italy, Gaul, and Africa. The Greeks always opposed their

adoption. An inscription on a statue raised to one of the notables in

the little city of Minturnae runs as follows: "He presented in four

days eleven pairs of gladiators who ceased to fight only when half of

them had fallen in the arena. He gave a hunt of ten terrible bears.

Treasure this in memory, noble fellow-citizens." The people,

therefore, had the passion for blood,[154] which still manifests

itself in Spain in bull-fights. The emperor, like the modern king of

Spain, must be present at these butcheries. Marcus Aurelius became

unpopular in Rome because he exhibited his weariness at the spectacles

of the amphitheatre by reading, speaking, or giving audiences instead

of regarding the games. When he enlisted gladiators to serve against

the barbarians who invaded Italy, the populace was about to revolt.

"He would deprive us of our amusements," cried one, "to compel us to

become philosophers."

=The Roman Peace.=--But there was in the empire something else than

the populace of Rome. To be just to the empire as a whole one must

consider events in the provinces. By subjecting all peoples, the

Romans had suppressed war in the interior of their empire. Thus was

established the Roman Peace which a Greek author describes in the

following language: "Every man can go where he will; the harbors are

full of ships, the mountains are safe for travellers just as the towns

for their inhabitants. Fear has everywhere ceased. The land has put

off its old armor of iron and put on festal garments. You have

realized the word of Homer, 'the earth is common to all.'" For the

first time, indeed, men of the Occident could build their houses,

cultivate their fields, enjoy their property and their leisure without

fearing at every moment being robbed, massacred, or thrown into

slavery--a security which we can hardly appreciate since we have

enjoyed it from infancy, but which seemed very sweet to the men of

antiquity.

=The Fusion of Peoples.=--In this empire now at peace travel became

easy. The Romans had built roads in every direction with stations and

relays; they had also made road-maps of the empire. Many people,

artisans, traders, journeyed from one end of the empire to the

other.[155] Rhetors and philosophers penetrated all Europe, going from

one city to another giving lectures. In every province could be found

men from the most remote provinces. Inscriptions show us in Spain

professors, painters, Greek sculptors; in Gaul, goldsmiths and Asiatic

workmen. Everybody transported and mingled customs, arts, and

religion. Little by little they accustomed themselves to speak the

language of the Romans. From the third century the Latin had become

the common language of the West, as the Greek since the successors of

Alexander had been the language of the Orient. Thus, as in Alexandria,

a common civilization was developed. This has been called by the name

Roman, though it was this hardly more than in name and in language. In

reality, it was the civilization of the ancient world united under

the emperor's authority.

=Superstitions.=--Religious beliefs were everywhere blended. As the

ancients did not believe in a single God, it was easy for them to

adopt new gods. All peoples, each of whom had its own religion, far

from rejecting the religions of others, adopted the gods of their

neighbors and fused them with their own. The Romans set the example by

raising the Pantheon, a temple to "all the gods," where each deity had

his sanctuary.

Everywhere there was much credulity. Men believed in the divinity of

the dead emperors; it was believed that Vespasian had in Egypt healed

a blind man and a paralytic. During the war with the Dacians the Roman

army was perishing of thirst; all at once it began to rain, and the

sudden storm appeared to all as a miracle; some said that an Egyptian

magician had conjured Hermes, others believed that Jupiter had taken

pity on the soldiers; and on the column of Marcus Aurelius Jupiter was

represented, thunderbolt in hand, sending the rain which the soldiers

caught in their bucklers.

When the apostles Barnabas and Paul came to the city of Lystra in Asia

Minor, the inhabitants invoked Barnabas as Jupiter and Paul as

Mercury; they were met by a procession, with priests at the head

leading a bull which they were about to sacrifice.

Cultured people were none the less credulous.[156] The Stoic

philosophers admitted omens. The emperor Augustus regarded it as a

bad sign when he put on the wrong shoe. Suetonius wrote to Pliny the

Younger, begging him to transfer his case to another day on account of

a dream which he had had. Pliny the Younger believed in ghosts.

Among peoples ready to admit everything, different religions, instead

of going to pieces, fused into a common religion. This religion, at

once Greek, Roman, Egyptian, and Asiatic, dominated the world at the

second century of our era; and so the Christians called it the

religion of the nations; down to the fourth century they gave the

pagans the name of "gentiles" (men of the nations); at the same time

the common law was called the Law of Nations.

FOOTNOTES:

[145] Inscriptions have been found where the name of Domitian has thus

been cut away.

[146] Suetonius ("Lives of the Twelve Caesars," Nero, ch. lvii.) relates,

that the king of the Parthians, when he sent ambassadors to the Senate

to renew his alliance with the Roman people, earnestly requested that

due honor should be paid to the memory of Nero. The historian continues,

"When, twenty years afterwards, at which time I was a young man, some

person of obscure birth gave himself out for Nero, that name secured him

so favorable a reception from the Parthians that he was very zealously

supported, and it was with much difficulty that they were persuaded to

give him up."--ED.

[147] Italy was not included among the provinces.

[148] A few provinces, the less important, remained to the Senate, but

the emperor was almost always master in these as well.

[149] The jurisconsult Gaius says, "On provincial soil we can have

possession only; the emperor owns the property."

[150] "Great personages," says Epictetus, "cannot root themselves like

plants; they must be much on the move in obedience to the commands of

the emperor."

[151] A client's task was a hard one; the poet Martial, who had served

thus, groans about it. He had to rise before day, put on his toga which

was an inconvenient and cumbersome garment, and wait a long time in the

ante-room.

[152] Caesar gave also a combat between two troops, each composed of 500

archers, 300 knights (30 knights according to Suetonius; Julius, ch.

39), and 20 elephants.

[153] In an official discourse an orator thanks the emperor Constantine

who had given to the amphitheatre an entire army of barbarian captives,

"to bring about the destruction of these men for the amusement of the

people. What triumph," he cried, "could have been more glorious?"

[154] St. Augustine in his "Confessions" describes the irresistible

attraction of these sanguinary spectacles.

[155] A Phrygian relates in an inscription that he had made seventy-two

voyages from Asia to Italy.

[156] There were some sceptical writers, like Lucian, but they were

isolated.

History of Ancient Civilization · 第 24 / 27 章