CHAPTER XVIII

ROMAN RELIGION

=The Roman Gods.=--The Romans, like the Greeks, believed that

everything that occurs in the world was the work of a deity. But in

place of a God who directs the whole universe, they had a deity for

every phenomenon which they saw. There was a divinity to make the seed

sprout, another to protect the bounds of the fields, another to guard

the fruits. Each had its name, its sex, and its functions.

The principal gods were Jupiter, god of the heaven; Janus, the

two-faced god (the deity who opens); Mars, god of war; Mercury, god of

trade; Vulcan, god of fire; Neptune, god of the sea; Ceres, goddess of

grains, the Earth, the Moon, Juno, and Minerva.

Below these were secondary deities. Some personified a quality--for

example, Youth, Concord, Health, Peace. Others presided over a certain

act in life: when the infant came into the world there were a god to

teach him to speak, a goddess to teach him to drink, another charged

with knitting his bones, two to accompany him to school, two to take

him home again. In short, there was a veritable legion of minor

special deities.

Other gods protected a city, a certain section of a mountain, a

forest; every river, every fountain, every tree had its little local

divinity. It is this that makes an old woman in a Latin romance

exclaim, "Our country is so full of gods that it is much easier to

find a god than a man."

=Form of the Gods.=--The Romans, unlike the Greeks, did not give their

gods a precise form. For a long time there was no idol in Rome; they

worshipped Jupiter under the form of a rock, Mars under that of a

sword. It was later that they imitated the wooden statues of the

Etruscans and the marbles of the Greeks. Perhaps they did not at first

conceive of the gods as having human forms.

Unlike the Greeks they did not imagine marriage and kinship among

their gods; they had no legends to tell of these relationships; they

knew of no Olympus where the gods met together. The Latin language had

a very significant word for designating the gods: they were called

Manifestations. They were the manifestations of a mysterious divine

power. This is why they were formless, without family relationship,

without legends. Everything that was known of the gods was that each

controlled a natural force and could benefit or injure men.

=Principles of the Roman Religion.=--The Roman was no lover of these

pale and frigid abstractions; he even seemed to fear them. When he

invoked them, he covered his face, perhaps that he might not see them.

But he thought that they were potent and that they would render him

service, if he knew how to please them. "The man whom the gods favor,"

says Plautus, "they cause to gain wealth."

The Roman conceives of religion as an exchange of good offices; the

worshipper brings offerings and homage; the god in return confers some

advantage.[110] If after having made a present to the god the man

receives nothing, he considers himself cheated. During the illness of

Germanicus the people offered sacrifices for his restoration. When it

was announced that Germanicus was dead, the people in their anger

overturned the altars and cast the statues of the gods into the

streets, because they had not done what was expected of them. And so

in our day the Italian peasant abuses the saint who does not give him

what he asks.

=Worship.=--Worship, therefore, consists in doing those things that

please the gods. They are presented with fruits, milk, wine, or animal

sacrifices. Sometimes the statues of the gods are brought from their

temples, laid on couches, and served with a feast. As in Greece,

magnificent homes (temples[111]) were built for them, and diversions

were arranged for them.

=Formalism.=--But it is not enough that one make a costly offering to

the gods. The Roman gods are punctilious as to form; they require that

all the acts of worship, the sacrifices, games, dedications, shall

proceed according to the ancient rules (the rites). When one desires

to offer a victim to Jupiter, one must select a white beast, sprinkle

salted meal on its head, and strike it with an axe; one must stand

erect with hands raised to heaven, the abode of Jupiter, and

pronounce a sacred formula. If any part of the ceremonial fails, the

sacrifice is of no avail; the god, it is thought, will have no

pleasure in it. A magistrate may be celebrating games in honor of the

protecting deities of Rome; "if he alters a word in his formula, if a

flute-player rests, if the actor stops short, the games do not conform

to the rites; they must be recommenced."[112]

And so the prudent man secures the assistance of two priests, one to

pronounce the formula, the other to follow the ritual accurately.

Every year the Arval Brothers, a college of priests, assemble in a

temple in the environs of Rome where they perform a sacred dance and

recite a prayer; this is written in an archaic language which no one

any longer comprehends, so much so that at the beginning of the

ceremony a written formulary must be given to each of the priests. And

yet, ever since the time that they ceased to comprehend it, they

continued to chant it without change. This is because the Romans hold

before all to the letter of the law in dealing with their gods. This

exactness in performing the prescribed ritual is for them their

religion. And so they regarded themselves as "the most religious of

men." "On all other points we are the inferiors or only the equals of

other peoples, but we excel all in religion, that is, the worship we

pay the gods."

=Prayer.=--When the Roman prays, it is not to lift his soul and feel

himself in communion with a god, but to ask of him a service. He is

concerned, then, first to find the god who can render it. "It is as

important," says Varro, "to know what god can aid us in a special case

as to know where the carpenter and baker live." Thus one must address

Ceres if one wants rich harvests, Mercury to make a fortune, Neptune

to have a happy voyage. Then the suppliant dons the proper garments,

for the gods love neatness; he brings an offering, for the gods love

not that one should come with empty hands. Then, erect, the head

veiled, the worshipper invokes the god. But he does not know the exact

name of the god, for, say the Romans, "no one knows the true names of

the gods." He says, then, for example, "Jupiter, greatest and best, or

whatever is the name that thou preferrest...." Then he proposes his

request, taking care to use always the clearest expressions so that

the god may make no mistake. If a libation is offered, one says,

"Receive the homage of this wine that I am pouring"; for the god might

think that one would present other wine and keep this back. The

prayers, too, are long, verbose, and full of repetitions.

=Omens.=--The Romans, like the Greeks, believe in omens. The gods,

they think, know the future, and they send signs that permit men to

divine them. Before undertaking any act, the Roman consults the gods.

The general about to engage in battle examines the entrails of

victims; the magistrates before holding an assembly regards the

passing birds (called "taking the auspices"). If the signs are

favorable, the gods are thought to approve the enterprise; if not,

they are against it. The gods often send a sign that had not been

requested. Every unexpected phenomenon is the presage of an event. A

comet appeared before the death of Caesar and was thought to have

announced it.

When the assembly of the people deliberates and it thunders, it is

because Jupiter does not wish that anything shall be decided on that

day and the assembly must dissolve. The most insignificant fact may be

interpreted as a sign--a flash of lightning, a word overheard, a rat

crossing the road, a diviner met on the way. And so when Marcellus had

determined on an enterprise, he had himself carried in a closed litter

that he might be sure of not seeing anything which could impose itself

on him as a portent.

These were not the superstitions of the populace; the republic

supported six augurs charged with predicting the future. It carefully

preserved a collection of prophecies, the Sibylline Books. It had

sacred chickens guarded by priests. No public act--assembly, election,

deliberation--could be done without the taking of the auspices, that

is to say, observation of the flight of birds. In the year 195 it was

learned that lightning had struck a temple of Jupiter and that it had

hit a hair on the head of the statue of Hercules; a governor wrote

that a chicken with three feet had been hatched; the senate assembled

to discuss these portents.

=The Priests.=--The priest in Rome, as in Greece, is not charged with

the care of souls, he exists only for the service of the god. He

guards his temple, administers his property, and performs the

ceremonies in his honor. Thus the guild of the Salii (the leapers)

watches over a shield which fell from heaven, they said, and which

was adored as an idol; every year they perform a dance in arms, and

this is their sole function.

The augurs predict the future. The pontiffs superintend the ceremonies

of worship; they regulate the calendar and fix the festivals to be

celebrated on the various days of the year.

Neither the priests, the augurs, nor the pontiffs form a separate

class. They are chosen from among the great families and continue to

exercise all the functions of state--judging, presiding over

assemblies, and commanding armies. This is the reason that the Roman

priests, potent as they were, did not constitute, as in Egypt, a

sacerdotal caste. At Rome it was a state religion, but not a

government by the priests.

=The Dead.=--The Romans, like the Hindoos and the Greeks, believed

that the soul survived the body. If care were taken to bury the body

according to the proper rites, the soul went to the lower world and

became a god; otherwise the soul could not enter the abode of the

dead, but returned to the earth terrifying the living and tormenting

them until suitable burial was performed. Pliny the Younger[113]

relates the story of a ghost which haunted a house and terrified to

death all the inhabitants of the dwelling; a philosopher who was brave

enough to follow it discovered at the place where the spectre stopped

some bones which had not been buried in the proper manner. The shade

of the Emperor Caligula wandered in the gardens of the palace; it was

necessary to disinter the body and bury it anew in regular form.

=Cult of the Dead.=--It was of importance, therefore, to both the

living and the dead that the rites should be observed. The family of

the deceased erected a funeral pile, burned the body on it, and placed

the ashes in an urn which was deposited in the tomb, a little chapel

dedicated to the Manes,[114] _i.e._, the souls that had become gods.

On fixed days of the year the relatives came to the tomb to bring

food; doubtless they believed that the soul was in need of

nourishment, for wine and milk were poured on the earth, flesh of

victims was burned, and vessels of milk and cakes were left behind.

These funeral ceremonies were perpetuated for an indefinite period; a

family could not abandon the souls of its ancestors, but continued to

maintain their tomb and the funeral feasts. In return, these souls

which had become gods loved and protected their posterity. Each

family, therefore, had its guardian deities which they called Lares.

=Cult of the Hearth.=--Each family had a hearth, also, that it adored.

For the Romans, as for the Hindoos, fire was a god and the hearth an

altar. The flame was to be maintained day and night, and offerings

made on the hearth of oil, fat, wine, and incense; the fire then

became brilliant and rose higher as if nourished by the offering.

Before beginning his meal the Roman thanked the god of the hearth,

gave him a part of the food, and poured out for him a little wine

(this was the libation). Even the sceptical Horace supped with his

slaves before the hearth and offered libation and prayer.

Every Roman family had in its house a sanctuary where were to be found

the Lares, the souls of the ancestors, and the altar of the hearth.

Rome also had its sacred hearth, called Vesta, an ancient word

signifying the hearth itself. Four virgins of the noblest families,

the Vestals, were charged with keeping the hearth, for it was

necessary that the flame should never be extinguished, and the care of

it could be confided only to pure beings. If a Vestal broke her vow,

she was buried alive in a cave, for she had committed sacrilege and

had endangered the whole Roman people.

THE FAMILY

=Religion of the Family.=--All the members of a family render worship

to the same ancestors and unite about the same hearth. They have

therefore the same gods, and these are their peculiar possession. The

sanctuary where the Lares[115] were kept was concealed in the house

and no stranger was to approach it. Thus the Roman family was a little

church; it had its religion and its worship to which no others than

its members had access. The ancient family was very different from the

modern, having its basis in the principles of religion.

=Marriage.=--The first rule of this religion is that one should be the

issue of a regular marriage if one is to have the right of adoring the

ancestors of the family. Roman marriage, therefore, is at the start a

religious ceremony. The father of the bride gives her away outside the

house when a procession conducts her to the house of the groom

chanting an ancient sacred refrain, "Hymen, O Hymen!" The bride is

then led before the altar of the husband where water and fire are

presented, and there in the presence of the gods of the family the

bride and groom divide between them a cake of meal. Marriage at this

period was called confarreatio (communion through the cake). Later

another form of marriage was invented. A relative of the bride in the

presence of witnesses sells her to the husband who declares that he

buys her for his wife. This is marriage by sale (coemptio).

For the Romans as for the Greeks marriage is a religious duty;

religion ordains that the family should not become extinct. The Roman,

therefore, declares when he marries that he takes his wife to

perpetuate the family through their children. A noble Roman who

sincerely loved his wife repudiated her because she brought him no

children.

=The Roman Woman.=--The Roman woman is never free. As a young girl,

she belongs to her father who chooses her husband for her; married,

she comes under the power of her husband--the jurisconsults say she is

under his "manus," _i.e._, she is in the same position as his

daughter. The woman always has a master who has the right of life and

death over her. And yet, she is never treated like a slave. She is the

equal in dignity of her husband; she is called the mother of the

family (materfamilias) just as her husband is called the father of the

family (paterfamilias). She is the mistress in the house, as he is the

master. She gives orders to the slaves whom she charges with all the

heavy tasks--the grinding of the grain, the making of bread, and the

cooking. She sits in the seat of honor (the atrium), spins and weaves,

apportions work to the slaves, watches the children, and directs the

house. She is not excluded from association with the men, like the

Greek woman; she eats at the table with her husband, receives

visitors, goes into town to dinner, appears at the public ceremonies,

at the theatre, and even at the courts. And still she is ordinarily

uncultured; the Romans do not care to instruct their daughters; the

quality which they most admire in woman is gravity, and on her tomb

they write by way of eulogy, "She kept the house and spun linen."

=The Children.=--The Roman child belongs to the father like a piece of

property. The father has the right of exposing him in the street. If

he accepts the child, the latter is brought up at first in the house.

Girls remain here until marriage; they spin and weave under the

supervision of their mother. The boys walk to the fields with their

father and exercise themselves in arms. The Romans are not an artistic

people; they require no more of their children than that they know how

to read, write, and reckon; neither music nor poetry is taught them.

They are brought up to be sober, silent, modest in their demeanor, and

obedient.

=The Father of the Family.=--The master of the house was called by the

Romans the father of the family. The paterfamilias is at once the

proprietor of the domain, the priest of the cult of the ancestors, and

the sovereign of the family. He reigns as master in his house. He has

the right of repudiating his wife, of rejecting his children, of

selling them, and marrying them at his pleasure. He can take for

himself all that belongs to them, everything that his wife brings to

him, and everything that his children gain; for neither the wife nor

the children may be proprietors. Finally he has over them all[116] the

"right of life and death," that is to say, he is their only judge. If

they commit crime, it is not the magistrate who punishes them, but the

father of the family who condemns them. One day (186 B.C.) the Roman

Senate decreed the penalty of death for all those who had participated

in the orgies of the cult of Bacchus. The men were executed, but for

all the women who were discovered among the guilty, it was necessary

that the Senate should address itself to the fathers of families, and

it was these who condemned to death their wives or their daughters.

"The husband," said the elder Cato, "is the judge of the wife, he can

do with her as he will; if she has committed any fault, he chastises

her; if she has drunk wine, he condemns her; if she has been

unfaithful to him, he kills her." When Catiline conspired against the

Senate, a senator perceived that his own son had taken part in the

conspiracy; he had him arrested, judged him, and condemned him to

death.

The power of the father of the family endured as long as life; the son

was never freed from it. Even if he became consul, he remained subject

to the power of his father. When the father died, the sons became in

turn fathers of families. As for the wife, she could never attain

freedom; she fell under the power of the heir of her husband; she

could, then, become subject to her own son.

FOOTNOTES:

[110] A legend represents King Numa debating with Jupiter the terms of a

contract: "You will sacrifice a head to me?" says Jupiter. "Very well,"

says Numa, "the head of an onion that I shall take in my garden." "No,"

replies Jupiter, "but I want something that pertains to a man." "We will

give you then the tip of the hair." "But it must be alive." "Then we

will add to this a little fish." Jupiter laughed and consented to this.

[111] In Rome, as in Greece, the temple was called a house.

[112] The remark is Cicero's.

[113] Pliny, Epistles, vii, 27. See another story in Plautus's

Mostellaria.

[114] The letters D.M. found on Roman tombs are the initials of Dei

Manes.

[115] They were called the Penates, that is to say, the gods of the

interior.

[116] In the language of the Roman law the wife, children, and slaves

"are not their own masters."

History of Ancient Civilization · 第 18 / 27 章